Lele007's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lele007's Profile › Lele007's Posts
She isn't even saying you should buy rice for both mums, na her own mama she dey prioritize? Isn't your mum her mum too? You done marry nonsense keep for house |
litigator: |
litigator: |
baralatie:Basically he was executed for his initial rebellion against David. The forgiveness he'd received was cancelled. |
Kobojunkie:What scripture have you presented to support your statements? |
very interesting question. Adonijah was initially forgiven for rebelling against David by trying to grab the throne over his father's head and oath. When he made the request for the concubine, he made it clear that he hadn't actually repented of and ended his rebellion, and still saw himself as king, and therefore a threat to Solomon and David's loyalists. Were there no other babes in all of Jerusalem, na the one wey dey warm the king's bed na im the guy want? |
Listen to wisdom: “For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire workers for his vineyard. He agreed to pay them a denarius for the day and sent them into his vineyard. “About nine in the morning he went out and saw others standing in the marketplace doing nothing. He told them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.’ So they went. “He went out again about noon and about three in the afternoon and did the same thing. About five in the afternoon he went out and found still others standing around. He asked them, ‘Why have you been standing here all day long doing nothing?’ “‘Because no one has hired us,’ they answered. “He said to them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard.’ “When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his foreman, ‘Call the workers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last ones hired and going on to the first.’ “The workers who were hired about five in the afternoon came and each received a denarius. So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. ‘These who were hired last worked only one hour,’ they said, ‘and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.’ “But he answered one of them, ‘I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’ |
Put it in form of a question in text or mail: "I've noticed that in the employee manual this is against company policy. Do you want me to proceed with your instruction to --- despite this?" If it's not framed like this it may come off as rude. |
JohnBullMySon:take correction: the residences within the estate are private property and cant be accessed without a warrant if entry is prevented, but IF THE ROADS WITHIN THE ESTATE ARE PUBLIC ROADS, even private citizens should not be prevented, talkless of police chiefs whether on social or official call. |
Ekealterego:What book is the excerpt from? where can I get it |
whats her insta @ |
jikins:epicgames.com? Do they have older PC games there (2008-2013 generation)? |
Hey. I need help. I installed Call of Duty 2 PC version (2005 game) and I cannot get Single Player exe to launch the game, eve though its installed. Multiplayer exe launches the game. I have scoured the net for solutions, no solutions seen. Does anyone know a way out? |
The problem is not so much that it is alleged to be an offence to drive with faded plates. Its in the interest of the car owner to have visible plates, because thats the first thing that may help track his car if stolen |
Lies! |
psalmistkakah:Was this Lagos state? and did that ₦25000 include your lawyers fees? |
backbone503:So what do we call this group that look like, fight like and kill like the "real Boko Haram", but according to you, are not? |
johhhnn:Give us your thoughts on contentment. |
After the most recent ruling in their case against Nigeria, I suspect that for the backers of P&ID, Kenny Rogers’ iconic song “ the Gambler” will never sound the same again. P&ID took Nigeria to arbitration alleging that Nigeria had repudiated a contract to build a wet-gas plant in Cross River state. In 2017 they won $6.6-billion at the arbitration, which over the years with the accrued interest, totals $10-billion as of date. During the arbitration and subsequent appeal process Nigeria had dabbled with the option of a settlement, and varying sums were allegedly offered to P&ID at different times, but these offers were never accepted; decisions P&ID may by now regret given the judge’s conclusions in the latest ruling. Every court case bears some risk; “open and shut case” is a common enough expression, but in reality very few cases are purely open and shut because there usually is a loophole. Even if unseen at the start of litigation, it can emerge in the course of it. The probability of a loophole unravelling a case may seem low, but its viability should be kept in mind. And so at a certain point in a court battle the perceived strength of a case can (and