₦airaland Forum

virginboy1:
Fantastic thread.

Nice one Bros Le.zz.

One fact I know for sure is that "a woman's primary lot is marriage"

Many of them claiming they won't marry is simply because they are paranoid of ending up with a cheat, divorce etc.

But deep down in their internal mind,they want and need a man.

A RICH WOMAN WITHOUT A MAN FEELS UNHAPPY AT A LONG RUN,WHILE A MARRIED MAN WITHOUT MONEY WILL END UP PARTIALLY UNHAPPY. Juxtapose it.

postmann:
Tearing through Kwale as we type...


Let her go!

joseph1832:
Not to forget black mailing too. She tried to blackmail me once, her ruse was thrown back at her hijab wearing face, then she changed her doveda signature just to show how frustrated, she is.

You should check the siggy on her doveda handle, it will make you laugh, and really remind you of something a dark baboon did. Lmao.

postmann:
This one got me laughing. Why are you so feared and revered? Isn't it for your dynamism and deep unfathomable improvisation?


Bwuaaahhaaa! She had it coming. The misinformed pontificator with no heritage.

Had to let her off thr hook lastnight.

SmartChoices:
liar you stalked the hell out of me that I had to abandon this moniker.... you opened six accounts to monitor me....you were just dazed I had the uncanny ability to sniff u out each time....akike, sheilak, morountodun, aisha96, dare2differ, were all opened to stalk me. You went to the extent of opening a thread of about 7 pages about your feelings for me....with several whatsapp messages and emails from you.....le.zz dar.ktroll was a witness.... you were so fixated on my person....eish.

MarieSucre:
"Even the instances of arbitrariness are subject to judicial interpretation being guided by the fundamental human rights."

How does wife beating, banning the ability to work at night, and limiting the right to pass citizenship intersect with human rights.

Its not enough to speak big English. Explain how that English works in human right context oga.

edited daretodiffer look at some more gems from the stable of SmartChoices. Have you packed your slippers yet?

MarieSucre:
The gender pay gap is negligible now It's barely existing. We are talking gender pay gap, you're posting graph about EARNINGS. A male teacher and a female teacher on the same level are paid the same amount, same with a male scientist and a female scientist. The disparity comes in total gross earnings(did you even read the graph at all), this is due to sociological factors. Women not majoring in fields that pay big. Married women taking less work hours to be with their children, women passing up promotion or transfer that would have meant more money but mean more work and time away from their children.
Here is direct quote from your article:
"The gender pay gap is worse for mothers , and it
only grows with age."

Read what you post properly ok. It pains me when you look ignorant coz I'm really enjoying this conversation. I will allow Mikollon1 to explain to you how women are not paid less in America. Mikollon1 is the man that will tell you, how wrong you are. I have given you data, I will not talk on it again. Let Mikollon1 do the rest.

Important questions
-What have you done about the gender pay gap in Nigeria?

I am so sorry that I misunderstood you and all. I should be ashamed that I am still arguing when these 3 european countries achieved universal suffrage later than one half of Nigeria. Compared to these 45 countries

1788 United States of America (to stand for election)
1893 New Zealand (to vote)
1902 Australia*
1906 Finland
1907 Norway (to stand for election)*
1913 Norway**
1915 Denmark, Iceland*
1917 Canada (to vote)*, Netherlands (to stand for election)
1918 Austria, Canada (to vote)*, Estonia, Georgia 1, Germany, Hungary, Ireland*, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,
Russian Federation, United Kingdom*
1919 Belarus, Belgium (to vote)*, Luxembourg, Netherlands (to vote), New Zealand (to stand for election), Sweden*,
Ukraine
British suffragette poster of 1905
1920 Albania, Canada (to stand for election)*, Czech Republic,
Iceland**, Slovakia, United States of America (to vote)
1921 Belgium (to stand for election)*, Georgia 1 , Sweden**
1928 Ireland**, United Kingdom**
1929 Romania*
1934 Portugal*
1944 Bulgaria, France
1945 Croatia, Slovenia,
Romania**, The F.Y.R. of Macedonia,Yugoslavia
1948 Belgium**
1949 Bosnia and Herzegovina,
1950 Barbados, Canada (to vote)**, Haiti
1952 Greece

And before the other half of Nigeria was granted suffrage in 1978. So basically I guess 3 beats 45 in your maths book.

