Politics › Re: Bruce Mayrock 69th Posthumous Birthday by jpphilips(m): 5:04pm On Apr 19, 2020 |
SAHACO: Bruce Baruch Mayrock (6 May 1949 – 30 May 1969) from Old Westbury, New York was a student at Columbia University who set himself ablaze at the premises of the United Nations Headquarters in New York on 29 May 1969, to protest genocide against the nation and people of Biafra in the Nigerian Civil War. Mayrock doused himself with a flammable liquid and set himself afire on the lawn outside the U.N. building. The fire was spotted by United Nations security guards who ran after him with fire extinguishers. Mayrock eluded them, running to the north lounge of the building as witnessed by several hundred delegates. Mayrock finally fell to his knees beside the bronze statue sculpted by Evgeniy Vuchetich to represent the human wish to end all wars, which bears the slogan "Let Us Beat Swords into Plowshares". The flames were extinguished and he was rushed to Bellevue Hospital Center where he was listed in critical condition and was pronounced dead in the early hours of 30 May 1969, the Biafran independence day. He was carrying a cardboard sign which said, "You must stop the genocide—please save 9 million Biafrans." Mayrock had worked actively to protest the war in Biafra, writing letters about the war to the U.S. President and leading government figures. The student took his life to protest the killing of innocent Biafran babies and what he believed was genocide in Biafra. He was concerned that people were being killed and no one was doing anything and no one was listening. Mayrock graduated with highest honors from Flatbush Yeshivah and was a Student of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America as well as Columbia University, and worked as a photographer for the Columbia Daily Spectator. He had previously studied briefly at Hofstra University. He is buried in Mount Ararat Cemetery, Farmingdale, Suffolk County, New York.
http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Bruce_Mayrock You must be ret@rded to copyright Joshua Waitzkin's picture to sell your stup!dity |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 2:10pm On Apr 19, 2020 |
kenpaul0: You can pass your comments without using foul language on our leaders. If someone uses similar language against the current what would you say? Suprised that everyone is keeping quiet to this I'm sure you don't even know what a leader should look like. I feel so sorry for your generation. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 12:39pm On Apr 12, 2020 |
jln115: the SADF had a casualty(KIA and accidents) figure of 0.03% during the Border War. You actually compared 30,743 SADF deployments with US 775,000 deployment? I think the most difficult job in Africa is English tutor. Not mentioning your mathematical somersault that morphed 5.8% to 0.03%
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 11:22am On Apr 12, 2020 |
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 10:16am On Apr 12, 2020 |
bidex111: And where did you get your starts from or source; before you start challenging anyone. That's what Google is meant for. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 10:15am On Apr 12, 2020 |
Whyem15: If only we can keep up with procurements like this, $1billion or more every year from ECA, but  Our neighbors are getting more aggressive and rude, particulary cameroon, and it is because of the support paul biya get's from france. Having a modernised military is the key to letting france know that we could decide to remove those puppets and nothing will happen because the french won't be able to project reasonable force within a short period in west Africa that will harm Nigeria. Cameroon's armed forces is just a little above 14,000 personnel, chad;35000. And to think this puppets are already facing unrest in their countries. Imagine cameroon sending men to arrest seperatist leaders in Abuja! All because of a few Exocet they were given by France. I know it's fantasy though  ECA holds money when crude price is relatively high |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 9:20am On Apr 12, 2020 |
Whyem15: Is Nigeria getting weapons to fight bokoharam or modernising it's arsenal because this is unfair to bokoharam gun trucks The only advantage this has over rpg 28 is range and accuracy. The rpg 28 has same armour penetration and significantly cheaper. It is really commendable and would help taking out technicals kilometers away. RPG 28 is for single shot only after which its discarded. Not a game changer. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 8:51am On Apr 12, 2020 |
Sizzorkay: I do agree with most of what you wrote, I said it before as well, to say the US couldn't defeat the Taliban is silly. But i also wouldn't call the loss of over 2,400 US military personnel in Afghanistan minimal casualty, that's a lot of dead soldiers With 775,000 deployment that's 0.3% KIA, I challenge anyone here to provide a better stats for a similar conflict in modern history. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 2:14pm On Apr 11, 2020 |
ugo4u: Stop wallowing in ignorance, as of 2014 I was very much within the military circles (Airforce) and was privy to some information esp from the contractor that procure our helicopters (Won't mention the name). The Israeli's were more than willing to give us Chinook helicopters to help with the fight against the insurgents, infact the deal was almost done and approved by Netanyahu before it was blocked by Obama citing (Leahy's Law) it's as simple as that I even saw minuted document to that effect. I still have all the memories as fresh as a morning wine. Can you post the "rules" that made it off limits to Nigeria but accessible to India, UAE, Singapore etc Calm down and learn stop basing your argument on hearsay or sentiments. You were in the Airforce in 2014 & probably one of the clusterfvcks that advised Jonathan to pursuit the Chinooks 
Let me ask you, did you support Jonathan's advisers based on what? Does Nigeria have any existing military treaty or defense MOU with the US in 2014? if the answer is NO then on what grounds did you and your cohorts advise Jonathan to chase shadows? what was in it for you guys? let me guess, the few Trips to New York, estacodes & sitting allowance?
