₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,182 members, 8,429,680 topics. Date: Friday, 19 June 2026 at 10:04 AM

Toggle theme

MissWrite's Posts

Nairaland ForumMissWrite's ProfileMissWrite's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 30 pages)

LiteratureRe: Having To Sleep Under The Bed You Made by MissWrite(f): 10:35am On Jan 10, 2018
This is very evocative ..............And beautiful in its gut-wrenching sadness.
1 Like
LiteratureRe: Dinner Conversation by MissWrite(op): 4:11pm On Jan 09, 2018
pweetyz:
I love this a lot.

If this is Nigeria however, the definition of a person would be considered wrong. Can't say about other countries tho.
Our Law provides that the foetus only becomes a person when it is independent of its Mother. This entails that a Baby is a person only when it is delivered of.

It's your story tho, so you have got the liberty to decide on your definition. I love the vast imagination and your lines of arguments too.

Kudos. You have done great.
Thank you smiley. I'm guessing you're a lawyer? grin

Yes, you're right. This is actually an excerpt from a book I started writing. The context is totalitarian. A popular pro-life argument is that personhood begins at conception (Peter Kreeft. This is real) and so, after the pro-life argument wins the lingering debate, the Government doesn't stop at just regulating women's bodies. It takes charge of everything else for an "improved" society. Like ensuring children are well cared for, by vetting and licensing parents and running routine domestic checks. Like imposing a legal BMI limit to enhance the cost-effectiveness of compulsory health insurance......and so fat people are incarcerated to work off the weight; and people with bad genes or scant means (and a host of other lapses) are denied a parent-license. Even though it would be easy to see the good intentions behind the stringent measures, it's an oppressed society that seeks to break free.
4 Likes 3 Shares
LiteratureRe: Dinner Conversation by MissWrite(op): 3:43pm On Jan 09, 2018
Missnande:
Beautiful! I have to ask though, are you a lawyer?
Thank you smiley. No, I'm not a lawyer.
LiteratureDinner Conversation by MissWrite(op):
All Rights Reserved.







“I am not against abortion.” Nhlolanti stated emphatically, “I haven’t decided to keep this baby for any moral reasons. I absolutely believe that a woman should have the right to decide issues regarding her own body. She should be allowed to assess her circumstances and decide what is best for her physical and mental health – her total wellbeing. Those rights should be non-negotiable.”

Nhlola sat in her kitchen nursing a cup of herbal tea as she watched Abram conscientiously dice tomatoes. He was making Spaghetti with Tomato sauce, the one thing he knew how to make to perfection, and he never stopped bragging about it. But Nhlola decided she could live with his feeling of superiority if it guaranteed the quieting of the rumbling in her belly. It had been a long day at the office and she was tired and so hungry that she could devour all six-feet of the thinly muscled chocolate skinned man she had in her sights. But she would wait for him to finish dinner instead. She was not about to make supper out of the only boyfriend, in all of her thirty-four years, she could actually stand to be around for longer than five months. Maybe she would have him for desert with some whipped cream………

“What about the baby’s rights. Should they be ignored?” He asked patronizingly, interrupting her thoughts.

“It’s a fetus. Not a baby.”

Abram patiently absorbed her defiance. “So, you’re saying that you don’t consider that -” he pointed to her belly, “- a baby?”

Nhlola instinctively placed her palm protectively over her abdomen. “This one is different.”

“Why?”

“Because I have already made my decision. And as a result of that, I have endorsed it with a purpose – with individuality. It is technically still a fetus but….. She’s also a product of my hopes and desires for her. So, she is my baby.”

“She?” Abram smiled derisively.

“I can only dream.” she quipped, “The point is, I made that decision. Me. And I know that I will probably go to prison for the rest of my life for this, but still, it’s my body and I should decide.”

Abram noted the anxious inflection in her tone and paused his chore. Ever since they learned that Nhlola was expecting, they had swung erratically between feelings of pure joy and utter trepidation. They weren’t married and worse still: they did not have a license from the MFA (the Ministry of Family affairs) to become parents. Their situation was precarious and Abram did not see any easy way out of it, but he had to stay positive for both of them.

“No one is going to prison. We are going to get through this.” He promised.

“Sure.” Nhlola said, but she still seemed distracted.

“And a fetus still has rights.” he remarked to keep her engaged.

