MacDaddy01's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MacDaddy01's Profile › MacDaddy01's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (of 111 pages)
Islam is a religion of peace ![]() |
If the catholic church is false, all christianity is false. ![]() Catholics compiled the bible and they are the first and oldest christian denomination in the world (Frosbel cant even trace his church to the 15th century). Catholic bible is more complete as it has the extra books missing from the protestants Or am I wrong? I need opinions on this? I may be wrong ![]() |
JeSoul: Oh dear.Religion is not science, agreed but religion, especially the Abrahamic faiths try to overstep into science. Wait, so the origin of man is not a scientific area? Hmm? When the bible claims that mn was created from dust by God is it not encroaching on the origin of man, a scientific area of study? I give up. |
sauer: Atheism is freedom in many ways. ![]() |
JeSoul: Really dude?No evidence, just empty rhetoric, Jesoul. As for the bold; MacDaddy01: 4) Religion claiming that God created the universe or big bang is a scientific claim. Religion claiming that God created man from dust is a scientific claim. Your logic is upside down because it is religion that is encroaching on science. Dawkins is addressing these issues and showing that religion should not be taught in science class. Even Dawkins said that he doesnt care what people believe as long as they dont interfere with the teaching of science or others public life |
I was like you when I first became an atheist. But this is a pipe dream. Only secular christians (christians who dont believe in the supernatural/miracles/everything in the bible) can ally with atheists The problem lies with your christian brothers and your bible. The moment you accept psalm 14;1 as true, you cant unite with atheists. How can you talk about uniting with atheists when you are not a secular christian and your bible says; psalm14;1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. 2Corinthians 6;14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? So, are you a secular christian? |
[quote author=tpia@]thread derailed as usual. now its about "me me me me me me me me", in his typical manner.[/quote]Wassap Tpia? ![]() |
By the way, Jesoul, do you believe that Dawkins is a philosophical dunce even if you dont agree with him? |
JeSoul: I think I too have said somewhere...Even you Jesoul? You were smart to avoid this issue before, why fall my hand? 1) First of all, Dawkins where did you get the idea that Dawkins is attemption to put himself as an authority on philosophy? Does talking about morality/religion equate to that? You just made a bold lie. 2)I want to know what wrong arguments Dawkins made on religion. You people have been making claims here and there but have failed to present one argument that is dunce-like from Dawkins. Anyone can make valid comments on religion whether supporting or criticising it. I dont know what the hell you people are talking about when you say that Dawkins doesnt know hwat he is saying. 3) You are free to name and quote his empty rhetoric of no substance that you so claim that he spouts. 4) Religion claiming that God created the universe or big bang is a scientific claim. Religion claiming that God created man from dust is a scientific claim. Your logic is upside down because it is religion that is encroaching on science. Dawkins is addressing these issues and showing that religion should not be taught in science class. Even Dawkins said that he doesnt care what people believe as long as they dont interfere with the teaching of science or others public life 5) If you watch the video, Dawkins said that he is an educator and he is concerned with teaching facts. He promotes the teaching of evolution in schools. He also says that he is concerned with what is true. |
tobechi74: Imagine this dude singing his praises and counting his loses. Someone else should rate u.stop blowing ur trumpet?At least, I showed my failings. Hardly any christian does that(Wel, apart from Davidylan that apoligsed for his abuse) As for others to rate me, that is the point of this thread |
wiegraf: Like you are? Stating this without any back up? Where are your facts, hmm? You're telling me 70 to 80 of xtians switch religions, hmm? Did you even skim the link I posted?Sorry, I missed your original comment. Thanks for the link. As for Davudylan, he attacks first and asks questions later. slowpoke |
justaqad: why na?Dont you have a comment? |
https://www.nairaland.com/1150005/library-best-40-atheist-arguments#13662115 Logicboy03: [size=18pt]4. The Paradox of omniscience[/size] |
justaqad: *just passing* |
vedaxcool: SEARCH NOT watch! That is that! Keep dancing around the point! No EVIDENCE so far tendered proves muslims were the ones SEARCHING such rubbish it remains your assumption, MAINLY MUSLIM COUNTRIES OUTLAW po.rn that's fact not an assumption! Islam seeks to make a muslim better not the other way round! ![]() Muslim majority countries rank higher than christian majority countries in searches for specific porn. Hwoever, we are to believe that it is not muslims that are searching for the po.rn in muslim majority countries. Please explain; if it is only christians searching for po.rn in muslims majority countries then how is it that it is more than christian majority countries when christians are the minority in those countries? Flipping the argument, it would be like me arguing that in America, the people who search for po.rn arent mostly christians, it could be the muslim minority Stop this denial. It is becoming embarrassing. It is better to provide solutions rather than deny the problem |
Reyginus: Lol. Sir, you're missing something. +chanting+ debunked, debunked, debunked...Let me wait for the bigger fish. You have nothing |
Reyginus: lol. That's enough incentive to vitalize your mind or wither it completely. ![]() |
Billyonaire: That question does not exist. Advancement of man as depicted by luminosity of magnetic aura which is visible only from 4th+ dimension awareness is a reflection of the frequency and wavelength of an individual as is almost always subject an and continuouse exposure to advanced knowledge and involvement in the cosmic and spiritual exercises. I know you will argue more, because I can deduce that the argument is your clear motive.You want to blow my brain? Abeg, rewrite this comment in english |
Reyginus: Passes it to the unbeliever. Lol.*Intercepts the garri and takes 2 scoops* |
Reyginus: ah! Advise# You need to watch it before making any comment. To save yourself. I know what you can do.Mtchew....I watched the video months ago. Yu were talking nonsense Next! |
Billyonaire: My Magnetic Aura is in far contrast to yours.How? What does your aura do that mine cant? |
Reyginus: exhausted so early?What more do you want? You gave me a fail as a score for my actions. ![]() |
Reyginus: Are you sure you've been following this thread? Read post 3 again.bs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRd-jlV82BI |
Reyginus: The reason these people will never take you serious. You don't know that the moment you agree to a 'proof' of a particular thing, asking for the its clarification is an illogical question. Because, before you agree it's a proof, it must be clarified. So, you're indirectly saying, 'this clarified statent of proof must be clarified before I accept'. Dumb if you ask me.What proof did Dawkins accept? |
Reyginus: Whose opinion were you expecting when you asked for my opinion. ![]() |
Billyonaire: I disagree.How is ur energy different from mine? |
Reyginus: Lol. Lb, the thing is, you were in every thread, majority of which exposed your illogical side. If you'd been in a few, maybe the case would have being different.lolz......in your own opinion |
OP...all humans are equal |
Reyginus: Stop standing by this man for your own good.Well, his first comment is very logical. There is no proof or evidence for God. Dawkins is also right to question the truthfullness of the proof (if that is what he said because you christians can lie about Dawkins). An example would be a hallucination- some people believe things that are hallucination- people claim to have seen Jesus wearing white robes. That question is also flawed. Which God will appear? The audience member would have had to define his god first (maybe this was what dawkins was trying to get at) So, try again. You fail to prove that Dawkins is a philosophical dunce |
Reyginus: Lol. The reason, you're always eager to make a point even when you don't understand what the arguement is all about.Sharaap, hater. I thought you were my buddy. Upon all the arguments we had, you dont even consider me a lil bit logical? |
Reyginus: That's a lie. You and I know you're not any close.Why do you finish me like this? Not even 50%? Is tat really the score you give me? A fail? You harsh ooo. Upon all the arguments we had |
tbaba1234: ^ Untrue..Thanks for the reply. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (of 111 pages)


