₦airaland Forum

johnydon22:
Just like we are too tiny to notice the curvature of the earth surfaces (so we imagine it as flat while standing on it) so too are we too big to notice the changes at a micro level.

If you tap the wall beside you right now slightly, there MUST and IS a slight vibration induced by that slight tap of your finger but you are too big to notice such miniscule change.

But that doesn't mean there wasn't any Change there was and no approximations can erase that in actuality..

johnydon22:
hahahahaha common bro you lot already have done a good job answering the thread, sometimes an epistle is not needed.

a few words most times are more powerful than a thousand!!!

johnydon22:
it does make it heavier but at a very miniscule level that you cannot notice it

UyiIredia:
It would weigh more with data but the added weight would be neglible which is why one doesn't feel the difference.

tobbie247:
Yes I know physics. But then, it's obviously negligible. Approximating to couple of decimal place will give equal value.

tobbie247:
If I have an empty notebook and then I write in all the pages, does it make it any lighter or heavier?

Mckandre:
I disagree,besides I was just giving an instance. tellme, are u insinuating that OP is relatively correct by that question?

destino24:
Em... Ok... Not photons.

There will be a slight change in mass, but the difference in weight would be so small and nominal

Justycxx:
owing to gravitational anomalies, the flashdrive might experience a slight loss or gain in weight depending on the actual gravity of the environment.

destino24:
Photons are massless.
No change in mass

destino24:
Photons are massless.
No change in mass

Mckandre:
The question is clueles and lacks logic reasoning. Its like asking if u can weigh a dead body and a living body with a soul.

multikolour:
http://www.punchng.com/proliferation-of-first-class-degrees-in-private-varsities/

Geniuses are borne not made. Ayodele Daniel Dada (the
student who broke record in the University of Lagos by
scoring 5.0 Cumulative Grade Point Average CGPA) did not
wake up one morning to score those straight As. We are
told that his UTME score was so high that his result was
withheld. Consequently, he had to go through diploma
course. Which of these so-called First Class students from
our private universities scored equivalent of straight As in
their secondary school exams, and which of them scored
anything close to 280 in their UTME? I doubt the honest
ability of our private universities to transmogrify ordinary
students with ordinary SSCE and banal UTME results into
overnight intellectual superstars.

LILGWANZ:
mehn I just had to commebt, first of all I hate people like you.imagine this boy planning on getting 1st in waec dude better write your exam and mind your business.who you epp

branhampaul:
Its Unfair For Peps Like Me Who Burn The Midnight Candle To Score Same With Those Who Dont Even Read Because They Paid an Amount To The Invigilator.. This Is Corruption.. How Can I Report Such Sch?

ElCount:
Meanwhile below is a picture of a trilobite ur index fossil, and yes thats a human foot, apparently "millions of year ago" humans existed side by side with these trilobites

ElCount:
first of all whatever evidence you think you are observing in the lab is micro-evolution no one has any qualms with that fact, it is true and observable the evolution attached to it is just meant for deception to deceive gullible minds like yours because when they attach the time factor that's when they tell you macro-evolution will occur which till today has no proof whatsoever.

Secondly, the layer of sedimentary rocks you are talking about alongside the fossils is the geologic column. For your information that was assembled artificially by geologist and even at that its still not complete, you will think someone who claimed to be enlightened as you do would know that, I am not going to go deep into that but I will just ask you:
How did you know for sure that the Jurassic rock layer for instance is 70million years old, how did they arrive at that figure?

and how come in the geologic column if it was actually formed over millions and billions of years as they claim, how come there are no traces of erosion, don't you think the rain would have left some marks? Learn to ask the right questions.

I don't know what you mean by more complex fossils I personally don't believe in that. the Trilobite is considered an index fossil by the evolutionist and very ancient, how is it that such an ancient organism ended up with one of the most sophisticated eyes ever known? Perhaps you didn't know about that

Thirdly, DNA sequencing doesn't tell you anything about ancestors that's one atrocious logic common with evolutionists. The Niger bridge and the third mainland bridge are both made of iron, therefore the Niger bridge is an ancestor of the third mainland bridge that's how ridiculous you guys sound.
If DNA sequencing should tell you anything its the fact that "a common designer is involved who decided to use thesame sequence".

Scientist can believe whatever they want they are the ones coming up with the theories to avoid the God question so if they don't believe their theory who will.

The Catholic church believes in micro-evolution which is a proven truth.

Finally, take your own advice, the internet and all informations are at your fingertips make good use of them and stop paddling a boat in ignorance. Ask the right questions. You guys are the ones to always claim to be smart and enlightened but when you start talking ignorance starts oozing out of all your orifices

ElCount:
Oga you go and do you homework, evolution has no evidence not to talk of overwhelming, you guys claim to know it all and are the smarter ones yet all ur arguments reeks of contradictions and fallacies, believe me if I begin to ask you questions on that theory you won't be able to answer one and will as usual resort to ad hominem. No make me pour the vex of my team wey loose match on you this night mtcheeeew!!!

ElCount:
Perhaps many of you don't know this but Hitler was an atheist and he believed very much in the Big bang and evolution dud. One ideology that propelled his actions was that "The jews hadn't evolved properly and he had to apply natural selection to eliminate them lest they contaminate the German gene"
Now going to the evolution theory you will find out that his ideology was in place and according to the theory no one can really fault his actions. One can confidently say that this theory played a major role in the second world war because of Hitlers' stance on eliminating the weaker species. This same ideology was also shared by many whites during the slave trade era (even Charles Darwin was a racist).
My question is how would you feel if someone considers you a lower specie to other humans and goes ahead to treat you like a piece of junk with this theory backing his actions owing to the fact that you have also defended this same theory for the better part of your life?

I mean if Hitler and Darwin were alive today they would have thought less of you and likened you to a weaker specie based on this theory and here you are defending this same theory which is an obvious lie and unproven in every respect

ERODEDEAST:
Christians can never be suicide bombers because they are not being promised imaginary 72 Virgins.
So the Journalist shouldn't "GO THERE"

everydayperson:
carry on

jayriginal:
Omo the way they were hyping the book, you'd think it was Ghost written by Alvin Platinga or CS Lewis.

I had to do a quick check before committing my time.

I wonder what they expect would happen. Perhaps the reader would experience an epiphany. Lol.

vooks:
This is an incredibly ridiculous excuse for shunning Ravi.
He s quite clear that is hypothetical on the prologue. Then am pleasantly surprised that you know the contents of his book enough to critique it yet you never went beyond the prologue....

Did you get this far?
But why do I begin to address a work as serious- minded as that of Harris with an imaginary scene like the one above? Because realities that are far from imaginary are enveloped in this story, and I wonder what Harris would say to those possibilities.

He may argue that the grief his book may cause families such as this one is justified and even nec- essary sometimes if the young student in the story and others like him are going to stop believing and living a lie. Does this sound familiar? He may well justify any amount of grief to any number of people because of an insistence that the value of his “truth” is greater than the destruction of a family. But to do so raises a huge question, doesn’t it? If in the microcosm of this one little episode Harris were to justify the devastation he has caused for the sake of what he sees as the truth, why does he deny God the same justification for allowing suffering in all of the intricacies and possibilities of a lifetime?

vooks:
Thank you. Please share your thoughts on the same as soon as you are done.

vooks:
Thank you. Please share your thoughts on the same as soon as you are done.

vooks:
Read the book