“Is that a fact?” Nhlola arched a perfect brow.

“Yes! Or it should be. You know how it is with these things, it’s all still debatable. But it is a fact that a fetus has valid life and, therefore, is a person. A fetus is a human being from the first day of existence – at conception. It has a beating heart in its third week! And brain activity within a month and half, how is that not a human being? A human being has rights, and the right not to be killed is a fundamental one. It should trump the mother’s right to decide what to do with her body. Therefore, the moral thing to do would be to suspend the rights of the mother to accommodate the life of the innocent child. Abortion is and should be considered murder.”

“Wow, so that’s the resistance I would have faced if I had decided to terminate this pregnancy?”

Abram snapped his fingers at her “Stay with me, darling, we are talking generally now. Let’s not do the ‘what-ifs’ regarding our particular situation?”

“Okay..” she indulged him, “say a fetus is an actual person and worthy of legal protection by the Government, he would have the inalienable rights germane to all persons -” she counted on her fingers, “- the right to freedom and equality, the right not to be discriminated against, the right to life, the right to protected by the law, the right not to be unfairly detained… etcetera, etcetera”

“Yes.”

“So, if a woman were to – say - murder a person and get convicted for it by a competent court of law, and sentenced to do time in prison. If she were also three weeks pregnant, would that not amount to a conflict?”

“No. Not, necessarily”

“Yes. Necessarily! If she went to prison three weeks pregnant, the system would be unlawfully detaining a minor. If the fetus is a person with rights, then that’s how it should be interpreted. He should even be entitled to his own legal representation, which is essentially what Pro-life advocates have been doing – presuming to know what is in the best interest of the fetus.”

“The fetus is in its mother’s womb, there’s nothing that can be done about that. Laws aren’t perfect, but we have to do the best we can with them.”

“No, I don’t accept that! That’s not good enough. The fetus’ right not to be unfairly detained has to be respected and protected. Maybe the court could suspend sentencing until its ruling does not interfere with the inalienable rights of an innocent fetus.”

“Maybe” Abram shrugged casually. “How does it work with conjoined twins?”

“However it works with conjoined twins, first, they would both be the same age and the issue of one being a minor would not arise. And secondly, the one who would be considered the accomplice would actually have had knowledge of the crime being committed. Unless he is physically challenged in a way that compromises his ability to be aware of his physical surroundings.”

“Hmm” Abram absent-mindedly strained the pasta. “So, say the judge rules that the fetus is free while the mother remains under arrest. And he decides that, if it is possible for the fetus to leave the prison, then it is free to do so. And it is on record that the fetus is not confined by any sentence or the prison walls but by the mother’s womb. And what difference does it make, anyway, whether the mother is in jail or at The Ritz; it’s all the same in there?”

“It does make a difference. The fetus is still feeding off the mother and shouldn’t be having prison food, prison air and second-hand trauma. It is an environmental adjustment forced on the fetus. And if the judge rules in favor of the separation of mother and fetus thinking he can just pass on that Gordian knot to be untied by the mother, then that’s an endorsement of abortion. Remember Alexander didn’t actually untie that knot, he arrogantly slashed it with his sword and voila! Technically the job is done. That kind of ruling simply means: try and oops! I couldn’t live without her after all. It’s an irresponsible decision. And by that I mean – it is shameless attempt to avoid responsibility.

The mother should insist on the release of her child, even if the court decides to punish her for reckless endangerment at the time of the crime and extend her sentence. A fetus would be the saving grace of delinquent mothers unless they can be safely transplanted into a surrogate. You can’t convict two people for the crime of one.”

“Maybe sentencing should be suspended.” Abram conceded.

“Okay, what if a mother decides to file for separation from the fetus?”

“Are you joking?”

“Well, it is a person and it can be sued. Even as a minor. The law only requires that the person who brings the suit be at least eighteen.”

“What would be the grounds for separation?”

“Any number of reasons, from the sound to the absolutely ridiculous, take your pick – health, lack of mental preparedness, ambiguous paternity, financial constraints – whatever.”

“No judge would entertain that suit.”

“No, they won’t. Because the Government has decided that the right to life of the fetus trumps mother’s right to liberty. But not, necessarily.”

“Yes, necessarily.”