I am sure it was the same team of clusterfvcks that advised Jonathan to circumvent Leahy's ban through South Africa with militants & bling-bling pastor? Do you expect them to know SA has been a US ally since Apartheid? We lost $10m to that stup!dity, Meanwhile, your mates in India circumvented CAATSA with EU, Iran is trying to circumvent US JCPOA sanctions with EU also.
You are not even ashamed to admit you were part of that conspiracy. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 10:52am On Apr 11, 2020 |
Toju200: well they aren't winning From my point of view... They killed more civilians than terrorists in Airstrike and you call that mission successful What is the Objective of Russia in Syria? to play with civilians? |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 10:46am On Apr 11, 2020 |
ugo4u: Stop wallowing in ignorance, as of 2014 I was very much within the military circles (Airforce) and was privy to some information esp from the contractor that procure our helicopters (Won't mention the name). The Israeli's were more than willing to give us Chinook helicopters to help with the fight against the insurgents, infact the deal was almost done and approved by Netanyahu before it was blocked by Obama citing (Leahy's Law) it's as simple as that I even saw minuted document to that effect. I still have all the memories as fresh as a morning wine. Can you post the "rules" that made it off limits to Nigeria but accessible to India, UAE, Singapore etc Calm down and learn stop basing your argument on hearsay or sentiments. You must be a child not to know the UAE is a US ally before you were born. Who expects you to know that 3,500 US troops are deployed at the Al Dhafra Air Base in Abu Dhabi. Who expects you to know that UAE is only one of three countries and the only Arab nation to participate with the US in six coalition actions over the last 20 years: Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Bosnia-Kosovo, the 1990 Gulf War and the fight against ISIS. UAE can get Chinook as a US ally, Nigeria can not.
Singapore and the U.S. have a strong bilateral defense partnership, underpinned by the 1990 Memorandum of Understanding and 2005 Strategic Framework Agreement, and most recently elevated by the 2015 enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement
You don't know these basic military relations between these countries yet open your butt hole to call me ignorant? Seems the goats we left in the politics section are here, time to leave!! |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 9:44am On Apr 11, 2020 |
blacKDalia: U.S objectives in Afghanistan are easy to list: stability, good governance and prosperity. It should be noted that the United States did not make a premeditated choice to focus it's attention on the small land locked mountainous region. 9/11 changed all that. The initial goal of US military operations was narrowly conceived ; the elimination of the threat posed by al-Qaeda. The mission was urgent and not preceded by any long term objective. Albeit they did make quick work of the Taliban regime, their efforts did not produce any rapid result on the hunt for Osama bin Laden. The longer the US stayed in Afghanistan, the more blurry the line became between it's narrow counter terror mission and a more ambitious effort of building a post Taliban Afghanistan.The question is, was the US' strategic objective of building a stable and prosperous Afghanistan achieved? The answer is no. And I think the Taliban will be back. You are the only person that came close to understanding what the US went to do in Afghanistan, the rest were busy saying what they think, not uncommon here though.
US went to Afghanistan to degrade the Taliban, ensure their Alqaeda allies no longer have the capability to pull a hit on US soil after 9/11. You can go back and listen to George bush address to the nation in 2001.
The last time I checked, that Objective was met with minimal casualties, one of the least in modern history, reason some keyboard warriors are struggling to pull out a better stats.
Haven met the primary Objective, there was global pressure to stabilize & rebuild Afghanistan, that gave birth to a secondary Objective which the likes of former US defense secretary Jim Mattis believe will not be achieved with the barrel.
It is irritating to read from comedians here that the US primary Objective wasn't met with overwhelming firepower. Even the Taliban themselves have forgotten their terror projection agenda, they are now interested in local politics to control provinces & earn seats in Parliament, that's how useless they have become, thanks to the US "flawed strategy" according to some women here.
