anonymous1759:


But when they invaded weaker Nations They was nothing like suffering in your dictionary. Let them go and face their mate. We’re tired of sanctions.

invade which weaker nations? Weren't China and Russia signatory to the UN declaration that Iraq occupation of Kuwait was illegal?

Did they sanction you? If you are tired go and lift it na. Oshodo Mayweather

AlphaWolf27:
Economy VS National Security. LOL.
Do you think Russia gives a rat-ass about sanctions. Watch and see. It didn't work for Pyongyang if you remember.......

yet their so called Supreme leader had to buy a smuggled Mercedes Benz. His own citizens get killed for wanting to go to South Korea or watch South Korea movies. It's none existence in world politics. Just like how thousands risked their lives to escape East Berlin for the west, how many South Korean are eager to move North?

oh! because you come with the usual China and Russia ally scrap, both countries are signatories to the ban and sanctions on the same North Korea but as it is with those two, you can't expect them to ever do a good job

olas24u:



Yandex is cool and their cars are very good but african countries are threatened when they deal with Russia,so you cant find their products ,the phone is nice and good and not fakes

are you using any. I will bet 5k that you are not. Except you will now rush to download yandex browser and other apps

anonymous1759:


Yinmu It’ll start and ends with sanctions. I’ll start respecting your RAMBO lord the day they’ll lnvade North Korea or Iran I don’t want to mention Russia or China self .

invade them why? is it a video game. Does people suffering give you orgasm or are you that mentally challenged?

The funny thing about this is that on a smaller scale, this is how the same set of people were rigorously insinuating that Huawei will be able to mitigate the sanctions it was placed under because China has over 1 billion people, Huawei will look inside and create it's own OS that Chinese people will buy. China is already on the verge of being world power so everybody will buy Huawei to be in China good grace.

Yet today with the same hypothetical 1 billion market in China, Huawei can't even make Top 4.
The very same people aren't buying the Huawei they claimed they will buy instead jumped ship to another brand

Binhamid:


NATO is an allied force, who exactly are they allying against. When Putin asked bill Clinton to join, why was he declined. The whole of body language of NATO is anti Russia and the fact that other countries are not scared by the increasing power of NATO is saddening because NATO countries will sabotage any group of countries trying to replicate the same thing they are doing. To answer your second question, these countries were part of USSR, US is just giving them NATO alliance to make sure they do not go back an ally to Russia but the truth is they are just benchwarmers in NATO, nothing they say will influence NATO's decision.

First you just showed you have you clause about what NATO is really about.
Second, you didn't answer my question. The question was how can small European countries raise and fund a sufficient army to protect it's sovereignty?

NATO since you don't look like one that likes to do research was formed with 2 main objectives, stop the spread of Soviet communism into western Europe as Europe was recovering from WW2 and they feared another war since the Soviet Union was annexing previous German conquered territories instead of liberating them. Second objective was protection of western Europe, the major powers in Europe back then were drained from the war and German per terms of surrender wasn't allowed to have a standing army, that's one of the reasons America and Canada were made to be allies in NATO to deter the Soviets from attacking western Europe.

With the fall of the SU, the first objective became redundant, if you care to read which I assume you don't, disbandment of NATO was proposed as at that time but the cost of individual state raising and funding it's own army and also the fear of one state attacking another all over again quash that idea. Instead the Presidential Pardon Program was put in place to form alliance in terms of economic growth and development with former Soviet states.
The first 3 former Soviets state to join NATO was vehemently opposed by the US. The Poland leader as at that time in a meeting in Praque told Clinton that no matter how he opposed it, they will eventually join NATO and that's how the US stand changed drastically to not object to former Soviet joining.

Most importantly, the US don't grant membership, they don't give out membership to NATO. countries that want to join make a formal request to the organisation, if you pass the preliminary requirements , the member state of NATO votes to either accept or reject. It's so frustrating that something so simple is what you guys don't understand.

Russia asking to join NATO is them looking for trouble nothing else. Will Russia ditch her military equipments to start integrating NATO standards and other weapons? The answer is very likely NO. so what do they want with an alliance that doesn't want anything from them?

I asked you what NATO is fighting Russia for, you haven't answered but you claimed the alliance is anti Russian. is present day Russia communist state? No, so what are you even saying.


