₦airaland Forum

Nothingserious:
“Does this mean classical mechanics is wrong? Certainly not; it means that classical mechanics is valid only within certain limits, and those limits happen to encompass everything we experience in our daily lives”

“These and other problems led to the defining development of twentieth-century physics: quantum mechanics. The great problem prior to quantum mechanics was that matter and light had been treated as fundamentally different phenomena: matter was interpreted as classical particles, while light was treated as waves. In quantum mechanics, this distinction is blurred: matter and light each exhibit characteristics of particles and waves. This concept does not exist within the limits of classical “



“Quantum mechanics emerged at the start of the twentieth century, and it was a concept that instigated a radical change in our understanding of the universe. As with any profound concept, its implications rippled from hard science into broader PHILOSOPHICAL issues.”

“The essential lesson of the Bohr-Einstein debate is that science, however rigorous and dispassionate, remains a thoroughly human process.

Some scientists are deeply religious, while others are atheists—just as might be found in any other profession or culture. Some scientists are conservative, while some are liberal. Although scientists are trained to judge evidence objectively, it is all too easy for these and other personal beliefs, or the career-long development of a given idea, to affect a neutral, objective evaluation of the da ta.

This is not to say that Einstein was religious and Bohr was not; that would be a gross oversimplification. The split between Einstein and Bohr centered on profound philosophical differences, and because they were two of the most brilliant minds of the twentieth century, they were each able to construct detailed arguments supporting their points of view. The debate was also respectful and civil; given Einstein and Bohr's respective achievements, there was no need for acrimony. Their debates about the nature of the atom and, by extension, of the underlying structure of the universe, remain one of the essential examples of rigorous testing and cross-examination of a new and controversial idea.”

https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/science-magazines/historic-dispute-his-classic-debate-albert-einstein-was-niels-bohr-correct-his-approach-interpreting

Let this sink into that delusion factory of yours maybe you'll better understand what is going on. Budaatum, truly the letter killeth, he quoted and still could not grasp the implications of what he was quoting.

Nothingserious:
“Bohr disliked it because it made the choice of mathematical solution ARBITRARY. Bohr did not like a scientist having to CHOOSE BETWEEN EQUATIONS . This was perhaps the first real Bohr-Einstein debate. ... However, Einstein was right and Bohr proved to be wrong about light quanta.”

This is no hard-science. These are philosophical personal decisions on WHAT TO CHOOSE OUT OF POSSIBLE OUTCOMES.

You obviously have no idea how science works. You probably think it's like your popes or pastors coming to tell us what your god said that should be taken on faith.

Nothingserious:
Characteristics of the nature of science

“Science education has defined tenets (characteristics) of the nature of science that are understandable by students and important for all citizens to know. William McComas and Joanne Olson analysed recent science education curriculum documents worldwide and identified 14 statements about the nature of science that are common to most curricula:

Science is an attempt to explain natural phenomena.
People from all cultures contribute to science.
Scientific knowledge, while durable, has a tentative character.
Scientific knowledge relies heavily, but not entirely, on observation, experimental evidence, rational arguments and scepticism.
There is no one way to do science – therefore, there is no universal step-by-step scientific method
New knowledge must be reported clearly and openly.
Scientists require accurate record-keeping, peer review and reproducibility.
Observations are theory laden.
Scientists are creative.
Over the centuries, science builds in both an evolutionary and a revolutionary way.
Science is part of social and cultural traditions.
Science and technology impact each other.
Scientific ideas are affected by the social and historical setting.
Laws and theories serve different roles in science – therefore, students should note that theories do not become laws even with additional evidence.
Simpler still

Some researchers have refined this list to the following five tenets:

Scientific knowledge is tentative (subject to change).
Science is empirically based (based on or derived from observation of the natural world).
Science is inferential, imaginative and creative.
Science is subjective and theory laden.
Science is socially and culturally embedded.

https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/412-describing-the-nature-of-science

Delusion factory at work. How is this now science has no proofs of scientific laws?

