₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,038 members, 8,515,145 topics. Date: Sunday, 08 November 2026 at 07:58 AM

Toggle theme

Merry100's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Merry100's Profile › Merry100's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 45 pages)

Romance › Re: Virginity. My Final Submission. Read Before You Comment. by Merry100:
Some virgins may still end up as experiments.

I agree that virginity is a good thing. It can help you avoid certain problems and strengthen your spiritual life. However, when it comes to relationships, it is best to set virginity aside and focus on genuine love. Don't be misled. Don't let virginity deceive; it has absolutely no role to play in relationship. I have seen more non-virgins enjoy than virgins.

Whether you are a virgin or not, just marry the right person. There are many virgins that become victims of wrong marriages.
Romance › Re: Virginity. My Final Submission. Read Before You Comment. by Merry100: 9:47pm On May 09
marcusverum:
The virginity conversation never ends. Here is where I stand and this is my final submission.

To everyone who immediately demands male virginity whenever female virginity is raised, I have one question.

Where in history has male virginity been a requirement for marriage? In which tribe? In which culture? In which religion?

Even the white wedding dress itself is a symbol of purity. Answer that honestly in your mind. Once you have, you will realize you are simply deflecting.

When a man wants to marry, the woman's family asks what he does, they ask about his capacity to provide. But when a man brings a woman home, his own family ignores his pocket and looks at her character and most importantly, her purity. Each gender carries what belongs to them.

Men are judged by what they can build and provide, this is why they are broke-shamed for underperforming. A man without resources is a man who has failed his primary social function

Women are judged by their sexual discipline, this is why they are slut-shamed for promiscuity. A woman without restraint has compromised the very trait that ensures stability and trust.

Women have a hymen for the same reason men do not. Men and women cannot be measured under the same moral compass, which is why the consequences are not the same.

Virgins are not perfect. They are not angels but they are still the better choice ahead of non-virgins not because of character alone, but because of what they bring to a marriage without being asked.

So to those who argue that virgins do not guarantee good character. If sexual discipline is not good character, then what is sleeping around? A woman who can keep her body in a world where women sell themselves to the highest bidder is not ordinary. She is rare. That discipline alone is the pinnacle of character.

A virgin offers a blank slate, no sexual ghosts, no comparisons to exes, and no emotional residue from past entanglements. Beyond purity, she offers proof of a rare trait in the modern market: the discipline to say no. This level of restraint is only possible because she has successfully navigated a world of manipulation, surpassing the lure of gifts, money and luxuries that compromise others.

As a man, instead of chastising virgins to feel better about your own choices, ask yourself why you aren't seeking a woman with sexual discipline instead of arguing that she doesn't exist.

And as a woman, tell yourself the truth, why are you so worried about virgins? Why do you keep badmouthing them to make yourself feel better? Is it because they still possess the one thing you once had and no longer do?

A woman who could keep her legs closed until marriage undoubtedly has a high level of self-discipline and this often transcends into the marriage.

Truly, change is constant and any woman can go wayward but the majority of women who cheat in relationships are those with prior sexual experience. Most often, they return to an ex or find a new lover nearby. It is a byproduct of indiscipline and recklessness. Old habits rarely die, they simply wait for an opportunity

For one, you can confidently discuss 'no sex before marriage' with a virgin, but you will be living in a fool’s paradise to try that with a woman who is not a virgin. Aside from the words coming out of her mouth, you can never tell if she’s not sleeping with someone else apart from you.

A woman who is sexually active before marriage has a higher tendency to maintain connection with previous sexual partners. That is how paternity fraud happens and when paternity fraud happens, it is men who suffer. No woman has ever unknowingly raised a child she did not give birth to. It is men who get deceived. A man raising another man's child, believing it is his, that is the consequence of ignoring this reality.

No man, regardless of what he argues publicly, will open his eyes and willingly marry a known prostitute. No parent here, mother or father, would celebrate their son bringing home a woman the entire street has passed through. Everyone knows this. The argument only exists online.

The only man who argues loudest against female virginity is a man who regrets his own choice. The only woman who argues loudest against it is a woman who regrets how she spent her prime. Watch the comment section and you will see exactly this play out. Virgins will never argue against this post. Men who married virgins will nod quietly because they already know. The ones performing outrage are the ones this post is about. The truth is always bitter. That has never stopped it from being the truth.

Any man who believes there are no virgins left should examine the life he is living and the places he is searching. Are you finding them at clubs? Hookup spots? Lounges? Men are marrying virgins with good character every single day. Virgins do not announce themselves. They do not perform for attention. Because the loudest women are the most reckless does not mean they are the majority. It only means they are the loudest. Any man who has given up on finding a decent woman should keep that conclusion to himself.