"Switzerland granted partial female voting rights in 1971 and federal elective rights in 1990
Greece 1952 and almighty France 1944."

Lets see how these countries have fared since time "half of Nigeria" beat them to granting universal suffrage.

Switzerland:

"Switzerland ranks in top ten regarding gender
equality
The World Economic Forum «Global Gender Gap Report
2011» published in November list Switzerland as 10th
of 135, narrowly before Germany and Spain, but clearly
behind Scandinavian countries such as Iceland, Norway
Finland and Sweden which have got rid of more than
80% of their gender inequality. Saudi Arabia, Mali,
Pakistan, Chad or Yemen are at the other end of the
ranking with a need for compensation of more than
50%"
www.humanrights.ch/en/switzerland/internal-affairs/gender/gender-equality/gender-equality-switzerland-well-finish

France:
1944: Women get the right to vote
1946: The French Constitution Preamble
mentions Equal Rights for Men and Women
1965: 1804 Marriage Settlement reform: women
can manage their goods, open a bank account
and have an occupation without their husband’s
authorization.
1967: The Neuwirth Act is passed: contraception
is authorized
1970: Mothers and fathers are equal as regard to
parental authority
1971: Wage equality between men and women
for the same job is mandatory
1974: The Veil Act legalizes abortion under
conditions.
1983: The Roudy Act is passed against work
discrimination.
1990: The Cour de Cassation made it illegal for
husbands to rape their wife.
1992: Sexual harassment at work is declared
illegal.
2000: A law on parity in politics is passed.
U.S. Government Reports
france.usembassy.gov/mobile//whm2.html

Half of Francois Hollande; President of France's cabinet are women.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/17/hollande-france-gender-equality

Greece:
" During the past decades, the position of women in Greek
society has changed dramatically. In 1983, a new family
law was passed, which provided for gender equality in
marriage, and abolished dowry and provided for equal
rights for " illegitimate " children. Adultery was
also decriminalised in 1983. The new family law provided
for civil marriage and liberalised the divorce law . In 2006,
Greece enacted Law 3500/2006 -"For combating
domestic violence"- which criminalised domestic violence,
including marital rape .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Greece

DO YOU SEE THAT GREECE WAS ABLE TO PASS A LAW TO DO AWAY WITH DOWRY.

How about instead of arguing senseless arguments on nairaland. You go meet our Senate to abolish the bride price so young men don't have to pay outrageous prices just to get married, can you do that for me. In that way you can make yourself useful to the society.

SmartChoices:
On point I could not have said it any better too. Rape laws should be strengthened and acculturated and equal penalties prescribed for false accusers and false witnesses in cases of rape.

MarieSucre:
Number 1 - YOU'RE SO F**KING IGNORANT
Yes women and men receive equal pay for the same job. The difference is in total earnings. Single women and single men earn the same gross total for the same jobs. The disparity comes between married men with children and married women with children(married women without children are still on par with single men and women).
This disparity comes about by lifestyle choices. What fields are women prone to go into? is it a higher paying field? Do they take on more or less jobs after childbirth that would make easier to facilitate promotion? These are factors to consider. Try to read in detail about things so as not to sound ignorant.

www.payscale.com/gender-lifetime-earnings-gap

www.aauw.org/research/the-simple-truth-about-the-gender-pay-gap/

www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2016/05/53_years_after_equal_pay_act_why_women_still_earn_less_than_men_and_how_to_bridge_the_wage_gap_city_club_panelists_say.html

ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-pay-gap/index_en.htm

www.pay-equity.org/

Here are two states passing laws to end it:

www.ibtimes.com/will-californias-fair-pay-law-eliminate-gender-wage-gap-2248337

dailyfreepress.com/2016/02/01/senate-gender-wage-gap-equity/

What are you trying to do about it? Nothing! Nada! Zilch! Instead you're nairaland insulting an anonymous woman. With your likes little wonder Nigeria is how it is.

