₦airaland Forum

bykebyke:
Messi was tagged a crime lord even before his trial started,Now Cristina has suddenly become an Irish citizen to dodge paying taxes yet nothing is being said.

Yes,you were doing your taxes at age 10.

Cristiano Ronaldo has no definite ties to any Irish company. He is not listed as an owner or beneficiary of any Irish organisation. Unlike Messi who has had to give 52% of his income to the Government, Ronaldo was a long term beneficiary of the Beckham Tax laws allowing him to pay only 25% of his earnings in tax.

Messi being a greedy jealous tax evading leprechaun quickly enlisted a crooked financial advisor to help him skim the takings. This advisor was eventually convicted of tax fraud in Argentina. Messi hired another set of criminals to cook his books, but he didn't reckon with the long arm of the law. Justice caught up with him in the end.

Your hero is a convicted felon. When next you see him cruising through the streets of Barcelona on his kiddie tricycle, blasting Akon, better check your pockets. Messi can dribble his way into your finances and you wouldn't even know it.

bykebyke:
^Marca have said nothing about this.



But they were the first to tag Messi a criminal here.

Messi is a convicted Felon. He was not 'tagged' a criminal - He IS a criminal. Cristiano Ronaldo however, is not.

Even 10 year olds know how tax work. Midgets are not exempted from taxation

Start Vaping. That's what I did. I know I can never quit nicotine, but at least I can reduce the amount and the carbon footprint on my lungs.

Smoking and drinking does not make you irresponsible though.

A40 bro please don't involve me in your attack on Ibime.

This is between you both.

My hand no dey. One love.

p.s I just dey very busy now, I still dey come for you on this Gerrard matter.

This show is amazing

bykebyke:
Respect yourself.

You should aim that AK at Raumdeuter's Apari Chrome Dome for the steady stream of unrefined crap he's been throwing up like confetti

diggz:
Dutch team says hi........

Hope you remember Spain before they started dominating too?

Don't mind the old man.

Imagine the old man saying league titles don't count- just UCL and World Cup performances yet he won't agree that Götze is better than Messi

Lowkey shots fired

raumdeuter:
World cup, CL is where players distinguish themselves not local tournaments like the ones Hidden Ikedia and John Terry excel in.

Genk is also winning the Belgian league, Its the CL and world cup that separates pretenders from the big boys

I see

So basically league titles don't count. Only Worldcup and UCL right?

raumdeuter:
WHen I first saw that you have cornered me I feared small but when I come see this useless thing you post I come convince say na Kuwait do you strong thing
Who cares about local league titles? WHen we are showing CL titles. When Mikel becomes MOTM at a CL final like Gerrard let us know

Gerrard did his own performance in the fuckinn CL final you dey tell us about who won EPL. EPL ko OPC ni

Can you please expatiate a little bit more on this statement?

I don't understand

raumdeuter:
Gerrard is a key player for Liverpool in the CL winning moment and the time they made the CL final

Mikel was a benchwarmer all through

We have established that Mikel was not a benchwarmer and played roughly the same amount of minutes Gerrard did during their UCL winning runs.

Mikel was also one of the best players on the pitch according to whosvored.

Yet Mikel has 2 EPL titles. Gerrard has 0

Why is Mikel not better than Gerrard?

Ibime:
You ain't saying nothing except about getting the balance of the team right which England failed to do in the last 15 years.

What did Galacticos of Madrid win after selling Makalele except getting disgraced and thumped all over Europe including 5-0 to Liverpool. That says nothing about the individual quality of each galactico. Its how you put the team together that counts.

Schweinsteiger is a failed attacking midfielder who was saved from years of mediocrity by LVG turning him into DM where he became World Class. If he ever comes across a successful AM like Lampard or Ballack, he should rankadede. Shoe get size.

Ibime please no allow Dayo use your corner run.

I don corner the old man.

raumdeuter:
My measurement is based on performance in big moments

Gerrard Istanbul beats anything Mikel or Terry has ever done

So Gerrard is better than Mikel because of Instanbul yes?

raumdeuter:
Mikel and Gerrard 2 players who won CL on the field, One was MOTM, One was 5th best. All still better than John Terry who was neither on the field nor even 24th best



If my Grandmother had peniss she would have been my grandfather like its not this same ENgland who crashed out to Iceland a country with about 40,000 men of football age. Like the population of Palmgrove bus stop




Gerrard already had his glory in Istanbul, at the biggest stage Terry slipped at his own biggest stage. even the camera was surprised



In a competition for losers, Terry was unsurprisingly the Man of the Match. is there a bigger loser around?

Mikel vs Gerrard who is better. Simple Question.

Based on trophies it's Mikel right?

raumdeuter:
This is what those Abule egba kpoli dey do you, You no dey see well and you no fat I for say na fat block your eyes. One guy dey manure thread wey be weedt@ker he fit hook you up

Mikel isnt a particularly injury prone player and on the fitness level, He is less injured than most players, It might be because he rarely plays too

Why did Mikel miss 2010 world cup simple question?

raumdeuter:
It was Gerrard backpass that cost his team the league by losing 30points to that Henry back pass

How many lies you wan tell sef?

I clearly meant 2006.

Gerrard did it so many times I lost track of the dates.

