₦airaland Forum

here is a simple clue: if the above was remotely true, then you wouldnt have to come to NL begging for customers... as the praises (from all the people you helped in the past) would be enough publicity to turn you into a billionaire overnight.

if nobody is talking about your herbs, then thats because they aint shiiit.

ocnovakmichael:
If I get you correctly, you said your sexuality has nothing to do with your gender, right?
Might I ask you, what is sexuality and what is gender?

GENDER is your sexual organ (and there is only two different gender)
SEXUALITY is your sexual orientation (and there is 100s... hetero, gay, bisexual, unicorn or whatever you desire)

people are either born MALE or born FEMALE...and although some are born with defect (aka two genders), you cant wake up one day and decide that you are a FEMALE when your sexual organ is MALE. you can believe (in your head) that you are different but that does NOT change what you are genetically.

Veecruz:
That is why God has given us the gift of Judgment so that if we are making an.error we can correct it, since it looks like we are all trying to do the "right thing."
So, enforcement is another thing entirely and the only thing i have asked for is for fair and valid judgment on this matter like we do for all other matters.Which you are already.doing now, so all these are void.

NOBODY has ever given you the gift of judgment of others... thats your FIRST MISTAKE.
if YOU are making an error then you can correct the mistake YOU are making, nobody gave you the right to judge others and make you judge over the lives of others....and claim that they are wrong because YOU believe they are wrong. your holybook teaches you to accept others regardless of who they are, not to judge people acting holier than thou, simply because you are against something that highly respected men of your bible did.

Did you see God punish Cain, or Judas Iscariot or the scribes and pharisees who sought to murder Him? Does that mean He consented to their murders?

every sinners under your bible deserve punishment... if in the eyes of your god polygamous men were not punished for having multiple wives and mistresses, then their action were not viewed as a sin. we are not talking of nobodys here, we are talking about HIGHLY RESPECTED MEN OF YOUR BIBLE.

That is the essence of this judgment which you are already doing so, this is void.

nobody is saying that you shouldnt have an opinion/view on a subject... i am just saying that you shouldnt say that what they are doing is wrong/evil in the eyes of your holybook (As if you are the spoke person/representant for the bible), and instead say that YOU dont believe that what they do is right OR that YOU are against what they do... which you are entitled to.

its obvious you are very clueless about the words of your holybook:

Matthew 7
Judging Others
7 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

alabo1:
Is the Man Jesus Christ? Even Christ said Tempt not the Lord thy God.

it also said:
Isaiah 41:10
So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.

why would a nurse ask a patient for money?! no wonder you were sacked.

BTW LA click LA Bendel state

if guns were as available in the UK as they are available in the US, you will hear of 10 times more unnecessary teenage death in the UK.

ocnovakmichael:
You see, In our world today, we have several genders: male identifying as female, women identifying as men, while others identifying as "they," "them" etc.

MISCONCEPTION #1
there are only TWO GENDER (male and female) and just because people suffering from mental disorder believe otherwise, shouldnt be a reason for people to now claim that there are more genders out there. your sexuality is completely different than your GENDER. being a homo is your sexuality, being a lesbian is your sexuality, being a crossdresser is your sexuality. your sexuality has nothing to do with your gender.
furthermore, many mentally deranged people also have sex change to appear of the opposite sex but that doesnt change who they are as a HUMAN BEING nor their GENDER. these men who transition to have their male organ removed and that now have tittays and even toto, CANNOT BEAR A CHILD like a woman can (and vice versa).
in 200years from now, when the skeleton of these mentally deranged people are dug up from the cemetery, nobody will say:"oh thats the body of a man who identified as a woman", they will instead say:"thats the body of a MAN!"

This gender maladjustments in our world today is the product of a society bankrupt of basic natural principles and the fear of the LORD. However, from the beginning it was not so.

MISCONCEPTION #2
many people out there have different god that they worship; many people out there dont believe in god;; many people suffering from mental disorder are actually in church right now believing yeye nonsense under the moon.

When God created the world, the Bible says, male and female created he them. "Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created" (Genesis 5:2). The genders are male and female only; not male, female, they, them, those, others.
Now the question is: who is the teacher behind this movement of crossdressers and transgenders?

MISCONCEPTION #3
those homos have been on earth since biblical days... lets not try to pretend that it just happened yesterday

someone should summarize for us...

