₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,330,645 members, 8,446,405 topics. Date: Thursday, 16 July 2026 at 01:50 PM

Toggle theme

Kobojunkie's Posts

Nairaland ForumKobojunkie's ProfileKobojunkie's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 (of 3863 pages)

FamilyRe: Malicious Disinformation About My Dead Friend. by Kobojunkie: 12:35am On May 22, 2024
Juzec:
∆ I actually posted about my missing friend yesterday. I'm feeling so devastated but I have to set the record straight. I saw the thread on front page about her death and so many people talking about hookup and the rest. How vile can some people get?
This lady is married with kids. She is doing very well more than majority of the sadistic souls talking about hookup.
She came back to Nigeria coz she was going through stuff and depression. She left home and was found to have committed suicide.
Please enough of all the disinformation flying about. Respect the dead please!!!!
Came back to Nigeria from where? Why didn't she simply get treatment where she was for her condition? Who goes back to Nigeria because of depression abeg! undecided

Poor kid! undecided
FamilyRe: Abuja-based Pastor, Stanley Ogbonna Throws Wife, Six Kids Out Of The House by Kobojunkie: 12:33am On May 22, 2024
Gboom:
The pastor is not wise at all.
A so-called role model washing his dirty line outside
You wey you dey regard pastor, you think say you wise? undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Help With This Book Please: 101 Weapons Of Spiritual Warfare, By Dk Olukoya by Kobojunkie: 10:35pm On May 21, 2024
cescky:
WHO HAS THE BOOK, KINDLY SHARE, thanks in advance
Book of nonsensical delusions. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie: 9:08pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
∆ The actual question you need to answer is why David came to Ahimelech for bread and not any other priest!
∆ Why did Jesus mention Abiathar when there was no mention of Abiathar with bread and David in the Bible?
That is a dumb question to ask. undecided

2. Another dumb question to ask since Jesus Christ was less concerned about the actual priest but rather interested in the fact that David ate holy bread which was meant for God. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie: 8:39pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
His father was a priest that commune with the king! So he's a descendant of the house of Elli the priest! So what should an average priest take when trying to escape?
The king summoned the priest and his family because they harbored a fugitive, and Saul intended to kill them all from the start. And here you already instead chose to conclude the man communed with the king.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions about Judas's death and Field of Blood! by Kobojunkie:
AbuTwins:
■ Judas Iscariot was the disciple of Jesus who betrayed him in the Bible. Jesus did promise him and other disciples rulership with him on thrones but i still wonder why he could betray him after such great promise!
Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Matthew 19:28
The rebuttal to your first claim is found right there in the same passage which you lifted that verse from. In Matthew 19 vs 27, Peter described the followers of Jesus Christ as those who have abandoned all in order to follow Him.
27 Peter said to him, “We left everything we had and followed you. So what will we have?”
28 Jesus said to them, “When the time of the new world comes, the Son of Man will sit on his great and glorious throne. And I can promise that you who followed me will sit on twelve thrones, and you will judge the twelve tribes of Israel. - Matthew 19 vs 27 vs 28
Judas was not known to have left everything to follow Jesus Christ.(Judas was busy stealing something for himself from the purse.) This, I am afraid does not contradict the Gospel of Jesus Christ. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 7:58pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ Why is it so hard for you to show me the exact screenshot or picture of where you got that particular verse, that same way you have written it. And I am going to tell you the error, if you aren't the one being mischievous
You want the translation name and I gave it to you. So, stop with the red-herring and answer the question or admit you lied that the divine is manifested in a chicken. undecided
RomanceRe: Housewife Publicly Displays Poster Of Husband's Side Chick To Shame Her by Kobojunkie: 7:52pm On May 21, 2024
Hezzyluv:
Most times, if a husband goes outside and misbehave, "the wife's action or inaction might have triggered it. Even the approach she used here tells a lot about her. So madam, check from your own side wetin you dey do or no dey do wey make your husband go on sex escapade.
So when your wife or girlfriend cheats on you, it is likely your fault as well? OK! grin
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 7:48pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ Show me where you got this particular translation, this exact way you have written it Kobojunkie
See what religion has done to your mind? You made a claim you are unable to back up with Scripture. When questioned, you resort red-herring fallacy! You are indeed a true example of a Christian! grin
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 6:24pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
The Contradictions is clear as daylight in the OP!
When comparing the accounts of the trials of Jesus in the four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), there are some differences and nuances in the details presented. Here is a comparison of the trials of Jesus as depicted in each Gospel:
- **Before the Sanhedrin**:
- **Matthew**: Jesus is brought to Caiaphas first, then to the full Sanhedrin.
- **Mark**: Jesus is brought directly to the house of the high priest.
- **Luke**: The Sanhedrin assembly is not explicitly mentioned.
- **John**: Jesus is brought to Annas first, then to Caiaphas.
I am glad I had indicated that you pay close attention to the dictionary definition of the word Contradiction as right from the very first compilation it is clear that you have a hard time grasping the meaning well.

