₦airaland Forum

FatherCHRISTMAS:
∆ Who created the chicken?

God created everything that is. So?

Michael547:
■ So where is written in the bible that the devil is 'God's quality control manager' and that the 'devil has been preprogrammed by God' and that the 'devil cannot go against the will of God'?
■ All these things that you were teaching me in the other thread. Where are the verses in the bible to support these claims that you made since the bible does not need interpretation?

I never said it is written. What I instead said that Scripture sort of depicts Satan as God's quality control manager.

Kobojunkie:
Scripture has Satan as sort of God's quality control manager of some sort. He tests all men under God's Law to see if they are worthy of God's approval or not. Even the righteous, including Jesus Christ, were not spared.

But I see that honesty is indeed far from your kind.

2. Again, stop with the desperate attempts to derail the conversation. Where is it written in Scripture that all that is contained in it REQUIRES Interpretation? If not written, why do you suggest then that such a thing as a true interpretation exists?

FatherCHRISTMAS:
∆ Do you understand what manifestation means?

Oh, I do. So, answer the question please. Explain how a chicken is a manifestation of the divine.

Michael547:
😁😁😁😁...so what is written in the book has no interpretation?

Why does it require an interpretation? Where is it written in Scripture that all that is contained in it REQUIRES Interpretation?

FatherCHRISTMAS:
∆ I know you got my explanation and understand the message because it was simple and straightforward.
∆ Regardless, you show know quantum particles or whatever you call it are just trying to give an explanation to what is already existing. Can they replicate the events? No they can't so that doesn't mean there isn't divine maker in charge.

I don't speak religious gobbledegook so there is absolutely no way I could ever understand or get any ambiguous messages you intend for me to process. Again, the request is simple. Explain by way of Scripture exactly how a chicken is a manifestation of the the divine. Posting randomly lifted and unrelated text is not what I asked of you.

2. I didn't mention them so you can go offer on a tangent abeg! I asked how pointing out that they exist --- invisible particles that make up most everything out there including chickens --- explains how a chicken is a manifestation of the divine? That is still on track with my original question to you.

Gboom:
∆ How miserable you are

Oh, i am miserable before i have never been conned by humans pretending to be gods? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Aemmyjah:
■ 😂 Go and do further research on the meaning of the Greek Preposition epi
When you're done, come back with junkies

The blindness is surely strong with this one!

AbuTwins:
■ Chai! See Kobo is coping and capping o!
Here is the context again:“Look,” Peter replied, “we have left everything to follow You. What then will there be for us?” Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, in the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on His glorious throne, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Matthew 19:27-28
More so, the apostles Jesus appointed and sent out were just 12 in Matthew 10:2-4
These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him. Jesus specifically told Peter on his asking!
Stop capping and coping!

Not only are you the one doing the capping and coping but also cherry-picking in a desperate attempt to make sense of what you realize by now does not!

Peter asked the question he did about those of them who had left everything to follow Him, not the first 12 disciples alone. We is a reference directly by Peter to merely the first 12 but instead to those of them who have abandoned everything to follow Jesus Christ. The first 12 disciples recorded in Scripture were not the only ones who were expected to do so since EVERY SINGLE one who wishes to follow Jesus Christ is required by Jesus Christ to do the same.

Aemmyjah:
Mark 2 NWT But he said to them: “Have you never read what David did when he was in need and he and the men with him were hungry? 26 How, in the account about A·biʹa·thar the chief priest, he entered into the house of God and ate the loaves of presentation, which it is not lawful for anybody to eat except the priests, and he also gave some to the men who were with him?
Pidgin
For the story about A·bi′a·thar wey be chief priest, una no read about how David enter the house of God and chop the bread wey them put as offering to God, something wey nobody get the right to chop except the priests, and e still give some to the men wey dey with-am?”

Your particular kind of delusion is likely beyond mediation!

tunene66:
■ There are a couple of differences between Jesus’s quotation of Isaiah 61:1 in Luke 4:18 and the normal translation of Isaiah 61 based on the Hebrew Bible. For one, Jesus omits “He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted” (something present in the Greek text as well). He also prefers the Septuagint (Greek Old Testament, LXX) to the Masoretic text (Hebrew manuscript) when He cites “recovery of sight to the blind.” There is still one more change, one we will notice tomorrow. See if you can find it in Luke 4:18!
As usual, we’ll take a look at the words used in the Greek and Hebrew and see how the word “blind” is used throughout Luke’s gospel account.
[By the way, here is Isaiah 61:1 in the LXX for you so that you can compare it to your Old Testament and Jesus’s citation of it: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, on account of which he has anointed me; he has sent me to bring good news to the poor, to heal those who are crushed in heart, to announce release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind…” (Isaiah 61:1).]

I think all of this is really unnecessary gobbledegook on your part. The passage you quoted from states that at the Synagogue, Jesus Christ was given a copy of the book of Isaiah to read from, and that is what He did.

