₦airaland Forum

JeSoul: I think I too have said somewhere...

[size=15pt]Dawkins attempting to present himself as an authority on religion or philosophy[/size]...is about on par as Mama Sunday attempting to present herself as an expert on Biophysics. Only fellow evangelical pop-atheists take him seriously when he goes on his anti-religious spiels that are all hot-air and no substance - M.O.? throw around enough 'big' words mixed with deliberately misapplied concepts with the aim to obfuscate the matter, all presented with an arrogant confidence to BS the audience into actually believing he knows what the hell it is he's talking about. All he's doing is giving an opinion - an opinion no more weighty than that of Pastor Ade of Ojuelegba foursquare gospel church.

What is my proof? none necessary. The very ludicrous & disingenuous idea of attempting to apply science to non-scientific matters is all the proof one needs. The two are separate disciplines and attempts to present them as contradictory, conflicting parts is straight up intellectual dishonesty. He should simply stick to Biology, his discipline of expertise.

Cheerios.

tobechi74: Imagine this dude singing his praises and counting his loses. Someone else should rate u.stop blowing ur trumpet?

wiegraf: Like you are? Stating this without any back up? Where are your facts, hmm? You're telling me 70 to 80 of xtians switch religions, hmm? Did you even skim the link I posted?

justaqad: why na?

Logicboy03: [size=18pt]4. The Paradox of omniscience[/size]


We agree that a "married bachelor" can not exist because it is contradictory and self-refuting. An omniscient God is self-refuting and contradictory.

-Omniscience means knowing all things



If God knows everything, then he can not forget because the moment he forgets, he doesn't know everything. However, if God cant forget, he then doesnt know how to remember or recollect. If he can't recollect. then there is something he doesn't know- he doesnt know how it feels to recollect or remember something.


[img]http://t.qkme.me/42ef.jpg[/img]

justaqad: *just passing*
whistles and walks away

vedaxcool: SEARCH NOT watch! That is that! Keep dancing around the point! No EVIDENCE so far tendered proves muslims were the ones SEARCHING such rubbish it remains your assumption, MAINLY MUSLIM COUNTRIES OUTLAW po.rn that's fact not an assumption! Islam seeks to make a muslim better not the other way round!

Reyginus: Lol. Sir, you're missing something. +chanting+ debunked, debunked, debunked...

Reyginus: lol. That's enough incentive to vitalize your mind or wither it completely.

Billyonaire: That question does not exist. Advancement of man as depicted by luminosity of magnetic aura which is visible only from 4th+ dimension awareness is a reflection of the frequency and wavelength of an individual as is almost always subject an and continuouse exposure to advanced knowledge and involvement in the cosmic and spiritual exercises. I know you will argue more, because I can deduce that the argument is your clear motive.

Reyginus: Passes it to the unbeliever. Lol.

Reyginus: ah! Advise# You need to watch it before making any comment. To save yourself. I know what you can do.

Billyonaire: My Magnetic Aura is in far contrast to yours.

Reyginus: exhausted so early?

Reyginus: Are you sure you've been following this thread? Read post 3 again.

Reyginus: The reason these people will never take you serious. You don't know that the moment you agree to a 'proof' of a particular thing, asking for the its clarification is an illogical question. Because, before you agree it's a proof, it must be clarified. So, you're indirectly saying, 'this clarified statent of proof must be clarified before I accept'. Dumb if you ask me.

Reyginus: Whose opinion were you expecting when you asked for my opinion.

Billyonaire: I disagree.

Reyginus: Lol. Lb, the thing is, you were in every thread, majority of which exposed your illogical side. If you'd been in a few, maybe the case would have being different.

Reyginus: Stop standing by this man for your own good.
For example, lb, dawkins granted an interview to al jazeera about 2 months ago on science and religion. In the interview, he made two comments which any rational mind can easily decipher to be irrational. The first. Dawkins mentioned as one of the reasons for his unbelief in God, the absence of proof. Then, it was time for the question segment. An audience, a muslim precisely, asked if he (dawkins) will believe God exist if He appeared as a proof to him. The dumb guy went this way:' that will depend on the truthfulness(not this word exactly) of the proof'. And I ask, can something be considered a proof, and still beg for clarification?

Reyginus: Lol. The reason, you're always eager to make a point even when you don't understand what the arguement is all about.

Reyginus: That's a lie. You and I know you're not any close.
To your op.
You achieved 1. Now, why lie to yourself of achieving 2? You didn't and I don't you ever will, except the present crop of brains quit nairaland. I didn't follow 3. 4 was cool. 5, deadly. 6, kaboom boom.
Let's be sincere lb, you arguement never scaled 50%, talk more 99. The problem was, you argue more from emotions than reasoning.

tbaba1234: ^ Untrue..

Many muslims work and pray in the office. As long as it is not affecting your work, no one cares. The prayer last for just 5-10 mins. Even managers take longer cigarette breaks during work hours why not prayer breaks? You just have to plan your time properly, take your first break for the mid-day prayer. Then pray your early evening prayer just before you leave the office.

In wall-street, there are some mosques. So if you can't find a place to pray in the office, you go there.

My friend worked in chevron, US and he used to pray in his boss's office.

Everyone loves a good worker. They do not care as long as you are not imposing it on them.

There are many muslims getting by just fine without riba. It only involves better planning from an individual.

Reyginus: I'm awesome lb. Is the bashing parade closer to a halt?

Reyginus: lb, as I once told you, dawkins is more of a scientist. Don't fall my hand here again. Please. Aside¤but how can anyone fail to recognise dawkins is a philosophical midget¤

naijachix: do u know what tolerance is? I didn't say u should allow a criminal to come and kill u. . .

Reyginus: knight, how are you doing with logic?

naijachix: sorry my guy, but i'm gonna do it d 9ja way. answer ur question with question. 1. are u a fool? 2. if yes, did u say there is no god? if all is yes, doesn't still mean u should condemn what their 'holy book' says. if u do not confine urself within the teaching of the bible. . . then it's not meant for u. u shld understand that it's not meant for u and then tolerate the people it's meant for; just the say way they should tolerate u and your believes.
Q.E.D