MATTHEW - Jesus Christ was taken to the High Priest, Caiaphas.
57 The men who arrested Jesus led him to the house of Caiaphas the high priest. The teachers of the law and the older Jewish leaders were gathered there. - Matthew 26 vs 57
MARK - Jesus Christ was taken to the High Priest, Caiaphas.
53 Those who arrested Jesus led him to the house of the high priest. All the leading priests, the older Jewish leaders, and the teachers of the law were gathered there.
54 Peter followed Jesus but stayed back at a distance. He followed him to the yard of the high priest’s house. He went into the yard and sat there with the guards, warming himself by their fire.
55 The leading priests and the whole high council tried to find something that Jesus had done wrong so they could kill him. But the council could find no proof that would allow them to kill Jesus.
56 Many people came and told lies against Jesus, but they all said different things. None of them agreed. - Mark 14 vs 53 - 56
JOHN - Jesus Christ was tied and brought Him before Annas
12 Then the soldiers with their commander and the Jewish guards arrested Jesus. They tied him
13 and brought him to Annas, the father-in-law of Caiaphas. Caiaphas was the high priest that year.
14 He was also the one who had told the other Jewish leaders that it would be better if one man died for all the people
...
19 The high priest asked Jesus questions about his followers and what he taught them.
20 Jesus answered, “I have always spoken openly to all people. I always taught in the synagogues and in the Temple area. All the Jews come together there. I never said anything in secret.
21 So why do you question me? Ask the people who heard my teaching. They know what I said.”
22 When Jesus said this, one of the guards standing there hit him. The guard said, “You should not talk to the high priest like that!”
23 Jesus answered, “If I said something wrong, tell everyone here what was wrong. But if what I said is right, then why do you hit me?”
24 So Annas sent Jesus to Caiaphas the high priest. He was still tied.
- John 18 vs 12 - 14
Absolutely no contradiction in all of the passages. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie: 6:03pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
He had the ephod with him because all his priestly family has been murdered. The father of Abiathar is Ahimelech!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

His family was killed but somehow he though to take the ephod of all things that was not some sort of family property he could keep for himself as he fled for his life. Which kain yeye claim be that? undecided

Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 5:14pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ Show me where you got the questionable redacted translation from
So, you know you lied! Why else are you doing everything to stop from answering the question? undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 5:14pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
The Contradictions is clear as daylight in the OP!

Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 5:02pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ The translation you quoted is questionable and doesn't follow the Hebrew Torah translation from which the Bible/Old testament was translated. It's not saying the same thing. Below is my own quote Then below is Kobojunkie quote Where is this your quote from. What kind of Bible is that. Can you post a link?
Please stop trying to derail the conversation with unnecessary claims. My request again to you is that you please explain to me how the content of the verse that is Psalm 24 vs 1 aligns with your earlier claim which suggests that a chicken is the manifestation of the divine being. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 3:35pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ What sort of translation is this, where did you get it from? It's very different from what I posted. It's a strange one
It is saying exactly the same thing that was written in the translation you had used earlier only it uses more common or simpler English words in expressing the same detail. You can search for easy-to-read translations of Scripture. undecided