What has Nigeria done? Girls are still taught to grow up and marry rich men and also to not choose high paying jobs so that their husbands doesn't feel less like a man among other short stories.

Number 2- YOU'RE A BLATANT LIAR.
1788 United States of America (to stand for election)
1893 New Zealand (to vote)
1902 Australia*
1906 Finland
1907 Norway (to stand for election)*
1913 Norway**
1915 Denmark, Iceland*
1917 Canada (to vote)*, Netherlands (to stand for election)
1918 Austria, Canada (to vote)*, Estonia, Georgia 1, Germany,
Hungary, Ireland*, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,
Russian Federation, United Kingdom*
1919 Belarus, Belgium (to vote)*, Luxembourg, Netherlands (to
vote), New Zealand (to stand for election), Sweden*,
Ukraine
1928 Ireland**, United Kingdom**

Even Cameroon and Niger got before us; 1946 and 1948 respectively.

Nigeria(South)-1958
1978 Nigeria (North), Republic of Moldova 1 , Zimbabwe (to stand
for election).

Imagine with Zimbabwe fa.
www.ipu.org/wmn-e/suffrage.htm

Number 3 - I CANT TELL IF YOU'RE JUST A PROFESSIONAL ILLITERATE

There is no evidence of female British lawyers ever been banned from wearing trousers. And it's hypocritical for you to make such a comparison on a blog where almost every some over-zealous religious homo sapien yaps about how women should stop emulating western women to wear trouser. like the jeans he puts on is his tribal wear.

*sighs* That was exhausting. Now I Hope and pray you receive sense, our country is counting on you to have sense.

PinketteDawn:
This still shows you never read my links when I posted them. Females and their male counterpart farmed in order to survive in prehistoric times. Even presently, I have seen pregnant woman going to farms in my village. If you read my post where I posted those links, you will see it there. Are pregnant women also exempted from working for nine months since they are incapacitated as you say? Please what do you mean by domestic life? And how is it easy? I have given you such examples to show you that women have been known to perform such feats you mentioned that made men 'genetically less dependent on women' and to also make it clear to you that the different roles we play today came up as a result of societal influence. Your role as a man is not more important than that of a woman, neither does it make you more superior to a woman.or make a woman more genetically dependent on a man.



Read my link.



I give you facts, you will not read, then you come back to tell me I am engaging in female banter. . Oya here is another link if you will read it. There are more. You have Google, browse and free yourself of this terribly embarrassing and lingering ignorance. Why the desperation to make me believe that women are genetically more dependent on men? Looks like you're frightened with the idea that the menfolk will become irrelevant in every other aspect except procreation in the near future.


http://mentalfloss.com/article/59287/9-female-warriors-who-made-their-mark-history



Male desperation made men suppress the amazing abilities of a woman just so they would appear to have always been in charge. Subtle hints still remain on the greatness of women and how they made their mark on history. Do I need to mention civilizations? The very earth you stand on is referred to as 'Mother earth'. Did you think that came by chance? Why not be called 'father earth' because men ruled over earth and found civilisations?
Let us not digress, the essence of this argument is still to prove to you that women are not more genetically dependent on men like you claim.





Same scientists who said that women are genetically more dependent on men right? The only person who has displayed poor cognitive abilities as far as I can see here is you. Even with your bigger frontal brain....lol. Rsearch and open your eyes, you refuse. ABEGI!




To protect and not to provide. Because a man is wired to protect his woman genetically, does that make the woman genetically helpless and more dependent on him? Even in lesser animals like the lions, the male protects it's tribe but in terms of providing, the females do the hunting. Please read your history and find out that women worked as hard as their male counterparts to provide for the family. Also, you make it seem like nuturing is a less important task than providing for the family and that a woman needs to depend on a man to nuture her offspring. I don't see how being aggressive and domineering makes a man genetically less dependent on the woman. If he can be aggressive and domineering enough to impregnate himself and give birth, then I would definitely consider the female to need him more than he needs her genetically.



