LordReed: It does not preclude it from being the weekly Sabbath. Besides there is no description of the events that suggests they rested for 3 intervening days. The bible clearly states they rested on the Sabbath day, singular denotation.
MuttleyLaff: "1After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb. 2Suddenly there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven, rolled away the stone, and sat on it. 3His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. 4The guards trembled in fear of him and became like dead men. 5But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. 6He is not here; He has risen, just as He said! Come, see the place where He lay" - Matthew 28:1-6
The ministering angelic host from heaven, the angel, saw or observed the exact hour Jesus awakened from the sleep state inside the tomb. The angel even told the women Jesus has risen. No one including the guards couldnt see anything because of the heavy stone rolled against the tomb entrance
Lol smart ass, yes of course the heavens witnessed it. No human witnessed it.
Or are you implying that on that same hour when the angel descended and rolled away the stone, Jesus was also being awakened inside the tomb?
LordReed: The text says they rested on THE Sabbath day, not on Sabbath days. Unless you mean to say that THE provides you with some ambiguity, I don't see how you can argue for a 3 day break.
John in his gospel made the ambiguity of Matthew's gospel clearer sir, that's what I've been trying to tell you. The "High Day" Sabbath is the Sabbath actually being referred to.
Ihedinobi3: If the Lord did not rise by 6pm on the dot on Saturday according to your scheme here, then He was dead for more than 72 hours (note also that He died before 6pm on the day that He died and that is really when the count begins because "the heart of the earth" is really Sheol or Hades, not merely the physical tomb in which He was laid). Also, according to the Scriptures, He was to rise on the third day. Your scheme has Him rising on the fourth.
As for when the Lord arose, you can believe that it really was Sunday, because that is why the first day of the week came to be called the Lord's Day in the Bible.
As for the rest of your objection, I already provided an explanation in my first answer on this thread and in that response to you. To recap, first of all, the ancient world had something that historians call "inclusive counting" when they counted days. So, Friday afternoon to Sunday morning would have been three days and three nights to the Jews to whom the Lord Jesus was speaking in Matthew 12:40. Second, political realities of ancient Palestine meant that there were multiple calendars governing different places, so, for example, the Passover was celebrated in Bethany two days before Jerusalem, both on the Sabbath too. So, our Lord ate the Passover the night before He was crucified a day before the Passover too. As far as the Scriptures and the ancient world are concerned, the prophecy of our Lord's time in death was perfectly and literally fulfilled. It doesn't matter that atheists who love lies don't agree.
This is not really an important issue. Of course, all the truths in the Bible are important, but whether you think the Lord Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday or on a Friday is of little account to your Salvation, so I am not going to debate or quarrel with you or anybody about this. I am quite sure that things are as I've just stated, but it is okay if you disagree.
Edited.
Everything you have contributed is noted sir.
I just have one question regarding the text in bold. Who saw or observed the exact hour Jesus awakened from the sleep state inside the tomb?
missjo, it is because Jesus was on the cross by 9:00am, died by 3:00pm Thursday day and was buried on same Thursday day before sundown, thats to fulfil the prophecy that clearly stated "... in the grave for three days and three nights" Also missjo, remember that, a Jewish day begins and ends at sundown, as in, the time in the evening when the sun disappears or daylight fades.
Yea I noted this in my earlier contribution as well.
LordReed: According to your timeline the women who were to dress his body did not go to the grave for 3 days - Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Why does the text not say so? The text gives the almost unquestionable idea that they only had one day, Saturday, of separation.
Not true sir. Once you disregard the false notion that his death and burial happened on a Friday, every other thing begins to make sense and fall in place.
Refer to and/or research the High Day of the passover (Thursday Sabbath) as emphasized by the Gospel of John in 19:31.
They didn't go on Thursday because it was a High day of passover. They prepared the spices on Friday. They didn't go on Saturday because it was the main Sabbath. Very early on Sunday morning was convenient, they did not even want to wait for the sun to come up.
Going by your submission above, the Lord was in the tomb for more than three days and three nights then yielding a similar problem.
How did you come to this conclusion sir?