Now please explain to me how the content of the verse aligns with your earlier claim. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie:
AbuTwins:
■ There was no case of Consecrated bread with Abiathar anywhere in the Bible! Jesus replied, “Have you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry and in need? What we read is about Ahimelech and David (not Abiathar and David) as regards consecrated bread! This wss a mistake! The mistake is in the name Abiathar! Jesus mentioned Abiathar instead of Ahimelech!
■ Yes, there was no high priest among them all! He was the only one Saul was addressing which shows he is highly regarded! All of them were killed but his son survived. Hence he can latter be the priest to continue his father's line. David too knew Ahimelech was highly regarded hence he came to him for bread!
■ No! He went to meet Ahimelech! He did not just took bread like Jesus's disciples took grains of corn! As for the different types of bread, it is clearly stated in the verses in the OP. David requested for five loafs of bread! But the priest answered David, “I don’t have any ordinary bread on hand; however, there is some consecrated bread here—provided the men have kept themselves from women.”
Because he mentioned Abiathar who had no bread dealings with David anywhere in the Bible! That's a mistake. only Ahimelech had consecrated bread dealings with David!
None of this makes sense enough to warrant a response, so I will let you continue with your rambling! undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie:
AbuTwins:
Ahimelech (the son of Ahitub) is the father of Abiathar! Where did you see your own Abimelech? What you quoted in 2 Samuel 8:17 is another scribal error of the many errors in the Bible!
Once again this is false! Ahimelech is the father of Abiathar! Once again it is Ahimelech not Abimelech!
You are still largely confused by the Biblical errors!
The relationship between Ahimelech, Ahitub, and Abiathar is mentioned in the following verses in the Bible:....
By examining these verses together, it becomes clear that Ahimelech is the son of Ahitub, and Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech, establishing their familial relationship in the biblical narrative.
My Abimelech typo which is clearly not reflected in any of the references used seems to have thrown you off as I can't seem to make heads or tails of what you. Here again, is my previous post without the Abimelech typos.


AbuTwins:
■ Abiathar became a priest during the time of King David. He was the son of Ahimelech, who was the high priest at Nob. After Saul's massacre of the priests of Nob, Abiathar escaped and joined David. Abiathar then served as a priest alongside Zadok during David's reign.
■ Abiathar's father, Ahimelech, was the high priest at the time of the incident with David at Nob where David received the consecrated bread. Abiathar later succeeded his father as a priest and served alongside Zadok during the reign of King David. They both continued to serve as priests during the reign of King Solomon as well.
■ So, Abiathar was not a co-priest with his father, Ahimelech, but he did succeed him as a priest and served alongside Zadok during the reigns of David and Solomon. I think the explanation above suffices! David did related with the father as regards the consecrated bread. Jesus mentioned the son! It is a mistake! Even google can't correct this!
1. There is no truth to this claim here. Rather, what is stated in 1 Samuel 23 is that Abiathar had the ephod with him when he escaped to join David hinting at him being the High Priest at that very time since the garment belonged to the High Priest - Exodus 28.
15 David ruled over all Israel, and he made good and fair decisions for all of his people.
16 Joab son of Zeruiah was the captain over the army. Jehoshaphat son of Ahilud was the historian.
17 Zadok son of Ahitub and Ahimelech son of Abiathar were priests. Seraiah was secretary.
18 Benaiah son of Jehoiada was in charge of the Kerethites and Pelethites, and David’s sons were priests. - 2 Samuel 8 vs 15- 18
Abiathar is not recorded to have served as a priest during David's reign. Abimelech Ahimelech, son of Abiathar, is recorded to have served as a priest instead. undecided

2. There is no scriptural backing for this claim. As mentioned earlier, the one who is recorded to have had the ephod was Abiathar, son of Ahimelech. undecided

3. Wrong! Your so-called explanations contravene details contained in Scripture regarding the very same. Yes, Abimelech Ahimelech and Abiathar were more likely priests at the time in question with Abiathar, the son, as the High Priest. Again, Abiathar had the ephod with him; the ephod belonged to the high priest. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 2:34pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
Psalm 24vs1 1The earth is the LORD's, and the fulness thereof; The world, and they that dwell therein. 2For he hath founded it upon the seas, And established it upon the floods.
I am sorry but you would need to explain this one to me.
1 The earth and everything on it belong to the Lord. The world and all its people belong to him.
2 He built the earth on the water. He built it over the rivers. - Psalm 24 vs 1 - 2
How does any of the statements above contain backing for the claim you made earlier that everything on earth is a manifestation of the divine being? undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 2:05pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
∆ Read each of the post in the OP and you'll see variations and differences in many accounts!
Those are contradictions!
Your OP reads more of an attempt to nitpick than anything else while your title claims an outright contradiction exists in the accounts. Can you more specifically indicate the actual contradictions that you identified in the accounts from the Gospels? I have taken the liberty of including the dictionary definition of the word Contradiction to help you in crafting your response. undecided
con·tra·dic·tion
/ˌkäntrəˈdikSH(ə)n/
noun

a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation that are opposed to one another.
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 2:03pm On May 21, 2024
AbuTwins:
∆ So what do you do to a fool? Answer them or Do not answer them?
∆ Why did Paul have to write to the foolish Galatians when they are already foolish?
∆ You are told that you gain nothing from the conversation and you loose nothing if you choose not to answer. So you decide. undecided

