₦airaland Forum

falconey:
my OPINION:

DATING : host GIRLS

MARRIAGE: host MEN

But this should not be so.. Dating should host both and same goes to marriage...

mirexxx:
ur opinion have been read!

and what do you think?

mirexxx:
what are u saying?

the girls make-up face is a lie to the real face..
If you see her today on make up and see her tomorrow without it u wouldnt recognize her..

Tho am not against her making up, actually i love it..

Women are just the female specie of the homo sapiens and their is no way the male species are superior to women.

They are both equal

In a relationship especially marriage, African men tend to see themselves as the superior being in the relationship and deserves all the respect and authority but this is not so.

A relationship is like a partnership between two consenting adults and both should be seen as equals in all ramifications.

Men should listen to their partners and consider their feelings and opinion in everything. Women are to be respected just as you expect respect from them, they are to be loved and cared for.

Treat her like a queen and she will make you a king..

#My honest Opinion.

mirexxx:
wickedness 2 whom??
making oneself beautiful via makeup now makes you a wicked person??
naija dudes sha
go abroad and see how guys are making it in the fashion, cosmetics, hairdressing business and see!
una own na 2 dey shout natural! natural! natural!
una go chop that natural face one day

Aaaah but its a lie na.. the girl na lion..

see her face, see the packaging..

If you carry this one go home, i bet you will start asking her who are u and wat happened to the girl i was with last night when you wake up in the morning

Jail her for what #Joke

Meanwhile am not a goodluck or buhari fan but i think buhari is joking trying to wrestle power from gej... i mean the guy is ruling already collecting it from him is impossicant even if the whole nigeria votes buhari.

Its not the people that votes that counts, it the people that counts

My girl friend averages 5'4 while i tower at 6'9ft, a very perfect match check my profile..

Girl i advice you make your point to him but the issue now is anyway you tell him he will take it the wrong way... Please check into his family background to see if they have tall gene traits in their family, if they do then you can marry him if you love him its probable ur kids will be tall... But if they dont and you care about ur kids height then the decision rests with you.. #ItWillBeAlright

And now the so called christians starts bashing, cursing and insulting each other..Lol.. enjoying this

Misogynist2014:
If I say something has no solution, that doesn't mean there is no solution outside my knowledge and human possibilities (spiritual, which you are failing to exploit), that is what I said. Though atom is self existent, it is obvious it can be sourced out from Higher power, without controversy. Then we need to compare life from atom(interestingly enough, not everything in the universe has an atom!) with life from an Everlasting God (non intelligent and intelligent) i.e Life from God and atom, requiring only a Yes or No.

Lol if i tell you i understand this, then i am lying

[size=20]This argument ended when you stated an atom is self existent (self existence meaning was or exists without any other cause) then you turn around say god can cause the atom. which is contradictory to ur first statement on atoms... If you throw in a god into the equation again then i can as well continue asserting that this your god cannot be self existent it must need a god thereby re-igniting the chain of infinite regress[/size]

Ubenedictus:
I love the way you define atoning sacrifice, you say it is a payment made to appease God for sins!

I agree to a good extent, but I prefer to be very specific when I use word in discussing doctrines, so i'll go futher and say, it is an offering of something in order to make amends for a wong done.

Put simply, I agree with your definition of atoning but you seem to think atonement happen only when punishment, wrath and discontent is transfered to the innocent, I on the other hand think atonement happens not neccessarily when another takes the just wrath of wrong doings but when the said wrath is averted without been poured. My position is that God the father didn't pour wrath on his son instead his son gave him a "sweet smelling offering" (sacrifice), that averted the wrath.

Please allow me to discuss the word atonement using scriptures.

@bolded.. please bro are you saying that torture and murder of jesus was actually a sweet smelling sacrifice to yahweh and then made him forgo his wrath

Hiswordxray:
Keep telling yourself you don't know the truth because lie feel more comfortable.
Lying to yourself won't change anything, just stop fighting it.

Lol you like that my God on my profile right?

ok lets move on..

You believe God (amadioha) exists right?

Misogynist2014:
Hmm. That was a fast one . I didn't call God atom {far be it from me} , I only likened THEM to the properties of atom. Though atom has no human known source, it is not impossible for God to create it. This leads us to intelligent design. Is the universe intelligent or not?

