MissWrite's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MissWrite's Profile › MissWrite's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 30 pages)
Daeylar: I tire ![]() |
BuddhaPalm:This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you for saying it. |
BALLOSKI: Interesting. What do you think is responsible for this? |
tosyne2much:Okay, Pm me. |
rival? Lmao! ![]() |
tosyne2much:Where have you been? I'm good, Tosin. You? I missed your italics. You don serve finish? |
RuthDaniels: I wish I had bells and confetti, but..... Thank you. |
greiboy:Lol! . Yes, dolls are already a fetish for some people. You're right; it will have an adverse social impact in the long run. Young men, especially the shy ones, will seek out the path of least resistance to patronize dolls; and they would not make the effort to develop social skills to get real-life girlfriends. They're the anti-social creeps that do crazy shiit like cut people in half, and become otherwise violent in their frustration. |
greiboy:Personally, I'm not a fan of these sex dolls. No, no, no, no. Dil.dos, maybe; they're essentially vagina massagers. But here there's just too much extraneous material. Bottom line: it's not a person. So I can't. But guys are different and I see how sex dolls can be beneficial if guys decide to patronize sex dolls instead of violating girls; or as a supplement in a relationship. But let's see first, how easy it would be to patronize these dolls without forming an emotional attachment. This kind of personalization might be very unhealthy. it's easier to stay detached from a hand-held device, than from this effigy that has even got a name. ![]() |
donstan18:Lmao!! , |
A sex doll is a masturbation tool. And masturbation isn't cheating. |
ShyCypher:Women can't detach themselves emotionally from sex? I don't know if that's entirely true. I know you want to maintain this romanticized image of women but here's something which I do not say proudly, only truly: Some women have been doing so professionally for years. And some women can cheat with the driver or gate man for the sole purpose of sex; and they choose these people who are perceivably beneath their social class not just for proximity, but because there's no risk of falling in love. While men always end up catching feelings for their secretaries, house-helps or even a prostitute. (Like in Bridget Jones' Diary, Sound of Music, Pretty Woman); no woman is beneath a guy when it comes to romance. Whereas a woman would seriously be second guessing herself if she starts getting dreamy eyed with the mechanic in view; it doesn't matter how attractive he is in reality. Also, some women can bang their rich husbands for years so he keeps paying for their stuff, without ever falling in love with him. Women can do sex very nicely with gadgets. Have you not heard how the cucumber has suffered under the lasciviousness of some women? African women in particular, can really let their hair down with a dil.do. Unlike with a man. Some! This is because, in a lot of areas still, African women are judged for being too sexually expressive. So, in most cases, all they can do is pray that he knows what he is doing. She may not woman-up to tell him what she wants, so that he doesn't label her an olosho. Enter dil.do, problem solved. And she'll make it go how she wants it to go. For me though, I doubt that the sex doll holds much of an appeal. It's too bulky; and only one appendage is really needed. Plus I don't want to have to stare into those lifeless eyes without a soul. After applying pressure to the necessary pleasure points, the rest happens in the head for me. I can be anywhere, with anyone doing whatever thing. So the dil.do is sufficient. It would get the job done. Men on the other hand don't give 2 fvcks about emotions. They just want a moist and willin' hole they can ram away in & control however they like without complaints & forget about the next mornin' - somethin' sex dolls can offer.That's a fleshlight. It hasn't been very popular all the while. I am really curious to see how this one plays out, because I believe men have an ego that a life-less thing cannot satisfy. Knowing that the moan is programmed and mechanized; and not a real feed-back . Unless it's like a karaoke machine that gives you points (moaning sounds) as you hit the notes. Then it could be a fun game. Pa! Pa! 60%.......Pa! Pa! Pa!........80%.....Pa! Pa! Pa! Pa!..........speaking in tongues.....that kind of thing. It'll get predictable after a while though. 2. Men naturally are independent and can afford to buy these dolls. A large percent of women (truth be told) depend on men for their upkeep. They sleep all day, go out at night, spread their legs and get paid. With no attention from men, their income will reduce.True. More women would have to work. But that's a good thing for everyone. Especially the women in question. 3. Women constantly need attention. Men don't. The sex doll will just be lyin' in a corner of the room lookin' at you for a day - somethin' men are prayin' for and women dread.I've not met those guys you are referring to; the ones that don't like attention. The ones I end up with always want to be cuddled, and kissed and get back rubs - babies! Well, the purpose of a sex doll is clear. None of that for anyone. But girls get attention from their girls, while guys are insecure about man/man bonding. 4. Men will flaunt their sex dolls because they don't give a fvck while women will want to hide theirs because they are used to pretendin' they do not like sex. So most of them will not even use their toys freely while men can pack it along with them when they travel.Women don't need to flaunt their toys. Nobody does. They only need the gadgets in the bedroom, where they can be used as freely as one would like (a dil.do is travel size anyway). Or are men planning to take their sex dolls out on dates? Or have public sex? Remember you're treading a thin line between sanity and mental instability here. If you get too attached to the thing, you'll start hearing voices |