2. There is no law against engaging those whom you choose to. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 1:59pm On May 21, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
Everything thing on earth is a manifestion of the divine being. That make it all a tool within a tool. Layers of tools
There is no biblical source to that claim, I am afraid. Can you for instance explain to us what divine being manifests as a chicken using Scripture?! undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Did Jesus Christ Make God look 100% Good and never Evil? by Kobojunkie: 1:58pm On May 21, 2024
Docodes:
∆ so are u saying the book of revelation is a lie?
∆ Why do people get terrified when they have encounter with Angels
1. the book of Revelations is not a lie, however, it is in utter foolishness that majority, including yourself, I suspect, apply literal interpretations to the content. Again, the problem has never been the content of the book but the mentality and mindset of the reader. undecided

2. Encounter which angel and which Demon? The God of Israel -- YHWH --- is written to have placed a seal on visions and prophets beginning almost 1900 years ago. This information is contained in that book for all to read, and the arrival of Jesus Christ, the last Prophet sent by YHWH heralded the endtime that is the last days of visions in the land. And Jesus Christ never promised to send Angels or demons to anyone of His followers. undecided

So, when people claim they encountered a demon or an angel, ask yourself what you ought to ask yourself is the source of their claim since YHWH no longer sends His angels to men and Jesus Christ never said He would send Angels to men.. lipsrsealed
RomanceRe: Psychopathic Geniuses by Kobojunkie: 6:59am On May 21, 2024
Bongadu:
A group for rare individuals who possess both a psychopathic personality and high intelligence.
Are you one of us?
Wetin you don do with your high intelligence abeg? undecided
FoodRe: Are These Apples GMO? by Kobojunkie: 5:44am On May 21, 2024
FeliciaOja:
the easiest way to know if you apple is GMO Take a bite of the apple Then keep the apple on a plate and notice if the white part turns brown If the apple is fresh then the white part will quickly turn brownish with 1 min exposure
if the apple is GMO then the white part will take time before it turns brownish around 3 to 5 mins normal apples when you bite them within a min the white part turn browinsh so GMO industries came up with a modified apple that you can bite and it wont turn brown quickly
those ones are GMO and of course they have chemicals that prevent natural bacteria breakdown the apple
thats why the white part stays white for a long time
if the natural bacterias in the air cannot decompose a food quickly then the bacterias inside your gut will not be able to decompose it and you end up eating shaft and chemicals which piles up to cancer.
Nonsense conclusions! undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie:
AbuTwins:
■ Abiathar became a priest during the time of King David. He was the son of Ahimelech, who was the high priest at Nob. After Saul's massacre of the priests of Nob, Abiathar escaped and joined David. Abiathar then served as a priest alongside Zadok during David's reign.
■ Abiathar's father, Ahimelech, was the high priest at the time of the incident with David at Nob where David received the consecrated bread. Abiathar later succeeded his father as a priest and served alongside Zadok during the reign of King David. They both continued to serve as priests during the reign of King Solomon as well.
■ So, Abiathar was not a co-priest with his father, Ahimelech, but he did succeed him as a priest and served alongside Zadok during the reigns of David and Solomon. I think the explanation above suffices! David did related with the father as regards the consecrated bread. Jesus mentioned the son! It is a mistake! Even google can't correct this!
1. There is no truth to this claim here. Ahimelech, son of Ahitub, was never addressed as one who had the honor of the High Priest either by Doeb or by Saul in 1 Samuel 22. Rather, what is stated in 1 Samuel 23 is that Abiathar had the ephod with him when he escaped to join David hinting at him being the High Priest at that very time since the garment belonged only to the High Priest - Exodus 28.
15 David ruled over all Israel, and he made good and fair decisions for all of his people.
16 Joab son of Zeruiah was the captain over the army. Jehoshaphat son of Ahilud was the historian.
17 Zadok son of Ahitub and Ahimelech son of Abiathar were priests. Seraiah was secretary.
18 Benaiah son of Jehoiada was in charge of the Kerethites and Pelethites, and David’s sons were priests. - 2 Samuel 8 vs 15- 18
Abiathar, son of Ahimelech, is not recorded to have served as a priest during David's reign. Abimelech, son of Abiathar is recorded to have served as a priest instead alongside Zadok, son of Ahitub, who may have been Abiathar, son of Ahimelech's uncle. undecided