You see, you always contradict yourself then jump from that argument to another..

You just stated that the atom is self existent and now contradicts yourself by saying God can create it..lolzz..

Why not just leave the argument there since you just brought it to an end with your statement that atom is self existent.

For the universe being designed or not, please go and read about the universe and how it works then take on that topic with people that believes in big bang and trash it out them with them.

If i am to take you on that discussion then i will have to be dabble into arguing how the universe came to be when i have stated that i dont know.

Misogynist2014:
When I started SSS, my science teacher taught me about atoms, he said that a piece of yam is sliced until it gets to a point where it is indivisible, then I thought in my mind, why can't we divide the whole atom into two, divide again, again and again. It puzzled me until I heard of the atomic bomb. Yes, the atom (proton, neutron and electron [trinity]) can still be divided, but this time, it is not called division but destruction. Therefore, the atom is self existent since it is indivisible. So is God, THE HOLY TRINITY.

Bro, you have just finished your argument with the bolded... You have just confirmed the universe was self existence because atoms are a form of energy and not an entity, and speaking from your own aspect the atom caused the universe which means that the materials for the universe is the atom which is self existent meaning the universe is self existent.

But this you feeble attempt to identify atom as your god is very laughable.
(its like proton is Yahweh, neutron is Jesus and Electron is holy spirit) LMAO pardon me but i had to laugh

Call an atom what ever you like, it doesnt change the fact that an atom is not an entity or a deity.. This your assertion is very ridiculous and your fellow theists will attack you when they see this..

CAPTIVATOR:
Johny , I must say I admire ur intelligence so much ... Have been followin ur discussion from page 0 with that religious guy ! But ur points are very valid .

If God know that Adam and Eve would sin, then their freewil is tampered with . Exactly, and that will mean they are not different from programmed robots .

But if on the other hand , God have the power to know .. But use self - control (one of his vital attributes) from knowing such, then the freewill is not tampered with. (comp. Gen)

makes a whole more sense to me

Misogynist2014:
Then it's not kinda right to be an atheist without having the fundamental and basic knowledge of your Faith (substance of things hoped for, evidence of things not seen). If then being a man who believes not in things without proof, I think then that it is right not to contradict your stance by remaining a theist till you have enough proof to back an earth from nothing (without GOD).

I am an atheist because i lack belief in any God. and thats the only thing atheism means nothing more..

Lol actually on the contrary, I maintain i do not know when i lack the knowledge but you believe that the world came to be out of nothing only that it comes in a more finer wear..

First your argument on first cause states that something can't come out of nothing. Very good.

But then again you believe your god just started existing on its own without needing to be created, that is failing in your own argument.

Let me say i agree with you that something can't come out of nothing, it means your god being existent on his own contradicts your argument. It must have a cause, another god i suppose and that other god must also have another god resulting in a chain of infinite regress. So you see you failed in your own argument by believing your god existed from nothing.

Secondly, As a creationist you believe the universe was created with words (is not material so its nothing) from this your god that still yet popped out of nothing.
He said the word and the universe magically popped out from nothing thereby you still failed in your own argument...

So now do you see the difference between you and i? You think the universe popped out from nothing (a word) said by a god that popped out of nothing (self existent) but i on the other hand say [size=20] I do not know how the universe started[/size]

Misogynist2014:
That means you came from something. Why then do you claim the universe came from nothing? Why then do you argue the universe has no source (which MUST be called God)?

Lol it means you have not been reading my posts because if you have you would noticed when i said this

First i have not argued with you that the earth popped out of nothing, i
made my stance clear to you that "I do not know" or claim to know how
the world or universe came to be.. "I opened my eyes and saw the world
just like you did, so i dont claim to possess such knowledge..

and this

Firstly i do not claim possess any knowledge of how the world started
because i opened my eyes and saw the world.. Most atheist say "We
dont know".

These was my replies to you from the onset of our discussion, show me where i asserted the world popped out of nothing..
I need not remind you that fallacy is a big sin in an argument, so please desist from it bro, Don't attribute what i didnt say to me.
Or do you want to force me to accept your ideology that the world came out of nothing?

Misogynist2014:
You won't run away from this. Did you come from something or Nothing?

Lol i came from my mother...

