₦airaland Forum

OMO IBO: LMAO
Nateevs, you are one funny guy.

Torres isn't goal barren. He is just useless but I like him.
Anyway, I'm on my phone at the moment so can't type for long.

You have no idea who a useless player is.
If you didn't see that we were much better going forward when Torres came in, then I cannot help.
The problem Torres has is goals of lack of. Just that.

Did you watch what Sturridge did today?
How come I don't see you ranting about the Ramires miss mid week?

OMO IBO: Nateevs, when are you going to admit Torres has bee rubbish??
I'm sure RA didn't pay £50M for Torres to come up with world class volley that results in a crucial goal.

I'm sorry dude. Torres did not price himself for £50m.
If you want £50m performances from him week in week out, then you need to buy a train ticket to Manchester.

I don't expect it so I don't raise my hopes.
What I know is we have a world class striker who can make things happen and has the ability to create something out of nothing.

Torres made two mistakes today. Two slips. After then he was brilliant.
Found Kalou in the far post with a beautifully-weighted cross.
Then a volley to give a goal in the final minute.

Do you know how many mistakes DS made? Kalou? DD?
Is it because Torres had a barren run is why all his mistakes are highlighted?

Please!

StarBoard: Torres must be a huge joke.
Where are his advocates?
Meanwhile,Howard Webb apparently isn't the only ref bought by a club if what is counting as Chelsea's goal is being allowed to stand, but mentally-challenged muppets like lalaboi and Diggs believe refs favour only United.
Even at that it's amazing this your patchy side allowed Wigan back into the game.Maybe another refereeing assist is necessary if you are to pull this off given your 50 million-pound striker can't convince himself to stay on his feet when it's necessary.

Then he comes up with a world class volley that results in a crucial goal.
Some see this cup as half-empty. . . I still see half-full.

afrodoc: see as most chelsea fans dey yab ramires die BUT for important matches d same fans say he MUST TO play

Then you've not been following.

[quote author=dyabman]@Nateevs

Do you really meant what i bold-ed , chelsea is better off without ramirez OMG! i can't believe this!
/quote]

Yes I meant it. You tell me why you can't believe it.

dyabman: ramirez that ramirez this . . thanks for his run to give Merieles the space and time to smash the second goal of the game . . yes he might be wasteful but please at this current chelsea team you need his ass on the pitch to unlock some stubborn defence like Barca's . . watch out for sturridge and ramirez to destroy barca on both legs without them believe me we will be decimated

Hehehe. What do you think Ramires would have done if HE had the ball and Meireles was running into space?
That is what matters . .

How can you even come out and defend Ramires after that miss? I have an Arsenal fan here who is very convinced that Ramires was trying to miss it.
He says that's the only explanation.

Chelsea is better off without Ramires. All pace. . no end product.

What a goal!

I am going to take this as an off day but if show up against Barca playing like this, it will be freaking murder.

Hehehe LWKMD for that Ramires miss.

Absolutely. Mikel has been brilliant since AVB left.

dayokanu: Surely a workman blames his tool. Everyone is too slow for him. Spain is too slow, Hodgson was too slow, Ancelotti is too slow, AVb was too slow,

Yet the same Lampard you campaigned against has been a fixture under Di matteos resurgence

Fixture?

Here we go
We seem to have started slowly.

I think the tactic is to sit back and catch Benfica on the break.
Ramires in place of Danny, I really do not like.

coogar: someone needs to buy dayokanu some artificial intelligence from china.

It will be of no use to him.
The troll will not know how to un-box the phocking life saver.

dayokanu: The joke is on you m0r0n. Dont you notice how you have become the gold standard for stupidity on this thread and everyone looks forward to hearing the next insane statement from you?

The scoreline was 4-2. The 4th goal is just the icing on the cake. The real game winner was the 3rd goal which came at a time when Villa were on the up.

Oh, You can ask your English teacher how the least important mirrors inconsequential

Phucking M0ron! You are using the benefit of hindsight as a tool to forge a perceived meaningful argument.
The 3rd goal won the game because 4hrs after the game . . it did.

At the time Torres scored his goal, the third goal had not won the game and this exactly is what confirm that your brain cells are in your shoes.