Nhlola ignored Abram’s gibe, “Supposing the mother then sues the government for infringement. She did not give her consent for her body to be used in gestation. I know what you’re thinking: pregnancy is a consequence of sex; therefore, consent might be implied by engaging in coitus. But you see, it is not! A woman’s decision to have sex could consent to an orgasm, and not motherhood. Just like my ordering a meal at that lousy restaurant down the street consents to getting stuffed, but not the food poisoning that is a common consequence of their dreck. So, since the woman does not consent to pregnancy, then the Government, in its bid to bestow ‘personhood’ on the fetus, should take responsibility in resolving the conflict. So, they should be made to compensate the mother in liquidated and ascertained damages for using her body as a ‘Surrogate under Duress’ and also forcing her into motherhood against her will. In addition, they would have to cover medical expenses and life insurance premiums – because pregnancy is a risky business. After which the baby could be placed for adoption at the Government’s discretion. This way, the Government has acknowledged both the right of the fetus to exist and the mother’s right to liberty.

Or they can simply stop being silly and properly define what and who constitutes a person. Personally, I consider it important to be: first, of the human species – regardless of color, gender or age; and secondly, an independent entity capable of independent association in the real environment – if it rains, can it get wet?”

Abram placed a deliciously steaming plate of food in front of Nhlola on the counter, “Eat!” he commanded as he pulled up a stool beside to her.

“Where’s yours?”

“I think I might need a drink first” he smiled.

“Did I upset you?” Nhlola scrunched up her nose.

He shook his head, “I just didn’t realize you felt this strongly about this….stuff. I guess I should be thankful you love me enough to want to keep my baby”

“I do love you” she assured him with a kiss on the lips.

“Yeah?”

“Mmm hmmm” she affirmed nuzzling his nose with hers, “But if I didn’t, I probably would still not be running out to get an abortion. I am ready for this. I am not an abortion nut, if there’s a thing like that. I’m just not opposed to it as an option should a woman, for any reason, choose to have one.”

Abram exhaled in mock irritation, “Eat your pasta” he said again as he went to the bar to mix himself a screwdriver. He always did it with way too much orange juice – whom was he kidding?

“You gave me all of two seconds to feel good about myself – thinking I had anything to do with your decision.”

“Who are you again?” Nhlola blinked in mock bewilderment.

“Ha, ha”

His drink in hand, he sat back down at the counter regarding her intently, “Seriously, what’s a father’s say in the matter?”

“You’re being really sensitive right now.”

“No, I’m not. I promise” he waved off her concerns, “But it sounds like you think that he has no say”

“Not ‘no say’….” She hedged.

“Alright, tell me”

“I just think that the father, just like the Government has no right to force a woman to commit to a pregnancy which she isn’t emotionally prepared for. It is her body”

“Okay, and following your reasoning, if he sues her to court and wins the case, he becomes liable to pay liquidated and ascertained damages for forced surrogacy in the counter suit. And thereafter gets sole custody of the child.”

Nhlola nodded exaggeratedly compensating for the absurdity of the supposition, “That would be correct.”

“And if a woman decides to keep it and the man wants an abortion? It is his sperm”

“If a woman is opposed to the operation, she shouldn’t be made to do it. The man is free to give up paternal rights and responsibilities because it should be his right to consent to or refrain from fatherhood.”

“Yes, but there is still the matter of a child with his DNA out and about. Does he get compensation for that?”

“Maybe. If a case for reckless abandonment doesn’t resonate with the Judge.”

“You think you have all the answers, don’t you?” he chided, emptying his tumbler, “Well, I think that a fetus absolutely is a person and should be regarded as such. What you suggested earlier about re-negotiating the ‘personhood’ of a fetus is another convenient way to avoid taking responsibility for the gravity of one’s actions, and that’s disgraceful.

Have you forgotten how black people were once disenfranchised in North American history by the two-fifths compromise? You can’t just label people to your convenience and do with them what you like.”

