₦airaland Forum

Bandakisk:
Sorry, this is quite confusing. Is one bedroom flat also known as room & parlour

If yes, please how much can I get such in Abj.

My target areas are: Apo, lugbe, gwarimpa and dutse

You might get such prices in Dutse but certainly not Apo, Lubge or Gwarinmpa.

I let out a self contain in Wuye, I charge N490k and I want to increase it to N600k this year.

Bandakisk:
Hello guys, please I need advice of those in Abuja.

I have a business of my own which I can do anywhere, I consistently make 100k monthly

I want to relocate to Abuja to further my other plans.

I need advice on the following;

1. Where to get a room & parlour of 250k to 300k.

2. General advice for me as a new comer in Abuja.

Housing prices in Abuja are hardly in this price range you state. Maybe places like Mararaba or Suleja which are not in Abuja but are very close.

Trollronaldo:
The meaning of ATHEISM is a lack of belief or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods.

I think there's no sufficient knowledge for someone to reach that conclusion hence makes atheism a fallacy of appealing to ignorance

Huh? How is lacking a belief a conclusion? Yourself are saying there is insufficient evidence for a god so where is the conclusion?

Dtruthspeaker:
so desperate to turn the table
hahahaha you don't matter devil for I have seen your end,

LoLz. Keep dreaming. Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
you no get anything to say before

Say to your bitter dreams? Your dreams only deserve derision. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
E no change anything devil! hahahaha

LoLz. It's you who thinks it does. Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
Deceive yourself devil, I have already finished enjoying the pleasure of your cursed living and your tumultuous death.

LoLz. Is that what makes you sleep at night? What a shame that bitterness has made you so. LMAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Which they all see that it is you who needs to deceive himself so as to block the Fear of God's Wrath from making you kill yourself and making the wrath come faster like Judas iscariot.

Bwahahahahaha! Oh Andromeda look upon yon dreamer. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Which would be cleared when you die.
I wish I could be there when you are dying as your body is twisted in unseeable agony and your face contorted in great fear. o I already see it, so no need!

LoLz. The bitterness has really bent you out of shape. Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
I don't need to exactly uber. When you die, you shall see them.

Right. That after you die scam. LoLz.

Dtruthspeaker:
We all know that you are a liar, so, empty talk.

Anyone read this knows who the dreamer is. LoLz.

[quote author=Dtruthspeaker post=120466picture

Sure! You already know that I am looking forward to leaving because I am going to a sweeter place so I have no problem but for you, Hell fire Motors are already parked on you patiently waiting. [/quote]

Dtruthspeaker:
Sure! You already know that I am looking forward to leaving because I am going to a sweeter place so I have no problem but for you, Hell fire Motors are already parked on you patiently waiting.

Show me a picture of the so called Hell fire Motors or of the sweeter place. LoLz.

Trollronaldo:
he cannot answer it because atheism is flawed

What is the flaw of atheism?

Dtruthspeaker:
Empty talk. I already know that you are in it already.

In your dreams. LoLz.

Dtruthspeaker:
This is not casting devil time, that stage don pasd. na so evils go dey flog una left and right till una go tire for life. Una go build small e go spoil. Una waka small una go fall. All d evils wey una don do go dey waka enter and comot from una house general hospital for Lagos Island.

LoLz. Keep dreaming. Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
Hell fire Motors are already on you waiting for you as soon as you die to deliver you there. so continue taking your delusional vicodin till you can take it no more. Your time on earth will soon expire

LoLz. Your time on earth is just as short as mine.

Workch:
okay, i thought you were an atheist

An agnostic atheist. Though these days I can't help but feel like an igtheist.

Workch:
if I ask you if a God exist and you give this second answer, would that not be pure Agnosticism?

It would be an agnostic answer and that's exactly the kind of answer I would give about the subject of the existence of gods.

Workch:
So why can't you just leave it at you don't know instead of you don't know if no one can know?

Secondly, do you know if we can travel at the speed of light?

Because you said no one can know, that is not something that can be determined at the moment.

No I don't know. It doesn't look possible because of the energy required but who knows there might be work arounds we don't know about yet

Workch:
I don't also think Harbour the idea of casualty because it creates a huge problem but my point is that no one know what actually happened, no one should reach a conclusion.
No one can know what happened then.

I don't know if no one can know but we don't right now so the best we can do is speculate. I just like my own speculations to have a bit of reality in them.

Workch:
What I am driving at is that, your analogy doesn't necessarily disprove the possibility of a frits cause.

I am not saying that a first cause necessarily exist but your analogy doesn't address that issue

It's not an analogy. Scientists can demonstrate that the idea of causality can be disrupted at the quantum level. If as is being surmised the big bang was a result of a disturbance in the quantum foam then it is possible there was no cause since the chain of cause and effect can be shown to be different from what we are familiar with. Now I am not saying that is what happened I am just saying that is a possibility we might need to get our heads around.

Workch:
But If A can cause B and B can Cause A, it does not mean that C cannot cause A and B without A and B being unable to Casue C.


Now your quantum physics analysis is limited in this knowledge

I don't understand what you are driving at.

Workch:
That fact that A can cause B and Be can cause A does not answer the question of first cause for me. Unless you want to buttress the point to make me understand you better

What it means is there could have been no first cause or that the concept is actually meaningless.

OLAADEGBU:
To be inerrant is to be free from error. Only the original autographs (the original manuscripts written by the apostles, prophets, etc.) are under the divine promise of inspiration and inerrancy. The books of the Bible, as they were originally written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (2 Timothy 3:16–17; 2 Peter 1:20–21), were 100 percent inerrant, accurate, authoritative, and true. There is no biblical promise that copies of the original manuscripts would be equally inerrant or free from errors. As the Bible has been copied thousands of times over thousands of years, some copyist errors have likely occurred.