Every woman wants a capable man. She is not looking for a virgin. She wants a man who has worked, built and conquered. So what does she offer him in return? Something she has already given freely to men who offered her nothing. As a man, ask yourself if that is a fair exchange.

Women are ruthless and intentional when they choose a man. A woman with the lowest standards will still desire a man at the top of his game. She will not settle for less than what she believes she deserves in provision. Yet men who are expected to provide everything financially will not even ask a woman what she brings to the table in purity. You are held to a high standard of success, but you refuse to hold her to a high standard of history. You ask for her hand but not her past and then you wonder why your home has no peace.

You will never hear a woman say there are no rich men left. Even a woman who wasted her prime still believes she deserves a wealthy man. She never lowers her standard. She never announces that good men do not exist. She keeps searching. Men should take note.

Think about this carefully. Her womb will carry your seed. Your legacy will grow inside her. A man who is intentional about his future must be intentional about where he plants it. Would you rather eat from a clean table or a dirty one? A brand new vessel or one weathered by years of careless use? If you can sit with that question honestly, you already know the answer.

Most men pursue non-virgin women because access is easier. No waiting. No standards to meet. No patience required but lust is not a foundation. When the consequences of a poor choice begin to surface in your marriage, which they will, and when they do, physical attraction will not save you. The body that drew you in will still be there but so will everything you refused to vet. The same men who mock posts like this are the ones sending anonymous messages to influencers online, broken and betrayed. They chose based on vibes, but they are now living on consequences.

The problem is never the women. The problem is men who are ready to settle for crumbs while women raise their standards daily. This is why most women no longer care about sexual discipline. They already know that somewhere a man is ready to save them regardless of her history. A man who believes a virgin is a long shot will always end up with whatever is left. Men settle for crumbs while women raise their standards and then wonder why the world is where it is today.

This post does not condemn any woman. Not every man will marry a virgin and not every non-virgin woman is unworthy of marriage. Some women are victims of bad relationships or marriages that broke them before they found the right man. There are women who are not virgins but are not wayward. The only intimacy they knew was in a relationship that did not survive. The problem is there is no way for a man to tell the difference from the outside. This is why virginity remains the clearest standard a man has.

If as a man you choose to settle for a non-virgin, that is your right. But do not be careless about it. Your duty is to vet thoroughly. Do not put your future and the future of your children on vibes and lust. Be intentional. Be selective. Choose a woman who serves your present and your future, not just your appetite. The baggage a woman carries into a marriage does not disappear at the altar. It unpacks itself slowly, and you will be the one living with the contents.

So to women who are virgins, keep it. What you carry has value that the world is working hard to convince you to give away for free. To women who are not, stop adding to the count. More men are waking up although some will remain ignorant and learn the hard way. That is their portion.

One thing is certain. A woman will not forgive a man for being unproductive. The day he loses his income, he loses her loyalty. Even a woman with no standards wants a top-tier man. Yet we have men willing to wife women with no standards. Every man bears his own cross but this post will be one that many men will be grateful they read.


- Marcus Verum
You can't reduce the whole world to your personal mindset. My brother's introduction took place today, and his engagement and wedding will happen soon. I have never seen any of my brothers obsess over virginity, nor have I heard any of my male relatives say a woman must be a virgin before they can marry her.

Love is a thing of the heart, not something controlled by society's mentality. A man can genuinely fall in love with a single mother, a divorced woman, or even a woman with ten children, even if twenty virgins are standing in front of him. Many marriages are built on genuine love, companionship, peace, loyalty, understanding, and emotional connection; not virginity.

Love is personal. How many great men specifically married virgins? Prince Harry chose the beautiful, hardworking, and accomplished; though divorced; Meghan Markle to be his wife.

There is a real-life example that recently took place. A divorced woman married a prominent honourable after leaving an abusive marriage. Her former husband was physically and verbally abusive, even toward their daughter. Despite being hardworking and supportive, she endured years of mistreatment. While she was still in that marriage, she met the honourable, who treated her with kindness and respect, and over time she fell in love with him.

The day she finally decided to leave, her friends followed her to help pack her belongings because they feared her husband would try to stop her. They warned him not to cause trouble, and many people in the area already knew about the abuse because the story had spread widely. When she finally left, people around her were genuinely happy because they knew what she had suffered through.

You clearly don't know how love works.
Romance › Re: Males, What's The Most Meaningful Conversation You've Had With A Female? by Merry100:
kpankpangolo:
You have to narrow it down to female friends and potential romance partners. If you include every female a man knows, I can fill this page with wise advice from female family members.

