Lezz's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lezz's Profile › Lezz's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 (of 219 pages)
Ishilove:Are you a lawyer or a wide reader? |
PinketteDawn:Pinkettedawn, you disappoint me in the most cruel of manners. You rob me of a good Sunday debate ![]() You shot yourself in the foot with your first source you cited that claims matriarchy . In the very opening was a disclaimer to your claims. It saved me the pain of delving further. ( I did a screenshot for you)And the rebutal you cited on your second source which sought to establish "men are more dependent on women" must have been written by a teen who was still experiencing her first menses. I have never been mentally assaulted with such laughable postulation and baselessly speculative nonsensicality. No data of stats or stated findings of professionals. Just plain old female chest beating. Her examples are: * men need women to take care of the baby * men throw around thier stocking * women give men fashion sense etc. Lolz, it would have been comic if it wasn't so ridiculous. You need to come up with something more mentally stirring.
|
cococandy:Cococandy has got an ass for brains that's why she likes fart-typing ![]() Can you give us the statistics of teenage pregnant girls who grew up with single mothers ? You know data abound of young girls being susceptible to rapé and teen pregnancies when they grow up with single mothers Yes, men cope poorly in divorce, this very biased thread said that much. But women worry more about keeping the union. And that's what your insecurity dares not admit in the open. You're the one with the insecuries that couldn't handle reality here. cococandy:Statistics keep proving you wrong. You will deny the obvious just to live the lie. But who's running to pastors and prophets for life partners? Women. Who's suffereng bulimia nervosa to keep young and sexy and slim? Women. Who keeps wearing phoney accessories and falsifying their looks? Women. I dey watch you ,cocoa |
cococandy:cocoa, coco? I love cocoa, all I see is cocoa ![]() You find this unbiasedly written piece devoid of sentiments sexist? Why am I not surprised! ![]() |
Adaeze003:Nice question!!! I love women, matter of fact, I have not been able to decipher what I love more between life and women ![]() And men do not go about prating on how independent they are of women, neither do they form groups or new ideology to promote segregation and antagonism of the sexes. It is Women who have chosen to live in denial not men. A divorced women is more apt to preach divorce as the solution to marital problems than is a divorced man. This section can very well serve as a social laboratory to carry out this theorem. ![]() |
Adaeze003:Ada, you can't draw up a principle from its exception!!! No principle or occurrence is in absolutism and the few exceptions can't void the premise on which the principle stands. Women may opt out of marriage, it does not negate the fact that the average woman wants a man no matter her financial status or position. She's is innately programmed to hang on to a male and tag along in the rough terrain of life. I have personally scripted threads that mirror this in the past, but seeing it re-echoed by professionals from the West -- the seat of female delusions-- is ever so refreshing. ![]() |
@pinkettedawn, you couldn't even quote me properly!!! ![]() Let me ask you, how come women were thus conditioned by society in all cultures and in all races across all peoples and time? Keep the denial on |
PinketteDawn:Your understanding of gene is frightfully limited, dear. You should be having to mentions now, including this one. https://www.nairaland.com/3119292/all-what-mother-dont If not, see her: |
[b] We live in an age in which women have earned complete independence. So do they need men at all? According to Dr NICK NEAVE, an evolutionary psychologist from Northumbria University, not only do they need men, they are fundamentally programmed to depend on them. Here, Dr Neave, 41, explains his provocative thesis: You're a successful woman with a job to die for, a fabulous home and a supportive husband, but do you ever get the urge to check his mobile phone for love messages? Or his bank statements for intimate meals a deux that you didn't share? And do you lie awake at night worrying how you'll cope if the worst happens, your fears are proved and your husband walks out? Don't worry. Your suspicion is only natural. At the risk of sounding extraordinarily sexist, I'm convinced that women, even in the happiest of relationships, are programmed to worry their men are going to abandon them. And they're terrified - in a way that most men find it frankly impossible to imagine. What's more, if their forebodings come true, women are more inclined to forgive an affair than a man if the shoe is on the other foot. That's not because they're nicer, more easygoing individuals. It's simply because their primeval urge to hang onto a male provider is so strong. Women in