Health › Re: Lady Bleeds To Death As Maitama General Hospital Refuses To Attend To Her by LordReed(m): 11:23am On Sep 30, 2023 |
sureboykris: Na wa There are many reason this could happen Number one is that the hospital might not even have the capacity to take care of such emergency
There's also a possibility the lady is already dead . But hospital staff should learn to communicate properly.
As for police report, hospitals have been asked to treat while waiting for report. But fear of harassment from police won't let them
In all , Nigeria has a long way to go Huh? Maitama General Hospital doesn't have capacity to take care of stab wound? Are you joking or what? |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Democrats Take Control Of Congress by LordReed(m): 11:21am On Sep 30, 2023 |
basilico: Tesla is under probe by DoJ also for planning to build a spectacular glass house in Texas. The house was not built. DoJ says there were plans for it to be secretly used by Elon Musk.
The DoJ is also investigating Tesla over the mileage Tesla says their cars manage on a single charge with suspicions about incorrect dashboard displays.
Never thought US govt would stoop so low as to go after their critics. Champion of fake takes, which of these involves illegal aliens? |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Democrats Take Control Of Congress by LordReed(m): 10:36am On Sep 30, 2023 |
basilico: Full Quote..Reinforces my earlier comment on the impeachment inquiry importance to dig out the cold hard facts. Turley comments on full context. They sold you an optical illusion. A mirage. People like you are only interested in one side of the story. Republicans are evil and Biden is a saint. This is what Turley said.
I want to emphasize what it is that we're here today for. This is a question of an impeachment inquiry . It is not a vote on articles of impeachment. In fact, I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment. That is something that an inquiry has to establish. But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Biden.
The inquiry is essentially designed to turn up evidence, if any, that would be sufficient to follow through with impeachment proceedings. But apparently, Democrats are hoping the public is gullible enough to buy what they are selling. Turn up evidence like this one: https://youtube.com/shorts/evPpb4LOOq4?si=7XsfyqvJRPe6HOw7 |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Democrats Take Control Of Congress by LordReed(m): 10:33am On Sep 30, 2023 |
BornAgainCow: Don’t even have the guts to quote who you are referring too 😂😂
You lost the argument bro. Please sit down. The VAST majority of Americans agree your man is a senile, weak and ineffective president who is likely to lose to Trump in a few months time. This is not me speaking. This is what the polls are saying. So keep crying. Suddenly polls are very valid again. LoLz. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Democrats Take Control Of Congress by LordReed(m): 10:22am On Sep 30, 2023 |
basilico: Biden admin targets Tesla for not hiring illegal aliens. Now the admin is suing Tesla for discrimination against blacks. Would this have happened if Musk did not buy Twitter. They cannot bankrupt him, Tesla is doing well thanks to the green agenda . Neither can they ignore Starlink, SpaceX who are miles ahead of competition. Biden admin is just promoting democracy and the vote.
Electric car maker Tesla, Inc., violated federal law by tolerating widespread and ongoing racial harassment of its Black employees and by subjecting some of these workers to retaliation for opposing the harassment, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today. According to the EEOC’s suit, since at least 2015 to the present, Black employees at Tesla’s Fremont, California manufacturing facilities have routinely endured racial abuse, pervasive stereotyping, and hostility as well as epithets such as variations of the N-word, “monkey,” “boy,” and “black b*tch.” Slurs were used casually and openly in high-traffic areas and at worker hubs. Black employees regularly encountered graffiti, including variations of the N-word, swastikas, threats, and nooses, on desks and other equipment, in bathroom stalls, within elevators, and even on new vehicles rolling off the production line, the EEOC said. Another false take. Where in what you quoted does it say illegal alien? You just like carrying water for racists. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 8:48pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Define forbidden Well, true. We are all encouraged to choose vocational skills or institutions that help us gain skills rather than go to university. Many factors play. The moral climate in the system and young ones are pressured to completely reject God or service to God and the philosophy It's still a matter of choice No one is pressured
How's that forbidden? Where in my post do you see forbidden? Meanwhile I recently watched a Watchtower video where an elder was stripped of his rank because his daughter decided to go to university and it was affecting other girls in the congregation. So you are saying such a thing will not happen even though it is coming right from the organisation? |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 7:00pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Yes. The Bible itself is seen by many as a religious figure as 2 Timothy 3:16 says that it is inspired of God. Genesis account helps us understand that sequence and order of creation in a reasonable manner though it does not mention all the details as to how and when Then it mentions about how the first humans were formed. From the dust of the earth. Science itself attests to it that the elements found in the dust is also found in the human body While several religions and logic helps us see that there's indeed a Creator, the Bible presents it in a way that is clear. Helping us to understand other questions as to why the earth was created, and the future... The Bible account give us details that evolution can never give us such as. Where we come from (History), why we are here (Purpose) and where we are going. By means of God's spirit did God help in creating the universe which includes the earth. The Bible just presents his personality more just as the blueprint of a house can tell you more of the owner /architect... It does not say when but it says the universe had a beginning before God began creating
1. Who created the earth - Nehemiah 9:6, Isaiah 42:5,8 2. With what did he use to create the earth - Psalm 33:6 3. Why did God create the earth - Isaiah 45:18, Genesis 1:2, Psalm 115:16
