₦airaland Forum

debosky:
@ No2A

Lexi has asked for the thread to be locked, given that he is the primary 'accused' in this matter.

Angie has refused to come out with a definitive answer on the question to lock or not to lock.

Frankly, I'm no longer amused by it, and since no evidence is being put forward to back up the accusations, it is peddling of falsehood - against NL regulations.  

Y'all should ask for the OP to bring out more information or retitle the thread 'speculations about womanisers on nairaland'.  

As moderator of this section, I can't allow this joke of a thread take away analysts from dealing with people wondering whether they are hot, or asking for solutions to their latest heartbreak.  

Yes i agree he's the primary accused however he was not the one who started the thread and he's not the only one accussed on the thread.

He has offered his own defence yet others have not really offered their own defense hence locking it would only be infavour of Whitelexi (which is not right and just) other accused usernames should also be given the opportunity in defending themselves otherwise it would make Whitelexi look like the innocent one in this case which is not fair until we hear the presentation of others.

@debosky

please leave the thread open, cus i realise now that it seems what the thread is saying is actually true, cus

1. They are too scared to ask you to lock the thread cus it would then mean that it was true and they are now scared of exposing themselves further

or

2. One of them is enjoying the exposure that the thread is giving.

They decided to wash their laundries in public, then lets leave it at that and make sure its sparkling clean.

[quote author=St☆rStruck link=topic=277265.msg3946863#msg3946863 date=1243624788]Now you know . . . https://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k222/tstreeter/nowuknow.gif[/quote]That is grossly unfair, am the last person you should even consider for such a title. The few people that know me offline can attest to that.

Starstruck i think you are mistaking my NL jokes with the real life me (Ask NL Administrator if you want further info).

chinesedoll:
my dear broda beware of those kind of pple
the question i ask myself is why lie abt ur marital status
when u know u are in desperate need for a guy
why not just come out straight
instead they go abt bashing pple that are bold enuf 2 come out and say wat dey want   _{i dont take nairaland seriouslyi dont take nairaland seriously, u dey post more dan 75tymes a day, i dont rember anytin abt nairaland immediately i logoff yet una dey bang evertin bangable here}
more yansh go still open
but no be me go open am
but d day any1 of dis bitches cross my path
i go 4get maturity come down to their level
and expose as many yansh as possible

Thank you jare, however wat pisses me off is that some ladies have the audacity to pretend to be holier than thou.

I do not support guys that womanise, I don't do it myself, however i sincerely dislike hypocrites that pretend to be holier than thou.

Also the fact that this issue even came to the surface on NL shows that it was probably even more serious than we think,

[quote author=St☆rStruck link=topic=277265.msg3946832#msg3946832 date=1243624415]Am I to assume that the guys who keep responding feel guilty and/or are hoping no one rats them out? Funny how they are all in the UK lol[/quote]u are lumping me in with womanisers ( )

@stillwater,

Nope he does not need to defend the guy, infact i despise guys that go around sleeping with women by lying to them that they love them (what goes around comes around) cus if u are in it for sex then tell d girl upfront so that she does not get it twisted.

However what i also find despicable is that women falling for the same shit everytime, that a guys I love you does not always mean he does, hence the reason that women need to keep their tampoons in place and stop opening their thighs anyhow.

Yes i understand that its difficult to get guys, nevertheless its not reason enough to want to try to keep them by sleeping with them, infact sleeping with a guy reduces the chances of keeping the guy (that is a secret guys would never tell you but which is true).

Guys are natural born hunters, hence they would chase after you and stick with you the longer you refuse to give them a taste of the pudding. Hence when ladies eassily give them a taste of the pudding, it simply takes away the self of fufillment derived from the act of chasing

@stillwater you said and i quote:

Get off your high yama yama horse!!! Naivety's got nothing to do with this. The guy must have promised he loved them that's why they decided to give him their all.

@stillwater

In that case then let's test your principle, STILLWATER I PROMISE THAT I LOVE YOU TORI TORUN, OYA DROP YOUR TIGHT JEANS   .

Abegi any man or woman can promise anything, it does not mean its true hence the reason to be carefull.

Pastor David,

I used to pride myself on being a good judge of character, I think i might be wrong a little cus its really worrying to even think that some of the people mentioned in this thread actually did something that the thread is implying. The bad part is that i sincerely actually thought some of the names and people identified to be connected to the issue of the thread, were actually quite decent. Men it seems i really need to raise my standards of expectation a little bit more, cus i must confess i am really a little bit disappointed with some usernames that i am seeing getting imbroiled in this mess.
The more i am researching this issue, the messy it gets. What suprises me however is that why do some women in this time and age believe every word that a guy tells them, if ladies at least try to continue to put there tampoons in its expected place without removing it for anybody, they would not have reason to regret befriending guys that are womanisers.