the 21st century may boast that they are truly independent for the first time in our social history. They may tell themselves and each other that they don't need a man. They can even start a family on their own thanks to IVF techniques. But, while feminists may argue this proves women have finally kicked off the shackles of dependence on men, I'm afraid they're wrong. In evolutionary terms the huge cultural changes over the past generation amount simply to the merest blink of an eye. It could take another 10,000 years for women to change their thinking. Quite simply, women are preprogrammed to feel dependent on men. Even today women may be richer and enjoy all the trappings of success but, deep down in their psyche, they fear they can't survive alone. These women may be shooting up the career ladder and earning more than the men in their lives, but when it comes to relationships men still hold the trump card. As an evolutionary psychologist, I study patterns of behaviour dating back to the first human societies, and constantly analyse evidence that demonstrates the key differences which have developed between the sexes since men were hunter-gatherers and women were child bearers. Females are smaller and weaker than males so, in prehistoric times, women and their offspring were prone to being the victims of predators, and violence. They needed the support and protection of men who didn't just have brute force but also had social status in the group, either through their sheer physicality or the strength of their personality. That's why women still look for a mate of higher social standing. If a woman had a relationship with a socially dominant male, she would immediately get greater access to resources because her social standing would be elevated, too. As we shall see, modern surveys consistently show that women today ape those inherent characteristics by looking for partners who are socially dominant and have the respect of their peers, paying close attention to how men interact with, and are treated by, other men. Men have a different reason for choosing a mate. The caveman needed to be sure he was raising a child who was genetically his. The best way of doing this was to secure a mate and guard her so she didn't get the chance to stray. A man's natural instinct may be to have sex with a different woman every day, but to safeguard his relationship (and secure his progeny), he has been forced into a pattern of monogamy. don't even realise what's happening. When couples meet at speed-dating evenings, typically a man will judge a woman on her looks and youth. His priorities are whether she's healthy, interested in sex and can give him children one day. He doesn't care how much she earns or her social status. Typically, however, a woman's first question will be: 'What job do you do?' It sounds a friendly overture, but what she really wants to know is his social position and earning capacity. Is he an industrious, hard worker, capable of providing for her and their children? Because of his power, even the ugliest politician on the planet has women lining up to go to bed with him. Were he the local rat catcher, his love life would be a good deal quieter. As American statesman Henry Kissinger put it: 'Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.' One might argue that it's only natural for today's women in their 30s or 40s to feel dependent on a man. After all, the vast majority were raised by mothers who by and large didn't have careers and were forced to rely financially on their husbands. Yet study after study proves that today's women in their 20s are just as insecure. In a recent study, two American researchers, John Marshall Townsend from Syracuse University and Gary Levy from the University of Toledo, presented women with photographs of men. The first group, described as doctors, wore designer ties, smart shirts and sported Rolex watches. The second wore plain shirts and Swatch watches and were described as teachers. The third group wore Burger King uniforms. Women repeatedly picked doctors as potential boyfriends - even though many of the men in the third category were actually more handsome. Quite simply, to women a man's looks are less important than earning power and social standing. In another study, male and female medical students were asked to pick their ideal mate from a selection of careers. The majority of men chose nurses. Women, however, picked hospital consultants. This demonstrates that, although every bit as financially successful as their male colleagues, these young women still feel they need men to confer power and social standing to a superior male. It's no surprise to me that another study this year by sociologists at Virginia University found that couples are happiest in traditional marriages run on old-fashioned gender lines, where the man is the main breadwinner. The report showed conclusively that women who worked were more dissatisfied with their husbands than those who stayed at home. One of the experts, W Radford