₦airaland Forum

ollah1:
cc

Omooba77
Pelvicky
Krasid
Usbcable
Coded01
Nihilist
dmcdad
Sebod
Thegoodjoe
Chelseafan1
raumdeuter
Airmark
codedguy1

what do you guys have to say about this

DonUjay:
You People just like disturbing . Draft your CV the way you want and stop trying to convince People to follow a Particular template. na by force?
Recently attended an Interview where I was asked questions Like:
How many People make up your family?
are you the first child?
what extra-curricula activities do you engage in?
just goes to show that sometimes giving employers a sneak peek into your social background won't necessarily be a bad idea
there's nothing wrong if you state your marital status or age in your CV, just try to keep it as concise as Possible. When it comes to CVS I'ld say you should Be Creative, Be Unique, Don't be straight-jacketed

airmark:
You made a good point, but i will disagree with your previous point that mou should have been left to continue. Chelsea is a big club and when its manager fails to manage his wards who he called the betrayers, well, and keeps churning out poor results up and down no serious club owner would stick to him cos of the previous season's feat. mou has done well for us, no doubt. This season he left us in a bad position which would have been worse if he continues. That's a fact. Chelsea is still trying to recover now and we could see the players are now enjoying the game due to a change in approach as directed by the coach. Hiddink had done it in the past and i believe he would do a good job this term too.
When you see a defending champion playing conservative football against the likes of bournemouth then there is big problem. When a coach could nt see the weak links in his team and still believed in luck and waiting for opponents to make mistakes before winning games then he has lost that midas touch. One thing one can easily discover in the chelsea's game now is sense of urgency in defending straight from the moment possession is lost and swift transition to attack when it is gained. Chelsea should not be sitting deep against minnows and waiting for willian to score goals from set-pieces. When we were having issues as regards our players, mou kept on telling us no new additions this january. I am a mourinho's fan but my loyalty to chelsea would n't let me call black, white. Mou's 3rd season syndrome would n't have got us europa league ticket, let alone ucl slot.

raumdeuter:
You know I have been proven right with most of my assertion while you have been proven wrong with most of yours

1. While we both agreed some of the players have been underperforming, I focused on Matic and my customer Hazard, You said it was Ivanovic, Fabregas and possibly Costa.

In the past 3 games it has been shown that Matic is one of the weakest link in the team. He still remains the only substitute to be removed this season and also was benched for 87mins last Saturday in Chelseas most comfortable win while his replacement Mikel- a man most fans said was the worst midfielder bossed the middle. Doing the basic job a midfielder was supposed to do.
Ivanovic has remained a stable part of the defence that have gone 2 games without conceding, Fabregas is now back to throwing Fabregas like passes and Costa is back to playing like a striker scoring in 2 games as many as he did in 13 games under Mourinho

2. I believe the slight turnaround was largely due to Hindick. I believe with Mourinho you would have lost at least 2 of the last 4 games. Claiming "was it not the same tactics that won last yr is short sighted", Coaches all over react to tactics and you have to keep evolving to stay on top. It was the same tactics, that won Klopp 2 Bundesliga, that made him finish 2nd twice. It was that same tactics that almost got him relegated before he left Dortmund. Another coach came and they have posted one of their best first half performance. It was the same tactics that almost won LvG the treble in 2010 that got him sacked 9months later by the same club and same players. Your tactics have to be updated regularly

3. I do not believe the Chelsea midfield is so bad that you were 16th on the table. I dont believe 15 teams have better players or better midfields than Chelsea. The same way why this time last season Dortmund was 18th on the table, I didnt believe their players were the worst in the league. They just needed a tweak in tactics and they would be fine.

4. Mourinho determination to make everyone an enemy was also one of the major reasons for the fall. The tactics are abrasive to outsiders and draining to the players. All the fighting the referees fighting the FA, fighting opposition coach plus media can only last so long

nateevs:
Let's have a little friendly debate.

You are right when you say that Chelsea's weak midfield was not the "single" cause of us slumping to 16th on the table. The midfield is a fundamental problem but not the root cause. You may or may not believe this (midfield being a problem) but that's beside the point.

What you consider the problem is what is always of concern to me. You believe the players stopped playing for Jose and that this is the root cause of the issue.

Would I be right by that conclusion?

Griffon:
Funny how some folks now think nothing is wrong with our midfield 'cos we won convincingly today.

Seeing comments like "Thisame bad midfield won today" is quite baffling.

In which world is a pivot of Mikel and Fabregas gold?

We've got injury and suspension to thank for today's victory. It was obvious Palace in the absence of Bolasie, Wickham and Cabaye lacked firepower. We've got Pardew to thank for deciding not to overload the midfield which would have seen Cesc and Mikel getting genuinely tested in the middle of the park Finally, we've got Hiddink to thank for once again doing what he knows how best to do.