Still waiting for those 5 scientists though.

Nothingserious:
Your foolishness makes you speak before thinking. I placed everything in there olodo!
Should I also be responsible for your scholarship?


“Einstein was actually awarded the 1921 prize a year late, due to a technicality.”

7. BOHR WON THE NOBEL PRIZE AT THE SAME TIME—AND IN THE SAME FIELD—AS ALBERT EINSTEIN.

Bohr and Einstein were not only contemporaries; they were good friends who partook in a series of conversations on physics over the course of decades, most notably at the 1927 Solvay Conferences now known as the Bohr–Einstein Debates. They argued two very different positions regarding the observations of electrons behaving as a particle in some experiments and a wave in others, even though an electron shouldn’t be able to be both. Bohr theorized the concept of complementarity to explain the phenomenon—that is, something can be two things at once, but we can only observe one of those things at a time. In establishing a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, Bohr argued that the act of observation of particles brings them into existence, which is known as the Copenhagen Interpretation.

Einstein, on the other hand, argued that particles exist whether or not we actively observe them. (Imagine a very complex version of the “if a tree falls in the forest” question.) Even with their opposing theories, both were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922: Bohr for his atomic model, and Einstein for his work on the photoelectric effect (instead of his then-controversial theory of relativity). So how did the two physicists receive prizes for the same thing in the same year? Einstein was actually awarded the 1921 prize a year late, due to a technicality.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/544594/facts-about-physicist-niels-bohr

The dummy here is you. Einstein was awarded the 1921 prize while Bohr was awarded the 1922 prize, your dumb head is now conflating the fact that Einstein was awarded his own prize a year late to mean they were awarded the same prize the same year. Or don't you know that up 3 people can win the same Nobel prize in the same year which is clearly not what happened here. Your delusion factory of a brain will also not let you process the fact the the reasons they were even awarded the prizes were not in conflict, their disagreements lay outside of the reasons why they were awarded the prizes. Einstein was awarded his "for his services to theoretical physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect" while Bohr's was "for his services in the investigation of the structure of atoms and of the radiation emanating from them" neither of which countermands the other, unless you don't understand English. Their disagreements was whether Bohr's Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics, which centered on his belief of complementarity, was valid in explaining nature. Bohr's arguments eventually won out and became the the foundation for the modern understanding of quantum mechanics but in no way invalidated Einstein's work on photoelectric effect. Your delusion factory of a brain needs to tune up some more to properly process simple facts. Oh yeah you gleaned it from a badly written Web article, figures.

I don't usually ask questions anymore but as my favourite NL pastor have this one.

Why is your god inconsistent with how he operates on the individual level? For example good people had really awful things happen to them while bad people have stupendously awesome things happen for them or him answering the prayer of the lady trying to find her keys while the father desperate for his child to survive cancer is ignored. Please explain this apparent inconsistencies.

AntiChristian:
Mazi, how old are you?

You'll understand soon!

I am already old enough to understand that death is permanent lights out, maybe its your turn to understand that.

Dtruthspeaker:
Evils son, Acts 22:21!

NO ROAD! AS USUAL AND ALWAYS!

Bwahahahahaha! That was not a specific command to go to Rome to die but for him to preach to gentiles. I guess your god didn't send you to preach so what are you doing making noise upandan? LMFAO!

Nothingserious:
Senior Borh and Einstein.

Note the word “arbitrary”. That’s not anything empirical. It comes down to philosophical decisions.

“Bohr disliked it because it made the choice of mathematical solution arbitrary. Bohr did not like a scientist having to choose between equations.”

“Even with their opposing theories, both were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922: Bohr for his atomic model, and Einstein for his work on the photoelectric effect (instead of his then-controversial theory of relativity). So how did the two physicists receive prizes for the same thing in the same year? Einstein was actually awarded the 1921 prize a year late, due to a technicality.”