Wilcox, said: 'Regardless of what married women say they believe about gender, they tend to have happier marriages when their husband is a good provider.' Happiest of all were women whose husbands brought in at least two-thirds of the household income, regardless of how much they helped with domestic chores. In short I suspect women will never feel truly comfortable earning more than their men. The need to rely on a man is driven by such a deep-seated biological urge, I cannot see it ever being eradicated completely. Only last week, a survey by the Skipton Building Society concluded that many women who are the main breadwinner hold it against their partner for contributing less to the household budget than they do. ![]() While those women might like the material rewards of their high salaries, they also dislike the financial responsibility - perhaps reflecting the inbuilt genetic imperative to rely on someone else. )It is that instinctive need to rely on a man which makes women so afraid of abandonment. Perhaps that is why women are more attuned to their partner's moods and curious about tiny aspects of his life. And they are much better than men at spotting liars. Evolutionary psychologists are convinced that these are in part throwbacks to a woman's need to maintain her relationship at all costs. It's completely irrational for women, who can earn as much as men, to have a terror of being abandoned. Even if she can't work, the welfare state means she's not going to starve. Yet it's a real fear for many women. We have anecdotal evidence of women lying awake at night worrying how they'd cope. Women are terrified of abandonment. They fear a drop in status or social standing that might come with divorce in a way men - who are driven by very different priorities - simply don't understand. Even extremely wealthy, successful women have these vestigial anxieties which bear absolutely no relation to the reality of their lives, but are throwbacks to caveman society. Ironically, although men actually fare less well after divorce and are often less happy, women typically are more frightened of living alone. Men find it extremely hard to forgive an affair. This dates back to early man's horror of unwittingly raising another man's child. However, women are predisposed to be more tolerant of affairs. It comes down to brutal economics. The thought of your husband having sex with another woman may be devastating. But even worse is the prospect of him pouring all his financial resources her way. Quite simply, women are so programmed to feel dependent that their subliminal urge to safeguard the home often outweighs the fury of being sexually betrayed. Terror of being abandoned even drives the beauty industry. Eating clinics report a four-fold rise in the number of middle-aged women seeking help for anorexia and bulimia because they're desperate to look slim and youthful. These problems were once the province of teenage girls. And while women may claim they are having cosmetic surgery and Botox treatments purely to feel better about themselves, I believe the reason is much more complex. Women are driven by a primeval urge to keep their men by looking youthful and fertile. Sexist? Maybe. True? I fear so. [/b] Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-420513/Sorry-women-dependent-men.html |
PinketteDawn:Gene predetermines behaviour patterns to an extend. You need me to say this? You hinge it on societal conditioning. I say not entirely true. |
PinketteDawn:Sugar, you have, without much effort, denied the structural and genetical difference between men and women. And you used the well-worn tool of "societal conditioning" as an excuse. Society condition women you say, and I say it is in your genes, baby. Let me tell you all ladies something without the consolation of euphemism to make me dear to you. There are not one difference between you and women of the last century. The only difference is they were true to their nature, you are denying your very predisposition with education. Carry on. |
Dragonking:Thanks, Brother!!! You done begin alter my weekend plans positively. ![]() |
PinketteDawn:Same belief here. PinketteDawn:In a way yes, the relationship between a man and a woman is complementary in nature , made so by the unfathomable brilliance of God through millions of years of evolution. That's why faggøtry can't make sense ever. Women are more dependent on their men in more ways than men are. I don't have the time now to type a long submission. But in everyday things like sex, emotional well-being, in chaos, spirituality, trend, culture etc. Women wait for man to lead and she follows. Take this home: If Nairaland were a physical sphere and a terrorist act were to occur or armed robbers where to attack, all the females here will instinctively, without the luxury of a nano second of thought look up to the men for direction, and leadership......that's the ones who will have the presence of mind, the others might be too busy screaming or in a state of perceptual shock. |