One thing i can take from this drama is that assumming Whitelexi is the really truly the culprit that this thread makes him out to be, then:

Whitelexi is obviously very good in bed, otherwise the ladies would not have been flocking to him or being angry with him for using them

Fornication has his physical and spiritual downsides, ladies need to understand that you cannot always eat your cake with someone and still have it at the same time.

@sexyhotmom you too wan watch soap opera

TOYOSI20:
Tubabie. . .am great oo. . . .whats up wid u mami, . . . .

No2. . . . thankies boo. . . like i said, it is imperative to call a spade a spade in ma books. . .  . . hope u cool sha??

LOL @ Pataki!

I saw that   , am always cool like cucumber. Hope you are aight too.

TOYOSI20:
LOL!!!. . . .i know say na this kian drama u like. . . .

Anyways missed yah plenties. . . .

Wo. . . .na2day. . . .which u gurls, . . . .??

Did the OP mention names,. . .  .??

that's where u fail to make sense. . . .which gurls have come here to talk trash??. . . .what trash is there to talk about??

I call it like i see it. . .regardless of gender or w/e. . . .its the very same thing ill'd say to some one i knew on a personal level!!

So truly what gives??. . . . .go and check ma archives very well. . . .i dont get off bashing peeps anyhow. . . so get it right abeg!!

The REAL truth lies BTW the parties involved. . . . . . .and the gospel truth about the matter is that when the going was good

it wasn't announced all over the forum but now that things are Stormy peeps want to come her an name names, . . . .

If u count that as being MATURE, . . . .then more grease to ur elbows oo!!!!!

Damn it girl sounds like you are about to go Bruce Lee on his ass, why are you all feisty all of a sudden.

TOYOSI20:
My exact sentiments. . . .There is so much to life than all these trivialities and childish shiznit. ahnahn. . . .

my friend will say. . “it is time to separate the men from the boyz!!”

All these name calling aint cute at all. . . . Like seriously. . . .A simple phone call would have taken care of things . . .

or simply just ignore the whole entire mess. . . .instead of raising dust and all that, . . .whatever be the case, . . .

there were good times before things started to fall apart. . . for the sake of those times, . . .

one should really think twice before “airing out ones dirty laundry”

After all life still goes on past NL, . . . .no??

That’s why I love the log off tab, . . .when I hit that tab. . . .its all over for moi. . . .

NL shouldn’t be taken too seriously. . . .or the cyber world in general!!!

Besides what is it that’s  new under the surface of the sun. . . .A kon fin deru ba oloro taba ni a oti gbo ri. . .!!

Pls abeg make one omo lu abi translate oo. . LOL!!!

Seriously guys . . .let us think twice before we act. . .that is why they say it is wise to look before u leap. . . .

cos some damages are irreversible. . . .just some thing to think about!!

take it easy y’all!! 

Toyosi first and foremost pls inteprete the yoruba that you used for us, thank you.

Toyosi smart words, I was also concerned that it might have been better if all parties concerned had settled the issue offline, instead of bringing to NL. Cus ultimately a lot of dirty laundries are bound to be washed in public out of rage.
Already 3 different usernames has been mentioned as parties to the scenario one way or another.

Its quite, funny, I would still watch the soap opera sha

@whitelexi, @babycool haba now you guys should please stop washing dirty linens in public. Even @thoniaslim has been dragged into the matter. (Hope say no one wuld drag me into this cus i didn't do what you think i did )

Yes you might be mad at each other for one reason or another but i don't think it okay for you to be exposing each other like this,

Please I beg all of una, stop the bickering and public exposure. No one benefits from the public exposure and bickering, NL is just a forumn. NL is not a do or die affair.

[quote author=St☆rStruck link=topic=277265.msg3943408#msg3943408 date=1243562066]Say that to my 9mm glock. . .[/quote]Oh baby don't do that , i promise to dump all other chics just for you alone, @agielove is just angry that i did not give her enough attention.