Can you share the stats with me and show me the reasons the women gave for being 'sadder'? And can you equally show me starts of unmarried working men of the same age range who are truly happy and fulfilled and their reasons for being so? I am interested. Men have also been known to complain of having nothing to go home to after galivanting and enjoying themselves with all the money they have made and still unmarried at an older age. Little wonder they suffer more in divorce.



A woman's maternal instinct has nothing to do with marriage and having a husband. Neither does it make a woman more genetically dependent on a man. The society influences marriage which I said earlier, is not a requirement for procreation. I am yet to see a man fast approaching old age, not married and without kids, who is truly happy and fulfilled. Once again show me the research done on depression level growing higher in women today with most women giving reason of not having a less genetically dependent male they were tied to, being the reason for their depression. Give me numbers.

By the way, not every woman who decided not to settle down, came up with that decision because they were more interested in chasing power or fame or glory.





Thank God!



Worrying more about sAving or keeping a relationship(which i have explained why it is so, please do keep up) now makes one more genetically dependent on the one who suffers more when the relationship breaks up. Sorry, I am confused now, my small frontal lobe is finding this hard to grasp......
When you are done treating yours, I will start my own treatment.






I believe the argument is who is more genetically dependent on the other. The need for procreation has always been there, not as an afterthought. I do remember writing that women and men are EQUALLY genetically dependent on each other. *sheesh* and I was accused of having Amnesia. Ok nau.


Your opinion, my opinion. Each to his own. Besides you started throwing jibes at me because I insisted on having my own opinion and not automatically bowing down to yours as the 'less genetically dependent' and superior one.



I find it amusing that you actually think you come across as a knowledgeable person by using high sounding words. Bigger frontal lobe

All I kept seeing is a sentence in an annoying mode of repetition: " Read my link", "Read my link", " Read my Link"


What link? Your archeological link which saw matter and conclude women ruled prehistoric times?

Your link which breathtakingly embarrassed and denied you what you claimed ? Is that the link I should read?

You must enjoy wasting people's time online

Your claimes stand debunked!!! Pinkettedawn, disproven and wrecked at bedtime

You owe me an appology for deceit and forgery. And Nairaland's hierarchy for posting false information.

By the link you submitted below , which called you a liar, and which I shall furnish in JPEG format below, you have effortlessly rendered yourself debate-unworthy.

I believe my job of dispensing justice is finished. I leave the floor now for the jury to study the evidence below.

orble:
Ponder on what? That Effeminacy (feminism) put NASA's Armstrong on the moooon? -are you kidding me?

What! that the UN WHO is a creation of the white man alone?
That you're totally obsessed about the white man ur gender people worship?

That our own Aba made Nollywood is world number 1 seconded only by Bollywood and Hollywood is in a far away third?

that dimwit don't know the western world is loosing their common sense of responsibility?

That women are to play the role of ordering men in our own society?

Come-on beautiful lady, stop this illusion now.

MarieSucre:
Its good thing that people like you don't support their laws because it's inconsequential. They're great with or without your backward views.

Even females have taken advantage of it to, but their stricter measures do not include taking away the right of women to pass on citizenship. Obama is an example of a man who got his citizenship from his mom but I guess when you praise your "first black president" you can't smell the hypocrisy in the air.

That's bullshit and you know it. You only need to ask enough people around you to know how many husbands just up and left to be with some mistress. And saying women leave their marital homes on their volition does not explain why the women left and why the men didn't instead handle the children to prove they don't have "emotional vulnerability".


Mind you the countries which don't offer dual citizenship are few and in-between, more importantly they're underdeveloped and backwards. No one even wants their citizenship in the first place, so that is not a good point at all.

Let me start by saying I find it quite amusing you felt the need to quote a short post of mine twice!!! That's how inadequate and desperate I made you !!!

Ok, let's dispense with the intro. I come to you:

MarieSucre:
I am actually sad that our customs and traditions haven't produce something superior like NASA, WHO, UN, Hollywood. Its wonderfully backward things like the drivel you posted.