All I can leave you with is educate yourself more so you don't be typing baseless agenda on a public forum

AstraDroid:


You are being biased on a factor of 10 as you think that the basis of World Leadership is helping parasitic blocs or deepening philanthropy.

There were world powers that enslaved and still enslave others. There were world powers who show benevolence and there will be world powers who will not give a shiiiit.

Philanthropy isnt a criteria to being world power, even when Africa was world power during the reign of Egypt, we conquered Israel and enslaved the Israelis, read your Bible book of histories. So why would you make philanthropy to Africans a criteria when Africans actually enslaved others during our own leadership?

You are myopically biased in your assertion.

then I can categorically state that your need for a multipolar whatever is out if hatred for America and I wouldn't be far from the truth.

That others did something bad doesn't mean such should be repeated in the future. See why I said Africans love to suffer and smile.

Like the say with great power come great responsibility so if they aren't ready to be responsible why should the accorded the power that comes with that??

seunmsg:
Sanctions alone are not enough to deter Putin. European and US leaders must put a military response on the table if they really intend to stop putting. Confiscating the assets of few Russian Oligarchs won’t put any serious fear into Putin or scare him enough to withdraw his 200k troops from Donetsk and Luhansk.

they can't confront Russia over Ukraine militarily. All the can do is what they are doing now.

nijanigga:
Big mistake for Ukraine to give up its nuclear arsenals from third largest nuclear power to 0 and relying on US,EU and UK to bark at putin

have you ever take time to read and understand the agreement that was signed or you just heard someone said it and it sounded nice and you start to spread the same falsehood without checking

Binhamid:
This war is stupid and based on US and Europe's greediness. Why can't just say NO to Ukraine from joining NATO. NATO is anti-russia and China. It will be foolish if Russia allows them to set up a base so close to their country. Russia is fighting for self preservation but the western media is painting another picture.

So China has joined now. it's not only Russia again.

wait, let's leave media speculation and all that, to you what is Russia fighting with NATO for? Soviet Union is gone, communism is gone in Europe, so how is NATO anti-Russian?
Second question, if NATO whose new objective is the security of Europe and defending human rights is disbanded right now, how rich and populated is the likes of Estonia, Latvia, Czech and other non-super power European countries to raise an Army to protect their sovereignty?

AstraDroid:


She does not know the full scope of the mRNA programs and has been programmed into marketing drugs for |Big Pharma. |Technically, Biden is reactionary, and that is not great for America Company.

It is best for a leader to know that the world has a roadmap and there are stages of evolution of the processes leading to the completion of the agenda as designed. China and Russia leaders know the roadmap and have 100 yrs goal as to re-uniting the old bloc that United States Company had destroyed during the last wars.

Russia's goal under Putin is to restore the Soviet Union, China's Goal under Xi is to bring together all of the Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, Mongolians etc under the leadership of Xi.

America and NATO wants otherwise, and it is naturally difficult to separate a people connected by DNA.

United States is a great place, and a great country, but no world power will be there forever, there was a time for Egypt, Rome, United Kingdom and now United States, and they can tarry as long as they want. There will new world power, but it will be multipolar.

I love the United States. But it is time to understand that you cant be King for ever.

wow! so people didn't die of COVID in China and Russia abi.
China knows the road map yet there's a recent spike of COVID cases in Hong Kong.

For all the multi-polar world you guys so desperately want, can you mention just two countries that have received financial aid from the so called China? not loans, aids meaning not to pay back.
Not need to even talk of Russia on that one.

when they don't carry Africans along on the world stage, you guys play race card not knowing those guys understand you people prefer to suffer and smile than actually doing something.
it's the one that make you suffer that you guys praise the most

chronique:


You lots don't even understand the dynamics of the EU market where Russia supplies the whole of Europe over 40% of basic energy needs that they can't possibly get elsewhere. Tell me how the US wants to supply gas to the whole of Europe and at what cost? Are they going to construct new delivery channels? You guys just sit on Nairaland and type away without even knowing the dynamics of the things you say.

guy you're very smart. The very people that import and use these energies didn't take that into consideration abi.
like they are waiting for you to tell them and you're accusing others of saying what they don't know.

hysterical

aribisala0:


Even God does not have that kind of power


It is illusory



Russia has effectively been under sanctions for decades and is already inured to them

Can the US stop Russia selling oil and gas? NO

The main things Russia sells are Energy and weapons and Russia has been moving away from dollars to the Euro for years
Also Russia has a very large land mass , plenty of Natural resources and is very self sufficient making most of what it needs.
The EU does not have the same appetite for conflict that The US and UK have . The reality is just like Putin grabbed Crimea he will grab Ukraine and Nothing the West can do about it

at least try to be informed before making dumb comments that others will read.

that's the least you can do

juman:
America should go and sit down.