2. There is no scriptural backing for this claim. As mentioned earlier, the one who is recorded to have had the ephod was Abiathar, son of Ahimelech. undecided

3. Wrong! Your so-called explanations contravene details contained in Scripture regarding the very same. Yes, Abimelech and Abiathar were more likely priests at the time in question with Abiathar, the son, as the High Priest. Again, Abiathar had the ephod with him; the ephod belonged to the high priest. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: This Is Why Satan And His Demonic Spirits Are Obsessed With Blood Sacrifice by Kobojunkie: 3:50am On May 21, 2024
petertamtam6:
I need more of this revelation..... Do you have telegram channel, you can send it
You mean you want more of the OP's lies, right? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Christianity EtcRe: Abiathar The Priest Or Ahimelek The Priest? Another Biblical Error! by Kobojunkie:
AbuTwins:
■ Jesus quoted David and Abiathar the Priest as regards consecrated bread! But Jesus made a mistake as he should have mentioned Ahimelek the Priest who is the father of Abiathar!
■ And more so, David didn't just enter the house of God and started eating! He requested for ordinary bread and when that wasn't available he opted for consecrated bread!
■ Jesus was portrayed to have made a mistake mentioning Abiathar the Priest instead of Ahimelek the Priest who happens to be the father of the former!
1. Jesus Christ stated that the High Priest at the time the event took place was Abiathar, not Ahimelek.
25 Jesus answered, “You have read what David did when he and the people with him were hungry and needed food.
26 It was during the time of Abiathar the high priest. David went into God’s house and ate the bread that was offered to God. And the Law of Moses says that only priests can eat that bread. David also gave some of the bread to the people with him.” - Mark 2 vs 25 - 26
Why should Jesus Christ not have mentioned the High Priest at the time? Why do you choose to rule that out as a mistake on Jesus's part? undecided

King Saul is recorded in the book of Samuel to have executed Ahimelech, and if you read the passage below, you would note that Saul never addresses Ahimelech, or any of the priests with him, as High priest but merely as priests. Even Doeg, the Edomite, mentioned him as being a priest, not a High Priest. undecided
11 Then King Saul ordered some men to bring the priest to him. Saul told them to bring Ahimelech son of Ahitub and all his relatives who were priests at Nob. So all of them came to the king.
12 Saul said to Ahimelech, “Listen now, son of Ahitub.” Ahimelech answered, “Yes, sir.”
13 Saul said to him, “Why did you and Jesse’s son make secret plans against me? You gave David bread and a sword. You prayed to God for him. And right now, David is waiting to attack me.”
14 Ahimelech answered, “David is very faithful to you. Not one of your other officers is as faithful as David. He is your own son-in-law and the captain of your bodyguards. Your own family respects David.
15 That was not the first time I prayed to God for David. Not at all! Don’t blame me or any of my relatives. We are your servants. I know nothing about what is happening.”
16 But the king said, “Ahimelech, you and all your relatives must die.”
17 Then the king told the guards at his side, “Go and kill the priests of the Lord because they are on David’s side too. They knew he was running away, but they didn’t tell me.” The king’s officers refused to hurt the priests of the Lord.
18 So the king gave the order to Doeg. Saul said, “Doeg, you go kill the priests.” So Doeg the Edomite went and killed the priests. That day he killed 85 men who were priests.
19 Nob was the city of the priests. Doeg killed all the people of Nob. He used his sword and killed men, women, children and small babies. He even killed their cattle, donkeys, and sheep.
20 But Abiathar son of Ahimelech escaped. He ran away and joined David.
21 Abiathar told David that Saul had killed the Lord’s priests.
22 Then David told Abiathar, “I saw Doeg the Edomite at Nob that day. I knew he would tell Saul! I am responsible for the death of your father’s family.
23 Stay with me. Don’t be afraid, because the man who tried to kill you is the same man who wants to kill me. I will protect you if you stay with me.” - 1 Samuel 22 vs 11 - 23
Saul did not regard Ahimelech as the High priest neither did Doeb. undecided

2. The story clearly says that David went into the House of God— not a bakery or kitchen where there were options — and ate bread that was consecrated for God. Where do you get this notion that there are different kinds of bread available to eat in the house of God? undecided