“Yes. I hear that” Nhlola was subdued by Abram’s surge of passion. He hadn’t shouted but his tone had been uncharacteristically terse. “But -”

He placed a finger on her lips, “No buts, please”

“This pasta is absolutely fabulous”

“I know” he smiled as he planted a kiss on her lips.
5 Likes 5 Shares
FamilyRe: Nigerian Mothers Have Failed This Generation by MissWrite(f):
Well, we cannot count or hope on a person's decision to be decent. Now that families have failed to instill morals in so many young men, we have to make sure that our laws work to convict rapists and sex offenders without equivocacy. When this is in full effect, parents would realize that ensuring their sons do not molest women isn't just out of "curtesy" to girls, but to keep them on the right side of the law and out of trouble. And then they would try to do the right thing for sheer self-preservation.
FamilyRe: Should Respect Be Earned Or Given In A Relationship Or Marriage? by MissWrite(f): 10:32am On Jan 07, 2018
Both. You earn respect by giving it; and not necessarily because you're "all that". If you treat people decently, you can expect to be treated decently as well. That's how respect is reciprocal. This is true within the context of marriage too.

If a husband has regard for his wife, she'll respect his position. Some men misunderstand the position - "head of the family". They assume it naturally has to be a dictatorship and not a democracy. They think it's about taking unilateral decisions and having the wife jump whenever they say "froggy", as though she were nothing but his personal slave. Such a wife might fear her husband; but she would not respect him. In the old days, a wife might stay in line because she was financially dependent on the man. The moment he lost his edge though, the wife would reciprocate the full value for his treatment of her. And he would think it's because the money's gone. Sure. But it's also because he did not give her respect to start with.

On the other hand, a husband who treats his wife like a person, has conversations with her, recognizing that she isn't just some airhead, genuinely considers her opinions (without discounting them because they come from a woman, or because they don't come from him) and then reserves the right to make the final call; a man who sees when it might be unreasonable to ask his wife to make his favorite meal because she's had a long day at work, instead of insisting that she should have known that his needs came first, and if she can't handle both work hours and domestic "duty", she should quit work; etc.......such a man earns his wife's respect because he gave it to her first.
RomanceRe: Lady Get Proposed To, But Everyone Is Against It Because...( Photo) by MissWrite(f): 8:43am On Jan 07, 2018
Na wa o. This kain babe wey all hands must be on deck undecided Well, na the guy sabi, sha.
RomanceRe: What Turns You "ON" When You See A Girl Or Guy?. by MissWrite(f): 8:34am On Jan 07, 2018
It's a certain charismatic aura that is developed by confidence and carriage; an attractive genuine smile, good grooming and a clean scent. Broad shoulders, large hands and a deep voice.
RomanceRe: Kassandra Okafor Marries Within 1 Month Of Meeting Her Man (Photos) by MissWrite(f): 11:16pm On Jan 06, 2018
Daeylar:
Lol, grin

To be honest I don't mind the word
I think the reason why the word denotes negativity for you and for a number of people is because of misogyny, misogyny made everything that related and relates to women as something to be ridiculed and mocked,



If the words were switched. Bachelor for women, spinster for men, today I think we would like spinster and use it,
(The Spinster and the Spinsterette
grin grin wink tongue grin)
While bachelor would be seen as distasteful and dropped,
(Or maybe that isn't your reason and you just don't like the word
Yes. You do have a point there.
RomanceRe: Know Your Birthday Twinny!!!!! by MissWrite(f): 11:10pm On Jan 06, 2018
Spasmic:
Okay. Whatever. undecided
Ah, Ahn..... embarassed. No, not "whatever" grin. I'm sorry if I offended you. And I do appreciate the compliment wink. The reason I've been weird about it is because you seemed to be picking on someone all in one breath. smiley

RomanceRe: Know Your Birthday Twinny!!!!! by MissWrite(f): 10:08pm On Jan 06, 2018
Spasmic:
I don't know who those monikers belong to. I just followed them because they followed me first.

And even if I wanted to hide in the guise of a fake moniker, why would I follow my original monikers?

Lol! I've seen people do that, especially when they don't intend to hide their id. Say the alt only became necessary because they were serving out a ban. But I didn't mean any disrespect by it, he's cool. It was just an unfortunate guess undecided.
RomanceRe: Know Your Birthday Twinny!!!!! by MissWrite(f): 9:48pm On Jan 06, 2018
Spasmic:
I assumed that because it would require a smart person to identify the invalidity of the content of the image. And I just mentioned the username of any smart Nairalander I could think of. Well, your username is easy to recollect, so.

No. I'm not a supersystemsnig.
smiley cool. I just assumed because you follow two of his alternate monikers. Maybe one undecided
EducationRe: Test Your English Proficiency Here (picture) by MissWrite(f): 9:46pm On Jan 06, 2018
The mother, I would say undecided.