SageOddy:
What are some ways a girl can respectfully ask for sex from her man?

is that man a stranger OR her bf OR her husband?
depending on who he is to her, there is many different ways to ask for sex

any smart older gentleman should also understand that as much as his money can attract a lot of these young women, it wont turn these women into old geriatric person who want to spend every night watching the news and/or do the boring stuff that such men often do. these men also have to adapt to these women if not, then being with them is a waste of time/energy/life.

you think the above men want to go out clubbing in the weekend or go shirtless at the beach?! they do so only because of these women.
its a 50/50 game where you do a little of what she likes and she does a little of what you like.

if you want her to be home all day watching TV and cooking for you and then watch the news when you come home then, in no time your driver/gateman/houseboy would be feasting on her bored self!

BTW doing TikTok and being on SM all day long is what these unemployed young women do, whether they are married to you or not. never expect your younger chica to do anything much at home, because they are unexperienced kids that need to experience life, before becoming wise adult

by all means, if thats what you wanna do then so be it.... but remember, many that went that way ended up 6 feet under.

a good criminal is a DEAD CRIMINAL!

@Veecruz
A) remember, i could judge you for doing something that "you" believe is right, while i dont believe its right... should i now enforce that YOU do what i desire because i believe it is wrong OR should i just allow you to do what you please because what may be wrong for me may not be wrong for you?!
righteousness for you may not be righteousness for me. you seem to have ONE view of what is right and therefore expect everyone to think like you do.

B) again, stop trying to read your holybook upside down, just to fit your selfish agenda. MANY HIGHLY RESPECTED MEN OF THE BIBLE HAD MULTIPLE WIVES and/or HAD COUNTLESS MISTRESSES AND BABYMAMAS (and were never punished for it). FACT!!!!

C) just because you are against polygamy; just because you believe its wrong and judge people who are into it, DOES NOT MAKE POLYGAMY WRONG. it just makes polygamy wrong "TO YOU". to the millions of people who gladly indulge into polygamy or polyandry, there is nothing wrong with such act. BTW: an act that many people in your holybook indulged in with no repercussions whatsoever.

so the reality is that: NO ONE CARES HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT POLYGAMY.... if you think its wrong then dont indulge in it, and let people who believe that polygamy is right to indulge in it (like King David/Solomon, Abraham or Jacob did).

D) what a hypocrite you are! your religion doesnt allow you to be an elder in church as a woman. will you now equally claim that you religion is evil because the same food should be served to women too (and if women cannot be elders in church then religion is evil)?!?

DJInfluence:
Am sorry to say you are wrong thinking this way.
There are 1001 very good reasons to explain this. It could be genuine love, it could be he has an interview or business meeting to attend, it could be it was her turn to carry him based on internal agreement between them, it could be an internal joke thing between them, it could be she insisted on carrying him to show her appreciation etc. But it's not weak. Are you even married? Unless you are married and experience untold bliss in your marriage don't talk about other people's marriage.

so, if you had a big job interview and there was muddy water everywhere, you would let your wife carry you like the above? let us be honest here: so out of ALL the solution available, your wife carrying you for back (like pikin) is the only solution you could find?

NothingDoMe:
Bulshit! Men cannot always pretend to be strong!

what made you automatically assume that this man wasnt strong?

Zackattack:
It is not a thing of pride for a man to control himself in front of a half naked woman. If anything at all, he's described effeminate.

Veecruz:
Is he not already controllling himself by warning her to cover up?

so in your world, a woman who isnt wearing a bra is HALF NAKED?!?!?!?!?!?

ufotunang:
..then why should she be advertising her market to her sister husband 🙄

so a woman not wearing a bra is automatically advertising for men?!?

Druss:
One shouldn't look. However the sister should also dress appropriately. Also this has nothing to do with being a man. It is natural for men to be attracted. What will be wrong is the man acting on his desire or allowing the temptation within his control to continue!

true, thus why whether the sister wearing a bra or not is irrelevant... unless jiggling breast is a problem for hubby

onadana:
He has the right to look at whatever is under his roof.

... and so far as we know, looking has NEVER been a crime in marriage.

shouldnt you also say:"as a married man, you shouldnt remotely look at your spouse's sister/friends in such a manner anyway?
"
it says a lot about a man who cant even control himself, because regardless of whether it is his wife's sister OR the olosho shopping at the mall, if you cant control yourself (when you see tittays jiggling) then you will ALWAYS fall!

shortgun:
Don't get it twisted, Nigerian girls have the most natural flexible body when it comes to dancing.

majority of women (of African/latin decent) can dance very well... regardless of their country of origin.