4. How will life be like on earth in the future? Psalm 37:10,11,29... Revelation 21:3,4...
The above are just points or verses that the Bible mentions about creation How do we know that the Bible is even true and the word of God. We have to put the Bible on trial and investigate it (not with an overly critical, pessimistic attitude like atheists do) but to determine if it is true. Now since the Bible claims to be the word of God and a gift for mankind, we expect that such book will become widely distributed and translated ans easy to read irrespective of location or language of the Bible... Statistics tells us that the Bible has been translated in about 4000 languages in whole or in part ; about 100% of earth's inhabitants have access to the Bible and billions of copies has been produced. The Bible remains the bestseller for all time... That can only be unique of God's word
But, the distribution of the Bible and accessibility and translation is not really convincing to believe that the Bible is God's word... What other point(s) give credit to the Bible as being God's word as it says?
1. History 2. Science 3. Prophecy 4. Moral advice
1. History: The Bible is a book of history as it not only talks about God but discuss about the dealings with men spanning several millennia. The Bible is not a myth as it mention specific events, names of people, places that still exist today or that existed then and still supported by secular records. Unlike mythical and other religious books that uses 'once upon a time, a certain man in a certain land', the Bible mentions dates, places, names of people that are well corroborated by secular history and archeology ... Once upon a time, critics did not believe that people like David, Pilate, Belshazzar, Nineveh etc never existed. Archeology has silenced them and is silencing them... Bible writers also mentions their own weaknesses and how they and their kings were punished for rebellion e.g, Simon Peter denials, David adultery, Jonah disobedience, Moses punishment. Something that other history books would have left out... The Bible mentions the occupation of people of places, how they did things, buried people, punished people, their capitals, many things that we would never have otherwise known. People have taken interest to validate or invalidate these, only giving credit to the Bible
2. Science... Science is dynamic. As we keep studying science, the laws and theories tend to change from time to time... What scientists see as fact 500 years ago is now laughable. The Bible is not a science textbook but what it says regarding science, even thousands of years ago is still fact though it was not commonly accepted. For example, the Bible mentions about the sequence of the water cycle about 3500 years ago... How would anyone know when they did not have sophisticated equipment like we have today? It describes the condensation, evaporation and condensation process in very simple and logical manner and later, someone mentions about the flow of water bodies - where they come from and how they return,explaining why the volumes of the sea is not rapidly increasing (Job 36:27, 28 and Ecclesiastes 1:7)... Ancient science describes the earth as flat and hanging on some creatures until Isaac Newton came up wit the gravity postulate... You may remember that in Geography (if you studied that), we were taught that it is only not too far that we accepted that the earth is spherical and the biggest evidence was from aerial photograph... 3500 years ago, a Bible writer wrote that the earth is not hanging on any support. How did he know? Did he go to space to view the earth or use any telescope 🔭? It was not even invented. 2700 years ago, someone wrote that the earth is a circle. How did he know either especially as it was opposite the common viewpoint and nobody in the secular world embraced the idea until the invention of the telescope and people going into space? They claim that what they say is inspired of God. What God says regarding science, through is word was FACT.
