Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 10:55pm On May 13, 2015*. Modified: 12:44am On May 14, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: These pseudo-feminists are continually flawed and floored in arguments against widely-read people. I pity them though. I prefer to take on CHIMAMANDA ADICHIE - their mentor- daily on her Facebook page. Ofcourse, the delusional hypocrite never replies so I, along with a select few 'assassins,' continually 'slay' her teeming disciples on and offline.
I actually hope there'll turn up here - I want to go for the 'kill'.
Chimamanda is just trying to sell her books and if it means adopting a stance and ideology that she herself doesn't even fully grasp, all in a vain attempt to appear westernised, be controversial and remain relevant. I don't blame her though. The young woman is only trying to eat and fend for herself. The most pitiable people are the jobless androids, doltish housewives (MrsShitma)and inane wet teenage girls that literally know nowt about the movement save for they learnt two weeks ago from tv.. they are littered higgledy piggledy all over the forum forming bosses ..  |
Romance › Re: Miss Nairaland Contest 2015 {campaign Thread} by kradleber: 10:25pm On May 13, 2015 |
stephenqueen: Am good ....Up juventus  Juventus did well this evening and I'm waving their flag just for this night, because in few weeks time the solidarity and affinity for those Italians(Rosonerri) would end. And then my indomitable MSN would decapitate them brutally in Berlin...and Messi would graciously win the Balon d'or for the fifth time... Meanwhile before Messi and Barcelona wins all of that... Tohpahz would win MissNL first... So y'all should vote Tohpahz as Miss NL 2015
|
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 10:14pm On May 13, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: You see, you admitted that BEFORE MEN [b] YOU ARE NOTHING BUT AN OBJECT FOR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION (WHICH CAN BE DISPOSED OFF)
There goes your feministic principle(s) - out the window . [/b] • Grandiose.. That's what I told the thot some hours ago. A mere baby-factory and Mr Chima's overweight fu¢king machine is all she is .  at least not until she learns the meaning of word 'bisexual' and input some knowledge in her sloppy and slobbering self , I can't even take her serious.. |
European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) › Re: Fc Barcelona Fan Thread: "més Que Un Club" by kradleber: 10:07pm On May 13, 2015 |
Krasid: Stop hallucinating bro The leprechaun is not winning the treble/ballon d'or. Ronaldo will lead Madrid to UCL glory, probably scoring one of his trademark headers in the final and would retain the ballon d'or .The UCL is all we have to play for, you seriously think we would let that slip away. I told you I'd reply fully after the match. @bold1 :- We now know who's really hallucinating and day dreaming. @bold2 :- Ronaldo netted a penalty but unfortunately it wasn't enough to see you through to the finals like you envisaged and prophesized. Moral of the tale: Its a trophyless and barren season for both Ronaldo, Madrid and Madridistas .Meanwhile Messi is winning the balon d'or for the fifth time and a well deserved treble. If you still think that Ronaldo is winning the Balon d'or this year then I have nothing to say to you other than you need a thorough psychiatric examination .  |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 9:53pm On May 13, 2015*. Modified: 12:37am On May 14, 2015 |
MrsChima: According to dumb asses...if you are a feminist you shouldn't take your spouse's name! 
Beyonce, a feminist married to a wealthy Black American man and added his sutname....she is still the same many money feminist that can buy all these broke niggas on NL.
I hope any of these dumb asses dony marry a woman who won't take their surname because they will come on NL bishing like bleeding bishes!  Many of these manbishes think hurling insults will change ANYTHING and dismantled Feminism! Manbishes repeat the same shit and rally each other for strength! Why would they need strength to battle WOMEN?!  Heck yeah... .. Beyonce is dumber than you are.. Just an Illuminati puppet shaking butt and getting naked on screen for money. There are many elite and sensible feminists you could have used as analogy, but you chose to mention Jay Z's B1tch.. Please go and sleep ... any way.. Madrid are out of champions league  |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 9:42pm On May 13, 2015*. Modified: 12:35am On May 14, 2015 |
MrsChima: Why are you mad? Why does it bother you so? If you want to know about me personally just ask. No need to write in big fonts to gather my attebtion.
You think hurling insults will get me to deactivate my account? Ha!
I have been insulted by notorious and infamous male insulters and I am still here. I have been here a long time and you are a non-factor.
Since you are so obsessed with my moniker....I don't just have my husband's name dumb ass. What does Feminism have to do with a moniker? Did your man or woman tell you that they won't take your surname?
