Nferyn's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Nferyn's Profile › Nferyn's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 (of 96 pages)
It's all manner of speach. Different cultures have different habits. There is no judgement here, but you need to have the perspective to acknowledge and appreciate the differences. And yes, it is stereotyping, I clearly pointed out that this was exaggerated - satire people ![]() |
I'm thinking about my wife |
holyghost:It is very unlikely they will produce human clones any time soon for several reasons, both medical, ethical and technological. Anyway, let's just assume human clones are already produced. Under that condition, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to treat these clones any different from other human beings. They are unique individuals with all the characteristics humans have - no difference. The only reason I could imagine is a general yuck-factor, an emotional, instinctual response to something that the cloned individual has no part, nor fault in. This would be pure discrimination on par with the ungliest forms of ignorant knee-jerk racism. |
holyghost:I honestly don't know what you mean with this? There is no sexual reproduction involved in cloning, neither hetero nor home holyghost:I don't think this has ever been done before - as there is absolutely no reason to do so - but it should be possible to extract one of the two parts of the split fertislised egg cell just after they are split. The only problem would be to detect at this early stage whether or not we're talking about twins. Anyway, it's not really relevant as I can see absolutely no reason to do so; |
I'm done thinking for a while, I think |
The one above, I mean |
I was just writing this reply ![]() |
Here I am ![]() Just to add some spice to Vexxy's post Some quotes by Henri Poincaré (famous mathematician and father of the chaos theory): La pensée ne doit jamais se soumettre, ni à un dogme, ni à un parti, ni à une passion, ni à un intérêt, ni à une idée préconçue, ni à quoi que ce soit, si ce n'est aux faits eux-mêmes, parce que, pour elle, se soumettre, ce serait cesser d'être translation (not as beautiful as the orginal french text): Thinking must never submit itself, neither to a dogma, nor to a party, nor to a passion, nor to an interest, nor to a preconceived idea, nor to whatever it may be, if not to facts themselves, because, for it, to submit would be to cease to be and To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is everything Science is built up of facts, as a house is built of stones; but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. The scientist does not study nature because it is useful, he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, and if nature were not worth knowing, life would not be worth living. |
tamia:To populate the earth with their kind. they usually only have sex when fertile. Women are the only ones that have hidden ovulation, tricking the men into sex (not that they mind ) |
FOD:No. Bonobo's (pygmee chimps) have sex for pleasure as well See: http://biosci.umn.edu/~pregal/bonobo.html |
holyghost:1. Clones can have different personalities as well, they are exactly the same as indentical twins in that regard 2. True, but what differnce does that make? 3. It is theoretically possible to do that with identical twins as well |
kelvin:Exactly. A clone is still a human though |
@ lioness If you feel that a successfull marriage between a Christian and and atheist does not support the thesis that marriages between catholics and Pentecostals can be successful, please say so. It would hurt me that people that really love each other would be turned away from each other, just because of some doctrinal differences between their two Christian faiths. The joke I posted before is till very much on topic: A man is walking across a bridge, when he sees another guy about to jump off. "Hey, man" he says, "you don't have to do that." "Why not?" the other guy says, "I've got nothing to live for. I lost my job, I'm bankrupt, my wife left me and took the kids, my car threw a rod, and my dog just died. My life totally sucks." "But God still loves you," the man says, "you believe in God, don't you?" "Well, I guess so," the guy says. "Tell me, are you a Christian?" "Yes" the guy answers. "Well, so am I!" the man says. "Catholic or Protestant?" "I'm Protestant" "Well, so am I!" "Methodist, or Baptist, or Presbyterian?" "I'm Baptist." Well, so am I!" "Northern or Southern Baptist?" "Northern Baptist." "Well so am I!" "Northern fundamentalist, liberal, or reformed?" "Northern fundamentalist." "Well, so am I!" "Northern fundamentalist eastern region, or Great Lakes region?" "Northern fundamentalist, eastern region." "Well, so am I!" "Northern fundamentalist, eastern region conference of 1898, or conference of 1912?" "Northern fundamentalist, eastern region, conference of 1912." "Die, heretic!" the man says, and pushes him off the bridge. Turning it into me having issues with my marriage is dishonest. I only used it as an example to explain that the issue at hand, shouldn't prevent two people that love each other dearly from marrying. That's my point |
Sorry for being the obnoxious male and wanting to have the last word, but the issue wasn't entirely closed to me. lioness:Now I know that There's no pattern to a successful marriage actually equals I guess you just explain your kind of marriage. I just noticed a negative tone to I guess you just explain your kind of marriage, but is was unwarranted |
lioness:Actually I am - sorry for that. I honestly don't understand what you mean with "I guess you just explain your kind of marriage." lioness:Sorry here Again, forgive me my choice of words, as English is not my mother tongue, I sometimes use words I've picked up, without knowing whether or not they're widely used. I mean nothing should be preventing the success of the mariage. And I was just trying to follow up on the logic. Apparently without success |
Eddy Tells:Our marriage is the proof it does. And that's the most weird logic I've ever seen. Care to explain? |
Eddy Tells:Yeah, if arguments fail you... appeal to emotion ![]() |
