₦airaland Forum

Godx:
The jon jones with narrow decisions against reyes/santos is very much beatable for Izzy tho very narrow. Why is Jon jones always picking fights with middleweights? He should go fight Blayde or something. We are still waiting for jones and brock lesnar fight.

Brock hasn't beaten a relevant heavyweight in 10 years and he's 43 years old now.
Nah the blockbuster fight to make right fuckin now is Jones vs Stipe.

Goat vs Goat.

We know this story. It has to happen now before the opportunity gets muffed up.

I will be so disappointed if koulibaly spends one more season at Napoli. He is too good to be satisfied playing for a club like Napoli. instead of buying Rice for 60m+ we should be looking at koulibaly for 75m imo.

patrickmuf:
Ever heard of out and out centre forward?

Please Just list the out and out wingers like I requested that's all. You are the one dragging out a small issue. Infact bro forget about it.

patrickmuf:
I don't have time for this back and forth.

You are a Barca fan and I think Kim is a Chelsea fan...You guys should worry about your respective clubs rather than come here to bore me with repetitive lines...

Over and out...

You made a reckless statement thinking you won't be called out to defend it. Just accept you made a mistake or you were just typing to be seen as smart when you have no atom of clue about what you were typing about. All these Amala turning and you support Chelsea so mind your business angle are dumb.

spillo1:
LMFAO........You like trouble.

Nope I am just curious. He made this statement.

In the league, as an out and out right winger, there's none close to him.

I am simply asking him to name those other wingers but he is not providing names.

patrickmuf:
There's a difference between a RW and RWF...Traore is a RW whilst Salah is a RWF...

You have said that before. Just list the other RW in the league that's all.

This wolves and Jorge Mendes partnership is looking like superb collaboration. Wolves are getting good players from him.

patrickmuf:
That's not my call, it's you who think he isn't that should drop names of those who are better than him.

I don't grab. You made the distinction by saying "Out and out wingers" which is confusing. All I am asking is for you to name those you term "out and out wingers" in the league for us to know what you mean. It's a very straightforward request.

patrickmuf:
Adama, one trick pony?
No end product?
Not a starter?

Abeg which kind thing person dey read for here?
The problem is that you don't watch Wolves that's why you're spewing the above lies. Wolves have just signed Semedo to ensure Traore returns back to the RW. Even as a wing back, that guy tormented Manchester City. He created at least 3 clear cut goal scoring chances.

In the league, as an out and out right winger,
there's none close to him. FYI, Salah and Mahrez are RWFs...

Kindly name the out and out right wingers in the league let's see.

spillo1:
LMFAO my guy. They want us to buy shaku shaku master with 5 epl goals for 70m+ but Sancho dropping world class numbers is the overrated one. Clowns full everywhere

Adama suits Wolves’s style. He’ll be a lot less effective if he plays for a team that faces sides that play the low block a lot. His best attribute is his pace,deny him space and he is useless. I don’t think he has enough in his game to be a starter for a top club.

spillo1:
LMFAO....... Stop showing your ignorance. It's becoming clear daily you don't know much.

* He is like fellani useful in only one aspect of the game, Beat the fullbacks with his pace and put in a cross. He is one dimensional.

*Adama has 5goals in 100+ Epl appearance.

* He was benched 11times in the league last season. He is not a certified starter for wolves.

I hope the same people calling hazard shaku shaku master are not telling us Adama has end product with 5 goals

hensben:
Against small teams mount will be used, Kovacic will be used against big teams.

Wrong. Mount biggest attributes are 1) his workrates and 2)pressing ability which will be needed against the big teams.

Almajirihunter:
Kovacic should be the starter IMO, two attacking minded midfielders doesn't sit well with me

It worked perfectly at city with Silva and Kdb. With the workrates of Mount and Havertz I see no issue with it.

96forever:
Mount ahead of Kovacic? Captain Azpi?

I see no scenario that mount won't be a certified starter. Mount may have to rotate in and out sometimes with Kovacic.

madrid5:
sorry I didn't take English classes seriously ,uncle oghiso was to funny for me to actually focus on his lessons.

Ok bro. Take note I was not dissing you or anything. I was literally confused reading it.