MarieSucre:
Your point 1 *sighs* A product of the Neanderthal mind.

MarieSucre:
Point2. Its still your type that will say women lean on men too much and we bring nothing to the table. Here you're standing in the way of this same thing. Make up your f**king mind. Why y'all so confused. What do you f**king want??

MarieSucre:
"Pls, be sincere my lady, all women more susceptible to manipulations and deceit particularly from our men folk... "

Wow, I never thought.. wow a man can admit this on nairaland. Look what you typed there. If I had typed this, you peeps would have called me a man-hater.
Now let me ask you question, since it's men who do the manipulation(in your words) why do women have to have their liberty taken from them? In a stadium or the cinema, it's the unruly audience or fan who gets sent out not the quiet ones who abide by the rules.

MarieSucre:
A wiseman once said "The true mark of an idiot is someone who cannot possibly conceive how anyone on earth could think differently than they do. "I do or believe X so everyone must do X and if someone doesn't do X they're either an idiot or a liar because X is all I know and what I know is all I NEED to know."

Ponder upon this.

MrPresident1:
Yeah, I do agree with you that the realities of the times we are in makes it ojukokoro to venture into polygamy, but there may be extenuating circumstances, many times it is the woman who forces the man to look outside, some men may even hide under the shadow of religion. If we were in an agrarian society without high technology, where a man's household is his workforce, and the size of it measures his wealth, for reasons of pride and to shine over other women, I think it is the woman herself who will marry other women for her husband.

Men can screw around because they are givers, they give, but the woman's body is a sacred temple, only a true and worthy man should worship therein.

Ishi, even if you wed in court, if judge sentences the father of your children to jail, na you go appeal by yourself o, you go tell judge say you don forgive am say make dem allow una to dey go house. How will you face his family or your own family,or your children, the woman who sent her husband to jail because he married another man? them go tell you say kin ni oju o ri ri? Court ko, kootu ni.

Or the judge will grant you divorce and splitting of assets, my dear, to what end when companionship is ordained by the Most High Himself? It is a man's world ruled by the women we give our hearts to. Pray for your own husband, everything between both of you will be seamless, God hears prayer.

PinketteDawn:
Hello? Whoever told you that a woman who is pregnant is incapacitated for nine months? Where in the world did you get that idea? Women of the olden days go to farm with protruding bellies and work just like their male counterparts.

Even today, the so called incapacitated pregnant woman does same hours in the office as a man does, comes back home to do another shift in the kitchen and goes to bed late after tending to the kids, then wakes up early the next day to start another round while the fully healthy, able bodied , less genetically dependent man cannot lift a finger once he comes back from work claiming tiredness.

PinketteDawn:
Excuse me but the intellectual woo woo I see here is not me. And by the way, the first person to write on such discovery was even a man, NOT a woman!

PinketteDawn:
Defenlessless of a woman (ahh the sheer ignorance!) There were female warriors who led MEN to war in the past. Females are no where near defenceless OK?

Women led men to war? As a one-off, isolated incident or a norm? Are you this desperate? Please, pinkettedawn, can you count all the battles known to history and count in your fingers those that were led by women
I know now your true moniker. You're only concerned with empty male-female banter. You don't care for facts.

PinketteDawn:
If you are going to cast aside discoveries made by archaeologists just to win an argument, then please explain to me how you have always known that even in prehistoric times, men have always ruled the world. Is it not from discoveries made by same archaeologists?

PinketteDawn:
*tsk tsk tsk...ramblings of a drowning sexist trying to clutch at straws. Reading can damage your ignorance seriously you know. You read to get knowledge and expand your mind, thus releasing you from the clutches of myopic thinking and ignorance.

I'm not the one who posted sources that contradicted her claims.
Seems you need reading and comprehension a heap lot more than I'll ever do. And scientists say the frontal brain responsible for cognitive abilities are smaller in women. Hello emotional beings

PinketteDawn:
[s]Please tell me the genes responsible for a woman to be more genetically dependent on a man, son.[/s]

Every body is a victim of societal conditioning including the so called man who believes he is less genetically dependent on a woman. That is why you cannot cry in front of a crowd, that is why you feel ashamed or less of a man when you cannot provide for your family.