There is no Alqaeda group linked to the Taliban that has ever pulled a hit on US soil in the last 15yrs, another fact!! that's proof US met her primary Objective in Afghanistan. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 9:13am On Apr 11, 2020 |
Toju200: gurellia warfare is different from conventional warfare...You say Mali will give us a rough day in battle ha I laugh. We been the gaint of Africa Entails many things not just military...You know Egypt is stronger. There's no African country that can defeat us in battle except perhaps military.. You're using our present situation to judge I'm using the future The general complained of Wrong info and tactics given to him He failed to change and respond on time IMO No country would dare Nigeria currently and in a few years. You say we don't have air defense I agree The TRACON project is underway Nigeria got the best eyes In the sky In case u don't know ISR and Geospatial technology Yes we fail most times I get it but appreciate the little we do that's why I'm even on Nairaland Isn't it the same Hilux terrorists in Mali that the whole European nations are deploying troops and hardware here and there..
Simple truth if Nigeria Falls Africa falls IN Mandela's words: Africa won't be respected until Nigeria is respected
Egugun be Kiafulloo There is a thin line between Patriotism & Jingoism, keep your hopes in check. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 9:06am On Apr 11, 2020 |
GabrielYulaw: Yes, it's a failure. Just like the Israelis, the US has an unhealthy fear of casualties. Just one dead soldier in the Middle East or anywhere else can trigger congressional hearings, firings and worse.
It doesn't matter if 1 person or 3K dies, they view every death as excessive and will spend millions of dollars in armaments attacking folks with AK who are about to overrun a single one of their soldiers. Someone like you should have known that.
And I'm not using my standards, but theirs. You must have failed comparisons or comprehension or both in elementary school. Give us your success statistics for a similar 19yrs battle lets compare KIA & WIA stats, how is that difficult? |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 8:39am On Apr 11, 2020 |
Whyem15: Ships can't be intercepted? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2072NJ&ved=2ahUKEwjgrebIld7oAhWKzoUKHbeeALsQFjADegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw2rOQQpv58zDeyxVND4vLKZ&cf=1
Of what strategic importance or benefit is somalia to US that they drone al shabab's commanders regularly? Of what use are the drone bases in the first instance knowing fully well they told the American public they are using them to fight bokoharam?. Is there global antiterrorism war now dependent on how useful the country is? Why did they block the sale of the cobras and chinook from Israel but allowed kenya to get them? Has Iran been able to buy weapons from any country other than russia and china? Why would you compare Iran to Nigeria militarily knowing they were allies with US before the revolution and US transferred several technologies to them, they were more industrialized than we are now yet we are already developing our local arms industries too. I am not making a case for Jonathan, I am trying to make people realise the US is abetting bokoharam. Apart from Italy, no one in the west sold reasinable weapons to us and we went to the east. Algeria wasn't able to buy weapons throughout the time they were on sanctions. Everything you wrote here has no bearing with arms supply through the sea. Your darling Jonathan eventually used the sea are you aware? Saudi as a US ally denied Nigeria air space, I asked why the sea wasn't an option? that is exactly what they used eventually but they forgot to tell chaps like you.
Bringing Somalia into this discourse is a distraction, if you don't know the economic importance of Somalia waters to global trade, if you don't know why the US, France even China ran to Djibouti to build bases to keep an eye on Somalia waters, then you have no buisness on this thread.
Iran broke ties with the US in 1979, (41years ago) I am not aware the US transferred technology to Iran at the time, but I am aware the US sold them some platforms & im aware several of those platforms are aged with no idea how to bring them back to life.
I am also aware that Russia transferred technology to Iran reason the Iranian domestic made Bavar 373 is a copy of the Russian S-300, I am also aware that Iran locally reverse engineered the US RQ-170 sentinel stealth drone to produce their local Shahed-171 and Saeqah drones. If you sincerely believe that US phantom technology transfer 41yrs ago gave birth to modern stealth drones, advanced interception & jamming capabilities, air defense systems that could down a US Global hawk, bros you have no buisness on this thread, just look for any Davido-Chioma thread & sign up. You sound ridiculous.
