Paschu's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Paschu's Profile › Paschu's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 (of 50 pages)
![]() |
He should run away because he's blunt about the truth, right? Do you really think that APC and buhari are more nigerian than everyone else? SHAME. spako4: |
Thay falana of a guy had become the worst irresponsible fellow I've ever seen going with the SAN tag. He should be stripped of that stuff already. Folks like him are the greatest threath to humanity, democracy, civility and rule of law. So regrettable that I once liked him, propably due to his gift of oratory which he has now wasted so grossly and shamelessly. |
That's hypocricy defined. |
Seige. State of emergency loading. |
My thought exactly. When Cameron called it a "fantastically corrupt" country, some lunatics claimed he knew not what he said. sapiosexual1: |
Leopard2A7: |
Peter The ROCK. ![]() "On you I will build the sledge hammer for brutal enforcement of the rule of law. And gates of tyranny and impunity shall not prevail against you". ![]() |
Okay na ![]() |
You are simply being unreasonable. If they are both supposed to "leave their official engagement to be in court" why then is it too hard for you to see that that's exactly what the FG wants to acheive with this their silly allegation? _____ just addeded**** If the AGF is sane why would he be taking the senate leaders to court for non-existent forgery and at the same time be defending buhari's lack of basic certificate? If he is out to do the right thing, why would he be threatening the lawyer who had gone to court to challenge the irregularity of buhari's nomination and election without providing his original certificate? ______ Regarding FFK, I mentined him to let you see that this Govt. has zero regard for rule of law. And since you could not see it, and the fact that some other people (like jonathan's cousin) are being held illegaly today, then this discussion is over. ________ Please leave my mention. spenca: |
You are really way more sick than I had imagined. MalcoImX: |
Mother of what? By what? Seriously you must be... Theoritical: |
Two complex questions: 1. Has FFK been proven by the law court to be guilty of corruption? If no, why then is he still being held in prison for over a month now? I don't even want to mention so many other political prisoners that are being held illegaly as at today. 2. Why is Saraki's CCT trial made to be held almost every day? Why the frequent arrest order issued on him each time he failed to appear in court due to his other official engagements? What makes you think that the new trumpped up charge would not be moved to daily hearing? If it does get to be heard daily how would saraki still go for his other trial and still preside over the senate? If both the senate president and his deputy get engrossed in dubious court case that drags them out of the senate sessions how would the senate operate without appointing new officials? If they do appoint new officials to replace (or even stand in for) the two embattled leaders, what then makes my assertion unrealistic? Friend you simply have no idea what Nigeria has gotten into. For your other assertion in the other post, you just don't have a grasp on what's going on. The accusers say that the senate standing rule (not a portion of it) was forged. Besides you should know that when you alter a part of a legal text the whole document becomes invalid. This was buhari's logic when he refused to give assent to the senate edited version of the 2016 appropriation bill. For a true comprehension of what's going on I advice you to go and read the last senate press release if have not done so already. spenca: |
Why do you deliberately shut down your reasoning faculty on a public forum? The standing rule book of the senate was the benchmark for everything done in the senate so far. Without the standing rule there would be no induction for the senate elects. And without induction they could not function as senators of the fedral rebuplic. So if you propose that the standing rule was invalid, then you should in effect be saying that everything else that's done with it is nullified. It's that simple. The truth however is that the plan of FG is not to prove that there was forgery. Their plan is simpmy to distablze the senate, topple its leadership and install their own puppets so that the FG's lucrative dirty deals (like budget padding) won't be exposed ever again. spenca: |
spenca:That's where you are too naive to get the point. The FG knows very well that they have zero case against those two guys, but here's the plan: 1. Remand them in the prison.pending when their ridiculous bail terms get fufilled or 2. Keep them out of senate proceedings with a compulsory daily court hearing, so that 3. There would be presure for their replacement in the senate Thus the game plan is simply to get the two men out of senate leadership by all crooked means. Got it? Unfortunately, tomorrow some nutcases will come here and tell me that buhari is not corrupt. |
You are the illiterate here. If you think you are not, then kindly explain (in details) the scenario that's being touted as forgery by the FG. And while you are at it, do let us know what the senate has done about the scenario and what the staus quo was in the upper chamber prior to the advent of the 8th senate. Thank you. gigabyte13: |
So EFCC is now buhari's personal property? You kids are just so annoying. 124mumsy: |
And that's the president's wife? Funny. |
1 . I vote for Ivyy. Cc NLJega 2. I vote for Mimzy. Cc NLJega 3. I vote for Mysticgal. Cc NLJega 4. I vote for Refiner. Cc NLJega 5. I vote for Optional1. Cc NLJega 6. I vote for Lanicky. Cc NLJega 7. I vote for Diasyluv. Cc NLJega |