6pm Wednesday - 6pm Saturday has three full 12hrs daylight & 12hr evenings making a full day in each of the three days. The exact time Jesus arose is something you will never find any literature on because it was only at about 5am on Sunday morning that Mary Magdalene and the mother of James found the tomb empty. Jesus could very well have risen the previous day at the exact hour of a three-day period (exactly 6pm) or one hour after 6pm Saturday, two hours, or three hours after 6pm, etc.. No one knows the exact time.
Considering that every single prophesy given by God regarding the coming Son of David (through the Virgin mother Mary descended from Nathan who was one of David's sons), the Zionic King of Israel (through the earthly father Joseph descended from the Kingly line of Solomon, Another of David's sons), were totally exact and perfect, then I as a believer have chosen to believe that Jesus rose on the exact time down to the second of a complete 3-day span because Jehovah is a God of perfection.
Regarding your opinion on the Sabbath, sir it's common historical knowledge that the High day of the passover in Jewish culture held on Thursdays, and it is also referred to as Sabbath. If John in his gospel had not even noted this particular sabbath was the high day, scholars would naturally have assumed it was a Friday - Saturday count. Just the insertion of the "high day" reference is enough to squash any doubt that the count started on 6pm Wednesday.
Moses in Genesis deliberately noted how the creator counts a human day: Genesis 1:5 King James Version (KJV) 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Genesis 1:8 King James Version (KJV) 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
[Evening and morning NOT morning and evening]
You of all people should know that most scriptures can always be confirmed by reference to another. In which case, anyone who still believes that Jesus was buried on a Friday and not found in the sepulchre on Sunday morning will definitely have a hard time proving that he spent 3days & 3nights as prophesied. Prophesies from God were mostly fulfilled literally and I doubt you will find any in the entire compilation of the present Bible that wasn't fulfilled literally, not to mention when it now involved a Prophesy of God himself becoming flesh, dying and resurrecting.
By the way, sixth hour and ninth hour in the Jewish clock is 12noon and 3pm respectively. I just inserted this here for anyone who wants to confirm the exact time darkness came over the land while Jesus hung on the cross an also the exact time Joseph of Arimathea enters the story to talk to Pilate.
LordReed: The bible says it was to fulfil a prophecy so was it fulfilled?
Hi LordReed, it's been a minute since I contributed to religious discussions here but please allow me to share what I have studied on this. The topic of the death & resurrection is of great interest to me.
First of all, the answer to your question is an emphatic YES, the prophesy of three mornings(daylight) and three evenings(night) was fulfilled LITERALLY.
By the old Jewish system of days & nights, a new day began at sunset (6pm) instead of midnight (12am) as we observe presently. Jesus the Christ died on a wednesday between the hours of 12noon and 3pm (Matt 27:45-56).
How can we be sure it was a Wednesday? Because of this passage: John 19:31 King James Version (KJV) 31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.
The Sabbath being referred to here does not speak of the regular Jewish Sabbath of Saturday, but rather the high day of the passover (as emphasized by John in his use of parenthesis to explain) also called a Sabbath. This "high day" was held on Thursdays.
Between 3pm and 6pm of Wednesday is the period where Joseph of Arimathea besought Pilate to release the body of Jesus to him for burial (Matthew 27:57-61). All of this could very well have taken approximately 3hours and by the time Jesus was laid in the tomb, it was already a little bit past 6pm of Wednesday.
Now if we start counting from 6pm on Wednesday (remember a new day starts at 6pm), then: 6pm Wednesday - 6pm Thursday = Day 1 6pm Thursday - 6pm Friday = Day 2 6pm Friday - 6pm Saturday = Day 3 Every day of the above is complete with 24hours of evening and morning (Note that the old testament bible records a full day by referring to it as evening and morning, never as morning and evening; another proof that a new day starts at 6pm).
The particular time and hour that Jesus arose can not be ascertained because no one witnessed it. The soldiers who kept watch outside the tomb only witnessed the earthquake and the angel rolling back the stone covering of the tomb which happened to grant Mary Magdalene and Mary mother of James, access into the sepulchre (this happened very early on Sunday morning).
John 20:1 calls it the first day of the week (Sunday) and he wrote that it was still dark (probably about 5am). Mathew 28:1 says it in much the same way calling it the end of the Sabbath (Saturday) as it began to dawn on the first day of the week (Sunday).