[quote author=St☆rStruck link=topic=277265.msg3943380#msg3943380 date=1243561432]Thought you said you loved me?![/quote]Sorry baby i also thought i did, am just suffering from multiple personality disorder, 

Women complain that their men are not close to them, that their men keep secrets from them, that their men are not their best friends. Yet at the same time women choose not to date someone who is already their friend. Doesn't this stance sound so self contradictory.
Is this not a case of decisions based on trivialities on the part of women, considering that my experiences is that: its better if the lady in question is actually a friend.

Does it not make long term sense for both the guy and gal to be good friends even before starting a romantic relationship.

Men and Women being attracted to each other without being friends is good,
However Men and Women being attracted to each other and being friends is even better.




@poster, please move on leave the girl she does not know what she is about to lose until she falls in love with someone who would never be her friend no matter how much she craves him to be. Its unfortunate that most of us (men and women) don't know what we have until we lose it (and am speaking from experience )

I love Nairaland , 

debosky:
I confess - I am the culprit. 

@debosky keep quiet there, how dare you try to steal my title.


@everybody[b] I confess i am the one[/b], don't mind @debosky he's just trying to steal my title. 


@agielove oya confirm my identity to everyone now that i have confessed.


@tope5000, @stillwater, @starstruck, @agathachristie @rosetyler and @allotherchics am very sorry for all those things i did, please forgive me. I promise not to do more than I have done again.

bindex:
I believe in naturalism and by that I believe  that the world is a closed system where nothing out side of the world life super natural forces affects it. I believe in secularism, and I also believe that all gods were created by men to help them solve the pesky probelms that is associated with life and all its vagaries. Toneyb said and I agree that religion is the outcome of man’s struggle with natural phenomenon that is why there are so many religions all over the place. I might not know how we got hear but I KNOW for sure that I did not get here because a Jewish deity created this world with all the people in it as vedetarians initially before Adam and Eve ate the friut of knowledge. I do not know how we got here but I know that the entire creation account in genesis 1 and 2 are not true.

@bindex

1. But your statement I highlighted is a contradiction.

2. You are claiming to not know something , yet at the same time you are also claiming to know with 100% certainty that the opposite is true.

3. For you to know that the entire genesis account is not true means that you have a foolproof 100% guaranteed reference by which you came to that determination.

4. Can you please give us the reference that you used.


---------------------

Okay let us start our discussion from the basics:

Option 1: Everything was created.

Option 2: Nothing was created.


@bindex, which of the options above do you believe.

toneyb:
I might not know  what 12345675*2336846374 but I know for sure that it isn't 5. The fact that we don't have answers today does not mean that we will not have answers in the future.

@toneyb

1. Is your statement a pledge of certainty or mere expectation?

2. Do you just realised that your statement is implying an 100% certainty that you are going to have answers in future that support your world view.

3. Do you not realise that you are actually exhibiting what is known as "faith" and "believe" considering that you are expecting your hearer to believe you based on what you think you might prove in the future and not based on what you can prove now.

4. Do you mean you are 100% sure that we would have answers in the future.

5. How do you know the answers you might have in the future (if at all) would not contradict your position.

6. Mathematics is science, because it is repeatable and duplicatable by anybody (hence why you can be 100% sure that 12345675*2336846374 is not 5). However since Evolution is not repeatable or duplicatable by anyone else apart from the "evolutionist" who originated the idea, how exactly is it then science. Hence:
   - how exactly is that you are now 100% sure that you will have answers in the future.
   - how exactly are u 100% sure that the answers you have in the future would be ones that support your worldview.

---------------------------------------------------------

@bindex

I would really appreciate if you take the time to answer the questions i have listed earlier, we are all here to learn hence you deciding not to answer a questions means either you choose not to teach us what you know/believe or you prefer to disallow the possibility of an intelligent dialogue

bindex:
Science of the supernatural or science of the ignorant? Was it your all supernatural who said breeding animals by striped sticks produced striped offsprings ? supernatural science indeed. Or was it your supernatural science that says that evil sprits cause diseases?

No2atheism has not asked me any question, I have already told him my position, I do not believe in the big bang or in evolution if he has questions he can ask those that believe in them and are defending them I am not one of them.

1. What do you believe, since you do not believe in big band and evolution.

2. Please try and answer the questions that you have answers for, unless you do not answer for any of the questions listed.

3. Your adequate response is awaited.

bindex:
Why are you asking me all this? Aren't you on the internet? There are a lot of materials about evolution and the big bang on the internet. I said they are more plausible than the drivel we have in genesis 1 and 2 which makes absolute no sense and which you have NO scientific evidence for.