It is important to remember that the biblical manuscripts we have today are in 99 percent agreement with one another. Yes, there are some minor differences, but the vast majority of the biblical text is identical from one manuscript to another. Most of the differences are in punctuation, word endings, minor grammatical issues, word order, etc.—issues easily explainable as scribal mistakes or changes in spelling rules. No important theological issue is thrown into doubt by any supposed error or contradiction. Biblical manuscripts from the fifteenth century agree completely with manuscripts from the third century. We can have absolute confidence that the Bible we have today is almost exactly identical to what the apostles and prophets wrote 2,000-plus years ago.

We should not be quick to say, "Oh, that is just a scribal error." The Bible's "errors" can be explained in a logical and believable manner. Discrepancies that cannot be explained—or are very difficult to explain—could very well have an answer that we simply do not know at this point. Just because we cannot find a solution does not mean that a solution doesn't exist. Believing there to be a scribal error must be the absolute last resort in clearing up any supposed Bible "error."

It is possible that minor errors have crept into our modern manuscripts and translations of the Bible. Copyists and translators are human beings, and they make mistakes. The fact that the Bible we have today is incredibly accurate is a testimony to its inspiration and preservation by God.

Can we still trust the Bible? Absolutely! Modern Bible translations are God’s Word. The Bible today is just as authoritative as it was in the first century AD. We can completely trust the Bible as being God's message to us. Yes, the biblical promises of inspiration and inerrancy only apply directly to the original manuscripts. But that does not impact our modern Bible's accuracy and authority. God’s Word endures forever, despite the occasional failings and mistakes of copyists and translators.

Source

Bwahahahahaha!

DeepSight:
Pls see my post to KnownUnknown above where I touch some more on this matter of expansion.

What is time?

OLAADEGBU:
To be inerrant is to be free from error. Only the original autographs (the original manuscripts written by the apostles, prophets, etc.) are under the divine promise of inspiration and inerrancy. The books of the Bible, as they were originally written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (2 Timothy 3:16–17; 2 Peter 1:20–21), were 100 percent inerrant, accurate, authoritative, and true. There is no biblical promise that copies of the original manuscripts would be equally inerrant or free from errors. As the Bible has been copied thousands of times over thousands of years, some copyist errors have likely occurred.

It is important to remember that the biblical manuscripts we have today are in 99 percent agreement with one another. Yes, there are some minor differences, but the vast majority of the biblical text is identical from one manuscript to another. Most of the differences are in punctuation, word endings, minor grammatical issues, word order, etc.—issues easily explainable as scribal mistakes or changes in spelling rules. No important theological issue is thrown into doubt by any supposed error or contradiction. Biblical manuscripts from the fifteenth century agree completely with manuscripts from the third century. We can have absolute confidence that the Bible we have today is almost exactly identical to what the apostles and prophets wrote 2,000-plus years ago.

We should not be quick to say, "Oh, that is just a scribal error." The Bible's "errors" can be explained in a logical and believable manner. Discrepancies that cannot be explained—or are very difficult to explain—could very well have an answer that we simply do not know at this point. Just because we cannot find a solution does not mean that a solution doesn't exist. Believing there to be a scribal error must be the absolute last resort in clearing up any supposed Bible "error."

It is possible that minor errors have crept into our modern manuscripts and translations of the Bible. Copyists and translators are human beings, and they make mistakes. The fact that the Bible we have today is incredibly accurate is a testimony to its inspiration and preservation by God.

Source

Oga there are no original manuscripts for you to compare it with what you have so you are just dreaming something up and saying it is true without anything backing it.

OLAADEGBU:
To be inerrant is to be free from error. Only the original autographs (the original manuscripts written by the apostles, prophets, etc.) are under the divine promise of inspiration and inerrancy. The books of the Bible, as they were originally written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (2 Timothy 3:16–17; 2 Peter 1:20–21), were 100 percent inerrant, accurate, authoritative, and true. There is no biblical promise that copies of the original manuscripts would be equally inerrant or free from errors. As the Bible has been copied thousands of times over thousands of years, some copyist errors have likely occurred.

Source

LoLz. Original manuscript that were no where to be found as at the time the translations were done? Don't be a joker.

And it doesn't address why the so called error of copying is still in the so called inerrant Bible.

Dtruthspeaker:
Whuwhuwhi E no get power devil. more evils and suffer to una soul. Dis year many of una go suffer die pass cockroach.

Bwahahahahaha! Are you not the one bragging about power, why don't you cast the devil out or whatever you call it? Are not the one with the almighty god yet you squawk like a chicken in distress. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
It is still the same outcome even if I go by the figures of speech way which is, you are still mad for we all know how atheists enter the house, which is itself is a figure of speech, but you threw it away and went literal.

Now I followed your literal and you are crying . hahahaha cry devil cry. You are just doing crying choir practice for lake of fire. hahahaha

No Road!

No dumdum, it means its never gonna happen. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Not even in your shadows dreams!.



With pleasure too. I pray you people go to sleep with one calamity burning and waking up to meet another one starting, until you drink hypo because you can not bear to live anymore.

So more evils and despairs to your souls o ye devils.

LoLz. Bitterness is rotting you from the inside out. Chai!

Dtruthspeaker:
See how Satan assistant don mad finish? Satan say make una call Satan when Satan enter una house? Satan no get sense at all.

For someone always bragging about figures of speech you are very poor in figuring them out. LMFAO!

OLAADEGBU:
Copyist errors does not detract from the fact the original manuscripts were inerrant.

https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-inerrancy.html

LoLz! What copying error that has continued to be propagated to this day. Bwahahahahaha!