₦airaland Forum

Aemmyjah:
Do you understand sciences

What happens before, during and after a global Deluge (if it really occurred) as to temperature and climate especially in polar regions?

the book Earth’s Most Challenging Mysteries asks:

“What made rabbits run into the same cave as coyotes? And an antelope with a wolverine and a grizzly? Bones of the mastodon were found, also a few reptiles . . . The whole mass of bones was covered and preserved by a flood deposit of gravel and rocks.”


In the book, The Mammoth and the Flood, "We want a cause that should kill the animals, and yet not break to pieces their bodies, or even mutilate them, . . . which would bury the bodies as well as kill the animals, . . . which could sweep together animals of different sizes and species, and mix them with trees and other debris of vegetation. What cause competent to do this is known to us, except rushing water on a great scale? . . . Water . . . is the only cause known to me capable of doing the work on a scale commensurate with the effects we see in Siberia.”


Atheist without sense
Some atheists even acknowledge that there was once a great deluge but they said the Bible account was copied... That does not deny that there was once a great flood

LoLz. Dumdum explain how mammoth got frozen intact but whale was not, in the same flood. Abi you don't know that mountain tops are practically frozen especially the Himalayas.

Dumdums that cannot reason.

Aemmyjah:
"" further evidence that a flood of immense proportions occurred in the not-too-distant past is the great number of fossils and carcasses deposited in icy, mucky dumps. The Saturday Evening Post noted: “Many of these animals were perfectly fresh, whole and undamaged, and still either standing or at least kneeling upright. . . . Here is a really shocking​—to our previous way of thinking—​picture. Vast herds of enormous, well-fed beasts not specifically designed for extreme cold, placidly feeding in sunny pastures . . . Suddenly they were all killed without any visible sign of violence and before they could so much as swallow a last mouthful of food, and then were quick-frozen so rapidly that every cell of their bodies is perfectly preserved.”

One such may have been the mammoth that was uncovered by excavators in Siberia. Vegetation was still in its mouth and stomach, and its flesh was even edible when thawed out.


You were expecting all carcasses of such disaster to rest on a mountain?

Explain how the mammoth got frozen during a flood according to your narrative.

Aemmyjah:
What questions?
Fossils discredit that a global flood ever happened?

Was the mammoth found on a mountain? Was it buried in sediment or it was frozen in ice?

Aemmyjah:
Remember what the issue of discussion on the thread is all about

Yes so go on answer the questions. LoLz.

gisevak:
Every human knows that there are a lot of mysteries in the world, of which the universe creator is one, and human existence is part of them. And many more mysteries. But you said there was no mystery behind the creator of the universe. Please don't mention me, nor do you quote me with your bunch of ignorant and illogical guesses again.

LoLz! Says the dumbass looking for what is not lost.

gisevak:
Smh! What is that question you are asking?

Go back and read my posts not going to repeat something I have repeated more than thrice already.

EMILO2STAY:
go fimd a job imstead of making usless argument on nairaland Mumu

person who thinks fairytale is fact. You are the miserable dumbass who needs to go get a life and stop talking of things that are evidently out of your depth.

EMILO2STAY:
an animal covered by sediment and minerialized to the bone for thousands of years is what you expect soft tissues from ? Are you normal? The volcanic eruption that happened in Pompeii around 79ad which saw many people covered in hot ash while they where still alive. This people though dead can still be seen today as they are only an image or figure of ashes in human form. Yet nothing like soft tissue in them even though it happened recently compared to noahs flood.
The fact that they where buried rapdly under what we know today as rocks dims the chances of any soft tissues to remzin intact.

I know your a slowpoke arguing senslessly but I just hope to educate you if you will learn.

You are a dummy. You mentioned a TRex that was found with soft tissue yet you are saying we shouldn't see soft tissue. Aren't you a dumbass that can't reason?

person if a specimen is fossilized with soft tissue the soft tissue will still be there no matter how long.

You are just a slowpoke arguing like a blind fool.

EMILO2STAY:
I am not a sheeple like you. The same universities teach evolution with out fact. So because university'sdont teach it does not make it fasle or untrue. The fossils speak for themselves. What are the facts behind evolution the universities teach? Mr university with dumb brain.

Ah I see it's a fact that you manufactured in your dumdum brain. LoLz.

