₦airaland Forum

thinkmoney:
Go and read please.
Hamas didn’t burn children, it’s a propaganda pushed by Israel and Netanyahu himself. But later investigation showed it was an hoax. Please go verify this VERY ONE about burning children.

Moreover, there is a problem when you are using one evil to justify another

AndyCole16:
Like you said, Hamas has done terrible things too and I'm not supporting them. However, there was nothing like Hamas, Hesbolah from the beginning. They came about as a millitia group against US/Israel systematic cleansing of their neighbors that started in late 50's.
The whole world has always been with Israel until recently when the the world begins to see them for who they really are.

ppogba:
I will re- enrol under your tutelage in the Sunday School Class.

ppogba:
By now, we should be expecting the CBN approved banks results to come in like a thief in the night.

Why the delay Oga Cardoso?

So many destinies are tired to these.
So many school fees are tired to these.

AndyCole16:
Do you really know how barbaric these Israelis are?
I'm not arguing though, but just asking an harmless question
They are answerable to no one; UN, US, etc.... They sre the real definition of EVIL

If you are on Tiktok, go search gaza knows, Palestine knows. It will reveal fresh atrocities of Israel today which you will never see on mainstream media because they control the media

megawealth01:
WALE thanks Sir

Abeg help us fast Sir

Cyberterror:
Shame no dey catch you. One heavily sanctioned country is being fought by two nuclear powers at the same time and still holding their ground strong.

God1000:
Iran is hitting Israel back to back, it seems the so-called iron dome has gone on vacation

Krisuba:
Back with 10 10 % technique. Na wahoo. Make them open door small nah

ahmedio2017:
It is not totally closed, and it is not totally open now, the enemies are not allowed stop all these unnecessary lies

ositadima1:
No, don’t portray Israel as if it is on the receiving end, that is not the case at all. My stance is this: the Jews were dispersed by the Romans during the Roman Empire because they were not subservient. After that, other people, also originally from the region but from different groups, inhabited the land. The USA and the UK reinstated Israel by force to compensate for the Holocaust. Then Israel began claiming more land, and with the support of the USA and the UK, it captured additional territory. Ask yourself: why is part of it called the “occupied West Bank”?

Mattswaggz:
Imagine even Ghana is ahead of Nigeria......giant of Africa only in population. .

ositadima1:
Your problem is that you just want to prove me wrong for the sake of it, nothing more. You have access to data and the internet on your phone, and I assume you have the same level of critical thinking as I do (maybe more). Do your homework.

Let me clarify this one more time. Prior to the UN plan, some Jews had already begun returning to those lands. Many of them bought land from Arabs who were living there at the time. So yes, Jews were initially welcomed.

Then the UN, which you could argue was influenced by Britain, the USA, and Europe, decided to compensate Jews for the Holocaust carried out by Germany against Jews, and proposed a two-state solution. But that land was already inhabited by other people.

What do you think those people would naturally do? What would you have done if your forefathers had lived on that land for generations, and now outsiders came and started telling you a different story?

Once again, you have the same resources as I do. Do your research.

ositadima1:
"This conflict is fundamentally a clash between two competing national movements, Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism, both claiming the same land.

It developed through four key stages:

In the late 1800s, both groups formed national identities and sought control of the land.

During World War I, Britain made conflicting promises to both Jews and Arabs about the future of the region.

Increased Jewish immigration in the early 20th century led to rising tensions, as Palestinians saw it as a takeover, while Jews saw it as a return and refuge.

In 1947, a UN plan to split the land was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders, leading to the 1948 war, mass Palestinian displacement, and the creation of Israel without a Palestinian state.


At its core, the conflict is a struggle between two claims to self-determination over the same territory."

Jangbajantis:
IRGC says spokesperson killed: State media
The IRGC has confirmed that General Ali Mohammad Naeini, its spokesman, has been killed in an Israeli-American missile attack.

The state-owned Tasnim news agency reported on Telegram and X that Naeini was killed early on Friday.[/b]

IRGC spokesperson Ali Mohammad Naini killed in strikes shortly after issuing defiant warning to US-Israel

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard spokesperson Ali Mohammad Naini was killed in joint US and Israeli strikes, Iranian state media reported on Friday. His death came minutes after he issued a defiant warning challenging US naval claims in the Gulf.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/irgc-spokesperson-ali-mohammad-naini-killed-in-strikes-shortly-after-issuing-defiant-warning-to-us-israel/amp_articleshow/129695722.cms

ositadima1:
It’s like you just want to argue for argument’s sake. Some people were forced out 2,000 years ago, and others replaced them, which is natural, so where exactly are they supposed to come back to?

Australia is not originally White; the real natives are Aboriginal people, who were suppressed by the British. Does it make sense to forcefully remove present-day Australians, who are mostly of British descent, to make way for Aboriginal people?