As at the time these two women got there, he had already risen some time after sunset on Saturday evening without the knowledge of the soldiers outside who stood guard. As far as they were concerned, the body of Jesus was still in the tomb by the time the two Marys got there at about 5am on Sunday morning.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but niggaz never forget you cheated on them. If you think he is still with you cos you've been forgiven, well i send you all the love you deserve. But never ever assume he won't bring it up again.
etiosa97: Honestly I've been addicted to tramadol for the past one year. It help me just forget about the predicament I'm going through... Now I'm addicted, I can't stop and if I try to stop, she comes with the drama again. My head is so messed up.. I wish I could explain every bit of our I feel in my heart but I just can't express my self
Obviously, it didn't do the job you intended it to. You must stop.
etiosa97: Thanks but these days I think I'm loosing my insanity. My heart tremble each time i think about my family. It's like I'm in a race. Like something is chasing me and I need to keep on making money for my family. I feel i will never be accepted or loved if I eventually go broke... Never thought life would be like this.
Dear, you really need to quit beating yourself up.
Oh my lord Please you've got to try getting your happiness from deep within yourself, it won't be easy but please try. Your mental health is your responsibility and no one else's.
This is Chapter 2 of my 10 chapter, gold digging manual for women I'll publish on my blog end of November. The book is titled Parasitique
PROLOGUE. Gold diggers targeting wealthy men play a kind of game most women have never heard of. Game whose principles appear counterproductive and self-defeating, but which work like clockwork. Everything in that game hinges on a deep understanding of a man and his relationship with his money.
This writeup will bring that understanding to you.
PLEASURES. The weakness of men is the pleasures of the flesh and the weakness of women is the pleasures of the cash. Women peep inside a man's open wallet as eagerly as men peep inside a woman's open legs.
Because the first thing a man wants from a woman is sex and the first thing a woman wants from a man is money; money and pussy are the treasure of each gender. A man's treasure is his money inside his wallet. And a woman's treasure is her pussy inside her legs.
TREASURES. Luke 12:34 says about treasure: "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."
A woman's heart is between her legs for her treasure is her pussy between her legs. Sex gets her attached because in opening her legs she's opening her heart.
But a man's heart is not between his legs for his dick is NOT a treasure. Dick has zero value. What gets a man attached on the same level as women getting attached through sex is not sex but a man's own treasure: Money.
A KIND Of GAME MOST WOMEN HAVE NEVER HEARD OF. How do you make a man fall in love with you?
Do you give him sex? When it comes to sex: Women need an emotional connection to have sex with a man. Men need sex to create an emotional connection with a woman. Gold Diggers, because they delay sex or don't have sex at all with men, they need something that can create an emotional connection with a man BEFORE or WITHOUT sex.
Which is a colossal challenge. How do you make a man emotionally attach to you without sleeping with him?
But Gold Diggers have an ace up their sleeve. They have an uncommon wisdom. They play a kind of a game that appears counterproductive and self-defeating but which works like clockwork: THEY MAKE A MAN SPEND ON THEM.
Here is a little secret only gold diggers know. It's how high-maintenance, materialistic women, hated as they are by Society, keep getting married to wealthy and powerful men, while low-maintenance women wallow in mediocre relationships.
The secret is this: Men express their love through money. Money is a man's emotions.
MEN EXPRESS THEIR LOVE THROUGH MONEY. While women express their love through sex. Men express their love through money. Ask a woman to prove her love and she'll open her legs. Ask a man to prove his love and he'll open his wallet:
Women express their love through sex. Maxwell: "Primrose loves me!" Friend: "How do you know? Maxwell: "She slept with me!"
Men express their Iove through money. Primrose: "Maxwell loves me!" Friend: "How do you know?" Primrose: "He bought me an iPhone 11"
Women open legs, men open hearts. A woman expresses his love for a man through sex. By opening her legs, she's in fact, opening her heart. For between her legs lies her heart. For women sex is emotional that way. But a man doesn't express his love for a woman through sex. A man expresses his love for a woman through money.
MONEY IS A MAN'S EMOTIONS. Where his money goes, a man's heart follows. The more money a man spends on a woman, no matter how insignificant she is to him, the more significant she'll become. Women go through this process with pussy. The more sex a woman gives a man the more attached she becomes. Because her heart is between her legs and pussy is her emotions.
With men it's money. Money is the emotions.