Why exactly do you want a separate Biafra country? What is your dissatisfaction with Nigeria as currently constituted?http://m.guardian.ng/features/biafra-how-nigerias-continuing-economic-war-against-igbo-fuels-agitation/ heryeendey |
Nelson Mandela: Champion of Freedom After 27 years in prison Nelson Mandela was freed in 1990 and negotiated the end of apartheid in South Africa bringing peace to a racially divided country and leading the fight for human rights around the world. INTRODUCTION After the National Party gained power in South Africa in 1948, its all-white government immediately began enforcing existing policies of racial segregation under a system of legislation that it called apartheid. Under apartheid, nonwhite South Africans (a majority of the population) would be forced to live in separate areas from whites and use separate public facilities, and contact between the two groups would be limited. Despite strong and consistent opposition to apartheid within and outside of South Africa, its laws remained in effect for the better part of 50 years. In 1991, the government of President F.W. de Klerk began to repeal most of the legislation that provided the basis for apartheid. BIRTH OF APARTHEID Racial segregation and white supremacy had become central aspects of South African policy long before apartheid began. The controversial 1913 Land Act, passed three years after South Africa gained its independence, marked the beginning of territorial segregation by forcing black Africans to live in reserves and making it illegal for them to work as sharecroppers. Opponents of the Land Act formed the South African National Native Congress, which would become the African National Congress (ANC). Did You Know? ANC leader Nelson Mandela, released from prison in February 1990, worked closely with President F.W. de Klerk's government to draw up a new constitution for South Africa. After both sides made concessions, they reached agreement in 1993, and would share the Nobel Peace Prize that year for their efforts. The Great Depression and World War II brought increasing economic woes to South Africa, and convinced the government to strengthen its policies of racial segregation. In 1948, the Afrikaner National Party won the general election under the slogan “apartheid” (literally “separateness”). Their goal was not only to separate South Africa’s white minority from its non-white majority, but also to separate non-whites from each other, and to divide black South Africans along tribal lines in order to decrease their political power. APARTHEID BECOMES LAW By 1950, the government had banned marriages between whites and people of other races, and prohibited sexual relations between black and white South Africans. The Population Registration Act of 1950 provided the basic framework for apartheid by classifying all South Africans by race, including Bantu (black Africans), Coloured (mixed race) and white. A fourth category, Asian (meaning Indian and Pakistani) was later added. In some cases, the legislation split families; parents could be classified as white, while their children were classified as colored. A series of Land Acts set aside more than 80 percent of the country’s land for the white minority, and “pass laws” required non-whites to carry documents authorizing their presence in restricted areas. In order to limit contact between the races, the government established separate public facilities for whites and non-whites, limited the activity of nonwhite labor unions and denied non-white participation in national government. APARTHEID AND SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd, who became prime minister in 1958, would refine apartheid policy further into a system he referred to as “separate development.” The Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act of 1959 created 10 Bantu homelands known as Bantustans. Separating black South Africans from each other enabled the government to claim there was no black majority, and reduced the possibility that blacks would unify into one nationalist organization. Every black South African was designated as a citizen as one of the Bantustans, a system that supposedly gave them full political rights, but effectively removed them from the nation’s political body. In one of the most devastating aspects of apartheid, the government forcibly removed black South Africans from rural areas designated as “white” to the homelands, and sold their land at low prices to white farmers. From 1961 to 1994, more than 3.5 million people were forcibly removed from their homes and deposited in the Bantustans, where they were plunged into poverty and hopelessness. OPPOSITION TO APARTHEID Resistance to apartheid within South Africa took many forms over the years, from non-violent demonstrations, protests and strikes to political action and eventually to armed resistance. Together with the South Indian National Congress, the ANC organized a mass meeting in 1952, during which attendees burned their pass books. A group calling itself the Congress of the People adopted a Freedom Charter in 1955 asserting that “South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black or white.[b]” The government broke up the meeting and arrested 150 people, charging them with high treason. In 1960, at the black township of Sharpesville, the police opened fire on a group of unarmed blacks associated with the Pan-African Congress (PAC), an offshoot of the ANC. The group had arrived at the police station without passes, inviting arrest as an act of resistance. At least 67 blacks were killed and more than 180 wounded. Sharpesville convinced many anti-apartheid leaders that they could not achieve their objectives by peaceful means, and both the PAC and ANC established military wings, neither of which ever posed a serious military threat to the state. By 1961, most resistance leaders had been captured and sentenced to long prison terms or executed. Nelson Mandela, a founder of Umkhonto we Sizwe (“Spear of the Nation”), the military wing of the ANC, was incarcerated from 1963 to 1990; his imprisonment would draw international attention and help garner support for the anti-apartheid cause.