Logicboy01's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Logicboy01's Profile › Logicboy01's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (of 42 pages)
herald9: thought you were thebigurban? ![]() Would it have made you happier if I rewrote the whole quote again ![]() |
swezenberg: You are far from being a Christian. A Christian does not spew the kind of thrash you just spewed out. You are either an Islamic or a boko haram sympathizer who wants that phrase ' so help me God or in God we trust to be removed from the anthem. America was founded on Christian doctrines and principles but they have erred. They have left their God and allowed many foreign practise and gods in their land. The time of God's anger is coming just like His anger is coming upon Nigeria.Are you okay? So you are saying that it is God sending Ebola to Nigeria? See craze!!!! ![]() Also, if you took time to read the story, you would have found out that no one is trying to remove "so help me God". The argument from the atheist is that it should not be compulsory. Lastly, America was never founded as a christian country. Many of the founders were deists and some even slave owners. The treaty of tripoli even puts America as a secular country. |
TheBigUrban2: Is it only me? Am I being too harsh? ![]() ![]() |
urheme: Religion has failed you not nigeria,Religion has failed Nigeria. Our pastors are hypocrite adulterers, tithe scammers and frauds. Government had to order churches not to try ebola miracle healings. We have boko haram and Almajiris destroying the north. Religious preachers preaching ignorance from the pulpit. Politicians stealing and plundering, yet offered the front seat at churches. Actually, Europe has progressed beyond God. When the European saw the Ebola, they made protocols to prevent an epidemic. Fools in Nigeria were busy praying and paying tithes until it spread from Liberia. God is not self evident. The sun itself is self evident- no one argues that the sun doesnt exists. |
tbaba12345: Dodge issue?? I believe in the dictates of the sharia. Most muslim do.Your sentence in bold makes no sense; God is not required to formulate any argument. You just pulled that out of thin air. I hate having this argument with religious people. They cant argue morality without missing their obvious hypocrisy. Your prophet had over 10 wives and yet, you have the nerve to lecture other societies on fornication and adultery? In the eyes of the modern western world, your prophet is deemed a serial adulterer. |
An0nimus: Of course we're having a simple discussion. A simple 'yes' or 'no' should do. This one you sharply enter defensive modeYou are part of the people I am studying- morally bankrupt and yet act all holy. You know you asked a very foolish question- asking me if I am stalking people. Yet, you are now acting like you asked a simple question and i am being overly defensive. https://verastic.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/See-Your-Life.png |
Swiftboy: worst than I thought! I saw it did not believe it...to be an Atheist is believable.lolGuy, take your ignorance and anti atheist bigotry elsewhere. |
tbaba12345: Our Intuition, reason and logic keep shifting the borders of what is good or evil. It is all subjective. The point is there is no objective good without God. It depends on societal conventions which keep changing.That is unavoidable. Morality must change as we learn new things. Even with the Quran. Flogging adulterers was okay in islamic societies in the past as prescribed with the Quran. Today, many muslim apologists like yourself dodge the issue as if it is no more relevant because it makes no sense |
tbaba12345: Yet societies have deemed it ok to murder others, How is that an objective value? Societies deemed it ok to burn people on stakes or kill a certain race. It is subject to societal conventions.Human beings are not always objective and naturally, their societies will follow. However, after the age of enlightenment, we have become rapidly better at making objective laws for our societies. Since this argument is a wide topic, I will enumerate the various failings of your points for more organisation; 1) You claim that human societies have deemed murdering people to be okay and so they arent very objective. Ironically, it has been the islamic societies that have been at the forefront of irrationality, backwardness and death. Sharia law has not made any single society more peaceful, more woman-friendly, more developed. PROOF; the 10 least peaceful countries, 10 least women-friendly countries and 10 least developed countries are majorly islamic while the ones at the top are all secular. 2) God does not transcend subjectivity. You can not prove that. For argument sake, let us agree that God is 100% objective, that would still be a problem because the humans listening to him are not 100% objective -Imagine God (Allah) is Iphone 5 and we humans are Iphone 1. God (Allah) then gives us the perfect software (the Quran). That software (Quran) would be useless/subjective because our operating systems (brains) can not process the data/information (religious laws) in the software (Quran)- the software (Quran) is too advanced for our operating systems (brain) but we understand the basic coding since we are of the same image (sofware company- Apple) 3) No one knows what Allah looks like. No one agrees on the list of halal things. There are muslims who agree that bats are halal. Shia vs Sunni vs Quranists vs Ahmadiyyah vs Wahabbists etc. The Quran is written in a confusing manner; almost all humanists will define humanism as stated in the humanist manifesto equally but then, your muslims will define islam differently from the same Quran. Point- Allah isnt clearly defined in the Quran; muslims are divided over what he wants. Some even fight for him as if he cant defend himself |