Veecruz:
Do we not judge and jury everything in this world whether it is about pastors or politicians or paternity issues or cheating spouses nepa tarrif hike?
Even you right now, are you not judging me that i should not judge other people who live differently?
Please, if you do not like judgments then you would have to stay away from social discussions.

there is nothing wrong with you having an opinion and judge people... its when you now want to claim that "your" opinion is the righteous one and these people are wrong/evil (because you dont believe in what they do), that is the problem.
there is absolutely nothing wrong with mature adults entering a polygamous union or having countless mistresees and babymamas (like many highly respected men in your bible did... aka king David/Solomon, Jacob, Abraham etc). yet you will now come here and try to give us "your" own version of what is right/wrong.

Veecruz:
So, the problem is, that the measurement of right and wrong is above "to them".
It is a test of doing that same thing they say is right or wrong to see if they say it is still right or wrong and this is done even without being religious.

it has nothing to being above or better (below or less), it has all to do with it being DIFFERENT. just because "you" dont abide by it, doesnt automatically dismisses their idea of what is right/good.

Veecruz:
This was extensively dealt with in these threads and all who said God never saw them as sinners were put to shame and silenced.
So, IT IS PROVEN THAT GOD NEVER EVER ACCEPTED NOR CONDONED THEIR SINS!

you must be reading your holybook upside down... but again, i am here to help you. the following verses clearly demonstrates that there is nothing wrong with marrying multiple wives:
Deuteronomy 21:15
15 If a man has two wives, and he loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons but the firstborn is the son of the wife he does not love,

Exodus 21:10
10 If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights.

Judges 8:30
30 He had seventy sons of his own, for he had many wives.

2 Chronicles 11:21
21 Rehoboam loved Maakah daughter of Absalom more than any of his other wives and concubines. In all, he had eighteen wives and sixty concubines, twenty-eight sons and sixty daughters.
... and the list goes on.

Veecruz:
Even you know that you are very very WRONG for the test of Truth of good/rght and evil/wrong is to reverse that thing which is said to be good or evil and apply it to other opposing party to see if he would call it good or evil when it is done to.him exactly as we know that stealing is evil because even thief when he was stolen from also confesses that.stealing is evil.

So, i am right to test all the polygamous minded husbands and as is proven, they.have already refused to let their fellow human being with the same human rights to do that which they say, is good.
CLEARLY PROVING THAT POLYGAMY IS EVIL.

so what you are claiming is that... polygamy is evil because polygamous men dont want their wives to have multiple partners?? BWAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!! what a very narrow minded way to reason. so let me think like you do and say:" since your pastor doesnt want you to preach/worship other religion, therefore YOUR PASTOR IS EVIL and/or YOUR RELIGION IS EVIL. correct?" or better yet:"your religion allows men to be elders in church but forbids women to be elders in church, so if i use your way of thinking, therefore YOUR RELIGION IS EVIL because of that, abi?!"

you sound like a very conceited person who is hellbent on its very selfish and narrow minded way of thinking... there are MANY different gods out there, many different faith, many different RIGHTEOUS way of life. the minute you try to claim that only "your" god or "your" way of life is the righteous one, therefore i understand that you people are the demons that dont even know how to read your own holybook. here is a clear verse (below) that explicitly tells you that there are many gods out there for many different people, but that "for christians" there is only one god (but you cant even read properly so now will claim that there is only one god for EVERYBODY):

1 Corinthians 8:5-6
5 For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”), 6 yet for us (aka christians) there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live.

so muslims can have their own god and live righteous lives, Buddhists can have their own gods and live righteous lives, jews can have their own god and live righeous lives, hindus can have their own god and live righteous lives etc

lexy2014:
can you pls tell me the name of your departure city, transit city and final destination?
which airline did you buy your first ticket?
which airline did you buy your second ticket?
which insurance company did you call to refund your money for the cancelled flight?
according to you "if you have a very important meeting to attend, then at that point you automatically should look for alternate options".
what are the "alternate options" the individual in question should have taken from PH to Lagos?
what is the transit city this individual in the story should have used as a transit city between PH and Lagos?

all these questions while the issue is very simple: lets say the flight was tomorrow saturday 6th of April, and his flight to Lagos with Air Peace was delayed or cancelled... the alternative flight from Port Harcourt to Lagos he could have booked is the Green Africa Airways flight to Lagos at 20.55pm. CASE CLOSED!

iamL:
I don't want kids, am not spending my hard earned money and time raising children in this cursed system that is passing away.
At time a point in my life I was worried but now I am supper free and peaceful. Honestly Am glad i didn't because all those around me who have kids are the ones telling me they wish they were bold like me.
Until I met someone who isn't into children am not getting married. Nothing like when a woman is building her wealth with freedom and peace of mind.

