Paschu's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Paschu's Profile › Paschu's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 50 pages)
But Diezeani and co owes you and your corhorts some public explanations, right? Your views are just so disgusting. Poo mrvitalis: |
martineverest:There's no First World Ladies Conference hapening in Denver or anywhere in Colorado. Heck, not even in any of the 50 States in the US. This is just another dumb lie which APC will soon deny. |
Geez, your attempt at Igbo is disgusting. I can bet anything that you were not born in Igbo land. Quit your pretence please. You have zero clue of what it means to be an Igbo person in Nigeria. amaechi1: |
[s] Ayatullah: |
[size=24pt]How come I'm not seeing those blind praise singers here?[/size] ![]() |
Take a look: http://lawpadi.com/how-to-make-a-freedom-of-information-request-in-nigeria/ The law was intended to apply to every public official/institution across the country. You are only saying that it does not apply to states because of a contradictory court ruling that happened in Lagos. But you forgot that prior to the delivery of the Lagos judgement, a high court judge in Ibadan, S.A. Akinteye, ruled that FoI Act is applicable to all States of the Federation. "The Ibadan High Court ruled last year that the application of the FoI Act was for the entire federation, therefore, “does not need to be domesticated by any state before taking effect in all states across the federation.” http://dailypost.ng/2014/11/01/court-rules-foi-act-binding-states/ http://www.nigeriannews.net/index.php/sid/227289435 It may also interest you to know that the said Ekiti State (besides Lagos), based on the information available to me, is the only State in Nigeria that has domesticated the FoI Act. So you, dammytosh and StOla are clearly just ranting over nothing. See validation: http://www.nigerianlawtoday.com/2015/10/the-freedom-of-information-act-and-its.html AZeD1: |
You are really silly. Shut down your phone and sleep. Go check what's done elsewhere. Trump and Clinton have their campaign fund and expenditure published MONTHLY. It's a public knowledge even on social media. The Freedom of Information Act gives you the RIGHT to know how the governor funded his campaign. If the bank refuses to give you the information then go to court. Dumb. dammytosh: |
Really. So freedom of information bill cannot give you access to the details of how a public figure funded his campaign? A matter you claim that the EFCC has already placed on the public domain? I am sorry for you. dammytosh: |
GEJ gave you the Freedom of Information Bill. How about using it? Stop getting drunk on the lies and propaganda of APC. Just be a man. Use your intelligence. Walk into Zenith HQs and demand for a full written explanation. Ask for raw data. Not just about the Zenith funding but also about the numerous donors that paid money into his Zenith bank account. If you cannot do the above then you are not more intelligent than those dudes who habitually spend their nights at bars speculating away on stuffs they're fed (by the already pocketed media) without any iota of verifiable data. Be unique. Prove to us that you are better than us. Don't just hype your intelligence on your phone. StOla: |
GOD BLESS YOU MY DEAR. A TRILLION THANKS AND LIKES!!! bnovative: |
Get this straight: Fayose is not afraid of your little investigation or shiny prosecution. What he is saying is that you should respect the rule of law which you claim to represent. You cannot freeze someone's PERSONAL account on MERE SUSPICION without a court order. And no court is authirized by law to issue such an order on a sitting governor here in Nigeria. So, since all your diabolical abracadabra at getting Fayose impeached has failed and died on arrival, you have no choice but to wait until his tenure is over. But if you really want to ditch your hypocrictical cap, all you need to do is send a just signal that will tear off the veil of hipocricy that has hitherto discredited your touted fight against corruption and made it look like a sysyematic opposition cleansing. You know how to do that? Do what Fayose suggested. Launch a transpatent and unbiased investigation into the alleged Aisha Buhari's involvement in forex round tripping. Investigate her involvement into the iGate or otherwise international bribery and contract frauds. Heck, open an investigation on the sitting president regarding his family's ownership of a choice estate in one of the choicest parts of the Fedral Capital Terriotry. An estate, which by the way, I heard rumoured that it was not included in the president's asset declaration document (which kind of makes me wonder again what saraki's case was all about). Heck, Nigerians want to see the ORIGINAL COPY of their president's required minimum academic qualification for the office of the POTFRON. Folks are not asking for the demented logic or a silly spin off from a bunch of integrity-challenged SANs. But here we are pokenosing into the senate standing rule. How about dealing with all the above first (as a way of putting your house in order) before witch-hunting and clamping down on the voices of opposition, especially the sitting governors of Rivers and Ekiti states? You cannot justifiably condemn someone when you are guilty of same or similar offence. Ayatullah: |
The British PM's "FantasticallyCorrupt" statement seems to be making a whole lot more of new sense now. OlandoOwoo: |
Breadmaker:Your comprehenssion and summary skills are out of this world. ![]() |
What I see here is YAHAYA Balogun NOT Paul, Abraham or Emmanuel Fayose. ![]() |
I Vote IVYY Cc:NLjega |
Of course. |
Funny that you use love and judgement (fear based manipulation) in the same context. Anyway, keep lifting your theory above the Truth. I guess you are smarter than Paul who said that sex is a mutual OBLIGATION in marriage and it's FRAUDLENT to deprive your spouse of sex (be it husband or wife) since you no longer have RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP over your body. UuzbaGuuzba: |
Thought it was from touts? ![]() |
