nice

nice

nice

women are confused there is a difference between love and sex,men are on an average 15 times more active than a woman,means for every time a normal women wants sex her male counter part has that same urge 15 times.the issue is westernization not ladies chasing your man.you mother leaved though it why didn't they brake up?women want to control that is the issue unfortunately you can not re-define nature which means men would always demand more sex.if it is love you want take love but if it is control then side chick would now become your head ache

Asorockqueen:
The rate at which some couples break up is now alarming and records have shown that it's always the cause of some side chicks, Why do some girls always find joy in seeing their fellow girls suffer in marriage, I know we have to blame the men in a way but most girls are quick to do anything to have the man, well I just want to say whatever you reap you shall sow, Ladies let's learn to support each other

western data,i advice you consider getting data from other sources,bear in mind certain people must keep a narrative

tensazangetsu20:

This is a lie. During the last Nigerian census, it was 105 men for every 100 women and when polygamy comes into play, the number becomes like 105 men for every 40 women. There are way more men than women in the world.

nice

that isn't true,every record shows it,in the caribbean they are on an average of three to one,in sweden,its three to one,so much so that the government is begging them to just get preganant ,same is spain.so i would advice you take a good look at the data,even in Nigerian it is 2 women to a man,and Africa has one of the highest rate of men in the world

AZeD1:

There are actually more men in the world than women, i guess its time to revise your "economic" theory to affect modern realities.

i think you still do not get it,let me explain to you in economic terms,there is a concept called demand and supply,which means the scarce a commodity the more expensive it goes for.now let us relate it ,the population of women to men are within some 2.5:1 in some countries you even see 4:1.then at the same time men do all the risky jobs,some are reverend fathers and some lost to guyism,means you have a large crowd of women and no man to meet demand.if feminist have deceived other women into believing one man to a woman it mean 1/4 of women would have partners while 3/4 would go without or rather use desperate measures to get somebody else's own which in turn can explain the high divorce rate which is going on.so women would be deceiving themself if they think they hold the power in Negotiation because either ways the men do not loss out simply because they are fewer in numbers ,which makes them a scarce commodity

AZeD1:

This line here ruined the whole article. Heterosexual women sleep with men so if men don't want women who sleep around, they should zip up.

You should not demand what you cannot give so if you are not sexually pure, you have no right to demand for a partner that is sexually pure.

Feminists claim to promote the advancement of women and gender equality, largely via the promotion of so-called sexual liberation, but their movement is leaving a wake of unhappy, unmarried, and childless women in its path, a real problem feminists seemingly refuse to entirely address.

According to a recent study from Yale University researchers, liberated, college educated women are freezing their eggs because they can't find a man to marry and have children with before their natural childbearing years expire. In the U.K., for instance, one in five women is childless when their natural reproductive years expires, as opposed to one in ten women a mere generation prior.

So what's to blame for this onslaught of college-educated yet terribly empty women?

The short answer is feminism.

The author of the study, Marcia Inhorn, an anthropology professor at Yale University, concludes that the common assumption about women putting off children to advance their careers is mere myth. The 150 women undergoing the egg-freezing process in the U.S. and Israel who were extensively interviewed for the study, claimed they were not putting off having a family in order to advance their career, but because they simply couldn't find a mate.

Inhorn blames the problem on a shortage of college-educated men. "There is a major gap — they are literally missing men. There are not enough college graduates for them. In simple terms, this is about an oversupply of educated women,” she says.
"Most women who are educated would like to have an educated partner. Traditionally women have also wanted to ‘marry up’ to go for someone more successful, financially well off," adds the researcher.

Inhorn then goes on to blame feminism, sort of. Essentially, because of feminism, liberated women are college-educated but unhappy and alone in exchange, she argues.

“As a feminist I think it’s great that women are doing so well but I think there has been a cost that has been paid,” says Inhorn, adding that women have been left in “sadness and isolation."

But there's more going on here. Other experts allude to what Inhorn is unwilling to say: it's not simply an "oversupply" of liberated women that's driving this trend, or a liberation-happiness trade-in; it's men refusing to settle down. And for that, I'd like to thank the feminists' push for “sexual liberation.”

