₦airaland Forum

DProDG:
Just out of curiosity, do you reject modern taxonomy too?

ifeness:
Do you disagree with them?

ifeness:
Ape is better,dust is worse

ifeness:
This is gonna be fun.

DProDG:
Well it's good to know you condone slavery

DProDG:
C'mon man, we know you didn't read that

Justfollowit:
It depends

I can allow her to marry former gigolo however I wouldn't want her to marry a man with 5 kids who has divorced 7 times

Justfollowit:


It was nice to know that YOU have an opinion on my signature

How have you been

johnydon22:
lol and you just shot yourself in the head with that link.. First the link clearly shows most slavery in the bible even sexual slavery.. a man selling his daughter to slavery and etc.. And you just finished yourself.

And again nowhere did the link stipulate that the bible ever said [size=20] Do not enslave anybody/ slavery is bad [/size] which has been the point my meme raised but you choose dabble into cheap defence and helped me castigate cheeky bible more..

from the link Exodus 21 a man can sell his daughter into slavery.. THE BIBLE FINDS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT..

Everybody please i recommend you read this link http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery Our dear misogynist gave us and see where the bible said [size=20] Do not enslave it is bad [/size] hahahahaha

Justfollowit:
Story

johnydon22:
Wooow i was looking really hard to see where it said [size=20] Do not own a slave or indulge in slavery[/size] But i couldn't see one. . You just posted about hebrew slaves. . . when the point we passed was No slavery . . . thanks for bringing that up bro, You just confirmed this pic.

johnydon22:
..

johnydon22:
..

lalasticlala:
http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/181939-nigerian-army-detains-policemen-without-food-for-refusing-to-wear-military-uniforms.html

kay1one2:
Sometimes when you talk I laugh at your own ignorance attempted to be covered up with vile language. You're very uneducated I give that to you. The origins of the evolutionary theory begin with one unique or wonder cell giving birth to all creation. Lemme give you an example, in your bone marrow exist pluripotent cells capable of giving rise to virtually any kind of cell in your body. That's where the idea of a bone marrow transplant comes from. Now those cells cannot produce plant or cow cells because both cells are intrinsically different from each other. Some small cells like hiv virus only contain one strand of ribonucleic acid not the double strand like humans; dna. These differences make it impossible for one cell to birth all.
No fossil has been found linking dinosaurs to birds and that brings up the point "missing link"; a well known argument amongst scientists and evolutionists. You don't fall in any where that's why the term sounds strange to you. I study life for a living so I won't bother try bringing you up to my level. Just watch you fool around copying and pasting!

johnydon22:
Are u always like this
I dont understand is closest to i dont hear? . . Did you study anything in English at all?
You see ur life? If someone says i dont know, ur brain translates it to "god did it" are you theists always purposely dumb or just act like it? How is "I dont know " same thing as "god did it"? When someone says "I dont know" it mean he is saying that he doesnt know and that is it.. that he'd rather say "i dont know" than assume up a lie like you as theist who wil say "a god did it" when you lack knowledge about a phenomenon.


Just as always, he brings in childish assumptions into it, the more you do this the more you contradict ur comic book...

I bid you to stop lying for once in your life for ur bible crap and be honest for once ... Look at what someone is saying and is proud of it.

So saying "we heard a voice but did not understand" will be embarrassing to them? . .says who? . . Do u really have to conjure up a cheap lie? ..instead they say to paul "We do not hear the voice" Which voice? if u didnt hear the voice how would u know there was a voice or do you just snap and say "i dont hear a voice?" ...I marvel at ur thinking honestly

Prodeegee:
Wow, no gbagauns again? So u can write this well?

ireneony:
Fück you!
Why then do you keep on following me ?

Before I open my eyes , unfollow me this minute ! Do you think I'm here to impress anyone ?

Zookeeper!

johnydon22:
Now comes to the part where i tell you to go fvck urself...

johnydon22:
Exactly because scientific studies improves with new observations and facts being unraveled and it always keeps improving, thats why its science ..STUDIES

johnydon22:
@bolded, my ignorance? On what please, evolution

Hahahahahahaha scientific studies myth Oh my goodness, education is murdered in Nigeria !!!

Please define Myth for me?

Define evolution?

then define science..

i.e- Please google it, help yourself with google and paste ur reply to me here

Y'all are beginning to loose ya sanity

johnydon22:
The lady is not omnipotent, thereby cannot heal the rapist kidney failure. if she could she would have without donating her kidney.

But your god as you always yap is omnipotent, yet demands blood sacrifice before forgiving sin? That is blood lust.

Cant he just go ahead and forgive you without asking for his son to be tortured and murdered?

It is barbaric, saddistic, blood lust insanity and nothing near love..

Bring a better example

johnydon22:
I always say "I do not know" when faced with the question of how life began, which i know is a very simple answer owing to the fact that its a subject that is still under heavy studies.