Those european countries are doing follow follow america.
Many of them if they treated the issue well from the beginning according to their opinions and interest, things would not have been in this way.

European countries need russia.
The whole gas use in germany supply by russia.
What of austria, italy etc.

Russia is big market for european countries products.
ETC.

America is the problem in this case not russia.

the country violating another country's sovereign thus breaching the very same agreement it was party isn't at fault right.

Ask yourself if you're okay like this

tamdun:

Russia annex cremea and nothing happened,US just used Ukraine as a pawn

I wonder how you guys use smart phone but make ignorant comment on a public forum.

Why was Russia kicked out of the G8?
Why was sanctions placed on their defense industry?

nothing happened. You have Internet but you can't make use of it

Krismas:
Ignorance! Why then are not the former members of the Soviet Union performing any sort of space activity today? Which among them have anything space, going? So it was Russia who went to space and crashed the first missile on the moon, in an era when rocket science was in infancy, Russia was ahead, copied nobody and was first to calculate d escape velocity required to lurch out of the earth’s gravity and adjusted for it. It’s a big deal. It’s ingenious.
The lies of the Americans were exposed wen other nations like China, India, Israel, Iran etc started sending robotic missions to the moon themselves. It is a fact that Armstrong’s flag is completely missing on the moon. American flags on the moon are 5, representing the other five robotic missions they sent there. The human mission has no single proof. Those proof you are presenting are completely comedy.
Rocket science is pretty understood now-a-days, most moon nations can build a rocket to carry a man to d moon. But why are they not doing it?
The simple truth is that btw the earth and the moon is a layer of scorching heat no human can survive. It’s ok to fly a tin can thru it, no one has figured a way to fly a human without getting such one cooked and roasted wen they fly into that zone. How did the Americans fly Armstrong thru the heat zone? They only have film trick pictures to show. They have no answer to dat. Armstrong on the moon is a blatant LIE

you write such a long epistle for someone who is ignorant of that aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union.

You should look it up, it will answer a lot of your ignorant questions.

talk about heat between the earth and moon. This is so dumb I can't even begin to imagine that there's a human being with such a minute thinking faculty to reason such.

Callisto1:
Only few minds will understand this post. Any element which is not in the period table is alien, most likely a fragment of meterites burnt up in the Earth's atmosphere thousands of years ago

the periodic table is not finite... more discovery will lead to more elements add. I think about 5 or so have been added in the last century

maybe they just haven't discovered the element 'x' or the correct method to test for it.

Oyiboman69:
your argument is far from reality....
Let me elucidate it more so you can get it.

Most African country like Nigeria believe that when when England is engaged in a battle,we're always in it support England due to the fact that they are our colonial master, due to the negative effect of the neocolonialism and that was why I said due to political affiliation and if there is no such thing,the effect of any war or whatever weapon they used will have no effect in our soil. Africa is in a weak state that was why you're here shivering over a war far away distant shore. don't quote me again if you can't read through my words and throwing tantrums....

Nigeria doesn't believe that when England is engaged in a battle, we support them. You're not Nigeria.
Since 1960, do you know how many Battles England has engaged in, how many did Nigeria join?

You talk about what you don't know instead of educating yourself, you double down on your ignorance.
If you don't, research, read and understand. The other guy was busy informing of nuclear fall out and you ignored it just to continue what you just typed up there.
Depending the megaton, a nuclear bomb dropped in Italy with a strong wind will carry that radiation to North Africa, North Africa don't need to do anything just stay in their country and go about their business but they will still be affected.
Just like we feel harmattan all the way from Sahara dessert, that radiation will blow all the way to Nigeria. we don't need to support anybody to feel the effect.

so my advice to you is educate yourself first, then try to listen. that people correct you online isn't a crime. it won't diminish your self value except you have low self esteem. it's a faceless forum jeez!

How's that for education

darediamond:


Have you finished talking?

If you have, go quietly read about History OF Space Exploration you via that discover What Russians are Made Of.