lioness:What's that supposed to mean? lioness:No, but I can attest to the fact that there is no impediment to succes. And its slightly arrogant (for a lack of better words, I don't mean anything so harsh) to imply that I cannot have any insight in christianity because I'm no christian. Shouldn't one study lions in the wild because you're not a lion yourself. Don't you have anythin meaningful to say becasue your a non-lion. Maybe it even gives you more insight because you have a little more distance lioness:Now that's funny. Do you mean that marriages between atheists and christians have more chance of succeeding than those between christians of different denominations? |
donnie:What do you mean? Only Christians can discuss their beliefs? No criticism is allowed because the Bible cannot be proven to be history? Contradictions should be overlooked because they come from non believers? What kind of attitude is that? Leave me with my precious beliefs because they are too fragile to stand questioning? If that is the case, than your stance is intellectual laziness of the highest order. |
lioness:No, but I'm married to a strong christian. And I can speak from personal experience that a loving marriage between even a christian and an atheist is possible, so why wouldn't it be possible between two christians from different denominations? All it takes is respect and putting your priorities right. And about understanding where I come from... do you? Can you explain? |
Lots of talk, no pictures ![]() |
[quote author=hot-angel link=topic=2341.msg73504#msg73504 date=1129523635]What will happen if i say I AM AGAINST THIS? Because there can not be Peace everywhere. There must be some violence!!!!!! That's Life.. and we have to live with it.[/quote]BULL... it's exactly this kind of attitude that perpetuates the violence. A few short lines from Martin Niemuller the during the Nazi regime: First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out-- because I was not a communist; Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out-- because I was not a socialist; Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out-- because I was not a trade unionist; Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- because I was not a Jew; Then they came for me-- and there was no one left to speak out for me. |
I cannot agree with you more, Seun. This kind of behaviour is absolutely unacceptable, no mather what the context. From the specific case you mentioned and the 'similar annoyance', it seems to me that these people accept and condone extremely unequal and unbalanced gender relations. How on earth can an 22 year old boy have the audacity and nerve to even think that he has the right to punish his sister? How is it even remotely possible that someone defends female genital mutilation? What kind of sick and puny minds can think that rape and beating is acceptable? In all of these cases, we're talking about males (I certainly wouldn't call them men, weak immature boys is closer to the truth) that are abusing their physical and societal power to subjugate the women. I have noticed in my dealings with Nigerian men - and with this I do not mean to extrapollate to all Nigerian men - that a considerable amount of them assume that they have more rights than their wives or sisters. I would applaud all Nigerian men that took an explicit feminist stance, just to counterbalance those that think they're the chosen ones |
Of course she shouldn't be allowed to do that. The baby can get infected through breastfeeding. If the woman is even considering this, then she isn't capable of raising the child in the first place. |
holyghost:If I weren't married already, why not? It's not like they're from out of space, they're humans, just like us. Even identical twins (and that's what clones are, except for the possible age difference) show different personalities The question is, should we allow human cloning? And there I'd rather have they don't start something like that. There are too many unpleasant ethical consequences |
Greatpeter:Hi GP, All of that is true, but there still are different scales of violence. I try to tell her that even in war zones only a small percentage of the population is affected. She fears that they will target here more because she's from abroud and you know... people from abroud are all loaded in money, why not let them share some with the boys with guns, he ![]() |
WesleyanA:Yes , she is. The thing is that she heard from friends that there is an especially violent gang on the loose now that uses machine guns. They were making comparisons to a situation of terror more than a decade ago - can't remember the exact date now. Luckily here in Belgium you don't need to take precautions at all, it's one of the safest countries around. There are some neighbourhoods in Brussels, with a lot of Arab pickpockets, but that's about it. They won't shove a gun in your face, the worst thing that could happen to you is being beaten up. |
[quote author=hot-angel link=topic=1989.msg72568#msg72568 date=1129442298]Hmmm..[/quote]Looks like I took over your job by accident, but don't worry, I did it for free and you can take all the credit. Just cast my gospel aside and don't include it in the Coconut Gospel. I feel right at home next to the outcast Thomas ![]() |
Uchechukwu:I agree, but that's not the only thing it is. Historically, religion has been used/ [list] [li]As a sort of folk science, explaining the world (e.g. see book of Genesis)[/li] [li]As a vehicle for social cohesion - a positive aspect of religion[/li] [li]As a vehicle of political power (e.g. the Catholic Church, even today)[/li] [li]as an instituation for oppression (e.g. the Inquisition, the withc hunts, the Magdalena Laundries, ...[/li] [li]As a justification for war and conquest (e.g. the Crusades, the 80year war, the Spanish Fury)[/li] [li]As a justification for slavery[/li] [li]and many many more[/li] [/list] All great monothesitic organised religions have blood on their hands - or more precisely, their very foundations are soaked in blood. I feel more for the applied pacifism of Budhism and for the pantheistical religions. Although intellectually I can not bring myself to believe in a higher being, it would make life a whole lot easier |
WesleyanA:Well, she is quite affraid. Apparently there are some armed robbers on the loose in Benin City ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 (of 96 pages)



)



. . and yeah there are armed robbers almost everywhere in nigeria. esp. in lagos. just advice her to be very careful and take extra security precautions than she's used to in Belgium.