16 Jesus traveled to Nazareth, the town where he grew up. On the Sabbath day he went to the synagogue as he always did. He stood up to read.
17 The book of Isaiah the prophet was given to him. He opened the book and found the place where this is written:
18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me. He has chosen me to tell the good news to the poor. He sent me to tell prisoners that they are free and to tell the blind that they can see again. He sent me to free those who have been treated badly
19 and to announce that the time has come for the Lord to show his kindness.”
20 Jesus closed the book, gave it back to the helper, and sat down. As everyone in the synagogue watched him closely,
21 he began to speak to them. He said, “While you heard me reading these words just now, they were coming true!” - Luke 4 vs 16 - 21

The passage does not say Jesus Christ chose the book or particular manuscript to read. It instead states that Jesus Christ read from the book that was given to Him and gave it back after He was done. Simple!

sagitariusbaby:
A handsome Nigeria man is about getting married to his boyfriend in the US. According to a close source, all is set for the wedding which is me at to be a talk of the town affair.
It is said that his parents who are based in Nigeria are in full support of the union.

Congratulations to the couple!

JustPowerApps:
■ Your gender is never mindful of spending guys money E reach your turn now you are mindful, yeye!

Why should they be mindful of spending someone else's money, especially a freebie? Why should you expect a third party, not even employed by your person, to be mindful about the spending of what is your own money? You no get shame say you dey even reason things like this?

Gboom:
■ E be like say some fake pastors don swindle you wella so tey you no dey regard them again

Not even on your life!

Sijo01:
■ Unfortunately, she didn't realize anything. He threw her and her things out remember? If he hasn't done that, she will still be enduring all the abuse until she pays with her life

No mind am!

nnekaobianuju:
this woman is traumatized and now hardened she has kept quiet for a very long timewhat could I do to warrant this. did he catch me with any man? is he not the father of my kids.abeg you don't have talk .he just want to push me and the children away because of property sharing after divorce after nineteen years of struggling with him from pauper to affluence. He can do anything for money and property. I want divorce over adultery by him and cultism and domestic violence but he said he will divorce but will not give shi shi be it money or property to me and kids. That's y he did this- eviction

What did her silence which seems a sign of her allegiance and loyalty in marriage to the described community dick profit her in the end?

nurusystem:
Some pastors na scam

All Pastors are scammers!

KnowledgePower7:
Another example is one babe that received 50k pocket money from her boyfriend
I was with her when she received the alert As we gisted and waited for bus to come We wait ooo No bus. We decided to enter Keke So I ask Keke how much, he said 200 each This girl said nooo it's 150 naira. Me sef wey no hold much cash accepted. But to my surprise, she left the Keke and said she can't pay 200 naira for a journey that cost 150. I was so shocked Someone with 50k plus refuse to pay 200 naira Just 50 naira difference. Omo Nigerian women are too stingy

Being wise about how one spends one's own money is not stinginess @OP, you should try it!

KnowledgePower7:
Whenever a woman cries for financial help on Social media. It is Only men that help. Only Men. I have never ever ever seen women contribute to help their fellow woman. Why?? A lady on X has C S operation to give birth
And pleaded massively for help!! 98% of those that responded are men. Despite this woman having more female friends on social media.
So I ask again and again Why are Nigerian women so Stingy? Why??

I don't know about you @OP, but I wouldn't be stupid enough to give such a woman money either. Why? What the Bleep did she get pregnant for without first making certain she had money enough for the pregnancy and emergencies. Maybe the Nigerian women you described were simply being wise with their money.

idahme:
■ Equality woman, I hope u support the wife to bring 50 percent of family expenses? If no then your line of arguments is null and void. Equality without equality in financial responsibility is zero equality.

The way some of una dey reason ehn... it dey always astound!

When did this become a debate of equality? Do men who are married to women who bring 50% never cheat? Do men married to women who are breadwinners never cheat? What is this abeg!

Michael547:
■Who has the correct interpretation of what is in the scripture in the world today?

There is no such thing as a correct interpretation of Scripture in the same way as there is no such thing as a correct interpretation of Grant's Anatomy! There is simply what is written in the book and what is not written in the book.

With well over 47,000 interpretations of Scripture by the Christians, none of which aligns with that which is stated in Scripture, there is more than enough room for ideas such as these. Anyone who denies this does so out of prejudice and nothing more.

AbuTwins:
■ So can you tell me the 12th disciple Jesus promised to rule with him or Jesus made another blunder?

Your major problem, same as that of the Christians before you, is that you think it makes sense to inject your privately held delusions between the lines of Scripture as if some unwritten rule you are to adhere to no matter what and are convinced it makes sense to do it. I am afraid it is the ultra mark of the ignorant and deluded.

Jesus Christ's response clearly did not indicate that it was only His first 12 disciples who had followed Him and He never said only the first 12 would sit on the thrones described. (He is recorded to have had at least 72 disciples in the same Gospel and about 500 at the time of His death.) So why would someone who at least went through and possibly completed even English comprehension courses in school jump to such a conclusion if not out of ignorance?

FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ this is hilarious, why will you even question if the divine being manifests through the things he has made? So you mean the chicken or Phasianidae just existed without any order of creation?