IT was recently that USA people partly stop depending on Russia for the development and lunching of there space exploration.

The official language in that regard still remains Russian. Hope you know what that implies?

how is the official language Russian? una dey sabi type rubbish eh. I'm certain you haven't watch any documentary out of the numerous out there of the space station.

Talking of launch platform, after the Apollo mission, NASA funds were reduced making it difficult economically to build a new launch platform from scratch. Russian space program, the highest they do is send probe to Mars atmosphere and then humans to the space station. Compare that to NASA that has send like 6 missions to Mars, Voyage 1 is the first man made object outside our galaxy and it's still sending back signals. The closest man made object to the sun is still operate by NASA. Venus, Jupiter, Neptune. And so many other space program.
It's just logical to use Russian platform to go to the space station.
It's similar to how the iPhone display is built by Samsung. The cost of building a whole new factory, employing people, figuring out the supply and manufacturing chain and that doesn't even include R& far outweighs any iPhone vs Samsung BS in terms of business economy. It's just logical to go buy off the shelves.

Oyiboman69:
and you're blind not to notice where I vividly talk about 'political affiliation'

your own case is even worse than first imagined. Your 'political affiliation' was about nuclear bomb not crossing the Mediterranean.
While as per your comment you said an acclaimed professor once said when Europe tribes have conflict, it is termed world war which is what I was referring to.

How can you not understand even your own comment?

PotatoSalad:

Lmao, you might have a point there.
Cos if they did send humans to the moon, I wonder why the Artemis program is taking so long. The way they're preparing for it makes it feel like it's a maiden voyage lmao.

Read and understand. Why do you think no other country has attempted it ever since. The Artemis is different from the Apollo because it is meant to have a landing station in space instead of a direct flight to the moon which was overtly expensive and dangerous.

All these are public knowledge but you guys will refuse to read but are quick to laugh ignorantly

goodheart01:


I know u would appear here Mr.Krismas with your warped analysis. No one is disputing the fact Russia first send an unnamed space rocket to the moon, so read my comments carefully

On the other hand, may I ask u Mr. Russian expert what proof do u have to say the Lunar landings were a hoax?? These are the lies the USSR brought up during the Cold War and as a Russian wannabe u swallowed hook nail and sinker.

How come the Chinese lunar aircraft caught sight of a worn out US flag on the moon after their own lunar exploration. If u must know these are proofs the US landed on the moon it just once but severally.

1) seismometers, mirrors, and even vehicles from the SEVERAL Apollo expeditions were left behind on the moon and other countries who have sent space robots can still see these things abandoned there

2) Lunar rocks, dirt, and literal pieces of the Moon were brought back and kept at the smithsonean university museum for astral geological studies. And those lunar rocks have been certified not to be of this earth by foreign and indigenous experts.

3) Lunar footprints of the astronauts are still there till date because they can’t be eroded due to the absence of an atmosphere on the moon. This is simple science I believe u should understand it. And these footprints have been covered by unmanned lunar vehicles sent to the moon recently

I’ll stop here for now. So go back and do a research and stop letting your little Russian wannabe syndrome hinder your sense of versatility.

it's not Russia that first went up to space. It's the USSR. Attributing that to Russia is just disrespectful to other Soviet states as at that time

Krismas:
Russia not only got to space first, they were the first country in this world to send an unmanned rocket to the moon. America landing on the moon is a hoax. Its just film trick cos no nation has figured out how to land man on the moon till dis day

it's a hoax yet no country has disproved it. Russia isn't the first country to go to space neither are they the first to send unmanned rocket to the moon.
Claiming USSR achievement just for Russia is disrespectful to all the Soviet states that made up the USSR.

Krismas:
U and prof malu are wrong. WW2 was fought in Europe Asia America Africa. Its was cross continental war. So it is world war. The bomb above is 50megaton. Packed in a container not longer than 30ft by 7ft. Wen detonated it was extremely destructive for more than 30miles radius, deadly at more than 60 miles radius and harmful at 100 mile radius. Do u know wot this means? A little container can cause so much damage! These people have amassed millions of such containers! To start at one point and go round the earth coming to the same spot is some 24,901mile distance. So about 5,000 of that container will burn up the WHOLE earth. And Russia alone has 62,550 Nuclear warheads. Simply put about 13,000 megaton blast will burn up the earth and Russia currently possesses the nuclear capability of about 94,000 megaton

na so from 6,000 plus, your own dn reach 62,000. Tomorrow now you will argue tooth and nail that it's 62,000

Dalil8:


Tsar Bomba is a soviet bomb.

