Kobojunkie:
Emulate John the Baptist in what way? Lol .. you Christians no even understand the kain mindfuckery una dey spew at all.

• John was a Nazarite of the Old Law of Moses
• John was the Last Old Law prophet chosen and sent by God to the people of the land of Canaan
• John was the the reincarnation of Elijah
• God spared Elijah death by the hand of the King and Queen in the land of Judah, but after he returned as John, God allowed the King and Queen of Judah do to him as they saw fit.

So exactly what aspect of John's life so you pretend is possible for your religious gods of men to emulate?

John is a mandean, so as your Jesus you follow around.

HellVictorinho6:


Can u help me with 1k?

Am so worried

Thats why

Send your aza.

DeepSight:


I dont think time was created. Time is self existent.
Good afternoon.

Good, this your god is part of existence, it is an entity, it's sexless, it also didn't create time, time is also self existing like your god.
Why is this god needed?


We already know some things about your god already.

DeepSight:


Quite correct, good afternoon.

Existence is always in the now, never in the past or future.

That's one of the things I said about monotheistic influence, you think time was created at a point in existence, but what Moment past when there was no time?

Good afternoon, bro deep sight.

DeepSight:


If eternity is one forever moment, then time is still and if that be the case one can look to the left and and behold the past or even go there and one can look to the right and behold the future and even go there.

What's one forever moment?
You are always in the moment.

Lol, are you not already using the moment to
look left and right?

Moment to Moment, that's it.

DeepSight:


I said I dont know. And I withdraw all my statements.
Good afternoon.

Good, you know you don't know.

DeepSight:


There are levels to logic.

A seer who sees the future in his dreams can hope for a thing invisible to you, and yet not be illogical.

Lol, this seer is a fraud.
The future and the past does not exist, only this present moment exist, and it is eternity.

DeepSight:


I dont know.
Good afternoon.

You already have a lot of assumptions about this god which is influenced by the Monotheistic gods around you.
Everyone knows that a creation needs a creator but why do you assume that universe is a creation?


Also you say it's an unknown god, the Greeks, agnostos, worships it too.

DeepSight:


As for the bold, I agree, even though you have written in an odd manner again.
Good Afternoon.

That's what made it Possible for your to "self exist".

I am using it the right way, it's you that should rewind.

Universe means everything that existence, so why is your god needed when its also part of everything that existence?

DeepSight:


The way you use the word "existence" is very confusing to me.
Its possible I am contradicting myself but I do know I honestly cannot cope with the way you are using that word, so i have to let it be.
Cheers.

There was never a time existence didn't exist, I might even agree that your god is the first vibration, then why is your god needed?


Existence means being, it's there in your philosophy too. Check it out.

DeepSight:


I think this is a self contradictory question.

God is a necessary being. If you dont understand that term in philosophy please read here -

https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil3600/PVI1.pdf

For anything to exist at all, something or the other must self exist.

God self exists.

But your god is already existing as the first vibration of existence?
Why is your god then needed??

You are the one contradicting yourself.

DeepSight:


You use the word "existence" in an odd way.
Of course anything that exists is "part of existence."

How is that a problem.

So why is your god needed since your god is part of it?

DeepSight:


Perhaps so.
Look, I dont really know anything. I just offer my perception and intuition here and there. Discard them if they dont strike a chord or resonate with you.

your god is part of existence, I got that sha.

DeepSight:


Well perhaps certain elementary things about God are knowable, but IT remains unknowable in its fullness - by this I mean ineffable and incomprehensible - but the lines here are so subtle I would not wish to argue the point.

How do you know all this?

Also why does the first vibration of existence have all these attributes? Is it to make it mysterious?
What about the second and third vibration of existence?

What's the use of the first vibration of existence?
Existence itself is all around.

DeepSight:


God is probably sexless. Even if in my private sensing the "first" vibration of existence is a feminine one.
Now, it is true that one may infer certain things about God, but that does not mean that God is truly knowable. For example, we say that God is transcendental - and yet, knowing that, only emphasizes that IT is beyond us to know.

So this god is an entity and this god is the first vibration of existence.
That means it didn't create existence, and just a part of it.

Do people know he is transcendental or believe so? Most people who say it are theists.