Junior Borh was later awarded a Nobel for countering another concept by the Senior Bohr.

Why would empirical data change overtime?
And you want to use caring data to test eternal truths of God, the Bible and religion?

You still flopped at the scientific proofs challenge. I hope you keep that in ur subconsciousness inspire of your 5 scientists reggae music.

Bwahahahahaha! OMFD! Do you even read anything beyond whatever confirms your delusions? Einstein was awarded the prize in 1921 while Bohr was awarded the prize in 1922 so where did you get this dumb idea they were awarded the same prize in the same year for opposing views?


When you give me 5 scientists saying what you say they said, I will produce evidence for 5 scientific laws. We can see the alacrity with which you answered this particular question because you obviously gleaned it from a poorly written website but you can't find anything to back up your other dumbass take. LMFAO!

AntiChristian:
Wetin concern Atheist with godly matter?

Better confess if you don become Christian.

Look at the meaning of atheist then you'll understand.

Nothingserious:
Why would scientists within same year award nobels to 2 scientists whose works are at variance with one another and whose work led to heated debates on who was right?

If we ask you to mention these scientists now you'll start another song and dance. LoL

Dtruthspeaker:
Creators are Always Above The Laws of their creations and Have the Right to Give Commands to their creations whilst creations are bound to obey their Creators. Nothing Wrong here, son of evil.

NO ROAD!



No suicide, son of evil, because God Sent Him in there. Paul did not send himself nor did he hear Satanreed telling him to go to there.

SO NO ROAD! AS USUAL AND ALWAYS!

Show me where the god said to Paul go to Rome. Abi he even said he was determined to go? Keep fooling yourself. You are too scared to put your life on the line like that. LMFAO!

PastorM:
2 Peter 3:8 Dear friends, don't let this one thing escape you: With the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day

Bwahahahaha! So I have to wait a thousand years for your god to say hi? LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Son of evil, as I said earlier, Creators are Always Above The Laws that of their creations

SO YOU DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING REASONABLE TO SAY.

NO ROAD! AS USUAL! AND AS ALWAYS

Yes now because your god is a hypocrite na, the god tells you to obey a law he doesn't keep; do as I say not as I do. LMFAO!

By the way didn't Paul know he was going to die in Rome why did he still go was that not suicide according to you? LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Son of evil, wise creations follow and do what their Creator Commands and Instructs.

The same laws you say the creator doesn't follow making your god a hypocrite. OMFD! LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Son of evil, as I have told you before, The Laws for creations never ever apply to Creators!

Creators are Always Above The Laws that of their creations.

LMFAO! So Jesus is a fake example for you since he was not operating on your level, why do you then call yourself a Christian? Bwahahahahahaha!

Nothingserious:
Do you know why I pick you and Kingxsamz ?
You guys are the weakest links of atheists I have seen on this forum. Two of you are just like jokers. So I catch cruise with the 2 of you cause nothing objective or logical comes from your responses.

You're just a piece of loquacious trash. The saying empty barrels make the loudest noise should have your picture and name on it as prime example. Then the meaning of useless should have you as secondary entry. LMFAO!

Nothingserious:
Sky daddy is not the name of God Yahweh.

You really don’t have any scientific proof for scientific laws.

I used to think you were really sensible but I was wrong. You are just another wannabe atheist

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa!

OMFD! You are so freaking pathetic. Together with your MAGIC SKY DADDY Yahweh you can't take up a simple challenge and I am the wannabe. LMFAO! Oh please you are so freaking useless so is MAGIC SKY DADDY Yahweh. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
Evilreed must always be evil, for as I told you before, as much as I desire to meet God, It must never be in circumstances which amounts to suicide.

Oh great so you admit Jesus committed suicide. Thanks for clearing that up. LMFAO!

Dtruthspeaker:
As I told you before, breaking The Law, will not take me there.