https://commentphotos.com/gallery/CommentPhotos.com_1393519415.jpg The U.S. Constitution also provides that "No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification of any Office or public Trust under the United States It is not hard to spot a dubious religious apologist or a pseudointellectual; they put up strawmen and irrelevant analogies to argue away from the original point. The US constitution clearly voids mandating any religious test for a govt job (eg making "so help me God" mandatory) But here we have Anony arguing irrelevant things -"atheism is a religion" -"what of if Jews dont like eagles as they are unclean animals" -"the soldier should leave the airforce if he doesnt like it" We are talking freedom from religion in the constitutiom and pseudointellectuals are calling atheism a religion ![]() |
![]() If the building collapsed wouldnt it be faulty engineering rather than an attack? |
tbaba12345: What I am saying is that if God does not exist then there are NO objective moral values. Moral values such as “Murdering innocent people for entertainment is wrong” and “Defending the innocent is good” are merely social conventions without God.1/10. Fail Just like Kay17 said, the idea of objectivity is that objective values remain objective on their own, without the need of an outside moral agent. God is not necessary for 1 + 1 = 2. It remains true whether God exists or not. Same with murder (killing a person for no reason); it remains objectively evil because it is detrimental to the victim and society at large if let people die anyhow. It even becomes worse when you consider that your belief in God is subjective- based on faith and not facts. If we asked 100 muslims to describe God, we would get 100 different descriptions because there is no objective fact or evidence for God. Yes, your belief in God is highly subjective and as such, you cant claim any objectivity (including an objective morality) with God. If you do not believe that your belief in God is subjective, then ask yourself why there is no objective consensus over things that are halal/haram in islam. Even your imam would have a far different understanding of what God forbids/accepts from you. |
^^^ Guilty conscience (from my accusation) forces op to come back and address criticism after ignoring it at first. #power of suggestion |
^^^ Funny how they are limited outside the islam section ![]() |
Lol! The op gets called out on his BS Op then proceeds to derail his own thread to avoid dealing with criticism ![]() |
An0nimus: Sounds like a day job to me. Hope you don't also stalk these people?You are a big fool. Why do you have to descend into such foolishness? Here I was thinking we were having a simple discussion ![]() |
RayMcBlue: Wasn't I explicit enough? ![]() Take a look at the bold. 1) It is not exactly a law but a a mandatory requirement (oath?) for those joining the Airforce 2) It is not universally accepted. Actually, it is universally seen to be id.iotic in secular countries. The very UK that USA copied the oath from doesnt even have the requirement (it is optional to mention the part about God) 3) The very oath (requiring mentioning God) has been removed in the courts and other arms of the armed forces because of its unconstitutionality. It is now optional to mention God 4) It is not a perception of threatening atheists constitutional rights. The mandatory oath is both illegal and unconstitutional against the freedom of religion. And here is the most important point about your FOOLISH POST; -RayMcblue; A tiny minority so selfish that they want the law abolished in order to suit their personal ideology. 5) The same thing slave owning whites said about blacks. The same thing white segregationist said about the rights of black people. Conclusion; you are an ignorant tool and I am not a hypocrite |
RayMcBlue: My opinion may be foolish but it sure as hell beats your rank hypocrisy. Case closed.And where is the hypocrisy? ![]() Show me |
An0nimus: Which people?People that can claim grace and righteousness in christ and still commit wicked and heartless deeds ![]() They know themselves |
RayMcBlue: No matter. It shouldn't be an issue. It's not like the United Air Force is actively forcing it's recruits to conform to the Christian faith or anything.It is psychologically damaging. And since you feel that atheists asking for their constitutional rights is the same as radical christians protesting outside an abortion clinic, I HAVE TO LEAVE YOU WITH YOUR FOOLISHNESS. GOODBYE ![]() |
RayMcBlue: Only a trouble maker and someone with a lot of spare time on their hands would opt to make a mountain out of what can easily be circumvented.Your ignorance is showing quite clearly. who is the troublemaker- the Airforce higher-ups who are breaking the law/constitution and infringing on the religious freedom of atheist soldiers or the atheist soldier who is claiming his rights? Note that other armed forces (military and navy) dropped this nonsense.... |
RikoduoSennin: The bolded is just plain wrong, I never said anything like that nor suggest such a thing. I merely state my observation of Nairaland atheist community. I did not imply "all", I said "some".Good point....so are you still a christian |
So what? Your terrorists are more popular than christian terrorists ![]() In a christian populated country, they are always going to give islam a less than favourable treatment |
RayMcBlue: If the rule said that you must say "So help me God", then by all means, say it. Just go through the motions. You don't have to believe it. I say "Jesus" all the time, and yet I don't believe in Jesus or any other supernatural being(s). It's just an expression, no more, no less.Well, you seem to like your constitutional rights being trampled upon. In the USA, it is illegal to make "so help me God" compulsory in any govt job |
ATMC: ...and second like is so u know u r wrong. Btwn its not always about you...learn that. ![]() |
Ubenedictus: it isn't fair, but i'm sure if atheist were in power it wont be any different.not only is the bold part irrelevant but it is also false. You'd be hard pressed to find a secular government forcing christians to say "there is no God" |





