₦airaland Forum

jeromestarks:
The baby of a cheating woman is not innocent: it is her blood. Whatever comes out of her is contaminated. It's like a wine from a dirty cup - it's no good use.

You are sick and need help ASAP.

Maynman:
Lordreed, ignoticism only makes sense when you are talking to a non theist especially these agnostics. A typical theist has a name for his deity, “god” is just a generic title, an English word with Germanic origins.
A yahweh worshipper and a Allah(hubal) worshipper will never agree they worship the same “god”, they worship different things call “god”.

Also Ignosticism and theological noncognitivism are similar but different. Taking on labels like workch is a endless circle.

I have a lot think about with regards to ignosticism, it's kinda new to me so I want to take time to really learn about it.

triplechoice:
, You can remain unmoved like an Egyptian mummy by what you imagined is 'your saltiness " Its doesn't concern me.,and it's your opinion . You didn give me what I asked for . I want your thoughts on the matter first.

I believe I asked a human being a question .

What's the difference between chatting with a bot and copying and pasting something for me to read, without further explanations

I have data to search for myself .

Besides, what you brought , I have sent it before and even more than that.


The normal thing to do , which everyone does here ,except some few , is to share your thoughts first on the matter to show you understand very well what you are explaining , and then support it with other mateials from the net .

Maynman copy and paste things
regularly from wiki,,but usually gives it a dfferent interpretation nearly everytime.

The definition of agnosticism he got from somewhere is being interpreted waywardly by him to suggest agnostics are people who believe in a god . Have you not seen that ?

Go through the thread and see how he highlighted 'believes' ,ignored the further explanations, and then use it to claim another thing to troll.

I'm not saying you are the same.
But clear my doubts .That's all .I don't want to waste my time anymore here chatting with people who don't understand the topic under discussion . It doesn't always end well .

In any case , That's past . No more interested . Thank you .

Goodnight .

Bye, Felicia. LMFAO!

Workch:
I'm just glad that we are on the same page with regards to atheism not being scientific.

But do you agree that science is agnostic? Specifically, science is Ignosticist.
The answer is invariably that "does God exist" is a non-question not worth taking seriously until someone, some day, comes along with a clear, non-outlandish and falsifiable concept.

I think as I learn everyday, I am tilting toward Ignosticism. But I am still doing my research.

Ignosticism doesn't claim to be scientific either but sure I am leaning towards it even more. These series of discussions have shown that the question what is a god has no good answers and cannot form the basis for any substantial inquiry.

triplechoice:
Then you are completely off or trying to play a deceptive game

Who is talking of disbelief alone ?

'I neither believe nor disbelieve ' is mentioned together to decribe something ,but you were comparing it to another thing that is completely different .

You don't know this at all .

I can see you don't like having your own bitter medicine which you like giving others .

I like it very much you are complaining .Lol

Next time discuss what you know and stop casting innuedoes at others for something they have said you barely understand .

I was the one who talked about ,"neither believing nor disbelieving" so don't come to ask me ,' where did I mention you '

And again , the terms ,lack of belief ,disbelief, and even lack of faith are all synonyms which describe the same thing ,atheism .

If you think otherwise, put your lack of belief in context and let me show you it can be replaced with the others .


Describes your lack of belief in a god using clear simple terms so others see what it really means to have a lack of belief in a god ,

Keep your copy and paste from Google . Let's see what you know .

Deceive who? You? What would that accomplish for me? Bwahahahahahaha!

LoLz! Your saltiness doesn't move me. I have provided you what you asked, if you have questions ask them, I won't be indulging you in repeating what should be clear to someone with secondary school education.

Workch:
If you had provided evidence and not trying to run from pillar to post, we would have ended this debate.

LoLz! Asked and answered. Reread it if you have forgotten. Bwahahahahahahaha!

KnownUnknown:
Man, the polytheist gets no love!!!!

I have a thousand gods with evidence.

Like that time Zeus turned into a bull and Sango obliterated that tree. LoLz.

Workch:
just substantiate your position with evidence 😂😂
Stop the distraction or agree that you lack any evidence

Asking questions that have already been treated is a sign of something wrong. We just went over this and you are still asking the same question. LMFAO!

Maynman:
Haaaaa Superior arguments 😂😂

Very superior rat inside the wall. LMFAO!

Workch:
Just leave the red herring. Please focus

I quote you directly then you start crying. Stop bringing up stuff you are only going to cry about ok?

Workch:
I'm going to be justified for always following the evidence where it leads and not making things up in my head.

Justified to whom?

Workch:
It's silly question since you are an atheist

Yet you are asking for demonstration and this simple thing that you are unable to demonstrate. LMFAO!

Workch:
I am waiting for either you or theists to provide any evidence so I can switch. It's as simple as that.
Get to work 😂

LMFAO! Who is asking you to switch? I dunno why you are knocking your head against a label. Are you going to get paid or receive some benefit I am not aware of? If someone is cutting cheques for switching lemme know lemme go get mine. Bwahahahahaha!