One of my sisters is in the tech industry. She has talked more substance than I’ve read in Nairaland’s technology section. Another is a medical doctor. When she talks about situations in her place of work, I cement my mind that this forum does not deserve a health section. The last one does three side hustles for a living. Advice regarding mental and financial perseverance are abundant whenever we sit down to talk.

When it comes to romantic partners, all we do is share life experiences. Doing so mostly throws me into the friend zone. I dust myself and move on. I will never learn what women want past physical appearance.
It is a good thing you have accomplished sisters. Men with sisters like that often speak more calmly, even when they have had bad experiences with some women. You won't find my brothers generalizing negatively about women. A lot of men who constantly insult women online were shaped by unhealthy environments growing up, and it shows in their mindset.
Romance › Re: Why Is It That Once I Tell A Lady I Like Her She Instantly Starts Pulling Away? by Merry100: 10:33am On May 07
Tekashi89:
Hey guys, my dating life sulks, I haven't been really lucky with girls ever since my secondary School days. Since I was born I've only dated two girls and that was way back in 2016 and last year in 2025.

I tend to attract more guys, single mothers or older women (very old women tend to like me).
I don't know what's it with me that tends to push away younger girls (note I'm 180cm 60kg) light skin most people say I'm handsome. But I don't know why I can't attract young single girls.

Where ever I go I tend to attract only single mothers and when a young girl even start getting attracted to me I'll later discover that she acts that way to every other guy around so there's nothing special about me.

I'm thinking of going spiritual but I just thought I should post it here first.

So guys I need your advice on this issue pls
Be less concerned about whether it is spiritual or not; instead, look out for the physical factor. Even if it is spiritual, there is likely a physical element attached to it, and if you address that physical factor, it is likely the problem will be solved.

Look within yourself; there might be a physical reason that is making you unappealing to ladies or causing them to lose interest. Not everything requires spiritual warfare; some problems just need simple physical adjustments.

There was a time I noticed something strange. Whenever I passed through a market or went there to buy something, whether on foot or in a car, I would feel as though a small stone had hit my forehead, and I would feel sick for a few days afterward. I kept praying, but it didn't stop.

One day, I went out with friends and we stopped by a market. I had forgotten about the issue. It was only after leaving that I realized I had visited the market without experiencing the usual symptoms. After thinking about it deeply, I came to the conclusion that it might be because I had a scarf tied on my head. I tested it again later, and it worked. I also tried a face cap and other head coverings, and the result was the same. Since then, I always cover my head in markets, and the problem stopped.

Some of these things may just be psychological, but they can still have real effects.
Romance › Re: Why Do Ladies Most Times Prefer To Meet A Guy, At An Eatery, Or At A Fast Food? by Merry100: 12:43pm On May 06
Because under the tree is not safe.
Romance › Re: Introduction Is Not Marriage: It Is Just A Declaration Of Intention by Merry100:
FreeStuffsNG:
Smh.

Many of you still do not get it how these things work. If you do introduction, you are already married! Both of you are already entangled.

Introduction is even the most important as it officially commences the exchange of vow rites before God, your parents, families, man and the law. If that is not marriage, what then is it?

Don't get entangled at all till the introduction level. If you have strong doubts about the union, cut him or her off before introduction!
It is already too late after introduction because you are already married to the person.
I agree that the introduction stage is serious and can be emotionally binding. It is no longer the "I'm still getting to know you" stage for the partners, and only something serious, such as deceit or unfaithfulness, should reasonably break it.

However, it is not marriage in any legal, traditional, or spiritual sense. It is still part of the courtship process, where families formally meet and assess compatibility.

It is important not to confuse levels of commitment: introduction is not marriage, and even engagement is still part of the process, not the final union.

During introduction, no vows have been exchanged and marriage rites have not been completed.

At that stage, the individuals are still fiances, not husband and wife, and shouldn't start behaving as though they are already married or begin cohabiting.

Marriage only exists after the full customary, religious, or civil rites are completed according to the applicable system.
Romance › Re: Introduction Is Not Marriage: It Is Just A Declaration Of Intention by Merry100: 6:54pm On May 05
.
Romance › Re: Having Sex With A Man And Expecting Compensation After Is Prostitution - Lady by Merry100:
Whorei is also an English word used as an offensive term to describe women who have had multiple sexual partners, even when the sex is free.

By that logic, it would also make sense for virgins to call out all non-virgins; both men and women; including this lady if she is not a virgin; as whorei or public toilet.