3. Prophecy : No man can foretell the future... Even weather forecast of the next few hours may be wrong. The biggest evidence that the Bible was inspired is in its prophecy which were pronounced several decades and centuries but now fulfilled in EXACT details... Did you know that about 200 years in advance, a man prophecied that a world power will invade and destroy his own nation and take many into captivity and later that same worldpower would be overthrown by a man named Cyrus, without a battle? It even add that's this worldpower, on the night of its overthrow will carelessly leave their doors open, creating chance for the overthrow and the deep moat that surrounded the nation as a protection will go down? And that later, this worldpower will be destroyed and no human will inhabit it forever? The prophecy was fulfilled and secular history confirms it. Babylon invaded and destroyed Jerusalem, Babylon was overthrown by Cyrus without a battle, he diverted the waters surrounding the city to gain access inside and the doors were left open due to the revelry of people of the city. Today, Babylon is in ruins and unlivable. It is like someone saying that Washington DC or Beijing or Moscow will destroy Libya and that same worldpower be destroyed by LordReed (whose father was not even born) and LordReed will remove the city's natural defence, overthrow the government just like that and that Washington will later be destroyed and unlivable... Only by divine inspiration could such prediction have happened... Another prophet predicted the fall of Nineveh and it's total destruction. This happened so much that critics said that Nineveh never existed. Today, only tiny remains have been excavated by archeologist confirming the city as once the capital of the Assyrian world power Did you know that, when Daniel lived (Babylon was world power). He predicted who the next world power would be? MedoPersia, then Greece (he even mentioned how great the king of Greece would be and his exploits but he'll die young and his kingdom won't go to his children but divided into 4 parts. That was true of Alexander the great), after Greece would be Rome (and that during the Roman worldpower is when the Messiah, Christ will come but he will be killed and Jerusalem will be destroyed). He also foretold that Rome will be divided into nations but the tiniest, insignificant nations will defeat three nations far greater and powerful than itself and it will become great and a dual worldpower but this worldpower will not be strong unlike other previous worldpowers due to the influence of the common people. Rome became divided. Britain was the smallest and insignificant but it destroyed Netherlands, Spain and France to become top and greatest empire but during the worldpower, it joined with USA to form what we call the Anglo-American worldpower which we have today but Anglo-American is not even strong due to the influence of the people as they tend to protest, revolution, insurrections, take the government to court, their democracy is even divided as we can see today, who is that man or group that would have done these when Babylon, MedoPersia, Greece, Rome were worldpower? The result will be fatal. The Bible mentions the name of the government that will destroy the Anglo-American worldpower. It will destroy it and every human government and be the sole government ruling forever, bringing about real peace and justice. If what the Bible says about successive worldpower has been fulfilled, it is foolish to deny that Anglo-American will be destroyed and we'll have a sole, world government... I did not even mention Jesus' prophecy of our time. He foretold that world condition and people attitude will be bad and our planet will be ruined by mankind - a time of wars, earthquakes, food shortages, epidemics and fearful sights. He said that about 2000 years ago. If you'd asked someone just 100 or 200 years ago about how life would be today, the prediction was that thing will be better. Remember vision 2020. 2020 came and it was completely out of what we expected
4. Moral advice: I don overwrite na😏
4 This is the thing with gish gallop, it takes a whole lot more writing to address even 1 point. I will address your 4 points 1 after another shortly. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 6:58pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: They don't forbid education Are JWs encouraged to go to university or to forego it? |
Christianity Etc › Re: how atheists are taking advantage of the liberalism in christianity. by LordReed(m): 6:56pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
HISSCRIBE1995: the one playing on the tv . You watch a TV that is off? Is that one Christian magic or what? LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 3:26pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: the less peope think the louder they are. Pointing to yourself again. LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 12:59pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
gisevak: Did you observe his views? They are not honest. He results in insults because he has no explanations for the questions being asked. He could not provide an explanation of the origin of human existence, nor did he provide explanations on how the creator of the universe is not a mystery. He would have just said he didn't know instead of trying to defend his dishonest stand. Personally, I do not subscribe to believing in something just because we are told, without making an effort to find out if it is true or not. I do not claim I know it all, nor can I prove the mysteries in the world for now. You insulted me the first time I overlooked it. You insulted me again and then I gave to you and now you are crying crocodile tears. All your valid questions I answered but did you answer any question except to dodge and insult? Always looking to project your failings on to others. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 12:37pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: continue,,, I am done with you. You were well roasted so yeah you are done. LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 12:36pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Publish what? Is Evolution really Scientific? We know what the scientific approach is na Publish your findings that evolution is not scientific or it's a myth. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 12:35pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: I mentioned them Or I should describe a bison and saber-toothed cat for you. Right, I didn't see that you had. So you are saying mammoth, bison and sabre toothed cat were frozen as a result of the flood? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 12:26pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Evolution is a science with a very debatable definition A theory that has not met scientific approach Don't stay on Nairaland with your analysis, publish it so that you can refute all the science evolution has enabled. LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 12:25pm On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: I m not in your level in any way so I wont bring self down to your mediocre level . I gave you more proof than verbal abuse, while you provided more verbal abuse than any proof. you argue maliciously and foolishly, at the end you resort to usless verbal abuse to gain leverage. next time dont quote me again to engage me in any argument because I dont discuss with total idiots. Stupid empty barrel, proof that you started arguing with because it didn't fit with your stupid narrative. LMAO! You are a dunce and you proved it, you even implicated yourself and yet you have mouth. Bwahahahahahaha! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 11:33am On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: people who are empty and have no fact to present during argument resort to verbal abuse. you have shown your true colour. you judge who is the empty barrel. Dundi are you not the one who started with the insults. You just proved that you are indeed a stupid empty barrel. Thanks for that. LMAO! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 10:02am On Sep 29, 2023 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 10:01am On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: keep arguing with yourself. mumu I clearly can't argue with you since you're nothing but a stupid empty barrel. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 9:41am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Is evolution a fact? Has it met scientific approach? Can a unicellular evolve into5a bicellular organism even in a controlled environment? Can organisms mate with other organisms outside their own kind? Do scientist agree on it? Even the definition? 15 years ago, Darwin thought that the Cell was so simple... The Cell, even the most 'simplest' cell is complex Who's mumu here? Oga write your paper and overturn evolution. LMFAO! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 9:25am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Which I did You lack comprehension of English? Aside from mammoth which other animal nah, don't play dumb. LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 9:24am On Sep 29, 2023 |
cornelboy: Lol don't mind this guy. They will tell you evolution is a very slow process that it can take millions of years before an organism could successfully evolve to another thing. How on earth did they know that? Humans lifespan is not even up to 200 years.
Na so so assumptions and myths dem dé give this atheist guys chop and dem dé swallow am  You in such an awesome position to overturn all biological science, just write a paper and present evidence that evolution is a myth. LoLz. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 9:22am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: They are many na Visit the internet The bison, mastodon, saber-toothed cats, etc
Intelligent atheist with rational thinking in an irrational planet LoLz. Mention 1, just 1. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 8:57am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Fine Personally, I don't drop links I drop screenshot so that everyone can see the point I'm making Bear in mind how none of you have addressed the OP The closest was Jaephoenix but he mentioned 'probably' and said he does not know That's your cup of tea. I am not interested in addressing the original post. What I was interested in was addressing something the OP said. Too bad if you don't like it. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 8:51am On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: I can see your frustration. But just end the argument by presenting me with an article like I did showimg mountains growing out of the water with fish being fossilized on them? Mugu man. Dumbo I already did but you are clearly too stupid to read. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 8:51am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: I never said only mammoth were frozen Use your brain Which other animal was frozen, dumbo. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 8:50am On Sep 29, 2023 |
EMILO2STAY: dont be stupid. I gave you that because I know you dont know. But nevertheless soft tissues in fossilized animals are note common at all. It is not what one expects when digging out fossils that has been materialized and hardened like a stone. How can soft tissues survive beeing minerialized and hardened? You dumb slowpoke!! Unless in rare situations liket the case of the t- rex. The presence of iron in the t- rex bone made it possible for it to survive that long.which makes that find a rare one and first of its kind in 2005 since the excavation of dinosaur fossils since the 1800. Soft tissues in fossilized animals is not a common sight. Besides the fact the soft tissues was found in fossils proves that these animals died out a few thousand years not millions of hears ago. Dumbo you claimed that fossilization is rapid so explain why the so called flood did not equally cause all the fossilised specimens to retain their soft tissue. Global flood evidence my arse. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did God Destroy The Earth With Flood? by LordReed(m): 8:47am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Himalayas is the only place you see scattered fossils? Stop dodging and explain how in the same flood only mammoths got frozen but the whales and other animals didn't. Was mammoth the only animal living in the arctic? |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 8:41am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Drop screenshot of your point in the link you dropped Aemmyjah: I am not reading any link Drop screenshot to prove your point If you're too lazy to click the link then that's not my problem. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 8:02am On Sep 29, 2023 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 7:59am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: By intelligent mind or by accident? Intelligent atheist  NATURAL PROCESS
|
Christianity Etc › Re: How Do Atheists Address The Question Of Human Existence? by LordReed(m): 7:53am On Sep 29, 2023 |
Aemmyjah: Then prove to us that something can emerge from nothing na Why do all these dumdums keep asking me to produce evidence for claims I didn't make? |