What does your shitty life have to do with me •Chronicles of a scatterbrained Imbe¢ile. African feminists are the most misinformed and confused Homosapiens in the four corners of the world. Lemme tell you what's laughable.. The fact that you are a fake ass wannabe feminist and yet your online monicker defeats the purpose.. Shows how clueless you are. MRS Shitma indeed.  |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 4:16pm On May 13, 2015*. Modified: 12:23am On May 14, 2015 |
MrsChima: This gay bish is pained.  • Would I still be considered gay when my meaty ostrich dumps some milky fluid in your anal walls.. Oponu oshi I bet if I took you to the zoo, they'd reward me handsomely for bringing back a missing Ape .. You look like Daddyshowkey had a daughter and forgot about her.. leprechaun. |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 4:07pm On May 13, 2015 |
Teempakguy: [color=orange]congratulations to every one who has been a part of this so far. I must say, the romance section is giving me many pleasant surprises and as such, I think everyone involved deserves a thumbs up.however, do not make this a gender thread. It's not going to end well for anyone . . . seeing as then majority of the females available are few and that their personal characteristics might provoke a fight.
I'd also like to suggest penalizing insults, discrimination, intimidation of the opposing group, and in general, any behavior that goes against the original rules of nairaland. Funlord! Keep it in check abeg. Also, kradleber . . . . chill. Also, I suggest allowing the contestants to use media and links anytime it may buttress their points. Statistics, wikipedia, infographics and even quotes from famous people. Provided they can be verified by third parties and, in appropriate situations, documentable.
Cc.naijab.oiy, ronald4 lif, sonofm.ark. [/color] What did I do? |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 1:33pm On May 13, 2015 |
VictoriaBee: Indeed and In truth.
Georgia kor, Georgina ni!   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 1:11pm On May 13, 2015 |
Borrussia: Nope, I'm now an undercover. Chuck Bartowski |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 1:08pm On May 13, 2015 |
VictoriaBee: MrsChima Mizmycoli Luxanne Missclassy etc
Family section women!  Mrschima shouldn't even be allowed anywhere within the perimeters of this thread. That thot is dumber than a Chinese Hamster. |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 12:55pm On May 13, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: Krad, why do so desperately want to make me duel it out? Just to confirm your claims that ThesonóMark enjoys e-fights? Yes, in a (type)written debate spellings are a necessary criterion (if you've ever participated in one). Then again, those are MY REPLIED SUGGESTIONS to what Naijaboiy asked. YOU HAVEN'T EVEN MADE A SINGLE SUGGESTION ALL THROUGH.
If you really want to e-duel against me, why not tag me in the Derailers' thread? Or maybe we would both be in opposing teams when the debates really commence? Let's see who really would floor the other .
I gave you two options; take up the challenge- KRADLEBER VERSUS THESONÒFMARK. PROVE HOW GOOD YOU ARE...OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE.
Stop derailing, would you? •Lmfao ! I told you before to opt out of school and join the circus . You could be the next Zip the Pinhead or maybe the next Emmet Kelly.  Point is- You are a natural comedian! .. why are you wasting your talents? • I don't wanna you brawl verbally……okay, maybe I do but i wanna do it differently and cremate you with brash barrage of words and cynical punchlines .at least i got this week off Fu¢k the generic back and forths and the regular disses.. ...let's do 'yo mama' instead . a thread is created where i slaughter and brutalize your momma remorselessly and effortlessly with double entendres and Priest Imhotep like one-liners.. accept the call out coward  |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 12:43pm On May 13, 2015 |
funlord: na by error I buy am oh! He grew up in my hood so na hood solidarity! I regret die You grew up in Atlanta, Georgia? |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 12:41pm On May 13, 2015 |
Borrussia: Borrussia is a term on its own. And I know you're sharwama. Alright.. Roger that. I was thinking you got bored and left the forum for good. |
|
|
|
|
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 12:17pm On May 13, 2015 |
I can't believe the word "P1mp'' is also censored on nairaland, and it automatically changes to Love-vendor unless its spelt incorrectly intentionally.
Na wa ooo, even my 13/14 year old cousins know what P1mp means..what's the point exactly with these whole censoring palava when the so called kids can without stuttering a bit rap out a kabilion profane slangs offhand already? Is this MTV base or what? .. Even Twitter is a bigger site and they don't censor foul words.. . smh for nl |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 12:10pm On May 13, 2015 |
funlord:
Me sef 4 prefer the freestyles! This young thug album don tire me! I need some NL flows! You listen to yung thug? ! Bill gates offered him millions to quit rapping. what does that tell you? That dude is an epitome and embodiment of wackness and illiteracy. Go download Kendrick Lamar's new album instead ( P1mp a butterfly) |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 11:59am On May 13, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: I think spontaneity would give it dynamism. You know, on-the-spot cognizance, analysis and rationalization of facts to support or oppose an argument in real time. More like an aptitude test.