A mother beat her daughter because she was drunk.

"A mother" is the subject of the sentence. She's the one doing, and who's action is qualified. Without the conjunction: A mother beat her daughter. She was drunk.
"A mother" is the subject in the first sentence, while "daughter" is the object. In the second sentence, if the daughter is to become the subject, it would be stated. But the pronoun "She" is used because it's taken for granted that "A mother" remains the subject.
RomanceRe: Know Your Birthday Twinny!!!!! by MissWrite(f): 9:18pm On Jan 06, 2018
Spasmic:
@Miss.write, I'm sure I'm not the only one that hates the kind of analogy in angy.55's profile.
undecided Hmmm......I'm sure you aren't the only one. But if you're implying that I don't, then I wonder why you would assume that? I don't know this moniker sad...........Supersystemsnig?
RomanceRe: Kassandra Okafor Marries Within 1 Month Of Meeting Her Man (Photos) by MissWrite(f): 3:45pm On Jan 06, 2018
Daeylar:
Lol grin
Just wanted to show you an example, lol, example of those people grin didn't really care sha, I can't take someone who says trash serious grin
How would the spinster have been like? grin grin grin grin grin grin grin tell me, lol,
Lol! grin grin seriously? Does "The Spinster" make you think of a show where a bunch of "hunksome" guys work for the attention of a woman? "The Bachelorette" may be a prize (it's glamorous) but "The Spinster" just sounds glum. It's such an ugly sounding word (spinster! Whoever came up with that?). It would be a show in black & white, of a middle-aged woman who's forgotten how to smile, who takes walks with her poodles and screams at children in hallways. Exhibiting her spinstrosity.





So in this case, is bad belle allowed or is it not allowed? grin grin
Toh! We cannot have them arrested, but they'd do well to swerve smiley. Nobody needs the negativity, biko.
RomanceRe: Kassandra Okafor Marries Within 1 Month Of Meeting Her Man (Photos) by MissWrite(f): 1:38pm On Jan 05, 2018
Daeylar:
angry Miss.write come and see them angry angry
Lmao! grin grin, see now? I'm going have to work on that, calling him "Man" won't be offensive to him at all. Same way that spinster has more sting than bachelor; so, we had to come up with bachelorette. Lol! If that reality tv show had been called "The Spinster" it would be a different show. grin



Rubbish and nonsense,
Marriage will be an achievement to whoever wants to make it an achievement.
Any woman or man can make marriage an achievement to them and it doesn't concern you in the least,


Imagine all the insults you threw because someone considers marriage an achievement?

The ones with this mentality are majorly parasites, who have nothing to offer apart from their bodies.
Marriage can only be an achievement to a dependent and illiterate woman.


How do you know the second statement? Do you know every woman both independent and dependent to know if they view marriage as an achievement or not?

Very myopic statement.

Why are you so pained that someone could consider marriage an achievement? Why are you pained over what someone decides to make an achievement or not? Why?
It's a free world,

Someone can consider marriage an achievement, the next woman may not consider marriage an achievement. Everyone should be free to live without facing unnecessary insults.

Truth indeed, mtchewwww.
smiley, Don't mind him and his ilk, people now prey on feminism to say that women shouldn't consider marriage an achievement, lol! They are missing the point actually. The feminist concept simply implies that I should be free to define my goals for myself, and not have society define them for me. If it's my goal to get married, and it works out for me, then haven't I achieved? After all the self-improvement books, and conscientiously positioning myself for a relationship? They don't just fall into a person's lap, you know. If i consider it to be an achievement for myself, then what right does anyone have to discount that?

But if it isn't my plan to get married, I shouldn't have to, just because other people expect it of me. The independence of the emancipated woman ensures that she doesn't NEED a man to guarantee her basic needs; and she can, therefore, decide if she WANTS one or not. After all, marriage provides a person with much more than (possibly) financial security (where either the man or the woman can be the beneficiary); it's also a play for love and companionship. So, all this talk about this woman having nothing to offer, simply because she considers this quick union a blessing, is really unwarranted.