A man can't spend it without getting attached. Just as Pussy is a woman's emotions and a woman can't spread it without getting attached.
WHY GOOD GIRLS LOSE. Good girls lose in love because they have the game backwards: To make a man fall in love ordinary women demand very little financially but give so much sexually. But sex doesn't get men attached the way it gets women attached.
Men themselves complain nonstop about gold diggers and materialistic women, but who do they marry? Gold diggers and materialistic women! Not the good girls giving sex free and demanding no money.
Gold diggers make men pay for nothing. Good girls make men fvck for nothing.
Gold diggers WIN because men's hearts follow their money not their dick because money is the treasure not the dick. Sex doesn't get men attached. Money does. The spending of it. As cruel and as crazy as it may sound, the key to a man's heart is getting his money while giving him NOTHING in return. The moment you give him ANYTHING you've ruined everything. The more a man spends on a woman - even without sex, even without love - the more he sees her as an INVESTMENT. And the more he needs everything to work out because otherwise everything has been a waste. If a man has spent heavily on you - ESPECIALLY without getting anything back - he will marry you. It becomes a business decision: "I have spent so much on this girl, if I drop her now it means I've wasted all my money!". It's a DECISION. When a man's commitment is a "decision" and not a "feeling" you have his love. Men are logical and this is the meaning of "Men love with their heads". It means men "decide" to fall in love.
Once a man views you as an investment, you have him by the balls. Because he's invested, he becomes predictable and powerless and can't easily walk away. You hold all the power in your hand because you spent nothing and gave nothing and you can walk out any time without losing anything. So, the man, to keep you from walking out, which will mean all the money he's spent on you so far will have been wasted, he has to spend more and more. Getting himself more and more invested.
By opening his wallet, He has played himself.
His money is controlling him.
MEN BRING THE CASH, WOMEN BRING THE FLESH. In love, Men invest financially, Women invest sexually.
Cruel, money-hungry Jezebels know that getting a man's heart has NOTHING to do with a woman opening her legs, but everything to do with a man opening his wallet. Gold diggers know that men eventually fall in love with the women they give money. Just like women eventually fall in love with the men they give pussy.
And do you know why it's absolutely totally necessary to deny the man sex? While spending his money? Because in his head he tells himself: "If I'm spending so much on this girl yet I'm getting no sex, then other guys who are not spending HAVE WORSE CHANCES with her. This girl is pure gold. She's chaste and clean".
In short; If you're impossible for him to fvck, even though he's spending, he figures you're impossible FOR EVERY OTHER MAN to fvck. He imagines if he can't buy your pussy, then no man will steal you from him by offering you money. It makes you a good investment.
WHEN A WOMAN DOESN'T ASK FOR MONEY. A man loves through his money. A woman loves through her pussy
A woman who doesn't ask for money is like a man who doesn't ask for sex. Both imagine their actions are noble but they both end up losing their partners. The low-maintenance woman loses because a man won't attach until he opens his wallet. And the chaste man loses because a woman won't attach until she opens her legs. When you don't ask for money or sex, you block your partner from bonding with you. The attachments that result from giving money and giving sex do not form. Until a woman has given you sex, you're just another guy she can drop and forget in a second. She's not invested. Just like until a man has given you money, you're just another girl he can drop and forget in a second. You haven't cost him anything yet. He is not invested.
We all know of good women who didn't bother their men for a cent, but were cruelly thrown aside in favour of greedy moneyhungry Jezebels. We also know of good men who didn't bother their women for sex, but were thrown aside for some h0rny hedonistic he-goat.
For men money is the treasure and spending is the attachment. For women pussy is the treasure and sex is the attachment.
GETTING A MAN INVESTED. A man can love you without giving you a cent, just as you can love a man without giving him sex. But to get a man invested in you, get him to SPEND on you. Just as a man knows to get you invested in him he must make you SLEEP with him.
A man doesn't consider it love until you sleep with him. You must not consider it love until a man spends on you.
A man can chase you for a year, but the day he fvcks you is the day YOU start chasing him. Tables turn after sex. Because after sex YOU become invested. It's the same with men and money. There's an amount of money that once a man spends on you - even without sex - shît becomes real for him and he'll start chasing. Because HE WILL BE INVESTED. Because you're now an "investment."