Or does it make sense to remove present-day Americans because Native Americans lived there before? Please be impartial in your judgment.

ositadima1:
No, it doesn’t. You were dispersed, you lost your land, and other people took it and lived there for thousands of years. The land does not belong to you, but to the people currently living there.

By the same logic, Native Americans lived in what is now the United States, and Europeans, especially the British, fought and killed many of them. Should current americans, then, be removed from the USA according to your reasoning?

ositadima1:
The funny thing is that Arab nations initially accepted the return of the Jews, but then Israel began expanding beyond the land that was allocated to it. Because it had the backing of Britain and the United States, it was able to capture more territory and displace the people living there, the Palestinians.

Why, then, would you expect there to be peace? Not only that, Israel and the United States have been influencing Arab and Persian states in ways that have limited their military strength. This is one reason we see various groups engaging in guerrilla warfare against Israel.

Israel seeks greater control in the Middle East to influence regional outcomes. This is why Iran is being targeted, and some argue that if Iran is weakened, countries like Turkey could be next, there are already statements from some Israeli leaders portraying Turkey as an even greater concern than Iran.

At its core, this conflict is about power and control, not what it is often presented to be.

ositadima1:
Let me tell you what happened, I hope you learn something today.

1. The Great Revolt (66–73 CE)

Cause: Rebellion against Roman taxation and religious interference.

Key Event: The Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE), led by the future Emperor Titus.

Outcome: Destruction of the Second Temple; thousands were killed or enslaved.

Legacy: Initiated the first major wave of the Jewish diaspora.

2. The Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE)

Leader: Simon bar Kokhba, who briefly established an independent state. (Not Ireal to be clear)

Roman Response: Emperor Hadrian launched a campaign of total suppression.

Casualties: Approximately 580,000 Jews were killed, and about 1,000 villages were destroyed.

Rebranding: Hadrian renamed the province Syria Palaestina (after the Philistines) and banned Jews from Jerusalem to sever their connection to the land.

Since then, they dispersed and integrated across different parts of the world. Don’t be surprised that some of them are in places like Iran.

Egypt, however, was never similarly dispersed; it has consistently been the land of the Egyptians, with a history going back more than 6,000 years.

ositadima1:
But there was no state of Israel before the 1940s, you can confirm this. Israel as a country was established in 1948. One could even argue that Nigeria, as a country, is older. This is a fact you can verify. In all your long writing, you never mentioned why there was no Jewish state prior to the 1940s In fact, there were no Jews living in those lands. They came from all over the world; this shows a gap in your knowledge.

Why don’t you calm down and do some research, or ask me respectfully so I can explain it to you?

ositadima1:
The problem in the Middle East can be traced back to the 1940s, after the Second World War, when the state of Isrãēl was created, and the subsequent acquisition of more land using the Bible as a pretext.

GeeKudi:
On the hind sight, that press release pegging OANDO's RI at N50 appears ill-timed.

nurudeen181:
But you forgot that if they wanted to have it long ago, they'll have had it. Imagine since the invasion of IRAQ till date. But they critically said they don't need it and that their nuclear technology is meant for civil purposes

Kastonkastroll:
Actually is time the Palestinians get their land back from those zionists. Those jews should go back to where they came from which is Europe.

Ever since they stepped their foot on the middle east, it has been one trouble or another.

opadiya:
Time will actually tell. We are only try to make permutations based on our assessment of the dominant figures in the 'merger'.
I think the word 'likely' I used is also pointing to the fact that my position is not a certainty. It is highly probable, though.

opadiya:
You are very very very correct on "he appear averse to stock exchange quotation" The situation may not be perfectly clear now, it is nonetheless a fact that Providus Bank post whatever arrangement is likely to be a privately owned bank.

DrMB:
Nigeria vs. West Africa: Who’s actually winning the fuel price battle?
New data from March 2026 shows a massive gap in petrol costs across the region, with prices ranging from ₦1,120 to over ₦2,200 per litre.
Does the price in your country match the reality on the ground, or are you seeing higher at the pumps? Let’s talk in the comments! 👇


Source

megawealth01:
UNITY BANK current outstanding shares: 11.69B shares

jonnysessy:
Those of us that had followed this thread for a while now knows better. Most of your stocks picks did exeptionally well. With fundsmentals or not, though i was a bit skeptical then. But, testimonies are abound on this thread of the cool monies made by so many. I would not want to overflog the issues by mentioning the stocks again.

My major point is i don't want to be left out on this Unity Bank. I will make sure am part of the success story.

You win some, you lose some.

megawealth01:
Convert to USD na

$1,472,743.21

deathwing:
I recall my dad bought DEAPCAP at N1 and sold it at N7 way back 2007 or 08. In 2026, it's still at N6. Objectively, it is nonsense

Agbalowomeri:
How can 2B be filthy rich Lol