₦airaland Forum

lalasticlala:
The joy and excitement that comes with childbirth is absent to the family of Frances Omgbolo when his wife gave birth to a dwarf baby.

It was gathered that the woman, 26, who was rushed to the labour room, came with full term pregnancy and was later delivered of a dwarf.

A source at the hospital said Omgbolo, a 41-year- old civil servant from Obrigbene community in Ekeremor Local Government Area of Bayelsa State, was thrown into confusion when he learnt that his wife has given birth to a dwarf, describing it as mysterious

Reacting to the unusual experience, Mrs. Omgbolo said she was shocked at the sight of the baby. According to her: “What I saw as a baby, I could not believe I carried it for nine months. Never in my life have I seen a thing like this. [size=18pt]This is my third pregnancy. I have three children, my first pregnancy was twins without any form of dwarfism. I don’t know where this is coming from. Since the outset of this pregnancy, I have had several challenges, including bad dreams. It is the handiwork of my enemies. But I thank God I am strong after delivery.”[/size]

Imagine the grown up dwarf reading his mother's comments in 20 years

Dadehmola:
I don't think the Ronaldo logic cuts it here cos Ronaldo's numbers are more impressive than robben's. Why would you choose a riquelme who's key numbers weren't as impressive as Mata's?

[size=18pt]EHN?[/size]

Post the Key numbers here for comparison.

Use Riquelme's stats at El Submarino as that was his best time in Europe

Dadehmola:
Yeah...

If you were asked to pick the player who defined the word "playmaking" and you had to choose between him and mata ( during his supposed top class "playmaking" at Chelsea),who would be your choice?

Riquelme was the daddy of all number 10s, the king of Enganches and I would obviously pick Riquelme over Mata(Subject to tactical tweak of course)

But that's not saying much....Robben is one of the best wingers in the world, but I would still pick Ronaldo over him so....

coogar:
oscar is a defender posing to be a playmaker - he's got nothing over mata apart from his defensive quality. oscar is excellent at his secondary role but very poor at his primary role.

45% pass accuracy is the worst i have seen since OPTA started collating stats.

I have honestly never in my life heard such a foolish utterance before. Mata is not a playmaker, but Oscar is?

Dadehmola:
Nihilist, was riquelme a playmaker or not? If he was, what particular quality did he posses that made him one?

Which Riquelme? Juan Riquelme the Argentine?

Shirley07:
I do admire these kind of players not only because of their skill set but because of their brain which are constantly working and in control.
As for Oscar being better than Mata? Yes, he is. Oscar has better pace, better control of the ball in tight places, better awareness, better dribbling to open up space and above all, can orchestrate play.
The only thing Mata has above him is his vision which he can only display in the final third but in the midfield, he's a lost puppy; that's if he doesn't lose the ball to begin with. Oscar is also defensively better than Mata. Enough said.

This kain highness? On a Monday?

Argument is now shifting from Mata was not Chelsea's playmaker to Mata is not a Playmaker.

Shirley07, using your bogus definition, oya explain how Oscar of all people was Chelsea's playmaker.

Shirley07:
The answer lies in your post. The team was built around Mata and he was the focal point of that team. Even then, he dictated nada.
And you were saying?

He dictated nada?

So what was he doing when he was having more passes and touches of the ball than any other Chelsea player? Playing draught?

Shirley07:
[size=18pt]Secondly, inability of the team mates to recognizing the actual playmaker and this is also the fault of coach. For example, Chelsea players didn't recognize Oscar as the actual playmaker, they probably thought that Mata is the playmaker since the team was built around Mata.[/size] However, the player that actually made play happened was Oscar, even with the little touches he had. Same thing happened with Mata and Kagawa in the games against Newcastle, Aston Villa, Westham e.t.c. Everyone defered to Mata in those games but Kagawa was the playmaker.
In a right set up and with an insightful coach, the playmaker gets more touches on the ball.

So the players thought Mata was the playmaker, and Mata performed as the playmaker, but OSCAR was the real playmaker?

Yet us Chelsea fans are unintelligent buffoons.

Shirley07:
Nope. Playmake is make a play i.e, conduct play, my engrish teacher.

Mata received the more passes than any other Chelsea midfielder that year, indicating that the whole team was constantly looking to get him on the ball as he was the focal point of the midfield play.

In addition to receiving the ball more than any other Chelsea midfielder, Mata was also registering more touches of the ball than any other player, indicating that he was having time to dwell on the ball a bit longer than anyone else, before he picked out a pass.

He was directly involved in 36.9% of all of Chelsea's league goals.


Finally he created chances quicker and in more volume than any other Chelsea player.

If that's not a playmaker, then I don't know what your definition of playmaker is.

AirborneLacer:
Jose's mad wish

Paris is only round the corner though.
One Eurostar trip away.

PSG

coogar:
shirley07, mata was chelsea's best playmaker since they had zola. no debating! mourinho just didn't like him cos he wanted him to be more defensive. mourinho wouldn't have liked any of xavi & iniesta too cos they don't suit his "jam body" football.

in terms of vision, key passes, final passes, guile, close control, deft touches, etc mata is a king. i could care less about his defensive side. anyone expecting mata to be as defensive as toure or matic is a lunatic. he's not built like a tank.

I'm just laughing at Shirley07

Everthing went through Mata during those 2 years

11/12 Mata received the highest number of passes in that Chelsea midfield and was involved in almost 40% of Chelsea's league goals.