EMILO2STAY:
whats is this your nonsense with soft tissue? Who is talking about that? So because they said so you must beleive it. Ok let me ask you what is the proof that they are millions of years old.?

You are the one who is trapped by his own nonsense. If fossilization is rapid then soft tissue in fossils will be prevalent since the trapped bodies will have no time to decompose (which ). But the fossil you linked has no soft tissue meaning it had time to decompose. But your dumb brain can't reason. The same dumdum who said this:

EMILO2STAY:
not the way it is found in the fossil records. the animals that appear in the fossil records are caught in action while alive.

is the same dumdum asking why soft tissue is an issue. How do you know they were alive and in action without the soft tissue dumdum?

The dating method used.

gisevak:
This shows how your mother trained you. I don't need to trade words with you. This thread is about the existence of humans and consciousness in the first place. If you can't talk about it, you can shamefully leave my thread for more logical people.

Look at this this one crying crocodile tears. When you were calling me ignorant e dey sweet you bah, now that you are on the receiving end you want to cry. Bwahahahahaha!

I asked you a simple question that you not been able to answer only to be dodging and trying to turn it on to me. If you have any shame yourself you'll stop posting and go think of what to do with your life instead of navel gazing and thinking of fairytale creators.

gisevak:
You made the claim that there is no mystery behind a creator. OK, "the origin of consciousness in the universe and human existence", is also not a mystery to you. I wonder at your level of ignorance.

Are you stupìd? What has the origin of consciousness got to do with a creator?

EMILO2STAY:
the agw of the fossils are wrong and cannot be substantiated in a ny way. Just mere speculations. They are not fact. But what is fact is that these fossils where found at the top of mountains which can only happen if that mountain was once covered by water and the animals where buried quickly and alive. Go find another excuse you know nothing.

Ýou linked an article that dated the fossil to millions of years yet you are arguing. Don't you see how stupìd you are? Bwahahahahaha!

EMILO2STAY:
dumb guy,the soft tissues found on fossils such as that of the t-rex proves it cannot be miilions of years. Instead it proves it to be just a few thousand years.

LMFAO! So why doesn't the whale fossil have soft tissue? You just irredeemably stupid making you unable to think. The article you linked said the whale fossil is millions of years old. Numb skull. Bwahahahahaha!

EMILO2STAY:
your a waste of time. Di professor need to teach you that fossilzation needs water? You have no point. The evolution theory taught in schools today where is the fact? You argue childishly.

Fucktàrd thinks his fairytale is fact. Dumdum go to reputable university's history department and tell them global flood is historical fact let them laugh you out of there you numbskull.

EMILO2STAY:
you expect to find soft tissue in petrified body of thousands of years. What a dunce.

LMFAO! So why are there fossils with soft tissue from millions of years ago?

Numb skull.

EMILO2STAY:
I gave you articles to prove the fact I stated. I am not your mate n anything . You always arguemnt senslessly and just beating about the bush. Why don't you show me a proof of mountains growing out with fishes and whales on it? Dunce argumentator.give an article like I did on mountains growing out and fossilizing whales on it.

The articles prove you wrong just by the age of the fossil alone talk more of all the obvious details that completely contradict your narrative.

You are a massive numb skull who didn't even read the articles he linked. Nonsense.

gisevak:
Simple question: how did you arrive at the conclusion that the mystery of a creator does not exist? Did you just make a guess without a fact? Is this how atheists reason—they just make up any idea for us to accept without proof or facts?
So, if you're accused of a crime, would the police legally throw you into prison without being convicted?

There is no mystery because there is no valid ground to consider the idea of a creator or creators. The idea is simply nonsense. How do you now want me to manufacture evidence for the nonsense?

With no evidence of a crime so where is such an accusation going to come from? You'll just dream it up?

EMILO2STAY:
they prove my point of a rapid burial and fossilization of sea creatures on a mountain. An indication that the mountian was once covered by water. Who is talking of soft tissue?

If it was rapid why is there no soft tissue? LoLz.

EMILO2STAY:
I already shpwed you if your serious google those words. If not then quit qouting me cuz your a waste of time.

You are the waste of time. Always spewing nonsense as if you know what you are talking about only to show you know diddly squat.