Tell me how this even makes sense. People wakes up, creates a moral standard based on their personal life experience, and others applaud it.

I still don't understand the moral of her post. All I see is just unnecessary self-praise. Let me restate it in a clearer way: "I have sex, but I don't collect gifts and money from guys; so I am a saint, but those who have sex and collect gifts and money are prostitutes."

Personal and double standards are now being glorified. Some ladies may have dated up to ten men and had sex with all of them while trying to find someone who truly loves them, but because they never came across a man who is intentional about them to the extent of spending on them or willing to invest in them emotionally and financially, some of them feel morally superior and judge those women who have partners who are intentional and willing to spend on and invest in them, even if those ladies have had sex with just one or two guys before finding someone who loves them, sometimes even going as far as calling them prostitutes.

There are many self-righteous and inconsistent moral standards these days.

Some single fathers feel entitled to judge single mothers for choices that are often similar in nature to their own.

Some non-virgins; even those who have secretly terminated several pregnancies feel entitled to judge single mothers.

Financial gestures or investments are one way of identifying true love. Guys can dump their sperm anywhere, a guy can approach a lady simply to dump his sperm but he won't make his intention known. A guy that is intentional and investing in a lady emotionally and/or financially is most likely to have feelings for her.
Romance › Re: When A Naija Babe Says “no Sex Till Marriage,” Here’s What Smart Guys Do by Merry100:
dontrulee:
It's very very easy to hack the female mind.
E no really hard to break them especially the ones with "no sex before marriage"
It is not logical to assume you can outsmart the female mind. Women possess the same reasoning ability and intelligence as men.

People think and respond differently based on individual personality and traits.

Like systems, humans aren't uniform; no matter how skilled a hacker is, they cannot outsmart every system because there are always stronger protections as well.
Romance › Re: When A Naija Babe Says “no Sex Till Marriage,” Here’s What Smart Guys Do by Merry100: 11:05pm On Apr 27
One or a few celibate women do not represent all celibate women.

There are different types of celibate women.

1. Some are no longer virgins but have now chosen to abstain from premarital sex in alignment with their faith.

2. Some are virgins who have been influenced by persuasive religious leaders or cultural expectations to believe that virginity will make their husbands love and cherish them.

These ones are more of hymen protectors, they don't have a personal conviction, so they are more likely to compromise under pressure or engage in some form of sexual activity as long as it doesn't affect their hymen.

3. Some are virgins who have consciously chosen celibacy based on their personal faith and convictions.

4. Others have their own personal reasons or motives.
Romance › Re: Would You Marry A Corrupt Politician For Money? by Merry100:
My values matter more than financial gain, so I wouldn't marry a corrupt politician for money. Political differences are not morality issues. People can have different views and still both be valid. My partner is a strong supporter of Tinubu, and I fully respect his right to his opinion. It doesn't affect our relationship in any way. If things continue to go well, marriage is likely.
Romance › Re: Involuntary Single Ladies In Nigeria: What’s Really Going On? by Merry100: 12:37am On Apr 24
PerfectStranger:
For this hard economy that instead of helping more men with job roles, na women dey collect am.

If we start employing more men in different job sectors, over 70% of spinsters will get engaged.
Majority of today's 30+ men will not be getting married any time soon or at all, highest na to find one girl give belle, case close grin
Unfortunately, no sensible woman can take this kind of narrative seriously. We will keep advocating for more jobs and better opportunities rather than reduce women's participation in the economy over a secondary matter like marriage. Marriage is not survival.

I choose my career over marriage because marriage is secondary. I can live fully and happily without it.

The system is still unfair to women; men are far more represented in employment, while women remain underrepresented.
Romance › Re: Modern Women No Understand Struggle by Merry100: 11:23pm On Apr 23
This is my view on marriage:

It is wise to be cautious about marrying someone who is still struggling financially, because marriage comes with real responsibilities.

Dating and marriage are not the same. Once people are married, it is meant to be a long-term commitment; through good and bad, in stability and in hardship. I don't see the sense in walking away just because financial issues arise.

The only time it makes sense to leave is if there are deeper problems like abuse, infidelity, or a consistent lack of effort. If it is a good partner that is going through a tough phase, that is exactly when support and loyalty should show up the most.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100: 10:45am On Apr 21
Dtruthspeaker:
See dis one is looking for who to have useless argument with. 🤣🤣🤣.
I wasn't arguing, just correcting a baseless claim. That is it. 🙂

You can't just throw open an unfounded claim and then cry wolf that someone wants to argue with you when you are corrected.