But sometimes when you see a naive misguided and poor analogy as this, you are compelled to take on the work of introducing young naive minds to what the studies really says.
First evolution is a scientific theory and is not something to be adhered to or believed. Just like you dont adhere to the meaning of diffusion as defined by science, because study is not a belief system, bear that in mind.

Now let me help and define what a scientific theory means.
Theory (science) A coherent statement or set of ideas that explains observed facts or phenomena, or which sets out the laws and principles of something known or observed; a hypothesis confirmed by observation, experiment etc. I want you to pay real attention to the words Observed facts and confirmed by observation and experiments. This goes a long way to show that theories are not assumptions or wishful thinkings but a way of explaining observed facts and it improves with more studies.
First evolution does not explain how life began. (Thats a study under abiogensis, you may do well to learn more about it)

Evolution simply means change in heritable traits of biological populations over
successive generations. and proposes that All life on Earth originated through common descent from a last universal
ancestor that lived approximately 3.5–3.8 billion years ago. . So you need to shoot the person that gave you that idea that evolution deals with crawling of life from a single celled organism. Science 101
If you had ever read anything about evolution, you would have known that evolution is a slow process and takes millions of years.
Meanwhile in todays world fishes have been observed to develop limbs as an adaptive feature.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dMRt4NQb1Q


This line shows you have never opened a book on evolution before, all you take is what you hear from other incredibly ignorant folks and this is the result.

So homo erectus is the first evolutionary trend of man you know? still clinging to our primary school social studies ..lol

I have explained what evolution is, so no need saying more on that. Meanwhile the human evolutionary trend branched off from one common ancestor as other primates.
And these are supported by archeological evidences.
1) Before 5 mya: In Africa, the ancestral lineage of humans and the chimpanzee lineage
split.
2) Before 4 mya: The hominid Australopithecus anamensis walked around
what is now Kenya on its hind legs.
3) >3 mya: Australopithecus afarensis (fossile evidence of this hominid “Lucy”) lived in Africa. And more hominids follows; australopithecus africanus, australopithecus robustus etc .
4) 2.5 mya: Some hominids made tools by chipping stones to form a cutting
edge. There were perhaps four or more species of hominid living in Africa.
5) 2 mya: The first members of the Homo clade, with their relatively large
brains, lived in Africa.
6) 1.5 mya: Hand axes were used. Also, hominids had spread out of Africa
and into much of Asia and Europe. These hominids included the ancestors of
Neanderthals ( Homo neanderthalensis) in Europe and Homo erectus in Asia.
7) 100,000 years ago: Human brains reached more or less the current range
of sizes. Early Homo sapiens lived in Africa. At the same time, Homo
neanderthalensis and Homo erectus lived in other parts of the Old World.
: Human cultures produced cave paintings and body
adornment, and constructed elaborate burials. Also, some groups of modern
humans extended their range beyond Africa.
9) Other Homo species had gone extinct, leaving only
modern humans, Homo sapiens , spread throughout the Old World... http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

Explanation above is a very basic one so as not to confuse naive minds like yours with the long list and names in human evolutionary trend of which little known to you homo erectus was a recent humanoid.

Where can i start treating such deceptive self induced ignorance. . Boy the difference between Human gene and chimps is less than 2% http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolutionary_genetics . . . These two primates share the same ancestory.

Tigers, lions and ordinary home cats have only 5% gene difference and that puts them all in the same family falidae.
and i dont see you disputing that they are related but you dispute that of humans and other primates because it contradicts your mythological beliefs. . this is science boy.. deal with it.
I wonder what you mean by beautifully arranged. if you mean complex, then how then do you believe a more complex idea as god can just pop out on it's own without a creator. following your argument another more complex creator should be responsible for your god then and so it goes on and on.

That you dont know how things came to be doesnt mean you should bring up something archaic and primitive as a god did it. because this kills your intellectual curiosity and retards your ability to learn how it really happened thereby keeping you in a state of self induced ignorance.
Bringing up something like a god did it doesnt answer this question, it only postpones it because you have to assume your god did not need a beginning thereby failing in ur own argument.

And after all this naive misrepresent and misguided points you brought up without even reading about evolution, this is were it ends? . . . lmao..

A god that creates because he wants love and worship is Narcissistic and this is a character disorder.
How would a perfect being demand love and worship. .

I beg you, please read about evolution before bringing up childish arguments up in nairaland that only makes someone close face in shame. .

If these stuff you brought out above is your refutation of evolution, please i recommend you to pick up a book on evolution, at least read it first so that you wouldn't open another thread on nairaland and give us another show of blatant ignorance.

And oh before i forget, the only way to disprove atheism is to prove ur god

ifeness:
That is the most scary part. The need for a sacrifices,human sacrifice to worsen it .

temitemi1:
GEJ my HERO! FAYOSE my ROLE MODEL!!

ifeness:
Life doesn't have a creator.

johnydon22:
Define science for me please ...

Have you even read anything about big bang or evolution?

Tell what you think big bang is and what you think evolution is...

johnydon22:
Check am na...

We africans just carry another people's mythology for head ni...