should) rise and fall based on an informed assessment of viable loopholes that could determine the outcome of the case. You don’t want to be too cocky, or underrate your opponent. It appears P&ID severely underrated Nigeria. The stakes were high, and P&ID knew early on what the greatest loopholes were: they had made or authorized questionable payments to Nigerian government officials around the time they procured the contract. How this fact did not motivate them enough to accept a quick settlement will no doubt be the subject of articles, books, and maybe a documentary or two in time to come. The said judgment of Sir Cranston of the English High Court has likely ended all hope of any settlement. Dismissing P&ID’s vigorous though “inconsistent” arguments against an opportunity for Nigeria to prove fraud, the judge agreed that Nigeria’s submissions before him revealed that P&ID lacked real capacity to execute the contract in the first place, that they misled the arbitration tribunal by perjury, and that they breached several anti-corruption statutes by various payments and gifts to Nigerian officials. There were also no factors weighty enough to stop a late challenge to the enforcement of the award in the face of the foregoing. This ruling sets the stage for Nigeria to approach the court again to argue that for these same reasons, the award should not be enforced. So the fireworks are not over yet, but we can already see the finish line: P&ID’s goose is nearly cooked. And why not? It is quite brazen; the idea of a handful of adventurers draining an impoverished third world country of $10-billion for repudiating a deal that gave zero value to the country. Looking beyond the PR schmooze and carefully crafted arguments of legitimacy, the court now says that on closer inspection this deal appears to have been a scam, a grand heist of global proportions. This case is a hodgepodge of ironic contradictions. If you’ve seen Steven Spielberg’s War of the Worlds, then picture P&ID as the invading alien, Nigeria the beleaguered planet, and bribery and corruption as the antihero, that hapless planet’s silent but deadly microbial defense that destroyed the invader from within. Who would have thought? It has been reported that earlier this Irish-owned company was offered as much as $250-million dollars cash, or alternatively a combined deal of $100-million plus $500-million in cash and concessions to settle out of court. They allegedly refused these offers. It must have seemed like a short-change to accept less than a billion to forgo a judgement award of $10-billion. Yes, but remember the loopholes. Read more https://ukastheses./2020/09/13/how-to-blow-half-a-billion-dollars/#more-123
|
...
|
Beosten:Weh don sah |
bestmutiu2019:No surprise the man wants to cut himself and his family off from your family. Not only do you listen to witchdoctors cum "prophets", you even have murder in the mind. The Bible says he who hates his brother is a murderer (in his heart). The advice you people need is to pray for God grace to truthfully examine your lives. May God's mercy be with you |
The question you should ask yourself is "what is plasma TV?" |
Remember when #SurvivingPeruzzi was trending? Below is a short write up that analyses such matters. "#SurvivingPeruzzi was a trending hashtag on Twitter early in the year 2020, created by a music label CEO who claimed that another label had stolen his artist, robbing him of the rewards of his investment in the talent and repertoire. Screenshots of private chats with the accused label boss, showed that the accused label boss, who is himself an award-winning artist and performer, responded to the accusations of enticing and engineering the breach of contract with the words, "I be him big brother or I be him daddy? Go and meet who you get problem with. All I’m doing is helping a brother and nothing more did I sign him" It is understood that the dispute is to be litigated, lawyers have apparently been instructed. Without seeking to curry or hold briefs for any side in the quagmire, this would seem like an appropriate time to make a few notes for business folk regarding the Lumley v. Gye[i] principle. Should the issue be this: is it correct for the accused artist/boss to assert that he cannot be held responsible for another person's decision to breach or disregard his contract, the answer would depend on what area of law a breach of legal right is occurring. Privity of contract is the legal standing to claim under or seek to enforce a contract against another; there is no privity of contract except between parties to a contract or such other persons (as non-parties) as have actionable status inherent in the contract. This principle is trite. If you are not a party to a contract, you cannot sue or claim, or be bound or liable under it[ii]. Your remedies and recourse for any breach are limited to him