So funny that you are arguing against how the world came from nothing when you believe it did.. .. whats the difference between you and those atheist when you both believe the world came out of nothing?

Misogynist2014:
Whether you believe in God or not, the earth didn't jump from somewhere, it had a beginning, don't shy away from this.

P.S. I've just followed you, follow back.

First i have not argued with you that the earth popped out of nothing, i made my stance clear to you that "I do not know" or claim to know how the world or universe came to be.. "I opened my eyes and saw the world just like you did, so i dont claim to possess such knowledge..

You on the other hand still like those atheists you pointed out believes the earth popped out of nothing..

Misogynist2014:
That's cumbersome, but let me quote you a post " Atheists argue that life popped out of nothing, therefore God is not needed in the
equation. They are quick at using M and B word. They say Earth is billions of years old
and man is millions of years old and evolved from tiny organisms. They have refused to
give us detailed reasons why it took so long and every process man took, if possible
catalyze the whole process, subsequently giving us a human being .
Let me use the experiment that Galileo Galilei used to stun the entire world of science;
the experiment that every object falls at same rate when air resistance is absent. To do
this, we have to pump out the air to give us a vacuum (though logic tells us the vacuum
is something, the absence of air molecules gives us a perfect example of nothing since
we are only concerned about the air molecules and its emptiness.)
Through this experiment, we see that for nothing(absence of air molecules) to exist,
something must have triggered it. What if we want to get our air molecules back(a very
important component of life itself)? Should we wait for a few days, months, years or
centuries for air molecules to pop out of nothing? A sane mind will realise that
something can't come out of nothing but nothing can come out of something. This proof
singlehandedly shows that the genesis of the 'faith' of atheists is shaky.
Since its now being proofed that life started from something and not nothing (even
nothing must come from something,) we can then try to highlight the properties and
characteristics this something must possess:
1) Must be called God because everything was created by him because without him was
anything made that was made.
2) He must be infinite because he is infinity, he came from infinity, therefore he has no
source, neither can he have an end because he is infinite.
3) He must be all powerful and infinitely intelligent. The works of his hands are sufficient
proof.
4) He must possess properties beyond normal, properties beyond our wisdom e.g an
invisible Spirit. People will wish to argue this one but Hebrews 11:3 says: Through faith,
we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that "things which are
seen are not made of things which do appear". This applies to everything in the universe,
including you and this knowledge is applied in the making of televisions and phones."

Good those atheists aired their opinion, its theirs and none of my business. it has nothing to do with others who disbelief in Gods, so do not generalize their views and impose it on all atheists. Refer to that opinion as their own view. . atheists do not have one common doctrine, being an atheist doesnt mean believing big bang or evolution it only entails [size=20] Disbelief in God(s) [/size] . . . so that right there is their opinion most atheist just say "we dont know"

And you as a creationist actually is the one that have something in common with those atheist (something came out of nothing.) And i think you know how

Hiswordxray:
That johnydon22 and davien don't believe God exist.

lol on the contrary i believe God exists... Check my profile and you will see my God there, atleast that one is real and prove able but not ur sky daddy

Misogynist2014:
I actually wanted to catch you on the break, but you were wise enough to ask, so as to have PERFECT KNOWLEDGE of what we are delving into. Atheists claim that the world started from nothing, so there is no need for God, hence my question. Can I now have my answer?

Firstly i do not claim possess any knowledge of how the world started because i opened my eyes and saw the world.. Most atheist say "We dont know".

Now can you tell me what you mean by atheist say the world started from nothing? Throw more light to that statement.. I actually love this turn you have taken our discussion

Misogynist2014:
That is brilliant of you. What then is provable, Something from nothing or Nothing from something?

And now since we are delving into a different issue all together i would like you to come out clearly and say what exactly you mean?

and he didnt say the name of the particular plane That is why chrisitians are so easy to fool.. #Gullibility

Misogynist2014:
Do you base your thinking on proof?

Proof and plausibility and observable knowledge

DProDG:
Lmao, KEB? You go ask tire today. Goodluck

lmao..

Misogynist2014:
Pls, can I ask you a question?

by all means do..

KingEbukasBlog:
copying and pasting from science websites ?... errrmmm

this doesnt address my assertion..

who told you he is smart, intelligent and not ignorant at all? like you stated above?