GIVING IS ATTACHING. Men love sex but it doesn't get them attached, it gets the women giving the sex attached. Women love money but it doesn't get them attached, it gets the men giving the money attached. By giving money, men become attached. By giving pussy women become attached.
For both men and women the emotional attachment happens IN GIVING. Not in receiving.
We fall in love with those we give. Not those who give us. Just like a virgin falls in love with, and emotionally attaches to, the man SHE GIVES her virginity to. While the man receiving the girl's virginity feels nothing but an ego boost. Giving is attaching. Because our heart follows our gift.
OUR HEART FOLLOWS OUR TREASURE. Steven can love Joyce with all his heart but if Joyce is giving all the pussy to Mark, then Mark will be the man Joyce gets attached to. No matter how much Steven loves her.
Mandy can give John all her pussy but if John is spending all his money on Grace then Grace will be the woman John gets attached to. No matter how much sex Mandy gives him.
Where a woman's pussy goes, her heart follows. Where a man's money goes his heart follows. Because pussy and money are the treasure of each gender. And where our treasure goes our heart follows. Matthew 6:21 "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."
David J. Stewart explains this verse this way: "Most people quote the Bible incorrectly concerning this Scripture passage in Matthew 6:21, which is also repeated again in Luke 12:34. Most people think that the Bible says, where a person's heart is, there will there treasure be also; but that's not what God said at all. It's the opposite! The treasure doesn't follow our heart; but rather, our heart follows our treasure... " - https://www.soulwinning.info/bd/treasure_and_heart.htm
Brent Esplin puts it this way: "I always interpreted this scripture as meaning that if your heart was right, you would naturally use your treasure (money, time, and talents) righteously. And yet, that is not what the scripture says at all. Jesus doesn’t say that your treasure will follow your heart, he says that your heart will follow your treasure. The way to change your heart is not by trying to change your heart, but by learning to control your treasure. Treasure clearly leads the way, and the heart follows. If you want to change your heart, move your treasure. Your treasure holds the key to your heart." - https://www.micawberprinciple.com/your-treasure-holds-the-key-to-your-heart-2600/
And the Revival Ministries International website explains: "Your heart follows your treasure – wherever your treasure goes, that is where your heart will go and that is where you will go." - https://www.revival.com/a/362-your-heart-follows-your-treasure
MEN ATTACH THROUGH SPENDING. This is not a hard concept to grasp.
As humans where we spend money, we become emotionally attached. That's why we like to buy things from the same people and the same stores because we feel a kind of a bond/connection/loyalty, to where we spend. It's the nature of money. It gets us attached. The more we spend at a place the more we feel like we have a bond with that place and we'll return again to spend.
I'm sure you've heard someone say to a shopkeeper, "boss, I buy here everyday but today I don't have money, can you give me something on credit?" The customer feels a bond, having spent a lot in that shop. He thinks the shopkeeper shares that bond. But no. The shopkeeper doesn't feel it and will reply, "No credit please!". Leaving the customer feeling betrayed.
Where we spend money, we become emotionally attached. With men this carries over into romantic relationships because in romantic relationships men are still spending money. So the game is still the same for them.
FOLLOW THE MONEY. If a guy has two women; one who loves him with all her heart but he's NOT spending on; and another he's spending on but who doesn't love him; which woman will it hurt him more to lose?
It's the one he's SPENDING ON.
If a guy has two women; one he's having sex with but not giving money and another he's giving money but not having sex with, which woman has his heart?
It's the one he's GIVING MONEY.
If a guy has a rich GF who spends on him, and another guy has a poor GF whom he spends on, If these two guys lose their GFs which guy would be hurt more?
It's the guy who SPENT ON HIS GF.
For men sex is a release. While spending is an expression of love. For women sex is the expression of love. Spending is the release. The stress that a man releases through sex, a woman releases through spending or Shopping.
This all means if there's a guy whose heart you want to win but he has many GFs, don't compete through sex. Don't Monopolize his dick. Monopolize his DOLLARS. Make him spend spend spend. On you. No matter if you see him once a week or once a month. Make him spend on you nonstop. You'll soon have his heart. Because his heart will follow his dollars. Sooner or later.
VALIDATION THROUGH SPENDING. A woman gets a self-esteem boost from SLEEPING with a top class man. It's called Validational Sex. A man gets that self-esteem boost by SPENDING on a top class woman. You can call it Validational Spending.