So everyone is in agreement that when all are fit this is our starting eleven
Pulisic ------- Werner ------- Ziyech
Mount------Havertz
----- -- -Kante-----------
Chilwell - Silva - Zouma - James
---------- Mendy--------------------

madrid5:
lmao,thunder fire you,thunder fire neymar,has your mighty neymar given PSG the champions league?idiots,hazard has good aura,at least that's what I will say na after his one season flop,having neymar in the squad na la liga wey we win last season we go for still win,heck who knows maybe his injury would have been worse that hazard's,so call better player like haland or mbappe,shut your smelling mouth about neymar ,go support PSG if the guy dick dey sweat you.

Sorry but the 15people that liked this post did you actually understand anything he wrote because am confused. The punctuations are killing me

BlueMann:
According to Telefoot, Chelsea do not want to sell Kante, and he doesn't want to leave either.

Matt Law (Basically tier 1 for Chelsea news) has said recently on Alex Goldberg's podcast we are not completely against selling Kante for the right price for several reasons. He is nearly 30 (We're building a team for the future), he's on 300k per week, he is beginning to accumulate a large amount of fitness and injury problems and he doesn't mesh with our other central midfielders very well in a pivot (He is ok at DM but its a waste of his ability).I wouldn't put it past the realm of possibility for us to sell him to Inter if they offer a large fee + Brozovic (Him and kovacic in a pivot will be hot) so we can finance the Rice deal.

Everton are quietly having a good transfer window. That midfield of Allen,Doucoure,James with Richarlison and maybe calvert Lewin upfront looks devastating on paper.

Godx:
Chelsea will always sign trash and won't learn from their lessons. All their big transfers in recent years have flopped. From Kepa to Morata to jorginho to Bakayoko now they have bought German Dele Ali for 80million. Let's hope it won't end in tears

Your club spent 350milli+ on Coutinho,Dembele and Griezmann. You should not be the one shaking this table my guy

Out of all our new signings, Werner seems like the weakest link and maybe havertz. That kid looks skinny as fuccck.

Melvyn11:
I saw somewhere you guys can't buy automatic weapons in the U.S?

Automatic weapons are not legal to buy and are highly regulated . Basically, the only people that can legally have automatic weapons are collectors, and even then it is very very difficult. The federal Govt should have not have such right.

Melvyn11:
Disagree about the 2nd amendment Rights. The 2nd amendment itself is a deterrent factor. Every Citizen should have the rights to defend his self and family. You cannot March into somebody house In the middle of the night and not expect retaliation. It could have been a burglar hiding as policemen. I wish Nigeria gave us the right to legally own fire arms as well.

I am a huge supporter of the 2nd amendment because of the lack of police where I previously stayed. I had my house broken into and after calling 911 the response time was gauged in hours. Now I own a S&W just in case.
The government is not even supposed to regulate the kind of guns we should own.

Godx:
Sometimes even being at your house and peacefully sleeping can get you killed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/us/fbi-louisville-shooting.html

Effects of the No-knock stupid policy. Who thought plain clothes no knock raids were a good idea in the first place? What kind of major malfunction went on in the head of who came up with that policy?

Melvyn11:
Many police officers have been freed just like that guy. It's like the judicial system in America actually protects them.

It actually does man. That was what started the LA riots of 1992 over Rodney King. He was beaten on camera by 5 or 6 police officers. All 6 police were acquited in a televised trial on live TV. It actually lead to the reform of the LAPD.

Coutinho14:
Man i just watched the worst police brutality video ever, wtf? 4 white male cops just killed a black man on camera while the guy was on the floor with his neck stepped upon....smh

My wife watched the video and cried. Don't be surprised if those 4 guys go Scot free.
Remember Daniel Shaver? He was unarmed crawling on the ground crying "please don't shoot me" when police shot him 5 times at near point blank range.

The officer who pulled the trigger was cleared of all wrongdoing, and the video footage of Shavers murder was not allowed at the trial.

When it's yours, it's yours. Nothing anyone can do about it. On this day.

nihilistjnr:
Where do you live? If you live in yankee, UK, etc, you would already know that the black experience is not homegenous.

There is a specific type of black that is more likely to be shot by police, and more likely to be carrying weapons on them, Using poverty as an excuse is not enough. Even when it comes to crime, there's a specific type of black that goes for shotting, and there's another that prefers white collar crime.

