₦airaland Forum

davidylan: lol maclatunji is an example of megalomania in action. The typical Nigerian is no different from the leaders he complains about daily... give them a little power and they go right off the cliff on an ego trip.

This is something we agree on. I might be aggressive at times about religion but to ban me for no reason is just foolish. The painful part is the silence of Nairaland muslims on his behaviour.

When I recently got banned by Seun and I complained, there were people who clearly saw that it was unfair to ban me for saying that "christianity is a fraud". This is because many christians have said worse things about atheism and Islam or even paganism. If such a rule was enforced, many people here would be banned.
The good thing here was that people saw the injustice and complained too.


However, whenever I get banned from the Islam section ( about 8 times now, I am going for the world record). Not one Nairaland muslim ever complains about the injustice. Not one. This is a very sad thing. Maclatunji will ban me without notification and when he does, he claims that I am derailing. But ask him to show you the comment that shows that I am derailing, he goes silent. After 3 or 4 bans, I became careful about the threads I commented on- this didnt stop maclatunji from banning me. Even when I am on topic, he still bans me. I put threads exposing maclatunji's power craze but no muslim on Nairaland ever even bothers to think that maclatunji has gone a step too far. Not one. Now compare this to when a whole Seun, the owner of the site bans me and people (although few) are still ready to say that the ban is unfair





Now, since I have a reputation here, some will dismiss my last paragraph and say that I am a militant atheist (and also a whiney little brat) that is complaining about a punishment I deserve and only telling his side of the story. However, this is the interesting part that shows the hypocrisy on others. Many of you know Vedaxcool. Vedaxcool derailed my thread and I asked maclatunji on the same thread why Vedaxcool was allowed to derail my thread. Instead of warning Vedaxcool, I was the one who got warned. Please, review the thread;

https://www.nairaland.com/987827/request-evidence-greatness-truthfulness-islam


Wait! there is more! [size=14pt]How can I be banned for something that even Seun has never banned me for?[/size] I always create new accounts or IDs whenever I get banned. Even Seun has never banned me for that. I created Lociboy01 when Logicboy was banned. I also created macdaddy. Seun has never banned me for creating new IDs. Never. Seun even "followed" my logicboy01 account. But the power crazy maclatunji has gone psychotic;

www.nairaland.com/attachments/755161_unfair_recent_png7961b87098fcaf3d4b204645358c7917

How can Maclatunji ban me for something even Seun accepts?

fellis: I am not so enlightened on issues of buddhism so I can't mention names.
But they do have gods, even you pasted something from another site that mentioned that they have gods.

Nope. Many people confuse devas with god. Generally, some Buddhists do not see devas as beings but as metaphorical for karma. Some buddhists have a god thsat they wish to be one with. Even the devas are not omnipotent or free from sin.

fellis: What difference is that going to make?

Name the bhuddists god that you claim exist.

fellis: They don't believe in an omnipotent diety/god.
They DO believe in the existence of gods, only that their concept of a god is different from that of mainstream religions.
Atheists do not believe that any gods exist.

Can you name the bhuddist gods?

fellis: How did your copy and paste show that I was arguing ignorantly?
Do gods exist in Buddhism or not?

Why not read and find out for yourself;

Gautama Buddha explicitly denies that the universe had a start by the act of a creator deity,[1][2] refuses to endorse any views on creation[3] and states that questions on the origin of the world are worthless.[4][5] The non-adherence[6] to the notion of an omnipotent creator deity or a prime mover is seen by many as a key distinction between Buddhism and other religions

Bhuddism is generally a non-theistic religion. However, Buddhism has gotten various influences and hence variations and so, some strands of it might look into spiritual beings.

vedaxcool: This is one thread I regret responding to, oh dear degenarating to d level of "logic"boy is very illogical! That "logic"boy ask absurd questions does not mean any theist should be engage in such follies! To the everyone if u were to be pressed and need to use a toilet would u ask what the maker of the toilet believe in b4 u use it? Pls quit dis bull crap!

Keep hating bro.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Wow you are funny, The devil has already lost the war. All that awaits him is the terror of hell. He is just trying as much as he can to deceive people i.e. drag down as many as he can with him.




Your dishonesty is appalling


Here we go again with you 22yr christian CV. Your understanding of the bible is still evidently lacking[/quote]Anony, just give up. Your slave religion is a fairytale.

frosbel: logicboy change your name to illogicboy or MacBaby01

Even your fellow atheists are now disputing your unfounded theories to avoid collective embarrassment !

