₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Guy that one no be wish, nah fact!
You don't have any family except people who are related to you by blood, i have families all over the earth so if you and i are stranded somewhere, i will ask for what Jesus promised me: families who are everywhere while you will instantly become a beggar.
That's logical, àbí you know trust logics again?

Actually it is your fervent wish. See highlighted below. LMFAO!

FreeIgboho:
BTW I think KnownUnknown and LordReed are one and the same person
But I could be wrong, of course

[img]https://c./sThfpVD5QvIAAAAC/wrong-parks-and-rec.gif[/img]

MaxInDHouse:
You missed it, i have no business with atheists so you're on your own, no prayers or bad wish except what God says about unbelievers! John 3:16-18

Oh when you were saying if I was homeless I would get no help that was a good wish? LMAO!

FreeIgboho:
Is this how the physicists you know talk? How many equations have you cited? What studies have you cited to prove that speed of light is the speed limit of the universe?
My friend we are talking lay man not Physics - which is why I was talking of end of space and end of time NOT space-time.
Which is also why you can’t deduce from what I posted how quantum mechanics supports simulation theory - because you can’t talk physics - you want lay man explanation.
Well here it is:
In quantum mech particles exist only when observed - just like our simulation. Also at core our reality is information not material - ”coding” - simulation!

[img]https://c./2Um1tZHImfMAAAAC/face-palm-no.gif[/img]

Akposy:
I wish I could send a voice note...too weak to type.

For marinating:
Wash your protein (meat) in vinegar water or salted water to remove any yamayama
Allow to dry a bit or pat dry with a paper towel

The next steps depend on you...I ain't a barbecue chef nor expert in grilling.

You may decide to put your meat in a bowl and squeeze lemon juice in them. The juice helps to tenderize the meat; ensuring your spices get absorbed into the meat
Now....add whatever spices you want (black pepper, blended habanero and onions, curry, thyme, rosemary, parsley, oregano, salt, a bit of butter, soy sauce, seasoning, spirit (vodka or whiskey....this is not necessary though).
Work in the spices into the meat with your clean hands.
Allow to sit on the counter or in your refrigerator for 3 - 10 hours, as the case may be.

You can then grill, airfry or steam.

You might decide to keep it simple by using just pepper, salt and seasoning. Sometimes, I crazily squeeze in orange or pineapple juice. Sometimes when it is almost ready, I glaze with honey mixed with pineapple juice. Just do you or do crazy .

It's your kitchen, experiment and do crazy things till you satisfy your taste buds or that of your consumers.

Regards

Thanks Chef A! I let you know how it turns out. Doing my first barbecue tomorrow.

CC: Munzy14

Image123:
Why is cause, you cannot delete or separate the why from the origin.

It is clearly very different. I dunno how you can read this:

The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era" to distinguish dates on the Ecclesiastic calendar in popular use from dates of the regnal year, the year of the reign of a sovereign, typically used in national law. (The word 'vulgar' originally meant 'of the ordinary people', with no derogatory associations.)

And say it is the same as avoiding Christ association when there is clearly nothing about avoiding Christ association in what was written.

Image123:
Who are the other people, they were all eyewitnesses as it is written. John, Peter, Matthew clearly show the change. Radical change is a very good indicator that something happened, religion or not.
You're not a historian, so why are you rejecting what the historians say because it doesn't suit your beliefs? You don't have anything, but you are rejecting what is available. That's serious unseriousness.

It has been established that these books could not have been written by these people so I have no reason to trust them as eyewitness accounts.

I haven't rejected what the historians say. I have rejected what Christian apologists say though, big difference.

FreeIgboho:
No we are not talking physics otherwise there’d be all sorts of equations and technical talk. I wouldn’t have asked you what’s at the end of time or space. I would have been talking space-time and such. In everyday English time is always now, which is infinite, likewise at the end of empty space you have more empty space - infinite

Well I have been talking about physics and physics is how we learn to describe the natural process including space. If you aren't taalking about phyics then the discussion is pointless.

BTW how come you have been mentioning classical physics and quantum mechanics but now you aren't talking physics because it doesn't support your assertions. LoL

FreeIgboho:
So we are back where we were: prove to me I exist outside your head

What would constitute evidence to you?