Today's victory doesn't and shouldn't rule out the obvious fact that we have a phucked midfield.

DrinkWater10:
Ed Woodward is at the far left ,putting on eye glasses just next to the masked man.
Or could i be wrong?
cc
Nihilist
Chelseafan

raumdeuter:
I miss Mourinho days already

No more party on this thread for a while

Why did Roman sack Mourinho sef

Nihilist you dey see the difference in tactics from when the noisy one was there

dopeJemi:
Basketball and ice hockey are the best if you are into sports investment

markovnikoff001:
From your response, it is obvious you have only worked for a small organisation, or one with very little structure...
...HR has nothing to do with lawsuits; the Legal and/or Contracts Department handles this
...HR may coordinate trainings in general but it does not handle Health and Safety Trainings, the HES department does
...HR does handle recruiting, infact it is one of their major functions, and for small organisations, their sole function.

To gain more understanding, read my response to the topic at the bottom of page 1 of this thread

Dhelake:
Happy birthday Nihilist

Someone should organize a E-fight for Nihilist's birthday

Dahveydson:
Lol. The recruitment and training that HR engages in is for what?

Lofx:
You can actually adapt STAR ...
Even your proposed answer to question 2 can be extended with a situational context to move it from a theoretical narrative to a relatable discussion that is based on the candidate's own experiences/ personal philosophy.

Also for question 1. When someone challenges your competence or ability to perform a role on the basis of your course of study, the real question is that do you have a practical understanding of the role and do you have what it takes to perform it well? Convince me. I would dimension the facets of the role/ function and provide details of my experiences and results in such areas.

Dahveydson:
This is new and I totally disagree.

Even at that, the process of settling dispute between and among employees and employers still falls under the prisms of Management.

ItGeek:
Happy new year everyone. Hope the new year helps us turn the corner.

A happy birthday to Nihilist and Odunharry.

dopeJemi:
Nihilist, today na your birthday?

Lofx:
I agree with you on structuring your answer in a descriptive way that substantiates your experience. When I interview people I look out for them to structure their answers to cover the STAR model and I often have to rephrase the questions to ensure that all are clearly answered. I am more impressed when the candidate naturally covers it in this structure without the nudging

S - situation/context
T - task
A - actions
R - results

http://www.quintcareers.com/star-interviewing/

Ibime:
Are you not one of the shekpe keeper lovers who defend Torres every game whilst sane people were calling for Sturridge and Lukaku?

Whilst Nateevs explicitly derided Sturridge and Lukaku everytime they played 5 or 10 minutes here and there, you were one of those who enshrined Torres right to no9 shirt blaming everyone but Torres himself. You were in that camp, whether explicitly or implicitly.

We suppose done ban you and Nateevs from this thread for that nonsense 2 year campaign for Torres

Ibime:
You mean to tell me Hazard is a better striker than Traore? If so, is he better than Loic Remy who he was preferred to? Dont worry, when Teixeira signs, you will see more of wingers playing upfront given the clubs financial investment in them.

Traore is a winger who has played upfront for half a season at Vitesse. Crowding him out of his primary position is due to poor planning. I have him down as the 4th or 5th AM and the 3rd striker.

In 1 or 2 years time, dont come telling us stories about how x and y manager forced out Traore after Emenalo has signed yet another big money winger to relegate him.

It is not new to hear niggas like you claiming a clear talent is not good enough just because politics hampered their progress. Afterall you were one of the Torres lovers who told us Sturridge and Lukaku are not good enough.

When I made the same point about DeBruyne being my favourite AM at the club yet being forced out by overcompetition and big names, na so some ninjas (not you in particular) dey talk say he cant be good enough and whatnot. Same thing with Lukaku and Sturridge. All na politics. Bookmark this post for future reference when Traore is shining. Im sure youll be the no1 nigga on his bandwagon as per Lukaku now.

Ibime:
Quit acting funky. . . if Emenalo buys 6 players in his position for megabucks, who do you expect the manager to play?

Do you think Hiddink will be brave enough to bench new £30m signing Teixeira to give small boy Traore a shot?

In addition to Hazard, Willian, Oscar, Pedro and Kenedy?

Since JM left have Hiddink or Steve Holland given Traore one minute on the pitch?

Nah nigga, when a club purchases expensive assets, the manager has a duty not to impair the value of the asset by benching them. If an expensive £30m signing isnt playing or has his confidence eroded by the manager, the whole board will be on the managers back.

Poor squad composition is on Emenalo.

Ibime:
Chelsea chief scout launches attack on club, says incredible talent Bertrand Traore is being wasted on the bench.

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/630319/Chelsea-scout-Bertrand-Traore-transfer-gossip-club

Emenalos answer is signing Teixeira to force him out even more. Same thing happened to Kevin De Bruyne when Emenalo went chasing Willian and Schurrle to force him out despite him already competing against Hazard, Mata, Oscar and Moses