Workch:
Which makes both atheism and Theism wrong for now at least.

And we are back to me asking you to show me where I disbelieve the question of gods which of course you cannot show. When will you realise you have no point?

Workch:
it's like explaining basic science to MaxInDHouse, how do you expect such person to understand that he can't believ something if evidence does not exist for it.

It's the same way you cannot understand that you can remain neutral until at least either evidence for or against comes.

And how do you demonstrate neutrality, by adopting the label agnostic?

Workch:
Do you have sufficient evidence to disbelief it?

Like we did when we found sufficient evidence against phlogiston?

There is no sufficient evidence to disbelieve either.

Workch:
you would have touched the topic if you can demonstrate anything 😅

You are not touching it because you don't have any scientific backing for it. I dare you to prove me wrong 🤣

LoLz. Can you show me where atheism claims to be a scientific position?

Workch:
The topic is atheism is not scientific. It has been proven.

I have proven it with you 😂

LoLz. I haven't even touched the topic yet so no you proved nothing. Bwahahahahaha!

Workch:
you explain how you ended up not believing it.
On what ground?

On the ground that I have no reason or sufficent evidence that can form the basis for belief.

Workch:
Explain what?
That you are appealing to ignorance?

I can't explain anything to you, it's like explaining basic things to a theist 😂😂
You guys are same thing

Bwahahahahaha! When you are sure of what you are saying come and explain how I am appealing to ignorance. LMFAO!

Maynman:
It seems you have gone too deep and too ashamed to back out 😂😂

I should Give evidence why i don’t believe in a word called god 😂

LMAO! Na so.

Workch:
Focus on giving evidence. Stop asking too much questions 😅

Bwahahahahaha! Explain it if you are sure of what you are talking about.

Workch:
he knows what he's doing, LordReed is trying to create a strawman that he will attack so we can stop asking him to substantiate his disbelief, unbelief or non-belief (whatever he calls it) with an evidence.

LoLz. What is the strawman I am trying to create?

Workch:
Lol, because you and I know that your disbelief is an appeal to ignorance

We both know this 🤣

Appeal to what ignorance?

Workch:
Evidence for your position "I do not believe in God".

Why did you reach such conclusion, show me with demonstrable evidence?

Explain how I do not believe is a conclusion.

Workch:
whether disbeliever, unbeliever or non-believer, they all mean someone who doesn't believe in God.

You are runnng away from the point and shooting the strawman 🤣🤣

Leave the definition and face the point of the discussion. When atheists need real argument, they succumb to fallacies.

Workch:
LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

LMAO! Evidence of what?

Workch:
for the umpteenth time, you are saying rubbish. Lol 😂

Your diagram is a fallacy. It's not true just because LordReed thinks it's true.

I'm so shocked that I have been engaging someone who even doesn't know the difference between belief and disbelief 🤣

LoLz. Just knocking your head against a simple diagram because you think I am asking you to choose. Such a sad little baby. Bwahahahahaha!

triplechoice:
Just imagine the talk

The prefix -dis before belief means ,not ,a negation ,

So, the word ,disbelief it's the same with the phrase lack of belief.

Leave Reed . He wants to confuse you because he is stuck .

He is the same person in the other thread who wanted to mock with

The half statement ,

"I don't believe '

With the full one ,


'I neither believe nor disbelieve '

He wanted to play some mental abracadabra ,but he failed woefully

Dude. Are you OK? Have actually looked at the meaning of disbelief or are just going off half cocked as usual.

Workch:
Really, let's check Oxford dictionary.

Atheism is a joke 😂

So according to LordReed, if you are not believing something, then it's not same as lacking belief in it.

Which Oxford Dictionary did you check?

Dtruthspeaker:
See devil trying to sound nice and decent.

This is where i authoritatively say, a True lover of God has a different good.result. My sweet grandma had it after she truly started following God. My mother had it when she too changed. And because i was studying these 2 and some other people whom i met who.had it also in contradistinction to other people like you and the vagaries you talk about, i decided to follow God even when i was young, i have had and lived and is living a very very sweet and beautiful life.

Life is really L.G.

And I have had a different result, the very results God promised, which is why I confidently say, any who does not have a sweet life lives under The Curse and you people can be comforting each other as you bear your Curses.

LoLz! I don hear. Nobody in your life will ever die or feel the pain of losing a loved one.

Dtruthspeaker:
Your family! hahahaha

No yours, the ones you used your own hand to type out that they are snakes. LMAO!

Workch:
Here goes the cherrypicking again.

The person that says he neither beliefs nor disbelief is not represented in that diagram. That diagram is a fallacy of false dichotomy

For the 3rd time I didn't tell you that the diagram represents your position. You can stop knocking your head against it now. LoLz.