So does that mean you prefer not to teach me what you know that i don't know. But is it not easier for you to teach me directly what you already know so that when i go back to the internet it becomes easier to build on what you would have already taught me by answering my questions.

Alternatively should i assume that you don't have answers the questions listed.

bindex:
If you bother to read my post you will see that I clearly stated that the theories are more plausible than the creation accounts we have in genesis 1 and 2 that have NO evidence to support them and go against what we see in the natural universe. I do not believe in the big bang or all the types of evolution that you have listed, but their assertions are much more plausible than the ridiculous drivel you have in your bible. The bible creation accounts should have some scientific evidence at least don't you think so?

Hello @bindex, please i like to put all ideas and notions on the table for easy access to analyses. Hence i don't like muddled up or evasive responses. Instead of long winded posts, i prefer question and answer sessions that show when there is an answer or when there is no answer.

The answer you provide to the questions are things that would determine my next question to you or comments to your answer, alternatively, you can consider it an opportunity to convert me into an atheist  or don't you want to do that.

I do not read minds hence my statements can only be based on your answers and not on what you might have said in the past.

so once again @bindex, kindly please provide answers to the following questions (I would appreciate if you can also tabulate the answers in correlation to the question so that it would make it easy to know which is which in your answers).

@bindex

1. Please explain the big bang theory to us in simple english.

2. What principles does the big bang entail.

3. What is evolution, please define.

4. Which evolution are you talking about. (is it Cosmic Evolution, Biological Evolution, Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution or Geologic Evolution).

5. Since you know so much about Genesis 1 and 2 can you please describe to us which World it is the those verses was talking about.

6. What is a Narrative.

7. What is a Fact.

8. What is Speculation.

9. What is repeatable Science.

Your simple and non-insulting response is highly appreciated

Thank you.

[quote author=pilgrim.1 link=topic=276706.msg3942033#msg3942033 date=1243538809]@No2Atheism

Abeg no vex o. . I was meaning to drop a line for your about that 'small assignment', remember? I no forget you at all - quite some interesting articles from the authors. I go drop you some of my observations when time reach. Stay blessed bro. [/quote]Thanks a lot , i feel honoured that you never forget , cus i really need an informed second opinion on that issue. cus the articles seem to be well researched and convincing hence your opiinon would certainly be welcomed.

bindex:
[b]Have you ever bothered to read about the big bang and all the principles it entails? [/b]The evloutionary theory is much more plausible than the creationist drivel that is written in genesis 1 and 2 which Christians do not even agree with and are always providing one excuse or another for it, because it stands contrary to the facts of what we see around us. The fact still remains that the world in which we live in was not created according to the narrative in genesis 1 and 2. The bible was talking about a different world not the one we find our selves in.

LMAO some people would not kill me with the logic process,

@bindex

1. Please explain the big bang theory to us in simple english.

2. What principles does the big bang entail.

3. What is evolution, please define.

4. Which evolution are you talking about. (is it Cosmic Evolution, Biological Evolution, Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution or Geologic Evolution).

5. Since you know so much about Genesis 1 and 2 can you please describe to us which World it is the those verses was talking about.

6. What is a Narrative.

7. What is a Fact.

8. What is Speculation.

9. What is repeatable Science.

Your simple and non-insulting response is highly appreciated.

@mukina

Giving birth to a baby is easier than worrying about it

tpiah:
well, what I noticed is as soon as they find cures for deadly diseases which subsequently no longer pose a threat to human well being, another set of deadlier diseases surfaces from somewhere.

God help us.

This answer is simply because some of the diseases are actually designed by man and are not a result of random chance of nature, hence money is not made when there are no diseases, instead money is made and guaranteed when there is always a new diseases to fight. A business man can't make money if there is no market, likewise Drug Companies can't make money if there are no diseases to make drugs for. Hence the reason why you keep seeing that more and more diseases keeps popping up each and every day despite the so called sophistication of our time and age.


1. If there are no diseases there would be no money to be made by Pharmaceutical companies, hence don't be deceived by the media. The truth is that most of the diseases in recent years are actually manufactured in laboratories.

2. Pharmaceutical companies claim natural remedies are not scienctific , yet they get their insipiration and new drug discoveries via the plagiarism of those same natural remedies work (e.g. how natural rememdies in africa, asia and native america have been copied, duplicated and marketted as new discoveries by so called western drug companies). The fundamental truth is that Drug companies would never admit the natural remedies do work simply because it would mean they are no longer relevant and thus mean that they can no longer make money.