Let start with the evidence.

First off, some of the women interviewed by Inhorn's own team even admit that it's not simply an educational gap; women said they would marry a man who doesn't have a degree but they can't find one who wants to marry them.
Then there’s Medical Director of U.K. clinic Create Fertility, Professor Geeta Nargund, who hits the nail on the head (emphasis added): “Women tell us frequently that they are freezing their eggs because the men they meet feel threatened by their success and so unwilling to commit to starting a family together.”

President of the British Fertility Society, Professor Adam Balen, concurred (emphasis added): “We are seeing some big societal issues, in particular in some social economic groups, with young men not committing.”

And here's Executive Director of IVI, Dr. Gillian Lockwood, on Inhorn's findings: "It exacerbates the problem of men not wanting to 'settle down' and start a family until it's almost too late for the woman to conceive naturally. And if she insists, he's quite likely to leave for a younger woman whose biological clock isn't ticking quite so loudly."

Dr. Lockwood's "own survey of women doing 'social' egg freezing found the overwhelming majority of women having their eggs frozen were doing so because they could not find a partner, or because their own partner would not commit," notes The Telegraph.
Bingo.

And there's even more!

Professor Simon Fishel, who founded Care Fertility, explained based on his research (emphasis added): “Almost all of the women in the study who employed egg freezing were heterosexual and wanted to become married mothers. Women lamented the ‘missing men’ in their lives, viewing egg freezing as a way to buy time while on the continuing (online) search for a committed partner.”

Over 90% of those surveyed were not freezing their eggs to postpone childbearing to advance a career. Instead, "they were desperately ‘preserving’ their fertility beyond the natural end of their reproductive lives, because they were single without partners to marry," he said.

So back to the original claim: the so-called sexual liberation of women is indeed screwing women, and not in a good way.

Why would a man rush to settle down and marry someone if he can not only have sex with “liberated” women without a ring, but even cohabitate with them, too? Moreover, the less chaste a woman is, the less preferable she will likely be to a man. Not to mention a woman's increasing age and creeping near infertility as another massively undesirable trait.
If women demanded more from men, did not sleep around in the name of feminism, men would settle into marriage at an earlier age.

But, nonetheless, these simple truths will be rejected by feminists everywhere, clinging hard to their sad, lonely lives in exchange for empty Feminism, as they accuse any dissenter of being a misogynist.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/18358/study-feminism-leaving-wake-unhappy-unmarried-amanda-prestigiacomo#

nice

nice

nice

my exert point and she was older

nextprince:

Yunusa/Ese Oruru comes to mind.

if this was a hausa muslim boy the hole internet would be on fire,IGBO people oya speak up failure to condemn this makes you people look the more like what i think you look

Islie:











http://punchng.com/mother-asks-man-to-pay-n800000-for-impregnating-14-year-old-daughter/

Tradition is more than religion,it is a way of life,which includes but not limited to ,language,dressing,customs,belief(religion),politics,education,sport,entertainment and history

dapyd1:
Some people are saying the two don't mix above, but I just want to be empirical value it.

Tradition is not equal to religion.

As long as there is no standing rule on the god/God an ọba can worship, no problem.

Our gods in Yoruba land are actually a path to Olódùmarè (God) who is the Alpha and Omega.

The medium of worshipping is not the point, worshipping is the point.

Ọbas belive in God. Either it is through Sango, Obatala, Ifá, Muhammed or Jesus is another matter entirely.

This is no OBA,this a stupid greedy man,if you want to be a Pastor resign your throne as OBA,you cant be a custodian of Tradition and a puppet in a church at the same time .while Traditionalism allows you to go anywhere and everywhere in search of wisdom the throne of your ancestors doesn't allow you bow to a white man religion

stephenduru:
HRM Oba Adeyemi Adediran ordained as a Pastor 13 years after his coronation.

The Acts of Apostles Int. Church Akure in conjunction with Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) Esa-Oke Chapter today ordained HRM (OBA) Adeyemi Akanbi Adediran as a Pastor.

According to the Oba, God first appeared to him in a dream that he would be ordained a Pastor. While still pondering on this, the general overseer of The Acts of Apostles Int. Church Akure, Apostle/Prophet (Dr.) Z.B. Adeboriota also revealed, without being told, that Kabiyesi has a call on his head.