So preaching is breaking the law? LMAO I didn't know that. Bwahahahahaha!

Nothingserious:
Lol!

I say it again today that THERE ARE NO SCIENTIFIC proofs for scientific laws. All are ASSUMED to be valid.

You can accept it as it is or keep crying for 5 scientists who said it. If you can’t counter it, then I know it is a fact.

If you have a contrary fact, say it here.
Or show me any scientific proof for any of our scientific laws.

Keep lazing around in shame

Here's a challenge for you and your nonexistent magic sky daddy. When you post 5 scientists saying there is no proof for scientific laws, I will post evidence for 5 scientific laws. Let's if you and you magic sky daddy are up to the challenge. LMAO!

Nothingserious:
Lol!

I say it again today that THERE ARE NO SCIENTIFIC proofs for scientific laws. All are ASSUMED to be valid.

You can accept it as it is or keep crying for 5 scientists who said it. If you can’t counter it, then I know it is a fact.

If you have a contrary fact, say it here.
Or show me any scientific proof for any of our scientific laws.

Keep lazing around in shame

Bwahahahahahaha! Your sky daddy doesn't exist keep crying upandan because we said so. LMAO!

Nothingserious:
Your failure yesterday was fully noted.
I said all scientists. You are just lazily asking for 5. Again I said all. I had thought you would brandish links everywhere here countering my claims. Lol

Too pathetic!

I said to quote 5 scientists saying so but apparently sky daddy magic can't even help you. LMAO! Just admit you don't have any scientist saying that instead of this braggado you are doing. Bwahahahahahaha!

As I said when I make a claim ask me for evidence. You make a claim you get to bring the evidence.

kingxsamz:
You still haven't answered my question on how Noah lived for more than 400 years when bis life span should have been less than 100.
I thought we were dealing with logic here, why are you avoiding the question?

The guy never answers anything only to start singing and dancing about. LMAO!

Nothingserious:
Miracles happen now and then.
Even if happens to you, would you willingly tell me? You would delete it from your camera.
Only God knows how many you had deleted in the past and how many you had failed to report.

You have had many experiences that your 5 senses cannot fathom. Would I expect you to come tell us about them?

Miracles are the exclusive prerogatives of God. Whenever he WISHES to do them for his own glory, he will do it. It doesn’t require your unbelief and godlessness. It will just happen when he so desires it.

You couldn’t even show me empirical proofs for scientific laws the other time. You kept lazily asking for 5 scientists as if we were doing children jokes. Now you want to delve into investigations of supernatural phenomena with natural tools. You are joking right?

Bwahahahahaha! There goes the delusion factory hard at work imagining all kinds of nonsense about me and believing it. It seems asking you for evidence or explanations is some kind of trigger for your song and dance reflex. LMAO!

Tell your god to make his magic happen in front of cameras so we can have a record. LMAO!

You made a claim you can't back up. Bring 5 scientists that say there is no proof of scientific laws, a simple request. Maybe ask your sky daddy for some magic to help you since it's too much for you to handle. Bwahahahahahaha!

Nothingserious:
The God who made the universe and fixed the sun and the earth can and will always do what he likes with nature. Why? Because he is SUPER-natural.

LOL! Yeah your god of laws and order decided to use magic that one time but now the god is so camera shy he never does his magic tricks in an era where cameras are ubiquitous. Bwahahahahahaha!

tobechi20:
Bring kids into the picture, and often, one’s sex drive takes a nose dive. Especially for mothers.

Low libido is a very common issue for new mothers as they are healing from childbirth, grappling with fluctuating hormones and extreme sleep deprivation.

While we know adjusting to a new baby can profoundly impact a couple’s life (including sexual intimacy), we, as a society, act like it shouldn’t. We act like there’s something wrong with a new mother needing a timeout from sex.

New mothers who admit to having less sex drive are often met with people urging, “Just do it anyway,” and “You’ll get in the mood.”