3. Humanity was more promiscous in the past than today (think of promiscuity in egypt, rome, africa, greece et al), yet there was nothing like HIV in the past until the past 100years. That enough is evidence for an alarm to start ringing in your head as to the origin of HIV. Yes there are diseases in the past, how the severity and frequency of such diseases is less than what we have today. For example Spain deliberately introduced disease to the Native Americans not because the disease occured natural amongst the native americans but because they were using the same principle  in which they creat the problem and provide the solution to the problem at the same time, such that they gain money, control and influence.

4. Some of the diseases we have today are manufactured diseases and problems. Because of greed for money, most pharmaceutical companies would never let the News Media carry the fact that some forms of Cancer has been treated easily with something as simple as Baking Soda.
http://aromatherapy4u./2008/08/05/974/. Below is a youtube link to someone who has presented a scientific paper on the issue of cancer and how the drug companies and making money and killing people by propagating rememdies which do not really heal the person but which only end up making money for such companies.
[flash=400,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/npgyZMaewuE&feature=PlayList&p=82AA16E0ED779BEA&index=3[/flash].

Yes Radiation therapy or Chemotherapy sometimes works, however the success rate and collateral damages done to the body of the patient is sometimes worse than desirable. Still Drug Companies do their best to suppress initiatives that would result in their own loss of investment or income.

5. Bird Flu, Swine Flu have been found to strains having a similarities, hence creation of novel diseases via gene splicing is not some too far fetched.

6. The best trick in the book that is used by Drug Companies and Government is this: "Create a problem or disease, then offer to solve or cure the same problem or disease that you caused". This same trick is being used in Iraq, Africa, Native America and even in the Western Countries.
The scenario is easily understood if we understand that there would be no need for a solution is there is no problem, hence there would be no money to be made by Governments or Drug companies if there are no diseases.

So my submission is this:

Science and Technology is not falling apart, rather it is the application and intepretation of the results of science and technology that is falling apart.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Science never said there is no Creator (instead atheists erroneously assume that because they can explain how something works then it means they can explain why and how that thing came into existence in the past in the first place), infact more and more scientific evidence is point to the fact the there has to be a Creator cus everything is just too damn perfect and designed to have been as a result of random chance.

Hence any true scientist would tell you that Science does not support Evolution instead most scientific evidence oppose evolution in its fundamentals. For example law of thermodynamics says that all things would start disintegrating over time when left to chance and time, yet evolution is based on the unscientific assumption that all things build-up increase in complexity over time by chance  (talk of flawed logic).

Science tells us that there are living matter and non-living matter and that a non-living matter can never change to a living matter. Yet Evolution assumes that at some point in the past (another assumption usually measured in millions of years by evolutionist  ) a non-living matter somehow changed to the first living matter.

The most astounding thing is that an undergraduate physics student or chemistry or biology student or mathematics student (i.e. areas of real science) dare not use the kind of logic which evolutionist use to explain themselves. Any student that does is bound to fail miserably, cus realy science does not pride itself on "speculations" based on the clever use of the words "could", "may", "might" and "would" that evolution tends to use to explain itself.

@TOH, i hope you are this feisty in other things too, i hope its not just NL that you are bringing down the roof, anyway sha @TOh oya dey bash them dey go , i dey kampe behind your back , , just come report anyone that slaps you.

This champions league final looks quite similar to the arsenal manutd match in the sense that Manutd looked disjointed and out of ideas for the whole match despite that Barcelona did not even look like they've gone beyond just the 3rd gear.

I never gave ManUtd against Barcelona, simply because Barcelona is a better and freely scoring version of what Arsenal was supposed to be, what Barcelona did to ManUtD can easily be seen with the way Arsenal dominated ManUtd at Manchester the last time the two met at old Trafford.


Unfortunately for ManUtd they going to feel the pain more because they needed to win the competition in other to win more money to service their debts, ManUtd without Fergie and with mount of debt is bound to implode, ManUtd's only hope is for Fergie to remain there for life.

Time for Henry to comeback to Arsenal to aid the development of the team, now that he has won his champions league medal that he always wanted in his collection.

Wenger time to sell Adebarndo and bring back Henry (who am sure would probably be willing to come back to retire in peace, with Arsenal)

@TOH i trust you, always ready to terminate anyone verbally,

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
--------------------------------------------

Usher - I can't Win


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5JDYelBxEo


[flash=400,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/I5JDYelBxEo[/flash]

mohawkchic:
~Keri Hilson Feat Neyo & Kanye ~Knock You Down

Very good track,