As long as you can label this god with attributes, it's ALREADY knowable.

DeepSight:


I am not an atheist either. God exists, but is unknowable.

But you already "know" it exist and called God not Goddess?

Minime10:
Friends there is still hope in so far as Jesust Christ is still on the throne of His Father.

So where is his father sitting? At Jesus right hand?

Why are you people more interested in Jesus than who jesus himself was praying and giving thanks to?

atheistconverta:
Kudos for not liking your post with your other monikers though.

Thank you.

So why do you fear this your god?
Only those scared of punishment fears.

The mad people are those that base their life on books with UNKNOWN AUTHORS.

Babinski:


You do not need to engage with him for any purposes of enlightenment. Check is posts on this forum over the years and it is clear he is not a Christian. He is probably some self acclaimed philosopher seeking to sow discord. If he can be making statement like Paul not being selected as one of the disciples, you can clearly see the depth of his understanding of the scriptures.

Nobody is talking about disciples here, even the Pharisees and scribes were disciples.
Use both understanding and comprehension before jumping to a Convo next time.

The 70 that Jesus chose and the Marys are also apostles na, over 100 seats will be added.
According to you, you only need to be chosen to be an apostle.

Ken4Christ:


Apostle Paul is the twelfth, not the one chosen to replace Judah.

No, when the other disciples wanted to chose who to replace Judas then did not consider saul, their former murderer.
And also Jesus was making that statement to the 12 disciples that were his witnesses, Matthew 19;28.
Saul never met Jesus.

No where did the other disciples refer to Saul as an apostle.

Ken4Christ:


He chose him to be an Apostle to the Gentiles.

Your Jesus will have to create more seats then.
Matthew 19:28

Ken4Christ:


Peter didn't argue with Paul. You don't teach anyone the gospel. But you can teach the revelation of God concerning the church and God's purpose and plans. The gospel is simple. It's about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ. It's the good news that Jesus died for the world and the free gift of salvation is available for all.

Saul the murderer of Ebonites was taught the Gospel by Men he was murdering.
And peter and saul argued over the doctrines saul was teaching.

PoliteActivist:


What do you mean?
Only the mind needs to be hypnotized/controlled

Only the mind can be hypnotized, in fact only the subconscious mind can be hypnotized.

So the gospel was preached and taught to Saul by Men?

Ken4Christ:


The Lord himself directed him where to go and hear the gospel. And he went to Ananias who laid hands on him and got him filled with the Holy Spirit.

Yet in Paul letters he went to Damascus without telling anyone.
He went to Damascus blind abi?!

How come peter who taught saul the gospel were arguing?

Ken4Christ:


Jesus chose him.

Like he chose the 70 apostles right in Luke 10:1?!
What about the Marys, are they also apostles?

Ken4Christ:


Revelation1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel UNTO HIS SERVANT JOHN.

Which was written in Greek and island in Patmos by john the fisherman lol.

The place you read that john was banished to Patmos, why not also read from there who wrote the book of Revelation

Ken4Christ:


Apostle Paul wasn't a disciple of Jesus when Jesus was on earth. So, he couldn't have been considered as a choice.

So why is he then an apostle?

Ken4Christ:


The book of Acts was not written by Apostle Paul. It was written by Dr Luke. What is your problem?

And Acts said.
Acts 9:6
6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

Who preached to gospel to him, and when?

Ken4Christ:


There are different kind of calling. For instance, they tried to kill John the beloved in the Bible but they couldn't. They even put in boiling oil, he didn't die. That was when they banished him to the island of Patmos where he saw the revelation Jesus asked him to write down.

They couldn't kill John and they banished him, what if john refused to go, what will happen??

Also, the John that was boiling in water didn't write book of Revelation, what a life you live.

Ken4Christ:


I don't get your question. Jesus ordained Apostle Paul into the Ministry and gave him the message to preach.

According to what saul or is it Paul told you.

Ken4Christ:

15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also ACCORDING TO THE WISDOM given unto him hath written unto you;

.

Notice how none of Jesus disciples called Saul or is it Paul, an apostle?
Even when they wanted to chose a substitute for Judas, Saul or is it Paul was never considered.