Ballzproblem2: another excuse again tuchel said he want defenders, boehly clearly stated that he wouldn't sign any player without tuchel consent,hence why we didn't sign Ronaldo so any player we signed tuchel had a hand in it ,he has the power to reject or accept ,tuchel made phone call to kounde, kounde Wasn't convinced,give Potter that phone kounde will fly straight to chelsea,you are just bringing up excuses ,I don tell tuchel ain't really smart apart from champions league he has nothing to boast of ,no sweet football , patternless , depends heavily in wingbacks, bottled two finals against Liverpool
You think it's not the recruitment team that does the talking and convincing mostly??
Most clubs recruitment team is the one that have most influences on players signings. Mudryk didn't come to Chelsea because of Potter for example. Mudryk came to Chelsea because of the plans Chelsea have for him and the future reason why he was persuaded and that's the work of the recruitment team
Ballzproblem2: let me give an example why Potter is smarter than tuchel whether recruitment team on not , badiashile was bought because Potter said he wants to play back four and our defense lacked left footed center back,as usual recruitment did their works ,,Potter chose badiashile because if his composure in the ball , height and long passes sometimes,that is a smart coach ,he knows what he wants he knows what area we lacked,to matches badiashile players we didn't concede,Silva had peace of mind,I will say it again tuchel has no excuse ,had it been he looked at chelsea properly and identified where we lacked we wouldn't be having lots of problem , signings we have been making so far a 10/10,I'd you think Potter didn't play a big role I don't know what to tell you.
#jo.dera #hens.ben
You see what I'm saying? Potter made his plans and the recruitment team went to work and identified Badiashile.
You see how it works?
Is it not something Tuchel lacks (good recruitment team)?
Ballzproblem2: rubbish talk ,as coach you want to tell me that tuchel didn't notice auba is old and finished ,as a coach you want to tell me he didn't notice that as soon as Kante and James had injury our performance drop,na dunce be that now.
Tuchel have made it very clear that he would be involved in managing players not getting players in.
Boehly wanted fofana, Cucurella and Gordons and he went in for them using data this data that. If Gordons have come now, you'll Still blame him on Tuchel. Give him the right recruitment team and get him the right players and you can be fully justified for calling him out if he fvcks up. Man made it clear he isn't interested cos he's not available for talent id, same thing happening with Potter.
Ballzproblem2: stop defending tuchel for Christ sake ,he was giving enough money to get his target ,he squandered it on defense,told boehly we don't need Midfielders,now here we are spending all over again , boehly wants to cut losses with all tuchel previous signing, brother scout or no scout, you shouldn't be bad as that stop defending nonsense
Which is better... Giving money to someone who isn't ready for talent id and prefers managing good players or getting a good recruitment team for him to get him good players.?
Ballzproblem2: you still don't get it,we took Brighton scouts because we want to copy their model for cheap players, developing and selling,so if we sack Potter today they stay ,they gave tuchel fucking £250m to spend, enough summer time go bring target and you are giving me bullshit excuse,to make matter worse tuchel couldn't even convince kounde or raphinha to join us but Potter did with all his target even malo gusto ,who I'll clearly compete for game time with James , Continue defending rubbish
That's the same thing we're saying. They know Potter can't do it alone reason why they brought his recruitment team to join him. Good recruitment team, something Tuchel lacked. So blaming Tuchel for poor recruitment no gel.
Most coaches depends on good recruitment team that fits with their ideology. Most of these things na Boehly handiwork that's why you'll hear data this data that early this season. There's a reason he washed his hands off once these recruitment minds came on board
Ballzproblem2: OMG keep quiet,I said tuchel never wanted a collaborative approach to signing players how is that hard for you to understand? and in case you don't know,two of our scouts came from Brighton,right hand to Potter , datro fofana was scouted by them from Brighton,same with madueke,do you think tuchel will work with this kind of names? absolutely not
There's a reason they came from Brighton and that's because they are needed to help potter in talent id.
Tuchel have made it clear that he's not interested in talent id, just managing of good players (because he's not good at it) cos it's demanding. Give him the guys Potter have and he'll still do wonders too.