[/b] APARTHEID COMES TO AN END In 1976, when thousands of black children in Soweto, a black township outside Johannesburg, demonstrated against the Afrikaans language requirement for black African students, the police opened fire with tear gas and bullets. The protests and government crackdowns that followed, combined with a national economic recession, drew more international attention to South Africa and shattered all illusions that apartheid had brought peace or prosperity to the nation. The United Nations General Assembly had denounced apartheid in 1973, and in 1976 the UN Security Council voted to impose a mandatory embargo on the sale of arms to South Africa. In 1985, the United Kingdom and United States imposed economic sanctions on the country. Under pressure from the international community, the National Party government of Pieter Botha sought to institute some reforms, including abolition of the pass laws and the ban on interracial sex and marriage. The reforms fell short of any substantive change, however, and by 1989 Botha was pressured to step aside in favor of F.W. de Klerk. De Klerk’s government subsequently repealed the Population Registration Act, as well as most of the other legislation that formed the legal basis for apartheid. A new constitution, which enfranchised blacks and other racial groups, took effect in 1994, and elections that year led to a coalition government with a nonwhite majority, marking the official end of the apartheid system. Source: http://www.history.com/topics/apartheid heryeendey |
I wonder why you're speaking english. You should be speaking a primitive obsolete language since you're still thinking like a caveman in 2016. Politician tomakint: |
CrazyMommy: "....
|
AntiWailer:Man, why are you guys so cold hearted? Cant't you just shut the Bleep up? Must you talk? Are you in any kind of mortal obligation to defend and justify this govt.? Are'nt you afraid that a man's six children were totally wiped off for no just cause by the elected govt. of his own country? Are you even a human beign at all? Guess you don't know what escalated the menace of boko haram, if you did, you'd be scared of this trend. You'd be so freaking terrified to justify the shameless mass murder of innocent kids and Nigerians. Nonsense. |
Licensed to kill. Yet someone will tell me it's ... |
No, don't blame buhari, blame me. I am the new head of state. Bunch of silly dunces littering every corner of NL since 2015. Jaideyone: |
Bunch of confused confusionists. |
I was actually begining to wonder how a whole monday would pass without a new supply of political porn and dope for the crack headed zombies. ![]() Here it is at last. APC = All Propaganda Congress And the zombies won't ever quit. |
RZArecta:OP this is the second premium content on this forum so far since Jan. 2016. Tha last line says it all. Unfortunately buharists are way too mentally damaged to comprehend the basic essentials of true nationalism and nation building. |
Thought it was only buhari that blocks all the blockables? |
See who's talking about reasoning. If you have even an atom of idea what reasoning means you'd bee too ashamed to ask the police or supreme court to change a decision made by the MAJORITY of the senators on INTERNAL matters which are the EXCLUSIVE affairs of the senate. Even an average 5 year old primary six girl would have been reasonable enough to ask "how come the agrieved senators did not raise the issue at the senate sessions"? Then she would have been educated to the fact that the poor political jobbers actually did bring the matter up in the senate but the majority of the senators insisted that those miscreants had no point because (as far as the senate is concerend) the process of the election was as normal and perfect as it could get. - Guess you did not see "1999" in that report? - Guess you also did not see words like "plot" "remand" and "distract"? Tommorow you'd also support buhari when he sends the IG to summon the Judge that says that buhari has a case to answer regarding his immaterial certificate. In your own scheme of reasoning, the Police and the court are now in the position to determine how the apex lawmakers should operate. SHAME. And you have the gut to suggest that you are reasonable? Sorry. |
It's either you have a very serious issue with comprehension or you are totally unable to read. There was no forgery anywhere. What the demented power drunks call "forgery" is actually a normal NAS process that has been in place since 1999. “The Rules of the Senate and how the institution elects its leadership are internal affairs. The National Assembly bureaucracy provides the Rules of a new Senate. It has always been so since 1999... Senators of the Eighth Senate have no control on the rules applied in the elections of June 9, 2015 because until after their inauguration, they were only Senators-elect, and therefore mere bystanders in the affairs of the Senate.The stupid old men gunning to overthrow the current senate leadership are mere psycophants who are desperate to bring nigeria down again to the era of lawlessness and dictatorship. Unfortunately majority of nigerians are so dumb and annoyingly silly to condemn impunity. Folks like you even cheer it on. Gosh. I certainly no longer blame Nigerians who no longer wish to be identified as Nigetians. pharmagba: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 (of 50 pages)