Created the most chances, created chances faster than anybody else, threw the most through balls...the man was the heartbeat of midfield

I've told shirley07 to upgrade to a plasma screen and stop listening to OGBC2

Shirley07:
No one in particular during Drogba era which was all about grit and physicality but after Drogba exit and Oscar arrival, Oscar became the playmaker until Chelsea signed Fabregas.
It's a myth that Mata was unstoppable at Chelsea. He was only unstoppable against teams that afforded him space but against teams that denied him space in midfield, he was gash. We all know the reason he was always good against us which was because of our open and gash midfield which allowed him to waltz through unhindered but against teams like City, Pool, Swansea, Southampton e.t.c, he was found wanting. And apart from his goals against Arsenal, he was always his invisible self against them.
His champion league performance were even the poorest. At that time, some Chelsea fans, including my bro said it was because the team had ugly style of play, relying on grit and also, it was his 1st season with them.
Fastforwarded to his 2nd season when Oscar and Hazard were signed, his performances in the CL were even more gash. He was so out of sort against Juve and Donetsk, was invisible throughout the game while the newcomers (Oscar and Hazard) were pulling up their weight and doing something useful in the game but no, Mata was his useless self except against Norjalland where he put on his commando hat.
And when Bennitez was appointed as Chelsea Coach, the team had a counter attacking playing style which was built around Mata. This allowed him to thrive but even then, he was still his useless self against those aforementioned teams like Swansea which dumped them out of the F.a cup, Man City, Liverpool e.t.c.
How do I know this? Because I watches majority of Chelsea games with my bro.
The funny thing is people just look at his stats for Chelsea and start to cream their pants, forgetting that he was Chelsea's chief set piece taker (corners and freekicks) which increased his stats and he himself is a natural stat padder. For example in Chelsea game against Donetsk where he was invisible and useless, he was still able to make an assist for Moses' goal through a corner kick. He was a stat padder for Chelsea and even now, for us. It's so sad that Mourinho discovered that earlier before Manutd's coach did.
For the umpeteeth time, Mata aint a playmaker!

My nigga this is 2014, you need to upgrade from OGBC2 FM Stereo to flatscreen HD signal.

Oscar was the playmaker

Over 100 pts difference between myself and Nitlad now

Fuckinghell!!!!

See Sterling

This is 2014 and they're still riding horse and chariot in heaven?

OP should better tell them to upgrade up there. Pastors on earth are flying private jets and waking up in new bugattis

So she rather died than commit suicide?

AriDsexy:
To ur last statement,seriously??

What is in heaven that Oyedepo is not already enjoying here on earth?

Openly Politicking at a Funeral for God's sake?

That fat bearded Shepopo has absolutely no shame at all.

Why is he prophesying against death?

I thought the end goal of this Christianity game is to go to heaven?

Oyedepo no wan die, because he knows that his own heaven is truly here on earth, with multiple private jets, huge mansions, millions in his bank account, and Magas paying heavily every week.

It's not a coincidence that this year's Shiloh was tagged 'Heaven on Earth'

If Oyedepo dies today, nobody can honestly say he has gone to a better place.

DJ please give me Red Red Wine by UB40

elampiro:
“He will blow up at some point. That’s part of his make-up. Remember these words. If I’m speaking to you, I’m exchanging information over what I feel passionate about but I don’t lecture you. I’m not preaching to you. [size=18pt]If you go and sit with Van Gaal, you’ll come out thinking ‘I’m 12 years old’. He will speak to you as if you have no clue. He will look at you and be thinking ‘what are you asking me?[/size]
"I’m Louis van Gaal’. He’s not my cup of tea. It’s one of the reasons I quite like Ronald (Koeman) as a person - he doesn’t preach or lecture people like the other guy does.

You mean this managerial failure has the gall to slag off LVG?

Maybe if Renee had actually listened to LVG, 2 different clubs would not have sacked him in less than 3 months after hiring.

dare2think:
Lol, revel in your temporary delight because I assure you Monday evening is a different story.

Tadic is a tool for missing that penalty. I pray chadli and Rooney put on their capes and save my gw

So you honestly believe that pair can cop the required 30pts or so?

I may well breach the Top 5 before this gameweek is done.

Dare2think will be under my wheels tonight....Maybe even Umzzy Umzzy

Nitlad is now nothing but a distant memory

Costa is getting too many cards mehn...

Hazardous....He can drimble and he can score

World Best!

Dzeko Injured in Warm up

Raumdeuter

SetrakusRa:
You've been screaming "luck, luck, luck" for aeons, why qunge comments from just monday? Show us similar comments from the 15 matches since the stat covers them all.

Why don't you direct your comments to Louis Van Gaal?

SetrakusRa:
Five most clinical Premier League sides


5) Manchester City, 11.9% chance conversion
4) Swansea City, 12.1% chance conversion
3) Everton, 12.2% chance conversion
2) Manchester United, 12.4% chance conversion
1) Chelsea, 13.4% chance conversion

Luck they say. *sighs*

After Manyoo's 'clinical display' of scoring twice from only 3 shots on Monday.

Louis Van Gaal: "Our first goal was a gift and the second was made easier because I saw the goalkeeper coming out of his goal,We were very lucky. I didn't see the confidence that I saw on the training ground earlier this week. We were the lucky team."

*SIGHSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*