Iran earned their place on the global table amidst sanctions some of which was global in nature not forgetting the 2006 UN arms embargo, while your president acted miserably on a parochial sanction despite having plethora of options. 15yrs ago, Iran was rated woefully I wonder why the so called "US technology transfer" left them miserable before now. Quit deceiving yourself.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 4:06am On Apr 11, 2020 |
Toju200: the russkies with their Sukhois are they winning in Syria.. ISIS destroyed three yesterday in Syria I'm case u don't know So Russia isn't winning in Syria because they were hit? really? |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 3:51am On Apr 11, 2020 |
nemesis8u: Just a minor correction . Nothing to correct, India proceeded with the purchase of five regiments of S-400 surface-to-air missiles in a $5.43 billion, paid in Euros in order to bypass CAATSA sanctions.
Last year, New Delhi made a down payment worth $800 million, and initial deliveries will arrive in October 2020, with the order completed between in 2023 and 2025. So India bypassed CAATSA fact!!
Turkey wasn't so lucky, CAATSA kicked them out of the F35 program, for buying the same S-400 Fact!! |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 3:27am On Apr 11, 2020 |
ugo4u: Obama stopped the sale of Chinooks to Nigeria that I am sure of, the Israeli's were willing to sell to us as per third party but it was blocked by the US. Some of you don't understand simple English, what is the difference between "Being off limits to you" & "you were stopped from getting it"? Whoever initiated a Chinook transfer to Nigeria from Israel is stup!d.
There are several people in the ministry of foreign affairs, that could've explained why it's useless initiating a deal like that let alone waiting to be screwed, it was an unrealistic wet dream.
I wasn't surprised he tried to get a Chinook, someone that negotiated arms transfer with pastors and militants what do you expect? Do you expect a militant to know what the diplomatic rules are?
The same reason Nigeria can't get a Chinook is the same reason Britain can't get a Raptor from the US, there are rules. So the US didn't block you from getting a Chinook, you weren't supposed to have it in the first place based on existing rules, only a president surrounded by ignorant folks will think the rules will bend in the US congress.
Go and read the US arms export control act to get a clue how those things work, Nigeria stands zero chance of getting a Chinook, directly or indirectly. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 2:25am On Apr 11, 2020 |
Toju200: He stopped us from getting three Chinooks and 10 cobras You can not touch a Chinook. US arms tansfer work differently, no US ally will tansfer a US made strategic asset without their pemission. Besides Egypt on an arms transfer agreement with the US, no African country use it, you think its a coincidence? If Israel or India agrees to sell, the US will block it, so stop complaining about not getting something you aren't supposed to have in the first place. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 1:51am On Apr 11, 2020 |
ugo4u: Nigerian Army Air components is still a pipe dream. I don't see any tangible thing happening to that effect even in 5yrs time except something urgent is done. You can't be talking about establishing an air wing with our pitiable defence budget majority of which goes into recurrent expenditure. Infact we don't have more than three operational T-72 tanks as of present. We hv not really seen the need to look for other sources of funding the Military other than the annual pitiable budget, if truely we have leaders that can think it won't be difficult to source for at least $2bn yearly from the private sector/public apart from defence budget to fund the military. Out of the VAT sef 2% can be budgeted strictly for purchase of equipment yearly but we no dey reason in this part of world. The military can raise its capital investment cost if they want to, for example, the cost of producing a barrel of crude oil in Nigeria is not more than $16, that figure rises to $25 -$30 per barrel once you include security.
The Nigerian navy charges both NNPC and oil companies as high as N1.4m for each gun boat escort the last time I checked. You can pay as high as $15k daily to get a pipeline over flight surveillance from NAF. They merely sit for government to buy the equipment then charge you to use it.
NPF claims to be under funded but nobody asks how much it cost to keep 2 mopols at the gate. Do the math how many of them are on such assignments to get a clue how much they rake in. Don't be deceived my friend. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 8:11pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
GabrielYulaw: It's not him that called it a failure. Everyone knows it's a failure. Even Trump the great idiot based his campaign on bringing the troops home and ending America's misadventures in the middle east.
0.3% KIA sounds really nice. Except if your brother or sister was included in that kill statistic.
Consider, the war in Afghanistan has damaged the US almost beyond the point of recovery. It has spent trillions of dollars prosecuting this war and has precious little to show for it. Its civil infrastructure is in shambles because there's no money to fix these, since war consumes money like crazy.
What the above statistics don't show is that quite a few service men and women stuffer from PTSD. They act crazy and do the craziest things and the cost of treating them is astronomical.
The war in Afghanistan has also massively degraded the US war fighting abilities. While it was focusing on fighting towelheads, the Chinese were massively growing their army and navy and the Russians were getting bolder and acting out.