PinketteDawn:
Women today still want to marry because of the societal conditioning that you need to be married to have children.

PinketteDawn:
A woman who has children out of wedlock, in some cultures is seen as a failure and the stigma lingers even after the woman later succeeds in marrying. Societal condition in has also persistently told women that 'no matter how much you make or how high you climb I'm your career, you need a man to be fulfilled.

PinketteDawn:
[s] Objectively, this is not so and we both know it. You as a man or woman will only be fulfilled when you find andachieve your purpose in life. It has nothing to do with marriage.
[/s]

PinketteDawn:
Dude, you just shot yourself in the leg by admitting that men suffer more in divorce?

PinketteDawn:
The so called less genetically dependent men! I am shocked. Please why is that? Rich women still wanting to get married is as a result of yet again, the societal and mind conditioning that a woman having a child out of wedlock in some cultures, is wrong. The stigma stays with the woman and even the child for a long time even after she successfully gets married. A woman who forgives her husband for cheating feels that she needs to do that in order not to 'break her home' because of constant drumming of 'endure, tolerate his excesses, all men are cheats, you don't know if the next man will be worse than this one' into her ears by the mother and friends it has nothing to do with genetics. If it does, then why do most marriages today, still succeed in breaking up on grounds of infidelity from a man? Oh wait! Because the woman realises finally, she is NOT more genetically dependent on the man than he is to her.

PinketteDawn:
I have always agreed that both sexes are EQUALLY genetically dependent on each other in to procreate. My disagrement is that one sex is more genetically dependent on the other. Sheeesh! *rolling my eyes* And yet, someone is trying to tell me he has no issues with memory retention!

PinketteDawn:
[s] Excuse me? What has 'spending more time in front of the mirror dressing up' got to do with this topic? I am guessing you are running out of things to say now. I did read my links very well before posting them. You are the one who failed to read them remember? At this point, permit me to say that you are now simply arguing for the sake of arguing. [/s]

PinketteDawn:
My handle being alternate has nothing to do with you being condescending...and I know condescending when I perceive it. I don't need to be a female for you to patronise me and I certainly won't fall for cheap tricks like this to reveal myself.


Read this carefully and understand it (if you can): If there is an outbreak of a peculiar disease which succeeds in wiping out the menfolk all over the world, leaving only the women folk on the face of the earth, your argument is saying that women will immediately die off because they are more genetically dependent on men. We both know this is not so. Women will live long after men have gone until they slowly die off eventually because they cannot procreate when the sperm banks run dry (that is if they decide not to have male children). They will adapt and assume all those male roles you have been subtly highlighting created by the society.

Likewise the same situation will occur if the womenfolk were attacked first. Men will even die faster because there is no vessel to breed and carry on the next generation. (Unless of course they were able to figure out how to get female ova, fertilise and keep them in an artificial womb to gestate for 9 months.This is of course for the remaining few who survived after they must have finish going to war and killing themselves over trivial issues)

PinketteDawn:
Honey please learn to read properly

Knightngale:
female children can inherit in almost every custom.

Nothing women cannot do nowadays.

SAMBARRY:
Mshewwww

MarieSucre:
More like you'll answer me never. Coz you ain't got no answer. Hypocrite.

MarieSucre:
I will address your number one directly. I'm guessing you're not opposed to white women giving men and their children citizenship even though they're prone to emotional vulnerability.
Seeing that statistics show that men are more prone to pack up and leave the family, maybe for another woman etc. Mothers more than not stay and shoulder the children. That there are lot more single mothers than fathers is a testament to this. Somehow these women who are obviously clear headed and determined for their families suffer from "emotional vulnerability" than the men who bail on them.
lolz The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

MarieSucre:
What is positive about..
-not allowing a woman to grant her husband and children citizenship
-beating your wife
-banning women from working at night
-disparate laws applied to female officers
I'm waiting.