An argument requires a valid point to engage with. Which isn't the case here.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100:
Tenrack:
leave that one. E go learn the hard way. Dem no dey tell person.
There are absolutely no life lessons to be learned from this narrative. Stop projecting such nonsense onto me; such assumption doesn't apply to me, save them for those your desperate femaIe relatives. I don't see men as something I need to survive. My happiness is my priority, whether married or unmarried.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100: 9:31am On Apr 21
Dtruthspeaker:
These threads prove you are a liar.

https://www.nairaland.com/4155106/why-more-nigerian-girls-becoming#62035529

https://www.nairaland.com/1146407/men-blamed-female-gold-diggers#13607224

https://www.nairaland.com/2985435/counter-thread-why-lagos-ladies#43701461

And where before you said that women should be financially prepared to come to the table now you are trying to defend gold diggers. And you were saying that not all women.

As I always, na phu dey biliv woman grin
You are the one being inconsistent here. You keep shifting the claim from "every woman" to "majority of women" to "gold diggers." You are simply dancing around the actual point.

There is no contradiction in what I said. Saying women should be financially prepared is about personal responsibility in relationships. That is not the same as labeling women as gold diggers. You are mixing two different ideas to avoid addressing the actual point.

And whether you say "every woman" or "the majority of women," it is still a broad generalization about women as a group, which includes me.

To make a serious claim, you need to have actual evidence, not assumptions. Random forum posts are not data, not research, and not proof of anything beyond individual opinions. Selective links from biased discussions do not establish any population-wide conclusion.

If you want to be taken seriously, provide actual evidence; not all this fanfare 🤣
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100:
Dtruthspeaker:
Generalization is as a result of the majority conduct, so we must generalize. And in every generalization we are aware of its exceptionalization. However, the exception is the one with the burden of proving itself.

And nonetheless your point is correct.
Your generalization is completely invalid. Assumptions, whether individual or collective, are not facts. Facts require evidence.

Less than 10% of Nigeria population can boast of having 10 million naira and above?

In the absence of widespread gold, how exactly did you arrive at the conclusion that the majority of women are gold diggers?

Given Nigeria's economic reality, there isn't even enough "gold" in circulation for most women to dig. The majority of Nigerian women don't have access to gold, so your claim is not logical. You can't accuse the majority of women of something they haven't done based on assumptions about what you think they would do.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100:
Dtruthspeaker:
Ad hominem/ad feminam fallacy.
Fair point on tone. That said, I don't agree with how your comment came across as a generalization either. My point is simply that it is important for both sides to be reasonably prepared, especially financially, before marriage.
Romance › Re: It Is Normal And Expected For 20 Something Year old Men To Be Broke by Merry100: 10:28am On Apr 20
Being broke doesn't mean a guy is irresponsible; there are actually broke guys with potentials. Dating while broke is fine, but the idea of people proceeding to marriage while they are financially unstable is irresponsible. Personally, I can't be broke and consider marriage.

I don't have an issue with just dating a broke guy. I recall a guy I once considered dating. He had just finished university and was preparing for his NYSC, so he wasn't financially stable at the time. I supported him financially, sending him money and airtime, even though he didn't ask for it. He eventually became financially okay, but I had to abandon the idea of dating him because I later realized we weren't compatible.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100: 10:21am On Apr 20
Dtruthspeaker:
Lies!
0
Why don't you people stabilize yourself?
The problem with many of you is that you assume every woman is like your sisters or girlfriends who aren't intentional about their lives.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100: 9:38am On Apr 20
tanigororo:
I guess you failed the comprehension part,
A ladys past is equivalent to the future of a man.
You clearly missed the point. I clarified the difference between stability and gold digging to address; and dismiss the flawed generalization.
Romance › Re: Poor Past Wants Rich Future! by Merry100: 3:00pm On Apr 19
Hypnotise:
Poor or rich, there is an element of gold digging in every woman
Some people fail to distinguish between valuing stability and gold digging. Many women simply value stability. It is irresponsible for a man or woman to enter marriage without being reasonably prepared for its responsibilities. That is why many responsible people, both men and women, focus on achieving their core goals before marriage because they understand the importance of building a good life.
Romance › Re: You Can Never Be Fine Or Okay As A Single Girl At 35 Or 40 Says A Lady by Merry100: 2:05pm On Apr 19
To love is to suffer. To avoid suffering, one must not love. But then one suffers from not loving.

Therefore, to love is to suffer; not to love is to suffer.

To suffer is to suffer. To be happy is to love. But suffering makes one unhappy.

