₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
Says stupid dodging devil who fled from his post as soon as I attacked. Weak Devil,

LoLz! So poor in reasoning that all you have left is blabbering like the village jester. Bwahahahahaha!

jaephoenix:
There's even Jesus coin now

Na wa o I never see that one.

Dtruthspeaker:
I was not interested in your answer I knew you would dodge so I wanted everyone to see that you are a dodging devil.

And everyone can see you have poor thinking and reasoning. Bwahahahahaha!

jaephoenix:
Lol. Cryptobible.
Which blockchain is it built on?

LoLz! Don't be surprised someone will come out and start selling John 3:16 crypto. Bwahahahahaha!

EriMma1:
There's this person I brought into my line of job. When I brought her in, I wanted her to learn the job very well for like 6 months or a year before she can launch out to get her own clients and be on her own but she left three weeks after following me a few times. She felt she has gotten the hang of the job and started getting her own clients and has been on her own since last year. I overlooked all that. She then started calling me along the line to teach or show her somethings on the job to which I refused because she left of her own accord knowing full well she has not learnt all there is to learn.

Now, there was a place I submitted my proposal letter and after they called me. We had a chat and after a good bargain, they told me to resume the following week. Two days to resumption, they called and told me to hold on. So I felt they got a better bargain. It pained me and I told this person all that happened and what I charged them. After that, I got two other clients who paid the same amount I charged the one that flopped. So I used those ones to console myself and moved on but was still hoping that they would get back to me someday.

Fast-forward to last week. This close pal of mine I trained on the job told me she got a call. In fact she went to that same place I told her I lost an opportunity and submitted a proposal. They now called her and she offered them lower charges and she was given the job.

At first I felt stabbed because she knew about my ordeal with the same company. I just chose not to discuss it further.

Ok, last year, I confided in her that I want to review my charges with my old clients. Like those I've been with for 4 , 5 years. Today, she called saying she reviewed her charges too with her clients. O boy! Because I reviewed, you too review? I mean something she started last year, she's already reviewing just because I told her I did and my clients have responded to it. These are clients I've had for years and you've only had yours for a few months, cos she started mid last year and she's already increasing fees. Is that how things are done? Anyways I didn't try to warn her of the implication of such act.

Now, I feel this person is just trying to compete with me and I'm thinking it's high time I start concealing somethings from her.

What do you think? Is it safe to continue divulging my plans to this person or am I overreacting?

Why are you telling your business information to a competitor? You are being naive is what is happening here.

Dtruthspeaker:
Now you have changed post from "cannot disagree or agree with the definition to "I don't know" to "How am I against it" all to avoid answering the question "do you agree with this explanation/definition or do you dispute it?"

You have no valid thing to say on this thread but just here to be the devil that you are!

Mmm hmm comman force me to agree or disagree naw. Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
Any one who was watching would see that the dreaded last days started after a certain prophecy was fulfilled and that was in 2010.

What was the prophecy?

HardMirror:
obviously . Unfortunately, many people fail to see that big politicians can easily circumvent this policy. On election day you would see how the new notes would flood the polls. Notes that the banks cant stock in the ATMs

True. Those guys have their connections enough to circumvent a lot of the rules.

HardMirror:
I have some questions for those defending Godwin Emefiele the CBN Governor.
You claim that the policy of the CBN governor is going to affect Tinubu and Atiku but favour Obi, because it would stop vote buying. Please answer this questions.

1. Do you really think this would affect Tinubu or Atiku? Do you think these men go to the bank to fill teller? When BVN was just introduced and everyone was rushing to the bank, do you know bankers left their work to go and register big men in their house? Getting cash is never going to be a problem for men at the level of Atiku and Tinubu.

2. Do you know how powerful state governors are? Are you aware that both PDP and APC have a lot of governors in power that can get them cash through several means? What about the senetors and reps?


3. You are clapping for Emefiele, how much of the new naira note have you gotten yourself? You are still collecting old note from atm, pos vendors and from the bank tellers and you think it is Atiku and Tinubu that would suffer when the deadline of 31st January comes.

4. If Buhari is doing this because he wants Tinubu to lose as some of you claim, are you saying Tinubu is the one in charge of DSS and not Buhari?

I sincerely dont understand how masses that are the most affected by the policy of CBN are thinking it is the big politicians that would suffer.

Seun nlfpmod mynd44 pls we need more answers. Thanks

As they say, when elephants fight it is the grass that suffers. It may be that the policy was introduced as an anti-vote buying measure but clearly the people who are going to suffer for it are the masses especially those who have only thrived in a cash only modus operandi.

Image123:
You care.

LoLz. He's now a mind reader. Bwahahahahaha!

Image123:
It was scriptural and gainsay-proof.

Like I am supposed to care.

Image123:
Because i am not just knowing you and other unbelievers from this thread, i explained the childishness.

Maybe your response was childish that's why your prejudice is seeing it everywhere.

Image123:
Yes, i used it to explain the absurdity since you asked for what stopped God seeing He has "unlimited authority to lie".

No, I am referring to your asking me the definition and then saying my understanding of it was childish when all I did was ask a question. The follow up question was based on your own statements of what omnipotence is. I didn't ask about "unlimited authority to lie" until after your own definition. If there is any absurdity it certainly isn't from me since all I did was ask questions based on what either you or Abdulgaffar22 said.

Dtruthspeaker:
First of for you to be against omnipotentness as you have already expressed, then you know about it. Else you would not have said anything here

So you can no longer claim "you don't know' that is a Lie for you have shown us you know, most especially as you are the one who presented the most popular definition

So answer "do you agree with this explanation/definition or do you dispute it?"

How am I against it when all I did was ask if the god has the attribute or not?