But what if you don’t get in the mood, even when you take this advice? What then?

Why aren’t the feelings of the woman valid? Shouldn’t she be listening to her body? Her mind?

I’m not sure where we got this idea that a husband owns his wife’s vagina. Or that he is entitled to intercourse, MouthAction, handling, or groping. I’m pretty sure I didn’t see that covenant in the paperwork. But I have an inkling that this entitlement is very much based in misogyny and male privilege.

Men are led to believe, often since they are young boys, that women should have sex with them when they want it. Even when their wives are not “in the mood.” Because sex is the way he feels intimate. Sex is the way he connects. Because putting your husband’s sexual desires first is supposedly the best way to avoid divorce.

These antiquated and sexist designs for marriage are damaging to women.

When a married mom doesn’t put out, she’s called “cold” and “selfish” and the dreaded “bitch.” She’s told she must have “something else going on” mentally. Outsiders to the marriage, and maybe even therapists, will question if the wife was ever sexually assaulted. Does she have a history of trauma? They’ll try to make connections that aren’t there. Because how could a wife possibly not want to have sex with her husband?

It is sickening and horrific to think of a woman having sex against her will, married or not. It’s disgusting that we automatically assume something must be “wrong” with a woman who is having a gap in her groove. Beyond all that, it’s dangerous.

Suggesting that married women and mothers should just “do it anyway” is sexual bullying and coercion. If a husband acts on the “just do it anyway” cliché and forces it — that’s called rape.

When we attack married mothers for not putting out, we’re reaffirming once again what’s important in this society.

A man’s needs, not a woman’s. A man’s voice, not a woman’s voice.

I wasn't taught that my wife owes me sex no matter what. May be that's why I think my wife and I should have sex when we both want it.

HardMirror:
lol. These guys never ready talk true to themselves.

I tell you. Always contradicting themselves in words and deeds.

Nothingserious:
Out of point.

Are we done with Noah’s communication and animal science skills?

If you don’t believe in miracles, no miracle or supernatural phenomena would ever make sense to you. So a Christian is a notch ahead of you in the understanding of nature/matter and super-nature.

You said "All Bible accounts are true" so please go ahead to tell us was it the sun that stopped or the earth that stopped?

AntiChristian:
Well, you Christians describe God poorly according to your books. I won't expect you to know better.

God has no size! He created the universe and everything that exists. So He is the greatest, the most high! The first and the last.

He is not ancient of ages nor lily of the valley or all those weird adjectives you guys use to qualify Him.

He is free of those imperfections!

Your god is as poor as the imaginations of those who created him.

Nothingserious:
Which online or internet platform was this resolution concluded? Same internet in our hands?

You meant to say “they think or suggest “ that it was impossible? Or as some say “they cannot empirically verify “?

No one said it’s not possible. Scientists and archeologists are still searching out the account and will one day come to terms with the Bible account.

No scientist has confirmed the account was not possible. They have all offered suggestions why and why not. That’s different from definite empirical data.

The Noah’s account happened as written in the Bible. All Bible accounts are true and trustworthy.

LMAO! So the sun stood still? Can you tell us how that happened, was it the sun that stopped moving or the earth? Bwahahahahaha!

Dtruthspeaker:
1) omnes moriendum! Man would not be mortal if he did not die.

2) Having a Great Good life and living on earth is the Proof whether God was indeed your Father or not, for God unfailingly takes care of His own Children and we can not wait to die for we know that the Best Living Comes after death.

So for us, death is just a door to a better and better Living for Satan and his seeds have spoilt this side of living for us, so we can not wait to go to the other side of Living where Satan and co, shall never be there!

Thus, as I have told you before, death is not a problem to us, it we are rather happy to die.

That is what it means to have Christ.

All who hath not Christ, though breathing, is Dead Already!

If you can't wait why haven't you gone to Sambisa to go preach to them? LMAO!