Thank you all for contributing your opinions; they are very much appreciated. Personally, I think that there’s a very thin line here. Whether or not sex amounts to rape, is a question of consent, no doubt. There are three situations here: First, there is the phone conversation where kossy had the most amount of control over the situation. She could and (perhaps) should easily have said “No” to David’s proposition then. That is if it is generally inferred that visiting a guy (or sleeping over) means consenting to sex. Truth is: that kind of proposition is vague (as not all visits result in sex) and the ensuing consent is equally ambiguous, because a naïve girl would tell you she consented to a sleep over and nothing further. Rape is a crime; naivety is not. Saying “No” at this point would be a precautionary measure – a preemptive move. So in effect, consent to sex is NOT given. The second situation: David starts to touch kossy in her sleep. She did not and could not have consented to that because she was asleep. So that does amount to molestation in my opinion. She wakes up and asks him to stop. Again, consent to sex is denied. The third situation: David ignores her rejection and continues to touch her. What is going on at this point, where he touches her in spite of her remonstrations? Is this still a decision-making zone or has the rape commenced? Nevertheless, she gets aroused (Is that arousal consent?) and begins to respond to him. But David knows he needs her verbal consent, and so he waits until he’s sure she’s no longer thinking with her head to ask if he should stop. When that consent was eventually given, the rape was already in progress. It’s like taking someone’s food without asking until you’ve taken it in your mouth; and then you ask whether you should spit it out or swallow it. The person would probably ask you to swallow it; and his consent will make you feel like you didn’t steal his food. But the owner of that food would still feel like you took his ownership of that food for granted and had your way with it. If you had just damned his consent he might not feel as angry, because you’re not trying to manipulate the situation to paint yourself as anything else but a food thief. This is the kind of situation that is easily gotten into when you're "friendly" with someone and not when you're strangers to one another. But it won’t be surprising that Kossy (or the food owner) would “feel” raped at the end of the day, because her consent was given under undue influence. The reason consent is so important in qualifying rape is because it should liberate the consenting party to the action; it is not meant solely to justify the actions of the consentee. This is what I think about the situation, but it’s all debatable. |
greiboy: . Thanks, sweetie. I'll tag you from here on out; since I have your permission. ![]() |
Nice. |
Lol! .If you have to ask, you're probably better off with the sex doll. |
I'm disappointed in this woman ; see how quickly she caved! Cook, clean and wash? Are we supposed to equate ourselves with sex dolls? albeit with some extra abilities to promote sales. Come on, girls! What is that? . Men should be allowed to play with dolls all they want (#gender equality, #no gender discrimination in toy shops). If dolls would do it for them, they should go crazy (it's better than objectifying women for this purpose); and whenever they're ready to have relationships with human beings, they know where to find themselves a woman. But we should not reduce ourselves to sex dolls with culinary and home-making skills just because they cannot handle a real-life person with thoughts in her head and desires in her heart. |
Obalende: . The first thing I thought after reading your post: she/he is just young and a bit misguided. But if you registered this moniker over ten years ago, you cannot be as young as your post suggests. So......I really don't know what's happened to you. You seem to imply that women should be treated like human beings because they are better human beings than men (or have a more positive social impact?). Women do not have to be better than men at anything to justify their equal treatment; they only have to be members of the species. Anyone, either male or female, can be bad at their job, given to violence, stupidly in love, jaywalk or drive badly. The emancipation and inclusion of women in the work place is not a silver bullet to eradicate substandard practice or the mediocrity of the human race. Women should not be saddled with that kind of responsibility. What special debt do we owe to society, that we are required to work off our oppression by being excellent? We are all humans, every one of us surely but uniquely flawed; and still, we all deserve to be seen as equally human. Women don't deserve equal regard because they are excellent; they deserve it because they are human. To your question: self love and personal integrity won't let me accept this oppression. I cannot not react to it or stand up for myself. And if you're wondering what oppression I'm referring to, please read my post on this from my topics. |
BiafranBushBoy:Okay, will do. |
BiafranBushBoy: ![]() Sure. You forget you actually have my number, if yours still ends with 63. |
BiafranBushBoy: , Awww....lol. Sorry. But no, sweetie, I didn't see your mention. Did you? Maybe you meant to, and then forgot. Would I ignore you? |
Proudgorgeousga: Yes, I did write an article on feminism. I'm sorry I left you hanging, sweetie; I'm only just getting a breather since morning . Lol, the truth is, this argument on NL just seems like a vicious cycle. It's exhausting! The outcome is always the same: some people will always choose to shamelessly misunderstand. But I'll go through the thread. I saw the title earlier and.......... so what? |
donstan18:You're free to try your luck with that strategy, why not. Best look for a hungry girl who's looking to be fed. You should have enough money to feed the hungry side boo as well; the one who's giving her the love. |
exlinkleads:What shall it profit a woman to be seen with a good looking man, when she's actually living with a beast behind closed doors? A man who is kind, loving, understanding, supportive and generally fun to be around with average looks, is much better than a handsome man who's none of those things. I think she's just emphasizing the importance of heart & soul over looks. Besides, some guys who are handsome are vain and entitled as well, and that's too much baggage for some people. |
Sensitivity1254:Thanks. I appreciate you giving your view on this. |
pabloXL:Thanks . I'll give it a try. |
greiboy: ![]() Sure. But not on that pretext though. I have nothing to coach you on. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 30 pages)


. 

; see how quickly she caved! Cook, clean and wash? Are we supposed to equate ourselves with sex dolls? albeit with some extra abilities to promote sales. Come on, girls! What is that?
, Awww....lol. Sorry.