Aemmyjah:
😂 🤣 😂
I'm sure you've not heard of the mammoth

LoLz. Lemme ask you was the mammoth found on a mountain? Was it buried in sediment or it was frozen in ice?

gisevak:
See how you are running away to provide an answer to how you came to your conclusion. That's what I have predicted here about self-acclaimed atheists without proof of their stands. They have no proof of their stand and still come to a conclusion about something they have no proof of. Is that logical?

Which running away? What is there to run away from? I'll tell you what is illogical, expecting me to provide proof for an idea that has no merit. Meanwhile you who thinks the idea has merit can provide no basis for why such an idea has merit. You are always pointing the fingers that implicate you.

EMILO2STAY:
you have no line of defence or proof now you want me to teach you. lol simply google. " fossil showing animals eating or giving birth" a see the substance in what I am saying. As the pictures I tried uploading refused uploading

You should be ashamed of your self for typing nonsense.

Not going to do your work for you. Show an example of such a fossil.

EMILO2STAY:
You should consider it a luxury that I indulge you.
https://theweek.com/speedreads/578738/paleontologists-discover-whale-fossil-mountain

https://www.forestrynepal.org/mysterious-discovery-of-dead-whale-in-himalayan-mountains-raises-questions-and-debate/

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1432014/bible-great-flood-genesis-marine-fossils-fish-mount-everest-himalayan-noah-ark-spt

None of these show an example of a fossilized fish or whale with soft tissue.

EMILO2STAY:
you have no line of defence or proof now you want me to teach you. lol simply google. " fossil showing animals eating or giving birth" a see the substance in what I am saying. As the pictures I tried uploading refused uploading

You should be ashamed of your self for typing nonsense.

LoLz. Show me 1 example.

EMILO2STAY:
what do you mean substantiate? do you have sense? do you need a lecturer to teach you something your common sense, logic and reality confirms? . is it not the same professor in university that has been teaching people the Darwinian evolutions without substantiating it with any evidence what soever. instead their attempt at faking it with the piltdown man and the peking man was exposed by steven j gould.

go and do small research before engaging me in any discussion or argument. you no reach

LMFAO!. Oh so the professors are not teaching this so called fact in history, archeology, paleontology so where is fact, in your backyard? Bwahahahahahaha!

gisevak:
The statement I quoted, or simply put, "There is no mystery of a creator or creators": how did you come to this conclusion?

Because the idea of a creator or creators has no basis in reality. If you think it does, provide such a basis.

gisevak:
How did you arrive at this conclusion?

What conclusion?

gisevak:
Since you know there is no universe-creator mystery, why don't you bring forward facts or proof to unleash the mystery? Did you read my stand on whether creators exist or not? How can you ask questions that I have already answered? You seem to not pay attention to the details being discussed. It's normal for humans to assume things are created or not, but your stand is highly illogical.

I should bring evidence for a mystery that doesn't exist? Can you even hear youself? LoLz.

EMILO2STAY:
wetin this one de talk? there are over 150 cultures world wide with a legendry tale of a world wide flood and in this legendary stories only 8people survived in a boat . this goes to show you that these people are aware of such because this stories and legends where passed down to them from ancestors who witnessed it or were born immediately after the flood.

scientific observation and test have proven that fossilization cannot happend unless water is involved, the rapid burial of animals some while eating, some while giving birth as discovered in the fossile records have shown that they where buried rapidly by a fast moving water.

flavius josephus the Jewish historian wrote of the noah ark still sitting in mount Ararat in Turkey. he wrote of how the wood was still been scrapped of the ark before it was fully fossilized.

so you can see that history ,archeology, paleontology and science all confirms the flood as true. forget about the nonsense your talking about proffesor in nsuka.

LoLz. Why is that you can never substantiate the nonsense you spew. If the global flood is a history ,archeology, paleontology fact then it should be taught in school curriculum shouldn't it? So how come no competent university is teaching it in its history ,archeology, paleontology curriculums? Nonsense upon nonsense.

sukkot:
hey those who are feeling it are feeling it. just thank GOD you are not part of the bullseye

Are you not the one "hungrying" for ww3?

sukkot:
ww3 raging as we speak. na who feel am know about am. over 3 million ukraine and russia deaths

Why do you lie like a fool sometimes? LoLz.