I wonder which talent id Potter will be doing when he's managing Chelsea and thinking tactics
hensben: Tuchel never had these guys, it was just him and Boehly so it was difficult because Voehly is inexperienced. This new scout identify players that have the chance to become world beaters, that’s the difference.
Thank you for saying the truth and clearing the air. I just saw that anti-tuchel rant by ballzproblem and I just shake my head.
This was someone praising Chelsea for bringing in Vivell and Stuart into the recruitment team, something Tuchel never had.
kokaneprodigy: It’s the challenge from the offside player that deemed it an offside offense. For obvious reasons you are deliberately leaving that out.
If only he made contact with the defender, I would have agreed with you but I'm not seeing any contact. At least, that contact would have made that challenge valid.
Our differing opinion emanated from the fact that Rashford didn't touch the ball, thus not interfering with play while I argued otherwise. This same player didn't touch the ball too and if there's no contact with the defender, then he clearly should have been onside(as per your claim) whether challenge or not!!
Kokaneprodigy, This is pictures not videos, so it won't capture my point I've been insistent on...
My main point is that
1... the pass being made to the offside players(in this case Man u and Sevilla)
2.. how they(the offside players) made the play active by chasing the ball
3... How they stopped at the last minute for their teammate(who's onside) to receive the ball without they(the offside players) touching the ball
These 3 scenerios was what happened in both games. You've talked about contact by Sevilla player on the Cadiz player which is valid(if true). But I'm not seeing any contact at all instead the Cadiz player slipped
iamoyindamola: That guy useless pass awilo sef There's one fofana in lens he's their captain but he's around 28yo And we can try amrabat too he's a good ball carrier, just that he look like person way fit slap arteta for training 😄
mostob: I have rewatched the clip. Do you know why Ode shouted at him? Sambi was probably feeling too big to mark. Twice, I repeat twice...Ode pointed at Gundogan and instructed Sambi to mark him but Sambi refused. Saliba was supposed to mark Alvarez while Sambi stays infield to mark Gundogan but just stood without pressing. Ode did nothing wrong whether as a captain or a player.
I just rewatched the clip again and this time without the tension of the match and coupled with Jen.cejyde explanations too, I certainly don't think Odegaard did anything wrong in calling him to order.
I mean, Odegaard pointed at him to Mark that zone (plus player) In order for Man city not get out of that press while he (Odegaard) started out with the press. It's really frustrating after giving your all to a cause only to find out that it's been made futile. It would have been a different case if Odegaard didn't instruct Sambi as well as showing the way.
It's really frustrating sha and 95% of us will do same thing esp if we really CARE!!
Jencejyde: Baba I get the point clearly and like I said looking at it purely from a player perspective,I do not believe Odegard acted wrongly as a captain. In fact I personally feel he had to do it to instill back concentration and confidence.
Sometimes as fans we will say our team is not doin well and there is no leadership because it seems everyone is just playing anyhow but when a player decides to show some leadership right there on the pitch, we bemoan the fact that it was done openly and could dampen the other players confidence.
I'd rather bark at you when on the pitch in the heat of the moment so as to ensure that we walk out that pitch as winners rather than keep quiet and lose only to meet you later to say you could have done this or that.
It's pointless after the loss.
We are all entitled to how we feel leadership should be displayed but in this context based on what happens on the pitch, I believe Odegard did what was best in not just sambis interest but for the team.
I believe you also see Ramsdale do this to his defenders. This is football and you can ge5 to some extreme adrenalin levels in a high stakes game . It's only normal to let out steam especially when you feel or see that another team mate is not pulling their weight in support of the cause..
You made sense. I now agree with your Pov of Odegaard being right with what he did
Jokerman: Lol... bro, you still dey blame Ronaldo for Juventus none trophies since 2021
When will you blame other players?
When will you blame Martial, Antony, Kean etc?
Na still the same thing we dey talk na
We'll start with Ronaldo (the bigger issue) then transcend to the rest. That's what Ten Haag did and as you can see he has bought Werghost to give Martial competition