Dtruthspeaker:
We have already seen you agree or disagree on many other things therefore, you can do so here, so agree or disagree

"do you agree with this explanation/definition or do you dispute it?"

I cannot disagree or agree with the definition of an attribute I have no demonstration of. Essentially you are asking me to agree or disagree something I don't know. Not possible for me.

Dtruthspeaker:
That is not what I asked, I asked "do you agree with this explanation/definition or do you dispute it?"

How can I agree or disagree with it?

Dtruthspeaker:
Did you change to affect the toys and environment in your wardrobe? Are you not outside the space and time of your wardrobe?

Maybe you should read the OP then my question again.

Dtruthspeaker:
No thing!

Good!

Image123:
He does not need to lie. You see sin as an opportunity while God sees it different. It's like me having all the authority to eat my poo and even no one will know, but it is so gross you know.
i did not come here for the OP, you know that na. And he doesn't seem to have issues with what i said, instead he seems to want to help me.

But you said the god CANNOT lie, not will not lie. One is about ability and the other is about the will. You will not poo even though you can.

Maybe you should come for the OP because I am merely responding to what they said so you can't be blaming me for what you call childish sense.

Dtruthspeaker:
And do you agree with this explanation/definition or do you dispute it?

There is no demonstrated being or thing with such an attribute, it other words it's not real.

Image123:
Lols, at least good of you. You don't have any example of omnipotence and you cannot define it. Omnipotence is primarily a christian language. So at least, give the Bible its privilege to define it. i cannot tell you that my name or son's name is Musa and you keep arguing with me that my name or son's name is not Musa. Is it your name? BTW, Merriem Webster tells us that Omnipotent is Almighty or having unlimited authority. It is not really the childish sense many unbelievers want to think of it like, omnipotent can do everything, so cannot is not omnipotent. God as God cannot lie, God cannot die, God cannot sin. Yet He is omnipotent. Always get and retain the biblical context and content.

If the god has unlimited authority then what is stopping the god from lying? He has unlimited authority to lie by definition!

BTW Abdulgaffar22 also provided you with a definition of omnipotence why aren't you responding to that?

Image123:
Hehehehe, lolz. Okay, define omnipotence. Or, who defines omnipotence?

The people who believe that there is such a thing have defined it as the unlimited power to do anything.

Image123:
This is cyclical you know, you have a spirit. For with the heart/spirit, man believes.

I don't know that, you have to define what a spirit is and how I can know it exists. Besides i was responding to the quote which does not mention spirit.

Image123:
Who defines omnipotence? Give two examples of an Omnipotent.

I have not claimed anything is omnipotent so I have no reason to provide any examples.

KnownUnknown:
They trot out C.S. Lewis as if he said anything sensible.
My favorite is the “trillemma” that could easily be a “quadlemma”.
Jesus: Lunatic, liar, or lord.
Jesus: Lunatic, liar, lord, or lore.

Always so deferential to authority. I like CS Lewis' works of fiction, puts me so much in mind of Tolkien, doesn't make me any more likely to accept everything he says.

That's a good one, LoLz.

petra1:
Kindly watch this Programme



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRs8uacWO5Y

Not going to watch a live programme unless there is a particular part of it you need me to see.

OLAADEGBU:
C.S. Lewis

Argument from the poisoned well that shoots itself in the foot. We shouldn't trust our brains except its the same brain you use to suppose a god so how do you trust there is a god? Useless argument.

Abdulgaffar22:
Being an omnipotent, can God just change Himself to become anything He likes ?


1. Essence of God is outside the world of space and time because God has been in existence before the creation of space and time.


2. Hence, for God to become anything else and therefore dwell inside the world of space and time, His nature has to undergo a change.


3. But God cannot just decide to change His own nature because He did not create His nature at first instance. His nature did not begin to exist and hence no need to be created.


If God's nature was created by His will, then He can decide to re-create it again and then change it according to His will. But this is not the case because His nature need not to be created at first instance since His nature has no beginning of existence.

4. Therefore, if God cannot just decide to change His own nature as explained in (3) above, then God (who is outside the world of space and time) cannot just decide to change and become anything else that can dwell inside the world of space and time. This is because such a real confinement of God inside a world of space and time must definitely involved a change in God's nature. Yet His nature cannot be changed (Malachi 3:6).

5. In conclusion, if Man really dwell inside the world of space and time and God is really outside the world of space and time, then God cannot change to become a Man or anything else apart from His original essence. This is why God is Eternal !

In essence the god is not omnipotent or you won't add omnipotent to his description?

Also how is this god outside space time able to affect anything inside space time? Would it not require a change in nature which you say the god is unable to do?

NNTR:
Where did I say, the Bible is silent on DNA and genes.

Please dont rewrite, twist or misrepresent what I typed.

We are not discussing Cinderella, but are discussing if all blacks came from Africa, and particularly where do all whites come from.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Here:

NNTR:
it's not Bible's place to teach about DNA and genes, that's all for science to do

We are discussing your funky statement: The black woman (i.e. in this case, starting with Eve) is the only human that has the mitochondrial DNA (i.e. Eve Gene with all the possible variations, for every kind of human being. Meaning that, when the DNA of a black woman's mutates, you have all other types of different skin tones and/or hues come about. Which has been demonstrated to be nothing but funky junk.

NNTR:
Wishful thinking on your part. Your tearful reunion is imagined

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Ok o! If you say so. LoLz.

NNTR:
What a pity. O ma se ooo.
LoLz! Oga it's not Bible's place to teach about DNA and genes, that's all for science to do in classes upon when done with catching up.
Strewn all over the bible are clues
Bwahahahahahaha!

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

At least you agree that your Bible is silent on DNA and genes. Stories can be interpreted anyway one likes. I could even declare that Cinderella has clues too. LMFAO!