I would like to see the disputes.


Liar

fellis: Atheism is lack of belief in the existence of a god.
Buddhists believe that gods exist (devas in higher realms), only that instead of worshipping them, they strive to be like them.
Buddhism is not an 'atheistic religion'. Whatever that means.

Keep remixing.

http://buddhism.about.com/od/basicbuddhistteachings/a/buddhaatheism.htm

Why do you argue so ignorantly?

Buddhists accept the existence of beings in higher realms (see Buddhist cosmology), known as devas, but they, like humans, are said to be suffering in samsara,[19] and are not necessarily wiser than us. In fact the Buddha is often portrayed as a teacher of the gods,[20] and superior to them.[21] Despite this there are believed to be enlightened devas.[22]

frosbel: Why we bother with these trolls is beyond me, they are not worth our time and attention !!

It is your duty to spread the word of God. Do you think missionaries were met with open hands?

fellis: I wonder what you wrote that earned you that ban.


lol, what does this even mean?

Bhuddists generally do not believe in a god.

frosbel: He was banned for his childishness and immaturity !!!

Frosbel, isnt it as sin to bear false witness? You have no idea why I was banned, so sharaap.

fellis: Na wa o.
What did I write to indicate that it was 'paining' me?
And Mac is the one you have a grudge with, not me, so stop looking for how to take it out on me.

hahaha



Just got banned by the islamic zealot 5 mins ago. That guy has problems. Power trip much?

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Should we continue in this Childish game?
Steve Jobs nko?[/quote]Steve Jobs was a Bhuddist. Note that Bhuddism is an atheistic religion. Guess you didnt know that!

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Yeah and Mark Zuckerberg invented social media and is solely responsible for facebook[/quote]No one is claiming that zuckerberg created social media. Stop playing strawmen!

Mark Zuckerberg created the original software for facebook. Not the current idea but the original codes.


Bill gates nko?

maclatunji: ^Then hold on to yourself and stop sticking out like a sore thumb.

Be a man and say what you really want to say to me. These one liners just make you to look like a grovelling schmuck

fellis: Na wa o.
What did I write to indicate that it was 'paining' me?
And Mac is the one you have a grudge with, not me, so stop looking for how to take it out on me.

Why are you begging the op to change the thread? hmmm? Why must he/she state that it is sarcastic? Is the logic behind it not valid? That religious people are hypocrites? Atheists will burn in hell, they are infidels but we love their products and technology!


As for MAC, he has a problem with me and not the other way around. Not one muslim complains about him (apart from the Shia when they got banned). I didnt even care who he was until he started banning me and kept threatening me to stop commenting on threads.

frosbel: How ironic, fanatics invented most of the technology you use today, what shameless hypocrisy

Wrong. Epic fail

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Even if it were true that more people will go to hell (which is by the way is not in the bible but simply you putting two and two together), it does not benefit satan because he too will be punished. So again you have no point.[/quote]How will Satan be punished? Fairytales make no sense. Even if his existence is destroyed, he won the war because most human beings would be in hell according to the bible. God can only have a Pyrrhic victory- which is actually a loss.



[quote author=Mr_Anony]Omnipotent simply means: He is able to do everything. It doesn't mean: He is the one doing everything. If you can't understand this simple distinction, then I am afraid I can't help you.[/quote]Lmao.....are you admitting that your God cant do anything?


You are now changing the meaning of "omnipotent" because it is not fitting with the biblical description of God. Christianity will always make you look foolish.




[quote author=Mr_Anony]Love is foolishness to those who can't comprehend it. I didn't expect you to understand[/quote]What? is this your new argument that atheists can not understand love? You don craze finish.

Furthermore, I was a christian for 22 years. So I should understand what the bible says

fellis: OP, why don't you just candidly point out to everyone that you were being sarcastic and save other would-be critics the trouble?

Is it paining you or something? Why not run to your safe haven where Maclatunji can ban anyone who is critical of islam?

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Michael Faraday was a christian, Why do you still use electricity? Are you not under the control of his "sky daddy"?
..................My God, the quality of posts on NL keep getting worse and worse by the day.[/quote]Dumbazz, nobody inbvented electricity. Many people made contributions to the use of electricity before Faraday.


Christians like you always enjoy ignorance

To get as many female muslim friends as possible so as to enjoy the food that is going to be cooked at Eid.