Therefore, to be happy, one must love, or love to suffer, or suffer from too much happiness.
Romance › Re: If A Lady Ever Tell You That She Does Not Date A Married Man, Then You Are Poor! by Merry100: 1:43pm On Apr 19
Cum4me:
You're right broke married men suffer from those girls too much. 90% of Nigeria girls useless. The day you buy car start dressing well. You go see how poor men girls child are so desperate to have you. grin
Who chases something that has no value? That is like pouring water into a leaking cup.

A broke man is like a tree without fruit, standing tall but offering nothing.

A broke woman still has value; at least she can perform household responsibilities like cooking, cleaning, and washing, and also provide emotional support.
Romance › Re: There Is No Man You Say 'sir' To That Would Not Love Or Consider Loving You. by Merry100:
Gbadugbakun:
Not just sir, she should kneel down whenever am talking to her. That's total submission.
Your dreams can only come true if you find a gullible, unwise woman. You are not more human than a woman; I still don't understand where all this unnecessary ego comes from. Why do you feel your wife has to kneel for you? What makes you so special?

What is even more shocking is that the men who treat their wives poorly are often the ones who feel most entitled to respect.

Gestures like kneeling or calling a husband "sir" are personal responses to being loved and cared for; they are not to be demanded or expected. Even Abraham didn't demand them, and God didn't command them of Sarah. They were acts of love, not obligations. Sarah was barren, yet she was still respected and cherished. Today, many barren women are insulted, belittled, and abandoned.

I don't see anything wrong in a woman kneeling for her husband or calling him "sir" or even "daddy," but if she gives these gestures to a man who doesn't love, care for, or emotionally neglects her, she is simply enslaving herself. That is what slaves do; they serve their master regardless of how poorly they are treated.

Ladies, don't be deceived; a man who genuinely loves you already feels it. Respect can deepen an existing love, but it cannot make a non-existing love appear out of thin air.
Romance › Re: There Is No Man You Say 'sir' To That Would Not Love Or Consider Loving You. by Merry100:
Girl, be careful with this mindset. The idea that "saying sir" will automatically make a man love or respect you is false and can backfire. "Yes sir" belongs mainly in professional or formal settings; it is not a love language.

Unprofessional behaviour has limited many women. Imagine how responsible women feel working in an environment where a boss or superior is hitting on them. Not every "I want you" or "I love you" is genuine love, and not every woman wants to end up as a plaything. It is best for a woman to set boundaries and focus on the job she was hired to do.

Even in informal settings, many men who pursue women displaying unnecessary submissive gestures aren't in it for love; they are after control and the freedom to behave recklessly.

Don't confuse obligatory gestures with real respect. Saying "yes sir" to superiors, bowing, kneeling, or prostrating for elders are just formalities.

Real respect, the kind that matters in relationships, cannot be learned, demanded, or forced. It develops naturally over time and is built on trust, responsibility, and character. If respect isn't built, it may never be real. You can't force it or fake it for long; eventually, it fades. Wise women find it difficult to respect foolish men, especially those who have been reckless, selfish, or self-centered from the start.

First impressions last. Consistency in the early stages matters. A partner earns respect by being responsible, thoughtful, and caring from the start. Once genuine respect is formed, it is hard to break; even when mistakes are made, it can persist and sometimes inspire understanding.

On the other hand, if someone acts selfishly or recklessly from the beginning, any respect shown may just be an obligatory gesture, the kind society expects women to give their partners. Such respect rarely lasts and can collapse quickly.

You are only simply misquoting the Bible "God never commanded women to submit to their husbands."
Romance › Re: Is It True That Some Women Bring Wealth/glory After Marrige. by Merry100: 12:50am On Apr 07
No woman is bad luck. You guys just look for every possible way to blame women. Even when women have no fault, you create one in your imagination.

Ladies, some men are very selfish; they can even marry you for the wrong reasons. If your partner starts talking about you having a "star" or some special power, try to convince him that there is no such thing.

Through my nature and the way I am treated by others, I have come to understand that the "weaker" you appear, the more likely you are to be treated better. By nature, I seem small and fragile. Male friends often see me as a girl rather than a woman. They literally babysit me: "You can't carry that," "I will help you cross the road," "Oh my God, you are cold," "Why are you so pale? Are you sure you are alright?" and so on.

Although that is just how I seem naturally, it has made me realize that many women are probably treated badly because they often display too much strength and self-worth.

I know of a woman whose husband believed she had a "good star," and that is why he married her. It is very clear that he doesn't love her. Coincidentally, he became very successful after their marriage, and now he can't let go of her because of that belief. Unfortunately, she is paying dearly for it. He isn't in love with her; his only attraction is the idea that she brings him luck. He even fears that if she has an affair, her "luck" might transfer to another man. Because of this, he made her a full-time housewife and gives her a monthly allowance.