3. Why should Christ's mention of the High Priest be considered an error? undecided

Christianity EtcRe: Tackling And Changing Your Dreamlife Through Prayer (A Must Read, Don't Miss It) by Kobojunkie: 11:59pm On May 20, 2024
David0002:
■ If you are having sex in the dream, it shows you are possessed with water spirit. Seeing snake or python in the dream also indicates you have connection with marine spirit. With this kind of dream, you can't progress in life. You need serious prayers.
When oyinbo have the same sexual dreams, they perceive them as merely due to sex hormones working through their body, which is pretty normal for most beginning in adulthood. They accept this and move on with their lives without creating for themselves useless struggles and issues. However, when Africans have same-sex dreams, they conclude it has to do with spirits especially possessing them, and from there they create phobias and anxieties that follow most of them for many years afterward, many ending up afraid of even their shadows while others never acquire sexual discipline and maturity that adults are expected to have as a result. WOW! lipsrsealed lipsrsealed lipsrsealed
Christianity EtcRe: God Caused Aaron's Staff To Bud With New Life. by Kobojunkie: 11:51pm On May 20, 2024
FatherCHRISTMAS:
From what I have observed about creation or bringing forth new life, nothing is ever dead. Some people like to refer to Aaron's staff as "dead rod". We'll perhaps because it was just a rod and had no branches to bring forth life.
But when Yahweh spoke and gave instructions, Aaron's rod didn't just sprout buds; it brought forth flowers and fruit, a clear demonstration of the power of the One who gives life.Yahweh
Moses, as a shepherd, had a rod in his hand too when tending sheep in the wilderness (Exodus 4:2). This rod later became known as the rod of God (Exodus 4:20), a symbol of the authority God gave to Moses.
This means there has to be a tool in your hand the most high can breath his miracles into for the world to see how marvelous he is.
This is all untrue since the same most high never said, later in His Law, that He needed any tools in the hands of any man for Him to work wonder in and through His own. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 11:47pm On May 20, 2024
AbuTwins:
CONTRADICTIONS
Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be like him. Proverbs 26:4
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he become wise in his own eyes. Proverbs 26:5
That ain't an example of a contradiction!
1 Just as snow should not fall in summer, nor rain at harvest time, so people should not honor a fool.
2 Don’t worry when someone curses you for no reason. Nothing bad will happen. Such words are like birds that fly past and never stop.
3 You have to whip a horse, you have to put a bridle on a mule, and you have to beat a fool.
4-5 There is no good way to answer fools when they say something stupid. If you answer them, then you, too, will look like a fool. If you don’t answer them, they will think they are smart. - Proverbs 26 vs 1 - 5
Language comprehension problems on your part should not be blamed on the text. undecided
Christianity EtcRe: Contradictions In The Biblical Trials Of Jesus by Kobojunkie: 11:41pm On May 20, 2024
AbuTwins:
■ Here is a summary of the trials of Jesus and his responses according to each of the four Gospels:....
When comparing the accounts of Jesus' trials as depicted in the four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), some of the main differences include:
Number of Trials:
The Gospels differ in the number of trials Jesus faced, with variations in the sequence and participants involved in the trial scenes.
Accusations:
The specific charges brought against Jesus vary across the Gospels, ranging from blasphemy to claims of political insurrection, reflecting different emphases in the narratives.
Responses of Jesus:
Jesus' responses to the accusations and questioning vary in tone and content, highlighting different aspects of his identity and mission in each Gospel account.
Role of Pontius Pilate:
The portrayal of Pontius Pilate and his involvement in the trials differs among the Gospels, with variations in his interactions with Jesus and decisions regarding Jesus' fate.
Crowd Involvement:
The role of the crowd in the trial scenes varies, with some Gospels emphasizing the crowd's demand for Jesus' crucifixion while others focus on different aspects of the narrative.
Locations and Settings:
The locations and settings of the trials are depicted differently in each Gospel, contributing to variations in the overall narrative and context of the trial scenes.
Theological Emphases:
Each Gospel writer emphasizes different theological themes and messages in their accounts of Jesus' trials, shaping the portrayal of the events to suit their intended audience and purpose.
It's like there are many Jesus in the Bible!
Can you more specifically indicate the actual contradictions that you identified in the accounts from the Gospels? I have taken the liberty of including the dictionary definition of the word Contradiction to help you in crafting your response. undecided
con·tra·dic·tion
/ˌkäntrəˈdikSH(ə)n/
noun

a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation that are opposed to one another.
Christianity EtcRe: Did Jesus Christ Make God look 100% Good and never Evil? by Kobojunkie: 8:43pm On May 20, 2024
Michael547:
😁😁😁you are a very funny person.
You can tell yourself that. undecided

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 (of 3863 pages)