Like a boss!

fellis: I didn't intend to start this brand new argument with you when I made that comment.
You appeared to think that an atheist created NL so I wanted to correct you by informing you that a Christian created it.

Point remains. You got nothing to say.

Funny that you're a muslim and the most important products in your life are the creations of christians and atheists. (maybe apart from your lipstick)

fellis: diluminati, relax.
Atheists are not the antichrist.

What is the difference? Your religions still look at us (atheists) as people that are doomed to hell.

fellis: Seun was a Christian when he created Nairaland. He became an atheist later.

Zuckerberg? Bill Gates nko?


You have nothing to say.

frosbel: We don't call people fools, the bible does.

Psalm 14:1-3 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none that does good. The LORD looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any that act wisely, that seek after God. They have all gone astray, they are all alike corrupt; there is none that does good, no, not one.

Why are you acting like this? Playing silly? You agree with the bible and therefore you believe that atheists are fools and do no good. Seun Osewa and Zuckerberg have brought technologies that have created togetherness in our societies. Nigerians from all over the world meet on Nairaland.

toba: why do atheist engage the services of christian lawyers to defend them in court?

Are there no atheist lawyers or what?


Furthermore, christian lawyers know that the bible is useless. Can you use the bible to legislate on internet laws? No, because it is a caveman book.

frosbel: We are here , actually , because it is our right, if our theist pals had not laid the foundation of science, especially Physics and Chemistry, atheists who are reaping were they did no sow, will be nowhere today.

Yep it's fact.

There is a difference- atheists do not go around calling religious people fools. The christians run around quoting psalm 14;1 saying that all atheists are fools while using atheists' products. Hpocrisy in abundance.

Fr0sbel: Better get your facts right before I 'disgrace' you this weekend

Of course it has existed in nature, but how we translated that into the electricity we use today in our world is the bane of my comment, right ?

Disgrace ke? No one invented electricity. Fact. End of story.


Many people have made contributions to electricity even before Faraday

Electricity would remain little more than an intellectual curiosity for millennia until 1600, when the English scientist William Gilbert made a careful study of electricity and magnetism, distinguishing the lodestone effect from static electricity produced by rubbing amber.[6] He coined the New Latin word electricus ("of amber" or "like amber", from ήλεκτρον [elektron], the Greek word for "amber" to refer to the property of attracting small objects after being rubbed.[9] This association gave rise to the English words "electric" and "electricity", which made their first appearance in print in Thomas Browne's Pseudodoxia Epidemica of 1646.[10]
Further work was conducted by Otto von Guericke, Robert Boyle, Stephen Gray and C. F. du Fay. In the 18th century, Benjamin Franklin conducted extensive research in electricity, selling his possessions to fund his work. In June 1752 he is reputed to have attached a metal key to the bottom of a dampened kite string and flown the kite in a storm-threatened sky.[11] A succession of sparks jumping from the key to the back of his hand showed that lightning was indeed electrical in nature.[12] He also explained the apparently paradoxical behavior of the Leyden jar as a device for storing large amounts of electrical charge.


Michael Faraday formed the foundation of electric motor technology
In 1791, Luigi Galvani published his discovery of bioelectricity, demonstrating that electricity was the medium by which nerve cells passed signals to the muscles.[13] Alessandro Volta's battery, or voltaic pile, of 1800, made from alternating layers of zinc and copper, provided scientists with a more reliable source of electrical energy than the electrostatic machines previously used.[13] The recognition of electromagnetism, the unity of electric and magnetic phenomena, is due to Hans Christian Ørsted and André-Marie Ampère in 1819-1820; Michael Faraday invented the electric motor in 1821, and Georg Ohm mathematically analysed the electrical circuit in 1827.[13] Electricity and magnetism (and light) were definitively linked by James Clerk Maxwell, in particular in his "On Physical Lines of Force" in 1861 and 1862.[14]
While it had been the early 19th century that had seen rapid progress in electrical science, the late 19th century would see the greatest progress in electrical engineering. Through such people as Nikola Tesla, Galileo Ferraris, Oliver Heaviside, Thomas Edison, Ottó Bláthy, Ányos Jedlik, Sir Charles Parsons, Joseph Swan, George Westinghouse, Ernst Werner von Siemens, Alexander Graham Bell and Lord Kelvin, electricity was turned from a scientific curiosity into an essential tool for modern life, becoming a driving force for the Second Industrial Revolution.[15]

This is quite idiotic because;

[size=18pt]
No one invented electricity[/size]



Electricity has been known since ancient times