The U.S did the same gragra and threatened to use nuclear weapons when nuclear armed missiles were installed in Cuba in 1962.

funny how you think that threat was gra gra. Maybe you should read more. There was a naval blockade on Cuba such that The Soviets couldn't help them. The invasion was real and could have happened and the US was ready to go nuclear with the Soviet Union.

why do you think the conceded to America's demand.

PROPEACE:

You guys don't get that nuclear weapons thing. Even if north Korea releases a little bomb, the havoc will be severe and replying them will even be more catastrophic. There will be no winner in that kind of warfare. Imagine Russia saying it has a weapon that can reduce London to rubbles. If they fire such at London, how then do you defeat them? By sending another one that will level the Kremlin? Imagine the loss of lives. No one will win a nuclear war. The countries with those weapons know it and that is why none of them has the guts to release it on anyone. Not even north Korea or Iran in their craziness are bold enough to do that now.

There are rules of engagement in every war as per Geneva convention. You don't use nukes on civilian population.

Oyiboman69:
you people talking as if the world is just a one room apartment that you can just destroy just like that. If not for political affiliations, all their nuclear bomb effect will not even cross the Mediterranean. the size of the world alone is beyond human imagination not to talk of ending it. Like professor mulumba will always says that...when the European tribes engaged in a tribal conflict, they call it world war. I guess that's why you're relating to the world as small,and I cannot also ignore the effect of what you watched in foreign movie cos they always use that line...when this happens,'it will be the end of the world.'

Your Professor needs to denounce his professorship. WW2 was fought in America, Europe, Asia ans Africa. if that's not the whole world I wonder what is.

In4matic:


You are also part of the reason why we are this backward. Believing we have to borrow to survive...

Let me ask you Chyjoey,
Why do we need to borrow to build a building, or two buildings or a 1000 units of buildings or roads or drainages?
What aspect of these things can't be built by Nigerians using Nigerian material

Do you guys read the news? How many successive government in Nigeria haven't done a housing scheme. All they do is take a vast area of land and build bungalows while inflating the cost.

Do you think a dictator from these same crop of people will magically start building 10 storeys instead of bungalow?

anonymous1759:



I know your likes will to result to VISA .
typical stomach infrastructure rather than intellectual. I don’t want to go to neither of those countries to live. Nigeria is OK I can’t live as a second citizen anywhere in the world all I pray Is to be successful in my country.
I would like to visit every country in the world for pleasure.

Whatever will promote peace, progress and stability is welcome either democracy or Autocratic system of Government.
Libya was more successful in Autocratic system of government to democracy, China etc

What I’m saying is that the west should not impose their style of Government to everyone and label anyone who’s not their ally as the aggressor.
I don’t want to live in a society where I can’t spank my animals ,kids Etc. a society where as a man I’m ranked 5th in other importance.
1 women
2 children
3 elderly
4 Animals
5 Men.
That’s their Agenda to make the world revolve around Women . Telling me polygamy is bad And fuckinng my fellow man Ass is good.

The west make you believe Africa is a third world country but their companies are all over Africa. They don’t support our life style but they’re here to exploit . Stop bullying people with visa shit because they’ve a different view from West.

so you only do what people tell you to do. interesting.

Nobody anywhere has told you to have gay sex. if you decide to do that, that's on you.

Learn to be responsible for your own action man.

Juventus4life:


These countries you mentioned have never committed any war crimes neither do they invaded any country.
Unlike ur America whose specialized in causing hovoc and destruction on planet. America are the first and the last country to use atomic bomb (nuclear) on human beings.

China backing Myanmar soldiers to kill their own people is not war crimes abi.
Go figure

Onyiiobi7735:

Lol! Both of you sound pathetic.America that is always paranoid, feeling threatened by China and Russia.
Thank God for these Eastern Powers that were raised to check America's influence and spread of LGBTQ approval.

does that mean there are no LGBTQ people in China or Russia? Even here in Nigeria, those people are there so what are you on about? Not all US allies have approved gay rights.
Thinking that not approving gay rights is standing up to America is just dumb reasoning

In a rush to sound intelligent you end up saying trash.