... and you are entitled to feel that way, because not everyone should have kids. think its more mature for someone to do what they desire and refuse to have kids than people who have kids knowing fully well they dont want and/or dont have the means to care for are kids.

i also feel it is VERY SELFISH for ones parents to expect us to give them grandkids, regardless of how we feel abut having children (As if "they" are gonna raise these kids)

if/when tomorrow they help her, then next week 20 will be there with their kids begging for help....
btw OP, why didnt "you" help her?

toujurs:
How can you be a man, and you are not vocal, you can't express to a woman, how you feel about her, like are you stupid, or you are just mad?
Set aside financial capacity, these women are broke too. That's why the rich Bleep them however they like, and dump them. Guy if you see a lady you like, please approach her and engage her, with a conversation and get her number.
Let it be, she was the one, that told you No, you don't need to be told a "No" 2 times.
If she says No, this shouldn't pull you down, there are too many single women out there.
Move onto the next. Till you get what you want. And settle for what you want.
As long as she is not, someone who sold out her coochie for money.
Toast women out there, it's sad to hear how men of this generation are too weak to woo women in public places. I understand tinubu happened, but this disaster touched every gender.
It's not, All women that are after financial benefits, some believe, money comes gradually.

as much as you made a lot of sense, let us all remember:
- some men are shyy/reserved, and there is nothing wrong with that
- some men are not well versed with women, and there is nothing wrong with that
- some men lose their composure when with women, and there is nothing wrong with that
- men should be themselves and not pretend to be who they are not, just in order to try to get with a woman.
- rich men pay for toto and fukc these undercover oloshos, which is completely different than men approaching a woman to try to woo her with words
- if it was that easy to get a GOOD WOMAN (not some yeye two bit undercover olosho) then every good men out there would be with one by now.
- there is a time for everything....time for dating, time for chop and clean mouth, time for being in a serious r/ship, and time to take it to the next level..... not all women (that men approach) are there for the same aim.
- it takes EXPERIENCE/KNOWLEDGE/CONFIDENCE/TRIALS AND FAILURES to be good at dealing with women. expecting men to just get it on the first try is too much to ask...instead you should let them know that:"regardless of what happens during their encounter with women, it will be an experience for them to be better at (the next time around)"

although hard to believe, i guess you were different. most youngster looking for their first time at a real toto (and with a raging erection), would have dived in, with no questions asked (even if the toto smelled like bad tuna).

Veecruz:
And it does not matter for i have just pointed out how we all know Who is The True God via the fact no one in any place in the world says that doing evil and wickedness is good nor do they live according to that Law!
So, now what people say in reference to their.religious preferrance or inclination is out.

so when buddhists say there is only ONE TRUE GOD, and decide to indulge in POLYANDRY, you will now come and tell us that their god is wrong and yours is right? who made you judge and jury on who is a true god and who is not? that fact that you would want to dismiss people0s beliefs, just because you are not ready to accept that ITS OK FOR PEOPLE TO BE DIFFERENT, is the problem here.
at the end of the day, a woman (and her husbands) into polyandry are not doing anything wrong. they all live respectfully in happy matrimony. whats wrong with that?

That is why i said
"Every interpretation falls on the ground of our universal and general knowledge of good and evil, for.God has done it, that upon just and fair and reasonable argument, if a view/interpretaion is right and good, it will stand no mattter the fire of examination and re-examination that is brought on it, hence the statement "Truth grows and shines under the fire of crossexamination"
But if is wrong and evil, THEY MUST FALL,hence the importance of valid and lawful arguments."
So, let us play judge, lawyer and Court fot already, i have put it before advocates of polygamy that since polygamy is not wrong, have they and shall they allow their wives to marry other husbands, since both of them are human beings with the same human rights.
And all of them have run away
So, clearly, the idea of polygamy is not a good thing

the universal knowledge of good and evil falls upon each and every individual to decide FOR THEIR LIVES whats right and whats wrong. the minute you are trying to force feed "your" notion of whats right down the throat of others because "you" dont think what they do is right, then you completely FAIL in this issue.

furthermore, asking polygamous men if they would let their wives have multiple husband is unintelligent. polygamous men look for multiple women to be with ONE husband, just like polyandrous women look for multiple men to be with ONE WIFE. these are two different set of people, with two different mindset. same as your pastor wouldnt agree that you go follow another church, although there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with that.

here is a simple clue: many highly respected men of your holybook (aka Abraham, king David/Solomon) had countless mistresses and babymamas and were NEVER viewed as sinners by your god, nor punished for it. it is only when one of them had sex with a MARRIED WOMAN that he was punished for it.... but none were ever punished for having countless of single women as mistresses/babymamas. yet you will now come here to give us "your " version of what is acceptable.

the problem in this discussion is that you are so full of yourself, you believe that only your holybook and its law is righteous, and nothing else is valid on this earth....while many people out there dont have to be religious to know whats right or wrong TO THEM. at the end of the day, if someone wants to have 3 wives/husbands (and treat their partner with love care and affection), then who are we to say that this is wrong, when its obvious that its right TO THEM.

