nemesis8u: Let me answer in a generalized perspective
User requirements
In the case of foreign customers :
The end user after trials etc deems the Russian system not upto their requirements so they mandate an alternative foreign system.
Sometimes the end user for the sake of ensuring commonality across different platforms in their fleet opts for common systems to cut down costs , training headache , maintenance hassle etc
In the case of OEM themselves It's simple because it means their own system ain't at par or not available so they opted for foreign one.
As to ur specific question
Russian offers their customers the option of customisation as per their needs. Eg IAF uses Israeli HUD on su30mki due to possible reasons I mentioned above.
Afaik Russians use own hud on their own aircrafts. I could be wrong though.
The general public feeds on information which is fed to them . Nothing ain't that simple . We don't know doesn't mean that it is not happening.
Sanctions mean nothing if a said country is not serious about it .
USA might have beef with Russia but that doesn't mean all European countries have a bone to pick with Russia but nevertheless have to support the sanctions due to geopolitical obligations. EU is a conglomerate of nations representing common interests but some nations might not deem it to be in their national interest to break all bridges with Russia. They would want some leverage with Russia and so they " help " russia wherever possible within being too overt about it and without explicitly compromising the EU stand.
Eg all modern T series tanks have french supplied thermal imagers . Supplies for maintenance etc r still continuing without raising too many eyebrows. Ironically the same T series tanks will form the bulkwark of the Russian armoured thrust if they decide to invade Europe
National interests triumphs all international obligations
Thanks a lot Sir.
Well detailed and comprehensive answer.
Although just a small correction, Russian navy SU-30SM also use the Thales HUD.
Whyem15: Now, just one rpg hitting that vehicle and they are all gone. Watched a video of Nigerian soldiers attacking bokoharam and most of them were trying to stay behind the armored vehicles deployed, the officer with them was telling them to use natural cover instead because those armored vehicles are easy targets and if they explode?!......
This video suggests they are defending from an ambush.
Whyem15: Now, just one rpg hitting that vehicle and they are all gone. Watched a video of Nigerian soldiers attacking bokoharam and most of them were trying to stay behind the armored vehicles deployed, the officer with them was telling them to use natural cover instead because those armored vehicles are easy targets and if they explode?!......
What I think is, after assaulting the vehicle with insurgents, they came under fire(ambush).
nemesis8u: No it's a very big advantage during Air combat especially with high off bore missiles. The Russians were pioneers of this combo. The west copied it.
Both SU57 and Mig35 have them
Pic of the hmds for su57 ( under development / trials )
nemesis8u: I am not sure about Su30MKI, could be Sura K/I HMDS same as in MiG-21 bisons. There was a program to replace it , but am unaware of its status.
Mig29 UPG uses Topsight-I and Mig 29K uses TopOwl-F HMDS
Mirage 2K uses TopOwl-F HMDS
LCA uses DASH IV/V HMDS ( Pic )
Etc
Is there some sort of a disadvantage to using HMDS with regards to Russian fighter planes?
komekn: You have not dissuaded me from my original position, which is the total package contract sum is $600 million, I did not use condescending language to get my view across and call you a liar. Its still your prerogative to disagree or agree.
I don't need to dissuade you over anything. It is your prerogative to believe whatever fantasy you want to believe in.
I had earlier presented official records from Nigeria and US department sources.
If you like take it, if you like leave it. Your problem.