And you were spot on when you said that both men and women could consider marriage an achievement. Haven't we been seeing ads here put up by guys? At the end of the day, we define what we want and set out to achieve our goals. And people who want to rain on our parade are all just bad-bele people.
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f): 6:11pm On Jan 04, 2018
Maezara:
I'm ready to task my pink blood with the cause, epitomizing true Nobility. smiley

Good evening. How have you been?
grin grin grin, good sport!

I've been good, sweetie. I hope you are too. kiss kiss kiss
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f): 5:37pm On Jan 04, 2018
Tozara:
Burnishing my Blue Spectacles in preparation to serve as a witness on the D-Day, when the plans put in place for the liberation of our Normandy shall be executed. smiley
Lol! Actually, you're one of the ones needed to get the wheels turning. wink
FamilyRe: Why Do Married Men Sexually Impress And Satify Their Mistress Than Their Wife by MissWrite(f): 10:01pm On Jan 02, 2018
Jman06:
I was just trying to imply that majority of Nigerian men who cheat on their wives do not cheat because they love and respect their wives like you typed. Was just playing around ! I know it isn't proper to give figures like that when arguing on a topic one has not really researched on, but that is when you are sure to some extent that there is a possibility of the counter argument being true. But based on my years of interaction with married men who cheat, and also based on stories we read on the media, i haven't come across any case where a cheating man claimed that he cheats because he loved and respected his wife.
Yes. But nobody was implying that majority of Nigerian men who cheat on their wives did so because they were affected by the Madonna-Wh.ore complex. In fact, I didn't give the relevance of any of the four factors I listed on the frequency of cheating.
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f):
Tozara:
Hmmm. smiley
Lmao!! grin grin grin.

Yeah, yeah........
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f): 9:40pm On Jan 02, 2018
Daeylar:
True. @bold
@ purple, sometimes I really don't understand if they expect you to fly off the road just disappear from the road? It really confuses me. You can even have an accident, just as long as you bounce off the road.
grin

I think we can blame them, why are they so angry all the time? Why can't they calm down and get themselves together and look for a solution? Meaningless anger that doesn't solve any problem,
Lol! Yes, I think you're right. People should be blamed. We should really rise above our personal frustrations and do something about the oppression.



It's what APC did. Change begins with you, I have never heard anything so annoying,

Fela called them well, suffering and smiling. Sometimes is you tell them let's try and make a change. They will start telling you that the world is bad and has always been bad, mtchewww any excuse to do nothing
That's what I absolutely detest! When people are so convinced that nothing will work and so they do just that: Nothing.


They actually enjoy getting mad at each other it's the only kind of entertainment they get. Very sadistic and scary.
grin grin, Gladiators in an arena who are all equally doomed. Spartacus should teach us lesson, it's the only way to get out. smiley
FamilyRe: Why Do Married Men Sexually Impress And Satify Their Mistress Than Their Wife by MissWrite(f): 9:20pm On Jan 02, 2018
Jman06:
Has any cheating Nigerian man ever told you he cheat on his wife because he loves and respects her huh

Agreed i never did a formal research on the subject but my dear, we already know the outcome of such research if we are to conduct one.
There you go. So those numbers are just pulled out of the blue.
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f): 9:01pm On Jan 02, 2018
Dfire:
okay summary there's nothing wrong with demanding gun rights it's the only thing worth protesting for in this country
Lol. Sure, why not. It's a start. When they see why we're eager for guns, we'll land on reforms.
PoliticsRe: We Need Gun Rights In Nigeria !! by MissWrite(f): 8:49pm On Jan 02, 2018
Dfire:
I called the 1960 fake because the British Empire collapsed they were giving most countries in Africa independence eventually they would have given us too protest or not
Rebellion? With the way I'm seeing Nigeria with Ipob, boko haram, arewa, Daddy freeze, delta militant, avengers, fulani herdsmen, massob, Python dance, endsarz,...... Eventually a rebellion would occur that would destroy Nigeria, note the Nigeria government isn't stopping any of these things infact they inspired some of them... So how is having guns going to start a rebellion?
I didn't say guns are starting any rebellion. angry
FamilyRe: Why Do Married Men Sexually Impress And Satify Their Mistress Than Their Wife by MissWrite(f): 8:43pm On Jan 02, 2018
Jman06:
Hmmmm....But my dear, 99.999percent of nigerian men know from puberty that sex is not dirty and shameful.
Chai! Let me see the questionnaires you made them fill out to arrive at that number.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 30 pages)