Veecruz:
There is only One God. But we have people who may be referring to the same God in their different languages vs those who have exercised their power to reject God and choose other things as their god.
But the Supremacy of God is seen that no place or people in the world says that doing evil and wickedness is good nor do they live according to that Law.So, dont muddle up the argument.

i fully disagree with what you are saying.... but for the sake of this discussion, let me help you a bit:
do you know that there are religion out there (under that same ONE TRUE GOD notion) that fully allow polyandry... aka Buddhism

Every interpretation falls on the ground of our universal knowledge of good and evil, for.God has done it, that upon just and fair and reasonable argument, if a view/interpretaion is right and good, it will stand no mattter the fire of examination and re-examination that is brought on it, hence the statement "Truth grows and shines under the fire of crossexamination"
But if is wrong and evil, THEY MUST FALL,hence the importance of valid and lawful arguments.

there is a huge difference between having difference of interpretation of that said holybook AND doing whats right or wrong. if you are now saying that so long as its "good" then anyone can interpret the words of that said holybook as they wish, then anyone can now say:" there is nothing wrong with a woman having multiple husbands (because its a good thing) and make it their religious way of life.

furthermore: many will claim (after reading the bible) that its a sin to have more than one wife, while others will claim it aint. are you now claiming that your ONE TRUE GOD doesnt have a set notion of whats right and whats wrong? many believe that its right to kill sinners, while others say its wrong. who is therefore right? but better yet, what is the need for a set law if anyone can do what the hell they please (and claim its rightful to them)?

all these yeye blogga blogga with fake news sef...

again, brotha Davido doesnt own any plane. he either uses his father's plane OR charter a private jet.

in these dangerous climates of paternity fraud, anybody who has the financial means to do a DNA test should do one, whether it makes them look distrustful in the eyes of their woman (or not).

better getting your woman mad for a few days than raising a bastard child for a few years.

i am sorry to say but whether he carries her or she carries him, it makes the partner on the back look like a WEAKLING.

i cant believe thats his wife... must be someone making money carrying people over muddy floods.
EDIT: so it seems they are husband and wife from Kenya, the husband is a pastor The couple are founders of a church named Harvest Church Kenya and they were on their way to church.

zionstaar75:
no one lied to him. It's boerboel but it's called brindle

you are actually right...i had to look it up. thanks for educating us on the subject. it does indeed look like a brindle

lexy2014:
what are you saying?
pls share with us your similar experience with an airline.
is it the way you said it above that you did it?

very simple: i had 2 tickets bought for an important trip... from point A (departure city) to point B (transit city) and then the next morning very early another flight with a different airline from point B to point C (final destination) .... when 1st flight got cancelled i automatically understood that my chances to get on the last flight of the initial company (to point B) was very slim , as they were 100s of us stranded at the airport wanting to get on that last flight of the day....so i quickly bought an alternative flight from point A to point B with a different airline to make sure i catch my next morning flight (from point B to point C)....then i contacted my insurance and got a full refund for the flight that was cancelled.

even if the flight was not cancelled, it is well known that airline overbook their flight, and bump people off... and if you have a very important meeting to attend, then at that point you automatically should look for alternate options, rather than wait for last flight of the night, with a 50/50 chance of getting on the flight.

Veecruz:
Now you based "nothing wrong" on your personal opinion, whereas this thread is based on the.standard of rightfullness especially that based on God!

1st you have to understand that there are countless of gods out there, and nobody can claim who is the righteous one with the ultimate message
2nd even people who read the exact same holybook (like the bible fr example), cannot make up their mind about what its true word is... mormon say one thing, jehovah witness another, catholic their own version etc etc

talking about "standard of rightfullness" when talking about religion is a huge mistake. especially when everyone can decide/interpret what the words of that said bible means (as they wish). is it not the exact same holybook with the exact same words that they all read but bend its meaning as they wish? so let us not play holy and come here pretending that there is only ONE standard that fits all.