Dheartless:When you're ready, I'll PM you all his gazillion monikers he uses. Unlike most Nairalanders, he doesn't own up to his handles except 2. But we have irrefutable evidence of all his zillion handles, including female ones he uses to hoodwink unsuspecting females into thinking he is being sought after. |
Dragonking:Thank God it's weekend. Let me e-drive there. ![]() Can I download it forthrightly from that link? I can only watch movies in bits on mobile. |
postmann: I haven't touched the vast reservoir of facts and evidence I have against that undernourished, demonised, petty, cold thief. Facts of his actual life that spilled onto Nairaland and other forums and e-platformsm. He is the breathing exemplification of attention deficit disorder and inexorable greed. I give him grace and time to mend his ways. But he can't just steer away from making side jibes, can he? |
Dragonking:Hehehehe, na so life be. I'm a novice to TV series o mobile life done spoil me finish. Na lappy and handset I dey download my movies to watch on the go or whenever I have paper work for office. |
Dheartless:Go read his posts and history, a lengthy backlog but you'll be rewarded. Now ask yourself this; he says he is 19 years of age. So what's he doing crowding supposedly much older women some of whom are married and with kids. From _Nubian113, to _Ladyboss, to _Creamish and to women in the family section most of whom are married and with children. If several of his failed attempts at swindling them had not been revealed no one will know. The real tradegy is when they refused complying with his financial shams, he comes to Nairaland and reveal everything they have confided in him offline. He will troll and hound them in rap battles until they deactivate. Go through his history log. |
Dragonking:Delta north, bro. It's good to know, brother. |
Dheartless:He is!!! A mythical 19 year old whose brain elasticity can't stretch beyond 5 minutes Google search to prate about what he has no knowledge about. ![]() One would think, the kid would be worried about his studies and future instead of dabbling into adult affairs he knows little about. But preying on the vulnerability of "older" females in dire emotional need is his stock-in-trade. He gives "carefully researched acquiescence" to their submissions to warm his way--always. The length of his epistle is a clear depiction of his desperate need of their recognition. ![]() We hope he doesn't die of the logical fallacy of his long epistles faster than he is certain to die from the failed search of another vulnerable woman to scam and later troll out of Nairaland when relationship goes bad. ![]() |
Dragonking:Another great Nairalander from Delta state too? Nice discovery. Just like me which region in Delta you from, bro? |
PinketteDawn: Good and honest start.PinketteDawn:But you have the answer yourself . You just stated that yourself above. |
postmann:Alright, bro. Today was for side jabs and veiled swearwords!!! Tomorrow might be for brutal confrontation..... of facts of course ![]() Good night |
postmann:Last week, I saw him being shellacked by several monikers in Romance section!!! He denied his own picture, his very self like he denied it in my thread! Lolz. ![]() His moniker isn't worth the show or fight!!! I will never diss him, if it ever amounts to that, I will just tell of his life and e-story. My simple phraseology will always make it an interesting read!!! |
postmann:That was one error he will wish he never made. |
postmann:A certain female says I hound him , yet he made me more famous and carried my handle on his signature for weeks!!!! Tell me about anger and frustration! I'm certain he will put a bullet through me if he catches me in the flesh!!! ![]() |
postmann:A part of me has genuine sympathy for him, but when I remember his gift of inherent wickedness and devilish antics. I am tempted to knock him once after a while!!! |
postmann: The older he makes my age, the more excusable his failures are ![]() Should I kill him ? |
postmann:No appeasement !!! These females with a high dose of hypocrisy have mastered the art of self-deception. And the hanger-on foundling will always tag "older females" to prepp them for sponging ![]() I have nothing against a hungry thief as long as he's genuinely hungry. ![]() |
[quote author=postmann post=45817465][/quote]He dies not today, or never. Not by my hands though. Why rush to kill he whom fate has fated his doom? |
bukatyne:You're still equating the Bible to the West. Granted, Europeans brought us Christianity but Christianity isn't theirs!!! End of story. And Africans didn't love their wives? In my village an adulterous man gets a fine or excommunicated till this fücking day!!! Your West made adultery a non justiciable act!!! |
postmann:Did you see that teary-eyed lamenting griever? ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 (of 219 pages)


. In the very opening was a disclaimer to your claims. It saved me the pain of delving further. ( I did a screenshot for you)