or those with whom you contracted. If the label switching artist is breaking his contract, then in the law of contract, he alone would be liable to his counterparty for that party's losses. It would seem then that the accused label boss would be safe from lawsuit. But that assumption would be wrong, if you were looking only at the law of contract. Lumley v. Gye was a first of its kind, as before the decision in that case the courts took the view that there could be no remedy for a breach of contract except against the party to the contract. A singer had been contracted to sing exclusively at the Her Majesty's Theatre. The proprietor of a competing theatre compelled and induced the singer to breach her contract, even after an injunction of court had been granted against it"... Keep reading: https:///daiicCt |
dalass:How much did you pay? |
Racoon:You know there is a difference between a "declaration" and an opinion? The justices merely gave their opinion, but have not laid down "the rule" so to speak |
This is not Tolulope. Tolulope Arotile was a pilot, and there is no maneuver that calls for the pilot to hang from the door. That is a pic of either a special operator or a air defence corp member in training. You no see the oyibo man there? |
Virtual hearings are a novel addition to Nigerian court practice due to the coronavirus lockdown. On July 14th it was widely reported in the news that the Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria had declared these virtual hearings as “constitutional”. But did they? Not as such. By way of pre-judgement dicta, (think of it as expert or sagely, but non-binding advice) the court convinced the Lagos and Ekiti states Attorneys-General to withdraw their constitutional interpretation suits seeking clarification of this issue, with the following observations/admonishments: 1. The Practice Directions on virtual proceedings made by various courts enjoy a presumption of regularity (ie. validity) unless duly declared otherwise, and therefore require full compliance; 2. Any judges refusing to act on or comply with those Practice Directions where convenient are liable to judicial sanction by the NJC; 3. The suit by the Attorneys-General were premature in so far as they asked the court to prognosticate on pending federal legislative action; 4. Emphatically, Eko JSC said: "we cannot say at this stage whether or not virtual sitting is constitutional". In a nutshell, the court did not in fact say that virtual sittings are constitutional, but rather that all involved, judges, lawyers and litigants, must act as if they were, until they are affirmed as constitutional, or struck down as unconstitutional. The court acted this way because it considered that the suit before it did not have the required elements for the court to give a considered judgment. One cannot help feeling however that this was a wasted opportunity. It is the previous posture of the Supreme Court with regard to what constitutes a "public" place for fair hearing and due process purpose, that had led to the controversy and uncertainty resulting in the cases seeking constitutional interpretation. If the complaint is that much judicial and litigation time is wasted by slow or overly technical adjudication, the solution cannot involve more slow or overly technical judicial action. Perhaps the court should have disregarded issues in the suit that called for speculation on pending national assembly lawmaking, and dealt instead with the all-important question: "what constitutes a public place vis-a-vis virtual proceedings"? Any and all further delay in answering that question authoritatively and finally, hurts Nigeria's jurisprudence and all who depend on it. And that's all of us and our economy. https://www./did-supreme-court-really-declare-virtual-sittings-edozie-uka |
I can't pretend to understand your pain. your parents are very callous to have treated you differently since they raised you as a child. You have to have a very strong mind if you really need to find your mum, because from all indicaitons there is some shame that your father and step mother are carrying. God luck and grace to you |
Lollll ! This shit right here is the reason I am only attracted to girls that drive. Them independent ladies. |
2020 update: definitely a scam. I waited till 1 am, guess what? at 1 am my SIM became data incompetent. "You are not online," no 4 or 3 or 2 or even 1.5G. Restarted phone, nothing helped. This was definitely from the tower. Fell asleep, woke up at 4.45 am. "You are back online" Well done 9mobile. With 12 mins before 5 am, ran a data balance check before and right after watching a 3 min music video at very low resolution. This depleted what was left of my 10mb bonus data and swiped 5mb out of my regular 30 day plan. So the result of this experiment: "free" YouTube streaming on 9mobile positive for scammy
|

...