MarieSucre:
I will address your number one directly. I'm guessing you're not opposed to white women giving men and their children citizenship even though they're prone to emotional vulnerability.

Seeing that statistics show that men are more prone to pack up and leave the family, maybe for another woman etc. Mothers more than not stay and shoulder the children. That there are lot more single mothers than fathers is a testament to this. Somehow these women who are obviously clear headed and determined for their families suffer from "emotional vulnerability" than the men who bail on them.

lolz The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

Bossforeva:
Source: http://www.starttells.com/blog/2016/05/22/exclusive-veteran-actress-patience-ozokwor-abadons-nollywood-after-getting-born-again-shares-her-testimony/

NB: This is an exclusive report, don't dare plagiarize

PinketteDawn:
Human culture once had evidence of matriarchy at some point in time. Different cultures that existed around the world in prehistoric times gave evidence to that. The reason why I brought this up was to disprove your claim that existing cultures have always seen man as the dominant sex right from the prehistoric times. The evidence I gave you did enough justice to that whether you like it or not. So you are the one in denial.

Here is another link for you.

http://www.womanthouartgod.com/didwomanruletheworld.php

PinketteDawn:
I will take this as an apology for your short attention span.

PinketteDawn:
Biology or genetics have nothing to do with this , child.

PinketteDawn:
This is simply as a result of the conditioning of the mind religion and societal influence. She has been made to believe that if she does not forgive and 'her'marriage breaks up, she will not find any other spouse to 'complete' her whereas the man can go ahead and get another woman(this is why many women keep enduring and forgiving till they die in an unhappy marriage).

PinketteDawn:
[s]This is false. First of all, nobody(man or woman) needs a spouse to be complete. Second of all many women have been known to remarry after things went awry in their first marriage.[/s]

PinketteDawn:
I still don't know what being ready to forgive a cheating spouse has to do with being more genetically dependent on that spouse.

PinketteDawn:
All the sources I cited helped alot to prove to you that no sex is more dependent on the other genetically

Did you just noded to genetic dependability of the sexes? And can you give me instances, please?

PinketteDawn:
. Perhaps you found it difficult to grasp the language in which the text was written. Or like the 'superior, dominant and aggressive' species you belong to, you were not patient enought to read and rid of your self of your obvious embarrassing ignorance.

I'm sorry not reading your own links before posting them is more embarrassing than public _nudity; it is displaying your ignorance in a celebratory manner

I believe you spend more time in front of your dressing mirror than you do in perusing facts you intend to use for defence. Sorry, but it's in your genes. I can't help ya!!

Perhaps archeologists can tell you it hasn't been this bad too, and you can seek escapism in the debris of matter subject to interpretation of the desperate few of which you're an eager applicant

PinketteDawn:
Now we are being patronising. Very rich.

PinketteDawn:


I wonder who is living in denial now. Your limited knowledge of history is very pitiable.

How is that now? You're the one who told me human society was matriarchal and the source you cited said it wasn't so. And you turn around to accuse me of living in denial?

I like your sense of humour

PinketteDawn:
And my good friend, why did you choose to ignore the last link completely?

The mechanism of my mental defence is automatic and hyper sensitive. As soon as your first two sources assaulted my mental perception, my auto-defence mechanism triggered in self-preservation

I could well be a mental kebab if I had gone further.

PinketteDawn:
Still waiting for you to educate me on how I am 'genetically' more dependent on a man than he is to me.

Look around you, evidence abound.

Women are forgiving their cheating partners more than men are forgiving theirs, even though divorce or separation bears more on men. Simple psychology and biology, baby.

Now you're going to point me to societal conditioning as defence again but all the sourced you've cited couldn't help you.

PinketteDawn:
"I have never been mentally assaulted with such laughable postulation and baselessly speculative nonsensicality."
Your words not mine.

dinachi:
@ Op stop being silly. This is exactly how American males like you started fighting for women and ended up loosing their own rights too. Now dogs and pets have better rights than men in the US. Dont bring that nonsense here.

Ishilove:
The latter, sir.