He disrespects her constantly by being unfaithful. He even has two other wives. The first wife lives in his main house, while he built separate houses for the other two wives and often goes there to spend time with them. Meanwhile, his first wife is often neglected.

Every woman deserves to be loved and treated right. It is simple logic: the more you treat others well, the more you receive good in return. God can bless you for treating your wife with love and respect. Simply marry someone you truly love and treat her right.
Romance › Re: “All Men Are The Same”… Or You’re Picking The Same Man In Different Bodies? by Merry100: 12:03am On Apr 06
I found a new coach.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZS98GFEATsvPw-3RstI/
Romance › Re: 7 Signs A Woman Has Been Conditioned To See Men Mainly As Providers by Merry100: 3:50pm On Apr 05
Brownlumi:
7 Signs a Woman Has Been Conditioned to See Men Mainly as Providers

(Not always evil. But definitely important to notice.)
What brought about this topic? Recently, I was chatting with a lady, the vibes was good and she was just daddying me, and viola! she dropped the "i want to eat shawarma, it's just 5k now..." and I'm like, this soon, moreover, I'm supposed to be a stranger to you!!!
So, First, an important disclaimer:

This is not about attacking women.
And it’s not saying every woman who likes provision is bad because let’s be honest, most adults want some level of stability, generosity, and competence in a partner.
That’s normal.
This is about something more specific:
When a woman’s mental model of men becomes heavily transactional
Meaning: “A man’s value is strongly tied to what he can provide materially.”
That kind of conditioning can come from past relationships, family upbringing, social media, friends, survival mentality, or sugar-daddy type dynamics and when it’s there, it often shows up in patterns like these:

1) She introduces money too early: This is one of the clearest signs. If a woman barely knows a man and already money is entering the conversation through airtime, food, transport, “small help”, gifts, “just 5k”, “who will spoil me?”, “I’m hungry”, “I need data” …that is usually not random. It often means she is already operating from a frame like:
“Let’s see whether this connection can produce something tangible.”
Now, some people do this playfully but playful billing is still billing and once money enters too early, it often tells you: provision is not a later layer for her — it’s part of the opening script.
That matters bro!

2) Her strongest attraction language is “what can he do for me?”: This one is subtle but very revealing. Watch how she talks about men she likes or respects. If her admiration is heavily centered on things like: “He takes care of me”, “He spends on me”, “He sorts me”, “He handles things”, “He doesn’t come empty-handed”, “He knows how to spoil a woman”…then you’re getting a clue.
Now, again, there’s nothing wrong with appreciating generosity but if the core admiration keeps circling back to: resource output more than character, values, emotional intelligence, integrity, compatibility
…then provision may be sitting too close to the center of her attraction map.
That is worth noticing.
3) She treats financial gestures as proof of seriousness: This is a very big one. In this mindset, a man is not truly “serious” unless he spends. So things like listening, consistency, emotional maturity, honesty, effort, presence,
may not fully count unless there is also money, gifts, payment or “sorting. Tha creates a dangerous dynamic because it means:
sincerity alone may not be legible to her unless it becomes material.
And that can quietly push a man into a loop where he starts feeling like he must: prove himself, keep spending, keep performing financially just to maintain emotional standing.
That’s not healthy.

4) She’s very comfortable asking — even when it’s inappropriate: This is one of the loudest tells. Some people won’t ask because they still have an internal boundary like: “No, that’s too soon.” But a woman who has become heavily provider-conditioned may be surprisingly comfortable asking for things from men in situations where many others would hesitate.

Examples: asking a stranger for money, asking early in the chat stage, asking repeatedly without much shame, framin requests as normal banter, acting surprised when there’s resistance. That comfort level is important because it often means:
the request no longer feels unusual to her.
It feels normal. And that kind of normalization doesn’t usually appear from nowhere.

5) She uses softness, pet names, or emotional tone as a bridge to extraction: This is a big one. She may not always say:
“Send me money.” Instead, she creates a mood where the ask feels emotionally natural.
This can look like: “Daddy 🥺”, “Aww now…”, “You don’t care 😞”, “Who will help me?”, “It’s just small na”, “I’m hungry 😩”, “I wish I had…”

This is powerful because it makes the request feel less like a transaction and more like:

a caring response to her emotional state.
That is how many people get drawn in. It doesn’t always mean she is consciously manipulative. Sometimes it’s just a relational style she has learned works. But either way:

softness can become a delivery system for extraction.
And that’s important to recognize.