Reports of massacres and torture by US forces also does its reputation no good and makes it look hypocritical when it lectures other countries on human rights.
The US war on terror is a failure with no clear goal or objective. The only thing it has to show for it is millions of deaths and unimaginable devastation. The Taliban they invaded Afghanistan to remove will be back in charge of that country very soon. If 0.3% KIA in 19yrs is a failure by your standards, can you share with us your success statistics standard of any 19yrs conflict since the history of mankind. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 8:06pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
GabrielYulaw: America, a weak enemy? Lol.
From what I can see the Taliban are not and have never been serious about negotiations. I remember reading an intelligence briefing to that effect, but then anyone could easily see that.
So, why are the Taliban negotiating? Mainly to bamboozle, and to show their power.
Remember the almighty US has endlessly said it would never ever negotiate with terrorists. Then imagine them going cap in hand to negotiate with some sandal-wearing towelheads who can't count up to 100 but can reassemble an AK 47 blindfolded.
So, the negotiations are a great propaganda coup for the Taliban. They will cheerfully negotiate an end to American occupation and agree to share power with the Afghan government. Once the Americans are gone they will reopen their offensive and make Afghanistan theirs once again. They agreed to negotiate because they have nothing to lose and everything to gain. How about speaking from the list of their demands. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 8:04pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
Whyem15: Because they it is the cheaper way to achieve the victory they want. US will leave totally, taliban will become a legal political party again and be sure that they will rule Afghanistan again very soon.
Just wish we will be getting some surveillance and reconnaissance equipment soon For a weak & defeated enemy? that's strange, can you point to any conflict in the world where a victor sit & negotiate with a weak & defeated adversary with terribly flawed strategies. How about going to read what the Taliban demands are than second guessing what they really want? You will sound smarter that way, trust me.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 2:40pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
Whyem15: https://allafrica.com/stories/201412291911.html This is a link I found about saudi refusing to grant flight permit to plane conveying Nigeria's weapons in 2014. I am sure there was another incident that Nigerian boumd weapons were siezed. Will keep search4 though. Quit the excuses, what happened to the Sea route? oops!! |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 2:33pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
kemicalreact: Yeah, I'm quite surprised by Algeria and Egypt's case, even Serbia (a strong Russian ally) was threatened when they wanted to buy the S400 
I think Nigeria should go for Russian weapons. They're cheaper, reliable and their delivery would not have any political undertone. We should have gone for the Su 25 equipped with latest avionics instead of going for that Super Tucano which won't be delivered at anytime soon. The Su 25 is the perfect platform for this COIN war judging by its performance against terrorists in Syria.
The problem lies with the decision makers and I doubt the president's situational awareness of what's going on in the North East. The man is senile and old, but I don't really blame him. 
Alll Buying Russian strategic weapons in 2020 is different from Jonathan's era. The US CAATSA came into force in 2017, those countries you mentioned except India evaded CAATSA, but Jonathan had no excuse except his usual buffoonery. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 1:54pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
GabrielYulaw: Toju won't you ever tire of blaming Obama for the inadequacies of the Nigerian army and airforce? Did Obama also stop us from buying stuff from China, South Africa, India, Russia and Egypt? Or Eastern Europe? Doesn't South Africa manufacture Super Hinds and even the Rooivak? The Tucano you are talking about, are there not equivalents we can get cheaper and sooner elsewhere? The weapons we use now, are most not from Russia and the Soviet Union, so why the sudden love for American weaponry? And as regards heavy lift helicopters, don't the Russians have the Mil Mi 26 Halo? What stopped us from buying these massive choppers as Algeria long since have? Or what stopped us from buying masses of Mil Mi 8 and 17s? What stopped us from buying platforms from other countries other than the US and massively upgrading the stuff we already have by giving them better avionics, engines, weapons and sensors?
Kindly leave Obama out of this please and find someone else within Nigeria to blame. Your excuse is wack and weak and I am very tired of hearing shit like that. You won't get anything from South Africa, Egypt, India or Israel in a US embargo, they will have to seek the permission of arms services committee to sell to you.[color=#000099] |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 1:50pm On Apr 10, 2020*. Modified: 3:32am On Apr 11, 2020 |
joshingjosh: this sanction you are talking about... Just seeing Cobra and chinook helicopter give me Erection..can u please provide the link where Nigeria requested for Chinook and Cobra?? Kenya got a Cobra to fight Alshabab, so the US would've considered selling to Nigeria if we asked, US has leaped above the Cobra for the Apache so it shouldn't be difficult. Jonathan's administration had a lot of money unfortunately the guy has the IQ of a housefly with a PhD. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 1:41pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
Toju200: it's not the best but we'll use what we have New platforms are coming.its better late than never If not for Obama's sanctions and blocking the tucano,Cobra and chinnok helicopters would have been here What are you saying? Obama stopped you from buying a Chinook? a strategic lift helicopter? stop dreaming, there is no way in the world the US will sell Chinook to a country like Nigeria. ban or no ban, that bird is off limits to you.