FreeIgboho:
See below

SMH. Still doesn't answer the question.

FreeIgboho:
That’s what we call where there is nothing in English language - empty space!

This is not an English language lesson. We are talking of physics and here your assertions are meaningless without evidence.

FreeIgboho:
Have you forgotten? You all FINALLY agreed with me.

I have circumstancial evidence you exist, doesn’t mean you exist!

Like I said don't kid yourself, I didn't agree that with you.

OLAADEGBU:
Did one diablo not something similar when Jesus rose from the dead?

Huh? Can you say that again.

FreeIgboho:
Let me put it to you this way, when you get to the end of that your space-time fabric, and nothing is outside it - in English language we call that nothing “empty space”

LoL! Where did you learn this physic from cos as far as I aware nobody says this. You are the first person I am hearing this "empty space" idea from. Besides what evidence do you have of this "empty space".

FreeIgboho:
You have all previously been persuaded by me that we have no way of knowing things for certain. That’s the context of all our discussion - that, based on evidence, one thing is more likely than the other, not that anything is certain

Then go find people who agree with you that it is merely a possibility, if you have evidence then we are no longer talking possibility. So which is it, are we discussing a speculation or do you have evidence.

Besides you didn't convince me of anything, don't kid yourself.

OLAADEGBU:
Back from the dead to haunt the living day out of you.

LoL! Let's see how that goes.

FreeIgboho:
Read the comments. The glitches are all over the place. Even one happened right in front of us and we all know it but can’t do anything about it - Buhari was switched!

LoL! I am not accepting unverified stories as evidence for a simulation.

FreeIgboho:
U r funny. The very first thing I ever said to u was that I was not certain of anything except that something exists. There was a whole thread of argument on that, with all of you claiming to be sure if things!

Then stop giving me stuff with people stating they know.

FreeIgboho:
That’s why I said there first has to be redefinition of terms for it to make sense. There is no finiteness in nothing and there is no finiteness in now (and also btw there is no finiteness in numbers). For any of those terms to be finite you have to make it clear you mean something other than what they mean in every day English

Why are we defining what has been well defined?

FreeIgboho:
Well for one thing quantum mechanics proved that our universe is made of information not particles (as is the case in classical physics).

Still not saying HOW. Simply stating something is not enough when the question is how.

Image123:
Two very different things. The disciples were not brainwashed, neither did they have to "believe" that Jesus died and rose again. They were not following fables, they touched, saw and handled what they were saying. The RADICAL change is the point here. The days ago shaky leaves cuddling in upper rooms were bolding declaring the resurrection in the open and in the temple. This was not directly a case of belief or hope.
So, you should ask people who witnessed the resurrection, not people who did not. How many writings do you have access to from 2000years ago, how many of them are written by christians?

It was written by other people so how do you it was the case?

Radical change happens in different religious and non religious cases, it is not a proof of truth.

If I was a historian I am sure I would go look for writings from 2000years ago but I am not nor am I interested in that time period exactly so access to writings from 2000years ago is not something I am looking for. But what is your point anyway?

Image123:
There is clearly a reference to it as an ALTERNATIVE, a very late comer alternative BTW. They are used by others who wish to be sensitive to non-Christians by not explicitly referring to Jesus as "Christ" nor as Dominus ("Lord" ) through use of the other abbreviations.

Why it is used is different from its origins.

Nothingserious:
Aside from appreciating a human for their kind works, how does the atheist show gratitude for life, good health, sanity, peace of mind, clement weather, miraculous events ( what you call twists in nature or special moments) ?

Can you answer my own questions now?

MaxInDHouse:
Prayers are for our people who are fighting us because they believe we are not worshiping God in the right way. We pray for them to see the light as for persons like you who doesn't want to hear anything about God or his words you're on your own!

So you can wish me bad things but pray for me to see the light. That sounds quite insincere.

FreeIgboho:
I think the thing is that you see these statements as absolutes. Of course NO ONE knows if we are living in a simulation or not.
What these folks are saying is that the evidence suggests it is highly likely. And they’re always folks who spent years studying physics or building simulations.