6) Her “jokes” about money are too consistent to be just jokes: This is one many guys ignore. A one-off “my love language is money” joke means very little.
But if the money theme keeps showing up again and again through: “credit alert”, “spoil me”, “my love language is money”, “money makes me happy”, “money bouquet”, “who go sort me?”…then at some point, you need to stop saying: “Maybe she’s joking” and start asking: “What if this is actually part of her real value system?” Because often repeated jokes are disguised declarations. People frequently hide their real orientation inside humor because humor gives them deniability. So if you challenge it, they can always say: “Ahn ahn, I was joking na.”
But if it keeps repeating, pay attention.
That repetition is data.

7) She seems more energized by benefits than by connection: This is the deepest sign of all. The question becomes: What really lights her up? Is it: meaningful conversation, mutual understanding, emotional safety, shared humor, values, chemistry? Or does she come alive most when there is money,
gifts,“sorting,” material possibility, provider signals?
That distinction is huge because some people enjoy the atmosphere of being liked but are especially animated by the rewards of being valued materially.
That can create relationships that feel exciting at first but are structurally unbalanced.
And those are the kinds of dynamics that often leave one person feeling: “I gave a lot, but I’m not sure what this really was.”
Painful, but common.
So what do you do if you notice these signs?
This is the part that matters most. Don’t become: bitter, insulting, or self-righteous. And also don’t become: naive, generous-by-pressure or emotionally blind.
The correct response is:

Boundaries + observation
That means: don’t reward early extraction, don’t rush into provider mode, don’t confuse chemistry with character, don’t assume warmth equals sincerity and don’t ignore repeated money framing
Instead, ask: “Who is this person when money is removed?” That one question can save you:
time, stress, confusion, and unnecessary debit alerts 😄 Because when you remove: gifts, favors, airtime, transport, “small help,” you get to see what actually remains of the connection.
And that’s where the truth often lives.
Final reality check

A woman can be sweet, funny, attractive, warm, emotionally expressive…and still fundamentally relate to men through provider expectation.That’s the part many guys struggle to accept because they think “But she’s nice.”
Yes.
She may be nice but niceness and non-transactionality are not the same thing.
Very important distinction.
Final street translation 😄

If every road with her eventually bends toward: money, sorting, spending, or “what are you bringing?”…then my brother, she may not be building with you. She may just be budgeting you.
Imbalance and entitlement are wrong; a woman should have her own source of income rather than relying on a relationship as leverage. That said, number 3 on your list is misleading.

There is no reason to dismiss financial support; it can be a genuine proof of seriousness. Love can be expressed in many ways, and meaningful investment is among the most reliable, because it is harder to fake. A man who only wants a fling is unlikely to support a woman's vision in any substantial way. For example, only few men would invest something as significant as 25 million naira in someone they are not serious about.

As the saying goes, "Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." Consistent investment; support, effort, and presence is a strong indicator of genuine care. Scripture reinforces this principle. John 3:16 shows that love is inseparable from giving: "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son."

Love is not one-sided. Women also demonstrate care by supporting their partners, including financially when needed.

Words alone are not enough. Some men are just players. How can a woman be sure of a man's sincerity without tangible proof? Has he ever risked his life for her, donated a kidney in a critical situation, or gone to extreme lengths to impress her, such as hunting a lion? It is not even advisable for a lady to just believe a guy is genuinely in love with her without clear indications.

Practical support is the clearest evidence of genuine care. Listening, consistency, emotional maturity, honesty, effort, or sweet talk are not enough on their own. Humans need substantial evidence; leave sincerity to God.

Love goes beyond words; it is revealed through consistent action. When someone truly values you, it shows in what they are willing to invest; time, effort, money, and attention. Words, poems, gifts, or flowers can be gestures for a fling. Practical support is harder to fake, so it is more trustworthy.

True care naturally drives action and leaves meaningful impressions. Even men with limited finances can show love through intention, consistency, and effort; what matters is meaningful action, not the amount of money.

Almost every relationship begins with "I love you," yet many marriages fail. Without investment, effort, or support, love is difficult to call genuine; it may be convenience rather than true connection.

It is wiser to step back when intentions are unclear rather than gamble. Relationships should not rely on words or emotions alone; they require visible commitment and meaningful action.
Romance › Re: I Dey Knack My Ex Pas Her Boyfriend (picture) by Merry100: 11:25am On Apr 02
Richarlison640:
Knack am well well your mate they count better cars them get better business, house and Investment your own na knack, oya knack all the style if you no get condom let me know we go buy for you

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 45 pages)