₦airaland Forum

troubleseller:
Which brings to mind, DC fans or Comic books fans in general, who would you guys like to be the new Batman? WB wants to go for someone younger.

Juzec:
Night school
5/10
Very dry humour , the 5 is for the message it conveys.

Ishilove:
A Star is Born-

I am yet again reminded why I am irredeemably and unashamedly romantic. Very powerful performances from Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga. Definitely worth every Oscar it was nominated for.

9/10

troubleseller:
If that is the one with Keanu Reeves, then I didn't like it at all. Couldn't sit past 15 mins of the film.

oyaskii:
Not many will appreciate this masterpiece..make sure you complete the trilogy...The dailogues were heavenly...Ethan Hawke is built for this kind of role.

troubleseller:
Before Sunrise - 9/10
This is the best romantic film I have ever watched.
Next, Before Sunset.

BlackManta:
The thread has lost its sanity.

The way they spent time here arguing over superheroes....it almost makes it look like other movie genres like horror, action, comedy, drama don't exist anymore.

Can't these people talk about something else other than DC and Marvel stuff...

I'm looking for good romantic comedy movies...
Someone should recommend something for me abeg.

Seunpaul01:
Nobody's fool 8/10

Tiffany really killed it, she's a real hoot.

alexistaiwo:
Batman under the hood


7/10

I like batty die
One of my favorite superheroes movie quote of all time.

"What's your superpower?"
"I am rich"

troubleseller:
Both performances were okay not spectacular. Steve Carrell was static while Timothee was fantastic but the story itself was not what I was expecting. The movie felt slow but rushed at the same time. Too many flashbacks and flash forwards and there was no concrete reason for Nic turning to drugs. Since this is a movie about addiction, I thought that will be covered.

troubleseller:
Beautiful Boy - 6/10

alexistaiwo:
Someone please remind me, what is the Joker superpowers?


Dude is always leaving batman black-eyed back to back

LastDance:
mission impossible fallout 7/10

Nice action movie though the film tricks were insane.

Most especially the helicopter part towards the last scene, i was like, what the fork!!!!!!!! How did they not die or the helicopter did not even explode when they both first fell to the ground, with all the colliding between the rocks and the helicopters, they still did not die.

Its just a movie but mehnn, the film tricks is insane.

This is why i loved action movies like white house down, London has fallen and even hunter killer.
They make you believe they are real action all all moves are real life possible but the last scenes of mission impossible is just insane.

AHCB:
for the fact that James McAvoy starred in the movie, I'm downloading it. Funny how I thought he was a wack actor because he played the role of Professor Xavier in X-men.

PS: na joke I dey oh. Before the marvel fan boys here start to dey vex upandan. Lol.

Beorn:
There's no sane human that knows his onions when it comes to movies, that'd call BvS a masterpiece. You're just trolling. BvS was generally accepted to be a disappointment.

cao:
It's still fresh, but I liked it and disliked it. James McAvoy gets to chew the scenery. The first act is good, but the third act may annoy you. I was able to guess the ending, maybe I've read too much comics that I can see those strings. I'm honestly still 2 minds about it, I don't think I can give a rating.

Guykhena:
Not really,, I mean how can you say the below?





If I was Shittaakeem and MJBOLT, I would have stopped taking you serious when you typed the above and just take you as a troll.

kendrick93:
no the writing and creative role was done by Sony unlike the movies where Disney holds sway..
it's Sony fixture length film...
u can check the link below

Guykhena:
Calm down, stop trying too hard to sound erroneous, its becoming sad to watch.

Simple,Sony still owns everything, the only difference is that the character can now appear in the MCU: for Sony, this means that they finance and produce Spider-Man movies and take the full gross but they are now part of the MCU and can draft in associated characters; for Marvel, they can use Spider-Man in Avengers-related films that they again finance, produce and take all the profits from. To make that clear, Sony took home none of the ticket sales from Civil War, Infinity War and Marvel had no direct financial stakes in Homecoming and upcoming Far from home.

For the casting and the likes, Marvel may weigh in their opinions, but that's just it, Sony can decide to carry it out or not, Case in point Marvel wanted Charlie Plummer to play Spidey, Sony decided on going with Tom Holland. And even before the deal, Marvel were still consulted in earlier Spidey films like ASM 1&2, so it isn't a big deal to consult the source company, being that they only benefit from the merchandise sales. So just give it a rest and move on

kendrick93:
you are right but note that this spider man animation-into the spider verse was specifically made by Sony...

cao:
Glass.

Shittaakeem:
I can't belive this
chaiiii Aburo Jon snow
u no nothing bro
u no nothing !!!!!!

let me tell you something Sony is still the head of the. Spiderman franchise not marvel.
Sony has the right to change actors and director.
if marvel had the right Tom Holland won't be spider man right now because he wasn't Kevin fiegie choice.
It's was Amy pascal. Make your research. bro marvel don't have the right to the Spiderman movies.

Aburo Jon snow.

MJBOLT:

marvel do not own the film rights to spider man,marvel only have creative rights over spiderman if he's in a movie where he is not the main character

you are just rephrasing what i said..key word "creative"

Shittaakeem:
Nigga Shut the Bleep up
Sony still has the right to spiderman dude.
Shut up.
Just realised u know noting
Aburo Jon snow

Shittaakeem:
Nigga Shut up
illumination/universal did and it made one billion with despicable me and minions(low budjet). It also made 800m+ with secret life of pets.