Liverpool were 3rd level on points with Manyoo in 2nd. Arsenal were struggling to crack top 4.

raumdeuter:
When he isnt good enough to make matchday squad nko? Mikel hasnt made matchday squad this season So we can assume he is injured or dead?

Injuries, these are the Mikel injuries in the last 6yrs. Mikel has missed less than 20 games injured so find another Lie

You are my esteemed Egbon whom I respect so much, so I won't jab you.

Are you saying that Mikel had his first ever injury at Chelsea in December 2010?

SHey if you met someone on the street that claims Mikel played 4 years of EPL, European and International football without injury, you wouldn't slap them ni?

Oya look at the earliest date on that picture you posted. Now can you please tell me why Mikel missed 2010 world cup? Was it due to visa problems

raumdeuter:
- Gerrard is not the best player in the world but he has performed in the CL final which Terry cannot point to. I am sure he would take that glorious night in Istabul over any league title

We are talking about Mikel vs Gerrard

- England was knocked out by Portugal in Euro 2004, I didnt know Henry now plays for Portugal. As you see you are gradually aproaching lies territory

If England had drawn rather than lost that match, they would have avoided facing the golden generation of portuguese and may have had a better chance of going further vs Greece. Gerrard instead chose to snatch defeat from the jaws of a certain draw, by kickstarting a chain of events saw them play and lose to Portugal on pens.

- Liverpool finished 30 points behind the league winners, So it was Gerrard who cost them 3 points they now multiplied it by a ratio of 10 to cost Liverpool the league. We are now firmly in lying territory. Kontinu

Do you watch the back of your tv? Liverpool were top of the table and needed just two wins to seal the title. Then Gerrard came up with his charactersistic slip up to throw it all away. Demba Ba was so used to Gerrard's slipups he was expecting a fuckup. Hear him: I was waiting for a mistake, it wasn't a surprise. .

- Carling cup? A competition for losers? Those are John Terry type competitions, I wont be surprised if Terry was the MOTM in that Carling cup final. Just checked Terry was MOTM

Actually I agree with you. Carling Cup is for losers. That's why Mikel has only 2 Carling Cups while Gerrard has 3. Yet Mikel has 4 FA Cups, Gerrard has 2. Mikel has 2 EPL titles, Gerrard has 0.

Surely Mikel is better than Gerrard?

raumdeuter:
Mikel was born in 1987 so he is still under 30. He has played 10 seasons in EPL meaning eligible for 38 games per season meaning 380 games over 10 yrs.

What that means is Mikel has been eligible for 380games for 10 yrs Plus 13 games this season totalling 393 games * 90mins of football = 35370mins

Lets even assume he missed 20 games due to Nations cup matches Making Mikel eligible for 373 games

373*90 = 33570mins

Mikel has actually played 16,217 mins for Chelsea which is less than 50% of games

With these stats it will be daft not to see that Mikel was a benchwarmer and a tag along. The only difference with him and Terry was Mikel was actually on the field in Chelsea greatest moments while Terry was in the stands

This is just a foolish calculation.

How can Mikel be eligible for all 380 games that season when he suffered numerous injuries between that period?

By the time you factor in injuries and AFCON, any sensible person would have realised that Mikel cannot be realistically expected to play 38 games a season.

Only Lampard, Ivanovic, Terry and I think Cech have achieved that at Chelsea so leave the professor peller act at the door.

The way to calculate it, is to divide Mikels total number of starts by the total number of times he made the matchday squad.

Over the course of the last 10 seasons, Mikel made the match day squad 290 times. Which means that he has only missed the squad 9 times a season(Including Injuries and AFCON). And out of those 290 times, he started 183 games which is 63%

This period includes his debut season when he was trying to establish himself, and last 2 seasons where he has lost his starting place. Despite this, he still started a whopping 63% of all the games he was available for. That's roughly on par with most of Chelsea's central midfielders outside Lampard during the same period

raumdeuter:
2008 CHelsea lost a CL final Mikel played 209 minutes
2012 Chelsea won the CL Mikel played 725 mins

2007 Liverpool lost a CL final Gerrard played 978 mins
2005 Liverpool won the CL Gerrard played 780mins and won Man of the match

These were the greatest moments of both clubs in the CL and we saw the differential in minutes

Gerrard also gave the through pass to Demba Ba that cost his team the league in 2014

Gerrard gave Henry the through pass that knocked England out of Euro 2004

Gerrard gave Henry the through pass that cost his team the league in 2004

Gerrard gave Drogba the through pass that won us the league in 2010

Gerrard scored an own goal in carling cup final to give us the trophy in 2005.

Mikel better than Gerrard yay or nay?

Also Gerrard only played 25 more minutes that Mikel in their UCL winning title campaigns


Also Mikel was the 5th best player out of 24 players that played that day so he clearly beasted the final. See whoscored chart

Mikel is surely better than Gerrard.

Sharp sharp before they come back

I wonder if we can prevent these krauts from posting on this page.

afrodoc2:
Nihilist , pass me that spliff bro

I'm on that vape hype now bro...

Burnthisleaguedown

Up Chelsea

And another one

600.

First two slots taken up by non bayern fans.

I see that A40 has runaway and left it to Dayo to pickup the pieces...