If a poor woman sits begging and a pretty Slay Queen sits next to her on a sofa, men will ignore the poor woman and give the Slay Queen money. For just being pretty. Men get a sweet feeling from giving money to a woman whom it would be an honor to have sex with. A guy who complains when his GF asks for a little money will happily give Beyonce his entire salary if she asks for it. Because it will make him feel special ("wow, Beyonce asked me for money!!!" ). It's a sweet feeling.
THE PROOF THAT YOU NEED AS A GIRL THAT MEN ATTACH THROUGH SPENDING. As a woman, consider your Ex Boyfriends and you'll see a pattern:
The broke and the stingy ones were usually cold, unromantic and downright abusive and didn't care if you stayed or left. While the generous ones who spent on you were also the romantic ones who cared. And who cared enough to wait till you were ready for sex and never pressured you.
It's not a coincidence.
A man's treatment of a woman depends on whether or not he spends. Because a man's emotions follow his money. The more value you place on yourself as a woman the more it costs a man to have you and the more valuable you become to him and the more he cares about losing you. in other words; high-maintenance women get better treatment than low-maintenance women.
Isn't this why parents charge high bride price for their daughter? That having parted with so much money to a get a wife, a man won't easily discard her? If a man beats his wife because she cost him money, then the price wasn't high enough. He didn't spend enough to view her as a treasure.
SAFEGUARDING YOUR LOVE AS A WOMAN. Ever noticed in TV shows that when rich men screw up, their wives go on shopping sprees as revenge?
Trophy Wives know spending a man's money is the only payback that hurts a man without threatening the marriage.
To stop your man from cheating you don't try to control his sexuality. A man's sex drive is impossible to control.
What you control is your man's finances. The more a man cheats the more you spend his money. So the less money he has to spend on other women. Finances enable a man to cheat. Without money most men don't know how to get a woman. And women don't give sex free.
Our grandmothers knew the game.
In the old days a man handed his salary over to his wife. Then it was the wife who controlled the finances. And from the wife the man got money for his day to day needs like transport fare and beer money. Which was all counted. This way it was hard for a man to cheat because he didn't have disposable cash on hand to spend.
Grand Mama got more game than Slay Mama.
SHERASEVEN1. If you follow YouTube Gold Digger channels, you've undoubtedly come across the name SheRaSeven1, the undisputed Queen of Gold Diggers.
Long-married to a rich man, SheRa is the author of gold digging books with triggering titles like "I Bring Nothing To The Table" and "Too Pretty To Pay Bills".
SheRa is one cold mother. Before digging for gold and writing for gold diggers she used to work at a mortuary as a makeup artist for dead people. And today, besides being a Trophy Wife, she's a real life witch with a witchcraft channel on YouTube (ashera star goddess). Yes baby, She's evil personified.
NOW....In case it feels like this writeup is pushing concepts I pulled from my ass, here is a SheRaSeven1 video explaining the need to get men to spend on you to get them to commit. It's a 15 min video titled: "Cheating Women, and more Topics". The part you want is at 6:45. Get it from the hoe's mouth:
So here's the game: You don't make a man fall in love with you so he will give you money. You make a man give you money so he will fall in love with you.
Because Finances are the man's Feelings. If he's financing you he'll have feelings for you.
crackhaus: I am really glad you shared this. I am glad NOT because it corroborates my comments, but because you just showed that your intuition is still very much fine-tuned regardless of what your wife might be thinking.
The issue now is a simple one because it's just a case of what are you going to do now? Do you want to save your marriage and get it back to a place of total peace and fidelity, or do you believe it is too far gone to be salvaged?
The reason why I deliberately ignored that whole story about how you summoned her to get back home just to cook your meal, was because that isn't the main issue. Even though majority of the posters here chose to fixate on that bit, it was obvious to me that the only reason you would be so inconsiderate as to order her back home to serve your food, was to show you still had some power over her. And when a man starts to do odd things in a bid to assert control over his wife, then the issues between them runs far deeper.
Now to the original question in your topic, the answer is NO, you can and MUST NOT tolerate all that nonsense from your wife. Her continuous threats and misbehaviour have gone on for so long because you allowed it. Tell her that you have had quite enough of the threats and that she should pray fervently to her God so you don't find hard evidence that she has been cheating on you, else she will find out the difference between six and half-a-dozen.