Tucano has a Russian equivalent, the YAK 130, why did your government not get it? Oh! Russia put you on a ban too. When you lie to yourself for long, it becomes your reality.
If the US refused to sell you a Cobra, why didn't he get an Mi-24? stop making excuses for that Buffoon. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 1:13pm On Apr 10, 2020*. Modified: 8:29am On Apr 12, 2020 |
Whyem15: Now, I'm not disputing the fact that the political class is corrupt and have been embezzling funds for buying weapons, but when these funds were made available, were we allowed to get them? Do you know the number of arms deals involving Nigeria that was blocked under the guise of "human rights violations" by those who sell tons of weapons to saudi and UAE yearly? This problem is both internal and external, the earlier we accept that that of external is the one destroying us most the better. Enough of that Arms embargo nonsense, how long have Iran, Cuba & Venezuela been under arms embargo? Did it stop Iran from ranking 14th militarily ahead of Israel, Australia & Spain? Leahy's ban was too narrow for any sensible government to complain about in a life & death situation, how about countries like Libya under a global arms embargo have they complained? did a global arms embargo stop Gen Haftar from attacking the Tripoli government?
Sensible leaders break umbrages to get results, Nigerian politicians sell dumb narratives to their dumb populace.
The same government under ban got Chinese MRAPS, got a Private military contractor for elections, bought the first set of Chinese combat drones. When its convenient, they remind you of Leahy's ban, did Leahy's ban stop them from stashing your money abroad?
If the US refused to sell him a Tucano, he would've gone to Russia to get a Yak 130 or its Chinese equivalent after all, Obasanjo got all our interceptors from China, stop making excuses for that loser! |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 12:45pm On Apr 10, 2020 |
Whyem15: Exactly what I have been pointing out. France has a reason to see Nigeria destroyed because of our past diplomatic relations with them. They have air assets in all these countries surrounding us , yet they've never for once deployed them against bokoharam. US has two drone bases in Niger, one in Cameroon yet the same thing. Jonathan wanted to end this war in 2014/15 so that he could get reelected, they blocked all the arms deal he made, even those he tried making secretely. We wanted to purchase cobra helicopters from Israel, they blicked it. Even if we are serious about ending this war which we are not currently, we will face a lot of challenges from these people who haven't for once scratched bokoharam. They don't even help us with intelligence. All you need do is go on sipri and see the quantity of weapons transfer in the last 10 years from US to nigeria and compare with Egypt's that get a lot in aids from US. You know nothing about global politics. Why will France or US sacrifice their people to save bloody Nigerians, what makes you think Nigerians are worth it to them? How will they convince their people to support that senseless action, you forgot they are advanced democracies?
France can do it for Cameroon, Chad, Niger, Mali, CIV because they surrender 60% of their wealth to France, why will France do it for you? No need to mention the US, can you pay the US to fight your battles?
You think sensible countries will sacrifice their people for a useless refinery like we did in Sierra leone & Liberia? Look at your mouth & sense of entitlement, they should fight for you, are they your house boys?
if you can't fight your battles why did you bother asking the same global powers to grant you Sovereignty? You would've remained an overseas British territory so British SAS will fight for you. Nonsense!! |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 11:30am On Apr 10, 2020 |
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 7:55am On Apr 10, 2020 |
BabaOwen: What's the importance of villages been destroyed? What's the importance of people been chased out of their ancestral homes? What's the importance of Nigerian civilians being killed because of their faith or the organization they work for? Nigerian soldiers can keep dying in borno, so far it does not have any economic importance to the country, right?
Monies that should be spent on more important things are been spent on the military.
Hope you no go vex when buhari announce say millions of dollars have been budgeted for rebuilding the north east, imagine if this millions of dollars is channeled to BOI 
Why did the UK go to war because of Falkland island? Was any harm been done to the UK economy for them to go to war because of the Falkland island? UK keeps half of all the oil proceeds from the north Falklands basin, so they are not occupying the Island for fun, & yes it was worth fighting for. |