You are not the divine but one trying to peddle lies using his mention. Again, how is the divine manifested in a chicken?

FatherCHRISTMAS:
■ So even tho I have given you a conscise answer to this, it won't hurt to explain more.
In Hebrews 11:3 it says, "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible
That is YHWH manifesting through words to call into being. In Genesis too, God created all living things in the sea and every kind of bird that flies in the air. I hope this is clear enough about the chicken

Yet more ambiguous nonsense! The verse you quoted does not even come close to answering the question I asked which is how the divine is manifested in a chicken. If you are attempting to convince me that because there are invisible quantum particles in every item and object in this world, then you folks are really truly utterly just full of sheets!

AbuTwins:
■ So why did Jesus mentioned Abiathar if he is not concerned with him? Anyways, it is a blunder!
And David didn't just enter the house of God to take bread! He requested for it. Jesus disciples didn't make any requests. They were just taking the crops!Really dumb mistake you'll agree with me!

The only dumb mistake here is you thinking it was your place to decide whether He could reference the High priest of the time instead of the actual priest David interacted with at that time or not. I get now you are merely desperate to find yourself ways to discredit Scripture but your attempts even a kindergartner would consider ridiculous. Are there contradictions in the book? Yes! These attempts of yours to invent them though show you no smart at all.

Sapasenator:
∆ My paternal grandfather had a serious quarrel with his wife and just disliked her. My dad as an only child took side with his mother against the father and he was instantly cut off by his own father.
When he was near death, he sold off all his houses and have out money to his kinsmen making sure my dad could not get a dime. He was very rich but stopped my dad from going to the secondary school in those days.
Years later, we realized my dad's mom was a very bad person who manipulated her son against his father.
That was the reason I changed my last name after my dad told me the story. Wtf !

Your granddad abandoned his own child simply because he picked his mother over him? Does it make sense that a sensible caretaker would do such a thing? No matter how bad the mother may have been, there is no excuse for what your granddad did to his own son. Imagine a supposed grown up holding a grudge.until death against his own son? Tufiakwa!!;

Creamypie:
on another note, y do women brainwash children into believing they are the ones paying the bills, and not the dad. y is it that in the event of separation, divorce the children go with their mum, begin to suffer, bearing in mind their mothers have turned em to her side thinking she's the bread winner? On the basis of the above and others not listed, y are u complaining about abandonment

So are we to believe then that it is ok to abandon/discard your children once you feel they have been brainwashed?

Jokerman:
∆ Jesus went to help to preach and remohe many people from hell.

∆ Hell (the abyss of fire) is the abode of Devil and the fallen angels. Any person who rejects the power of salvation Jesus Christ offers is heading there to be with his master Satan.
∆ Lake of Fire is worse than hell, because Satan, his angels, etc, will be more tortured

When did Jesus Christ do what you claim?

2. Where Jesus Christ abi who talk this one abeg?

3. More tortured ke? Where did you obtain this claim from? Hope not a book of dreams/visions?

AbuTwins:
The Contradictions is clear as daylight in the OP!
- **Charges**:
- **Matthew**: The false witnesses accuse Jesus of threatening to destroy the temple.
- **Mark**: The witnesses' testimonies are inconsistent and do not agree.
- **Luke**: The witnesses' testimonies are not recorded.
- **John**: Jesus is questioned about His disciples and His teachings.

Once again, I am glad I had indicated that you pay close attention to the dictionary definition of the word Contradiction as right from the very first compilation it is clear that you have a hard time grasping the meaning well.

Clearly, even in this case, you did not find any contradictions so why assert a contradiction?

con·tra·dic·tion
/ˌkäntrəˈdikSH(ə)n/
noun
▶ a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation that are opposed to one another.

---

LeeMason:
■ They died while working in the recording studio located along Transformer Road in Amarata axis of Yenagoa.
The young men in the studio were working from night to morning using their generator but may have fallen asleep and forgot to switch off the generator.
The generator was kept inside and the studio had no ventilation
Six of them were discovered dead in the morning, while one of the victims who was unconscious was rushed to the hospital where he later gave up the ghost. The owner of the studio, a popular producer named Akpos Barakubo AKA SlimKelz was among the deceased

Poor kids!

LilMissFavvy:
■ Family should arrest the husband for questioning asap. Was she living in marital turbulence, yet pretending/smiling? Did he infect her with an incurable ailment? What caused her depression?
■ Or did she have any genetic health challenge? She looks beautiful and healthy, so what caused a depression bad enough to make a mother decide to abandon her children and kill her$elf? Nothing is adding up, her family should do the needful. Start with the husband and get information from her children.

The problem with all of this is she was an adult, and as such, responsible for her own mental and emotional well-being. If she was having a hard time in the marriage, she had every right and time to choose her mental well-being and sanity over it all.

2. Depression does not care how good you look or how well you smile in pictures. So long as the man did not kill her, there is nothing they can do.

Babangidapikin:
Mscheew such a fine woman ...why Suicide

DEPRESSION!!!