Also, you have to stop exchanging words with her or making comments about her looks.
If you notice, I have not suggested you directly accuse her of cheating on you or advocated separation. This is because, since you have had the suspicion for this long but made no move to get any evidence, then you probably can stay married. Just caution her as stated above.
Cheers.
And what is the difference between six and half-a-dozen? Lmao
This is one of my biggest fears while driving behind large trucks carrying stuff, which makes me steer clear at least 50meters. Gosh I have goosebumps now
Female ejaculation ,Imo, can either come as squirting or fluid ( the one that looks like semen/milky) . Some women are lucky to experience both at the same time, some never really experience any.
MrBrownJay1: - you cannot raise honest children while you yourself is a dishonest person (or show dishonest traits). BE HONEST WITH YOUR KIDS!! - you cannot instill trust in them if you yourself are an untrustworthy person. TRUST YOUR KIDS TO BE RIGHT - from the day they are born, you have to be 110% fully honest with them... and not a deceitful being, and instill in them the beauty of DOING good, and REWARDING good from day one. if they have been misbehaving all this time, then they will surely have a miserable life because all their "fun" privileges of life would have been removed from their lives. - you MUST take an ACTIVE role (and participate) in their upbringing... not let them be raised by some deluded houseboy/girl (or some other deluded bastards). having a difficult job is NOT an excuse! a person who needs to lie to his kids to see if they are misbehaving is an immature person who did NOT take part in these kids upbringing. if he/she did, they they would automatically know whether they could leave these kids home alone or not. if after 12 yrs you dont know your kids, then you are a useless parent. FACT!!!!! - in the world we live in today, punishment should be removal of any gadget (ipad/phones etc) no access to a computer (unless to do homework), no video games, no sport, no fun outings, removal from social media entirely, no access to internet, no friends over, no meeting friends after school etc - if you have shown the right path to your kids and instill such proper notion of "right and wrong" in them (since the day that they were born), you would have a clear idea, by the time they are old enough to be left home alone, if you actually CAN leave them home alone. if/when after 12 good years of RAISING and EDUCATING your kids the best you possibly can, they are still disobedient/misbehaving/lying etc, then there is NO BLOODY way you can leave them home alone! no tricks is gonna fix that and you should just accept that you have FAILED at parenting these kids!
if by 12yrs old, your kids DONT know "right from wrong" OR dont care about "right from wrong", then there is nothing you can possibly do NOW to change that, and you might as well accept the little demons you've raised them to be.
btw...it is possible that some kids may have some emotional issues (ADHD/mild autism bla bla bla) which would be understandable... BUT, if you have multiple children and ALL OF THEM are misbehaving/lying and disregard right from wrong, then again, parents should solely be blamed here.
Kkings11: for a short time. Humans are reactive by nature and we pick on subtle cues. I asked one of the kids why they do that and she said he never believes them if they tell him otherwise. He created an avenue for distrust towards his kids to creep in and now whatever they tell him would be second guessed @missjo
Lol, you asked his daughter questions regarding how her father raises her?
You're either not being honest, or you don't know the meaning of boundaries.
MrBrownJay1: when it comes to raising children, you MUST overthink because children learn from their parents 1st and foremost... and everything you do or say can/will duplicate on your kids.
A) not only it is IMMATURE for anyone to leave their kids home alone not knowing when you are coming back, it is also very DANGEROUS.
B) this person (which i wouldnt call "smart" ) will instill the wrong values to his kids... the simple fact that he has NO trust/confidence in his children says a lot about the man OR what he is trying to instill in them.
i can assure you that there are BETTER more efficient mature ways to make sure that your kids do what they are suppose to do and/or aint into misbehaving while you are away... and if that person had raised these kids properly from their infant days, then by the time they are old enough to be left home alone, you would either have good kids that you can TRUST and leave by themselves OR fully well know that you failed in raising them properly, thus CANT leave these misbehaving kids home alone..
What are the mature ways you have been using to raise your own kids that has made them 100% obedient and NEVER prone to misbehaviour?
Christianity Etc › Re: Was Jesus In The Grave For 3days And 3nights Literally? by missjo(f): 8:19am On Nov 30, 2019