If you're abroad, then you know what I mean. There is a cultural aspect to this that you cannot ignore. It's not a coincindence that gangsta rap, drill, and bashment and the most popular forms of artistic expression in these communities.

I disagree with most here and I could write an essay on them but I will just focus on the hip-hop and Rap part. It's true that a lot of mainstream rap today revolves around either drugs or crime/gang activity, but rap as a whole don't glorify these things. Only a small subset of rappers do. One can point to many mainstream rappers who don't glorify drugs/violence, but rather use their music to report on what happens in their communities and comment on these things. Focusing on rap's depictions of these things kinda misses the point. rap is street journalism, so their music will reflect the communities they come from. Therefore, the prominence of the drug and the violence that comes from it is not because of rap; rather, rap depicts those things because that's how life is for many people in their communities.
I remember watching a documentary about "making it" as a rapper, and I remember they asked these rappers, both aspiring ones and stars, about why there were so many depictions of violence, drugs, and the like. Their answer?Because that's what the record companies want you to say. The record companies wanted to sell as many records as possible, and they saw that they could sell the most records if they involved drugs, sex, violence, etc. Why? Because that was the kind of rap that white people bought the most. In fact, white people are the main consumers of rap music, not blacks.

nihilistjnr:
That may be true, but none of these initiatives seem to be as high profile as BLM movement.

If 93% of all black murder victims were killed by black people, then shouldn't efforts in that area be a bigger concern?

If you're black in the western world, the truth of the matter is that you fear your own kind more than the white dude.

The biggest black male artistes in the world make money from songs primarily about bïtches, drugs and violence. Let's not pretend that we don't live for this shït.

If you want black people to stop dying, but you're not campaigning against the race statistically proven to be the top murderer of black people,

you're not campaigning against the people who have turned the murder of black people into a full blown entertainment platform, singing about it, bragging about it, and filling up social media about it...

And and you're not campaigning the niggas running around on road with call of duty guns, and even a rocket launcher...

Then what's really the point of your campaign?

Is it to save black lives? Or is it to ensure that the murder of black folks remains an exclusively black privilege?

BLM is not a movement to save black people from themselves . HIV and AID Awareness program is not related to Covid-19 Awareness program . Like I have pointed out before they are other organizations/groups which main focus are on that. It's main focus is on institutional and systemic racism. BLM is generally about the way systematic racism affects the safety of marginalized groups, particularly blacks in the US. More specifically, they're about police violence against black Americans, racial profiling etc The goal isn't strictly saving black lives from themselves but from the State. It is about unfair treatment that leads to criminalization and deaths of Black people.

I understand your argument But you miss the point. BLM is specifically about how the State's agents carry out their duties relating to Black people. There are other groups that focus on black on black crime reductions.

nihilistjnr:
Not holding brief for Dayo but I don't think it's that simple.

Until you live in Yankee, it can be difficult to understand the percieved hypocrisy of the BLM movement.

Black people invented gangsta rap, which is the only genre of music I know that allows the artiste to brag about murdering other black men

Ultimately, black people are responsible for more black murders than white people. Pointing this out isn't necessarily hypocrisy.

I can give you an example of how a BLM activist was murdered by his fellow black man.

I can even give you an example of how a BLM activist actually murdered a fellow blackman.

There are peace summits all the time in Chicago that address gang violence, black on black crime and crimes against minorities. Public officials, intellectuals and activist groups attend. There are plenty of organizations that are devoted entirely to ending black on black crime. Intraracial (Black on black) crimes is not the purpose of BLM.

The black on black argument is a logical fallacy in my opinion. How black people treat each other has nothing to do with whether police should be able to kill them with impunity. Intraracial violence is about as common among white people as it is among black people. Black murder victims were killed by black perpetrators about 91% of the time from 2009 to 2013, white victims were killed by white perpetrators about 83% of the time according to FBI database

All violence and crime is about proximity, Calling it 'black-on-black crime' is an unnecessary specification."

Crime rates in poor black neighborhoods are often high because of concentrated poverty, lack of investment and low employment and education prospects, the concept of black on black crime attributs the problem to blackness itself, rather than the societal factors that cause any group to commit crimes against people who live near them.

airmark:
Pjanic for Jorginho? Not bad for me.

Why would you want Pjanic over Jorginho?