Example: Monikers which have been divided into two teams are notified to be present online at a fixed time. When they all indicate they are online by that time, the topic to be debated on is unveiled and ,since they know which team they each belong to beforehand, a time limit is set for the teams to present their arguments.
A fixed score might be set for each attribute of their arguments. PARAMETERS SUCH AS STATED BELOW (BUT NOT LIMITED TO IT) COULD BE USED TO SCORE;
1. OPENING = 1O MARKS
2. ARTICULATION OF POINTS= 10 MARKS
3. SPELLINGS= 10 MARKS
4. CONCLUSION= 10 MARKS Since it is a debate, ensuring the aforelisted could boast the scores of debaters who are diligent. Cc: Falconey KradLeber
Before I say anything I just wanna ask if you have ever envisaged yourself during your quiet time as a successful comedian I can't even comment lengthily, your no.3 judging criterion is funnier than the stupidest scene in Horrible bosses 2 .. lol ..Thesonofthemark ..what has 'Spellings' have to with a Romance sect. debate that revolves mainly around relationship issues? more ridiculous is that it carries 10 points .. Is this a spelling bee or English class or a grammar contest? . smh I don't concur to this |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 11:46am On May 13, 2015 |
agarawu23: I know you will never agree with my point but I still insist on my point.
its no more news that majority will carry the vote from ppl's nominations. I read the thread from page 0-8 before dropping my opinion.
Even you yourself understand what I am saying but I will not talk much cos I don't want to prolong on this issue
you once made a statement "my candidate alws win" while campaigning for your candidate( and that's where my point is exactly) you guys are biased on this forum, you know the truth but you will refuse to talk. the poll is all about familiarity/popularity, lot of ppl know that but will remain dumb forever if they are here to worship one moniker or the other.
I know its a nomination list, but are we going to cry over a split milk if the vote eventually favours the wrong monikers? OK I don hear.
you are assuring us a perfect program whereas you yourself is one of the bias monikers here
let's expect the best from you guys. You must be a troll. This whole exercise is no where near the word "biased'. You need to take the ALS (Ice bucket challenge), clean your cornea and reread what the o.p said this thread was for. The judges haven't even been voted yet! Are you even smart at all? If the poll is about familiarity and popularity then why is everyone allowed to nominate whomever he/she wants? or why didn't the organiser simply appoint specific people himself instead of making it more or less a round table discussion ? stop breeding rumours with no foundations and don't ruin this fun for us. |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 11:14am On May 13, 2015 |
funlord: Na so? Ever heard about 5th columnists! Prior knowledge should NOT be an option! I think it should be this time around .. My disposition when the thread is created may not be appropriate and adequate enough to engage in a verbal duel, even if I have the better materials and much more valid points, i could still lose sorely to a contestant with weaker points but who's was more settled and in the right frame when the thread was created...so I think we should be giving a lil' time to prepare . I mean, we are not freestyle rapping or are we ?  |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 11:09am On May 13, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: For me, I wouldn't be bothered if anyone has prior knowledge of the topics since I'm confident of my grasp of world issues.
I never asked whether you are bothered or not Mister Braggadocio after all you're only participating as a judge. Coming up with points spontaneously every split second on a thread is never gonna be absolutely coherent. There'd be a lot of typos and grammatical shananigans if i may say and etcetera . And no matter how well you think you're a mobile Kemet Library, the points you'd outline on the fly can never be as well articulated as that of the pal who took the pain and time to cross-check,over-edit, and add that touch of finesse to his written.. I prefer Perfectionism and thank goodness naijaboiy has said we'd be given prep time.. |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 10:53am On May 13, 2015 |
naijaboiy: [color=#1980BC]Topics will be given before hand to ensure adequate preparation of points and ideas.
The teams against each other will select topic most befitting to them amongst the ones which they were given.
[/color] Okay.. If the topics are gonna be given beforehand, its fine. it takes nowt from the entire exercise. |
Romance › Re: The Official Romance Section Debate: (preparation Thread) by kradleber: 10:45am On May 13, 2015 |
TheSonOfMark: It should be impromptu and the pro and opposing sides posting their arguments in real time. •So we venture into the debate threads unprepared and completely clueless of the topic and what to debate about, then we start developing points to back up our arguments off the top of the dome? If that's the idea then I'm totally down with it. That way the debating process would be undiluted and in its rawest form..no refinery..cool I just hope some tortoise-contestants won't in one way or the other manage to know of the topic beforehand cos that'd be cheating. |