Check out this video. See how it dovetails with what I told you - that strange occurrences are glitches in the matrix - things you atheists always attribute to coincidence. You really are helping them by always saying they don’t exist (which is what they want!). It would be funny if u r the ones who go to “heaven” because you made their work easier while on earth!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWajxzWrMAg

So a guy just narrates 5 stories with no way to verify them and we are supposed to accept them as penitence we are in a simulation? LoL. No buddy, that is not how it works.

FreeIgboho:
I think the thing is that you see these statements as absolutes. Of course NO ONE knows if we are living in a simulation or not.
What these folks are saying is that the evidence suggests it is highly likely. And they’re always folks who spent years studying physics or building simulations.

Check out this video. See how it dovetails with what I told you - that strange occurrences are glitches in the matrix - things you atheists always attribute to coincidence. You really are helping them by always saying they don’t exist (which is what they want!). It would be funny if u r the ones who go to “heaven” because you made their work easier while on earth!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWajxzWrMAg

They are not using the language of possibility but of certainty. Even you most times use the language of certainty. For instance you say Musk has information we don't have because he is somehow in touch with these other beings. If I asked how you know this you'd revert to the language of possibility. Look at the title of the video, they are using the word discovered as if it is a proven fact.

Now I don't mind speculations, they are fun to think about but when people like you talk like they know things they can't possibly know then I think we are no longer speculating. If you want us to speculate, we can but if you want to state your opinions as verified facts then be ready to defend your position.

sagenaija:
[size=6pt][/size]
Please expatiate.

In science a theory is not a frivolous claim someone makes to simply air his own views and opinions. A theory has been rigorously tested and verified to be correct. Evolution has been tested in different ways and found to hold up. One famous way has been to look for rabbits before the Cambrian explosion in the fossil records and till date there are none because the theory predicts that such an animal did not emerge until during the Cambrian explosion. Another way the theory has been tested is in a lab setting with unicellular organisms which under predator pressure developed the ability to become multicellular over successive generations despite not carrying the genetic information for that particular mutation. This is to illustrate the kind of rigour a theory goes through and the what it takes to call something a theory. Newton's theories continue to hold up despite being formulated so long ago because it has continued to prove true within the scope it is supposed to apply in.

MaxInDHouse:
Don't mind that first century carpenter jare {Luke 9:51-56} how can someone be praying for his enemies in this twenty~first century? Matthew 5:43-48
Abeg you're a winner and you are blessed in Jesus name, AMEN! Matthew 7:21-27

Oh like you wish me all sorts of negative things, is that the prayer you are saying Jesus asked you to make? LMAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
You also called growth spurts, anomalies and deformities, infirmities mutations eg 6 fingers, birth marks, colourations of skin etc.

And none of you ever called it evolution, so Thief, As Usual with you Criminals called Atheist, carry your Lying Thieving soul out of this place.

[img]https://c./PdEdBURIf1QAAAAC/sasha-banks-he-aint-going-nowhere-baby.gif[/img]

sagenaija:
[size=8pt][/size]
Even Science calls it a "THEORY".
What does that tell you?

Almost immediately after posting this, you and a number of others on the thread have ALREADY VEERED OFF from 'evolution' into some other TOTALLY UNRELATED issues.

If your brains work like this, how do you expect to appreciate the right answers to your questions?

There is no "just" in scientific theories, they have been rigorously tested and continue to be tested for errors.

TenQ:
It's not about science, it's about a major CHARACTER FLAW of Lying caused by a Godless existence!

Being an atheist should not automatically turn you into a liar!
Correct this character flaw sir!

Wait are you saying being godless makes you into a liar?

jmoore:
Clap for yourself.

If Z evolved from B and B evolved from A, if you keep going on and on you will have infinite regression. Does it make logical sense?

BTW, why haven't humans evolved into another creature? Evolution has expired?

You guys claiming critical thinkers but have limited perspective.

Smh

LoL! It is not infinite since it had an origin in time.

Humans are evolving but you won't get to see how it turns out because you lifetime is too short for that observation to be made by you. Maybe your 1 millionth descendant will be a human with suitably radical differences from what we are now.