Ivanovic scored the 3rd goal in the 83rd minute.
7 mins in football in enough to score 3 goals or fo sake of argument, 1 goal as confirmed by Torres.
Do I need to tell you this.

How phucking then can you come to the conclusion that at 83mins, the game had been won?



The ref gave 4mins of added on time.
Torres scored the 4th goal on 92mins and you made this statement immediately after.

dayokanu: Torres scores an inconsequential goal at last

At the time Torres scored the goal, there was enough time to score another if Torres had missed it. . . 2mins.
How then can you come to a conclusion at the time and still defend now that the Torres goal was inconsequential.


This is not even a point of view, you are just a phucking troll who lives on the internet to feel important. You create and attempt to sustain meaningless arguments.
Do you lack a social life?


-----------------------------------------------------

As to the mirroring of one word or the other.

Inconsequential:

inconsequential - lacking worth or importance;
unimportant - not important;


Which I strongly is very very different from "least important"
But I need to explain this to you don't I??

dayokanu: He scored the least important goal today. An inconsequential one.

Without the goal, the game would still have been won. Scoring a 4th goal in the very last minute means very little in the grand scheme of things

This is where you sound really grand stoopid.
How can you prove that?

Did you already know as well that Villa would score 2 and level scores?


And how the hell are you using 'least important' and 'inconsequential' to describe one single thing?

Back to earth.

dayokanu: Ivanovics goal came at a time when Chelsea was down and Aston Villa was in the ascendancy

Torres scored a good goal but his goal was the least important in todays win

Now you are doing a very good job of arguing with yourself.
I cannot remember anyone arguing that Torres' goal was more important than any other.
The argument is about your silly statement.

dayokanu: Torres scores an inconsequential goal at last

And I think we have proved beyond reasonable doubt that it isn't it.
So which argument are you standing by?

BlueDiva: Let's give FT some credit.
He was able to score a beautiful goal today, i salute him.

Isn't it amazing how there are arguments on here even when he's scored.

dayokanu: Same analogy for the striker who scored in a 10-0 win.

The most important goals today were scored by Ivanovic and Sturridge

Torres goal was a welcome bonus

What are you talking about Dayo?
Do you just like trolling?

Ivanovic scored Chelsea's 3rd at the 83rd minute.Right just after Villa's amazing comeback.
Did you think the fire had been quenched out of them?

Villa could have got it back in the dying minute and Torres' goal proved conclusive for a Chelsea win.
Simple.

10 nil, blah blah, blah, na you know.

dayokanu: What point did you raise?

Even a striker who score the 10th goal in a 10-0 win would claim the same

If Torres missed the chance and in that time Villa scored a goal to equalize, would you have blamed Torres for not securing the win?

If yes, why would you call the goal inconsequential?

dayokanu: Let him keep scoring 4th goals in 4-2 wins

What a waste.

Almost all Chelsea defenders bar Ashley Cole have as many league goals as him

You still have not addressed the point I raised.
The least I expect from you is to man up and stop the crap rather than calling the goal inconsequential.

Interesting. gap down to 5pts behind Arsenal.
Nice win into the Arsenal V City game.

Arsenal back down to earth.
City have drawn and the game has become a must win for them. (City)
Hopefully City wins the game and we win ours to stay 2pts behind them.

That pressure is crucial.
Top four still not out of reach.
Maybe Brendan Rodgers can do his former employers a favour tomorrow.

dayokanu: Opeee ooooooo

Torres scores an inconsequential goal at last

Meanwhile if he failed to score the goal and Villa go on and equalize, you will be back here ranting on about how crucial it would have been for Torres to have scored that.

Gosh! Just get off his back.

Nice one Torres!

dayokanu: This is the type of problems you go through when you keep a sterile striker like Torres on the field

You only see what you are looking for.
To me, these are the problems you see when you have mid-fielders like Ramires and Malouda.
Both have been absolutely awful since they came in. They have barely made a complete pass.

Goal!

Wow! 2-2.

Oouch! How did that happen?

What the hell happened to Manchester City by the way?

Nice one Bran

What's wrong with Luiz?

Torres is a very good player.
He is just going through a phase of low confidence.
Plus all the stories in the papers are alarming. . Fans alike.

Maybe the news of Anzhi's £40m bid is what is on his mind.