As a confirmation, Apostle Paul Adenuga  revealed by Word of Knowledge, when he visited Kabiyesi in his palace in Esa-Oke in April 2017, that Kabiyesi has a call on his head as a Pastor. He said this in the presence of all CAN ministers in Esa-Oke.

Ladies and gentlemen, here comes our amiable king, HRM (Oba) Pastor Adeyemi Akanbi Adediran. Help me congratulate this king that loves God with all his heart.



Source: http://www.trezzyhelm.com/2017/07/hrm-oba-adeyemi-adediran-ordained-as.html

on point

you know you are right,but the question is who is the ignorant one,the man who believes in the religion of those who enslaved him .just asking how does a slave master happen to leave a slave with something that can free him/her.its food for thought

udopee:
IGNORANCE IS A VERY BIG DISEASE...EMBRACE JESUS CHRIST AND YOUR LIFE WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN!!!!

nice

nice

nice

I would have thought Nnamdi Kanu would have told the south eastern Senators that during there meeting,abi since the two years he has been insulting and preparing to burn Nigeria.he didn't know that there was the cheaper option

legislatively:
you should also make the quit notice permanent by sponsoring a bill to include referendum in the constitution.

7million

i am quite sure you are not conversant with the law,nobody declares a public holiday outside the President,neither can you tell other people not to move,those fall under treasonable offence,that is aside Kanu BUYING GUNS,INTERCEPTING COMMUNICATIONS SIGNAL,ILLEGAL BROAD CASTING,,INSTIGATING WAR,INSULTING THE STATE.THE LIST IS ENDLESS.that is on the local front on the international front opening of embassies,lying to foreign government,creating discord,dividing Nigerian Association.there sins are too much to mention.let the igbo go,nobody give a dame about them we are tired,Since 1956 one set of people has made life terrible for everybody.let the igbo people go i repeat we do not want them .South south do not like them,south west don't like them,north central don't like them,north east don't like them,north west don't like them.and you brain cant tell you there must be something wrong with you.let them go,haba everywhere you go igbo problem.they are like a cuss,i land in malaysia the custom officer ask me in clear words am i igbo,i said no why do you ask,he said because they are criminals .everywhere you go igbo problem,we are tired igbo people must go

DrGoodman:


What laws did the Igbo's break by deciding to sit at home, or are you just scared for nothing like others?

Most analysts say the problem of Nigeria is corruption,i agree to some extent,one branch is corruption but that is not the root cause,the root cause of Nigerians problem is the lack of patrotism.it is quite sicking to watch once personal interest take preference over general interest,i stand by my earlier analysis and i maintain strongly that if the igbos say they are not Nigerian and they are not willing to commit 100% to the Nigerian project then let them go.Any Northern governor or Senator who couldn't speak when the igbo where displaying open rascality,open contempt,conducting acts of treason and sabotage to the country Nigeria and there governors could not speak then those same governors must keep quite now and if they insist on speaking then 2019 we shall tell you who appointed you to office .i stand by that statement,i read with shock comment emanating from osita a man who was give a rosey ride to the head of road safety and then to minister without doing or serving Nigeria in any capacity had the temerity to write things in support of there biafra,well all i can say is the leaders of today must not give the tomorrow leaders more trouble the issue of biafra most and should be settled now .either they go or they stay.second i reject with ever bone in my body the attempt by the senate to give the south east a development commission,that in my interpretation is an insult to the good people of the south south,under what ground does south east need a commission i ask?those forms of black mail would not work.the only people who deserve a development commission is the Niger Delta in fact as far as i am concern every state should rely on its resources and pay 50% royalty to the federal government.i total condemn the attempt to give south east a development commission,black mail is not exclusive to any part of the country,if south east is to get a development commission so should every region of the county which means the senate should set up south west commission,north east,north west and north central commission respectively even the north east which has been devastated by boko haram do not have a development commission

Rather it should be if only you new your country make sense.i laugh when i hear people talking

Tahrah:
It's a pity,if only our country made sense.......

nice

nice

nice

nice