SEX is SEX. Call it whatever you like. It does not change what it is. 1 Corinthians 7 (ISV) Concerning Marriage 1 Now about what you asked: “Is it advisable for a man not to marry?” (Compare) 2 Because sexual immorality is so rampant, every man should have his own wife, and every woman should have her own husband. 3 A husband should fulfill his obligation to his wife, and a wife should do the same for her husband. 4 A wife does not have authority over her own body, but her husband does. In the same way, a husband doesn’t have authority over his own body, but his wife does. 5 Do not withhold yourselves from each other unless you agree to do so just for a set time, in order to devote yourselves to prayer. Then you should come together again so that Satan does not tempt you through your lack of self-control. 6 But I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I would like everyone to be unmarried, like I am. However, each person has a special gift from God, one this and another that. 8 I say to those who are unmarried, especially to widows: It is good for them to remain like me. 9 However, if they cannot control themselves, they should get married, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. 10 To married people I give this command (not really I, but the Lord): A wife must not leave her husband. 11 But if she does leave him, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. Likewise, a husband must not abandon his wife. 12 I (not the Lord) say to the rest of you: If a brother has a wife who is an unbeliever and she is willing to live with him, he must not abandon her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is an unbeliever and he is willing to live with her, she must not abandon him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified because of her husband. Otherwise, your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. 15 But if the unbelieving partner leaves, let him go. In such cases the brother or sister is not under obligation. God has called you to live in peace. 16 Wife, you might be able to save your husband. Husband, you might be able to save your wife. Live according to God’s Call 17 Nevertheless, everyone should live the life that the Lord gave him and to which God called him. This is my rule in all the churches. 18 Was anyone circumcised when he was called? He should not try to change that. Was anyone uncircumcised when he was called? He should not get circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but obeying God’s commandments is everything. 20 Everyone should stay in the same condition in which he was called. 21 Were you a slave when you were called? Do not let that bother you. Of course, if you have a chance to become free, take advantage of the opportunity. 22 For the slave who has been called to belong to the Lord is the Lord’s free person. In the same way, the free person who has been called is the Messiah’s slave. 23 You were bought for a price. Stop becoming slaves of people. 24 Brothers, everyone should stay in the same condition in which he was called by God. Concerning Virgins 25 Now concerning virgins, although I do not have any command from the Lord, I will give you my opinion as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy. 26 In view of the present crisis, I think it is prudent for a man to stay as he is. 27 Have you become committed to a wife? Stop trying to get released from your commitment. Have you been freed from your commitment to a wife? Stop looking for one. 28 But if you do get married, you have not sinned. And if a virgin gets married, she has not sinned. However, these people will experience trouble in this life, and I want to spare you from that. 29 This is what I mean, brothers: The time is short. From now on, those who have wives should live as though they had none, 30 and those who mourn as though they did not mourn, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing, and those who buy as though they did not own a thing, 31 and those who use the things in the world as though they were not dependent on them. For the world in its present form is passing away. 32 I want you to be free from concerns. An unmarried man is concerned about the things of the Lord, that is, about how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about things of this world, that is, about how he can please his wife, 34 and so his attention is divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the affairs of the Lord, so that she may be holy in body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world, that is, about how she can please her husband. 35 I’m saying this for your benefit, not to put a noose around your necks, but to promote good order and unhindered devotion to the Lord. 36 If a man thinks he is not behaving properly toward his virgin, and if his passion is so strong that he feels he ought to marry her, let him do what he wants; he isn’t sinning. Let them get married. 37 However, if a man stands firm in his resolve, feels no necessity, and has made up his mind to keep her a virgin, he will be acting appropriately. 38 So then the man who marries the virgin acts appropriately, but the man who refrains from marriage does even better. 39 A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, only in the Lord. 40 However, in my opinion she will be happier if she stays as she is. And in saying this, I think that I, too, have God’s Spirit. UuzbaGuuzba: |
IMPRESSIVE. |
Personally, any attempt by my wife to resist my sexual advances would turn OFF every atom of sexual urge in me at once. I refuse to accept the norm of begging or manipulating one's way into sex. But come to think of it... Since sex is STRICTLY for marriage, why then should a man be accused of rape when he INSISTS on having sex with his own wife? Does that not sound hypocritical to you? I think a (Christian) woman has no business getting married in the first place if she ever brings herself to the point where her own husband will have to force her to have sex wirh him. That's absurd. You cannot be a wife and still refuse to have sex with your husband when he wants it. You also cannot be a husband and still refuse to have sex with your wife when she wants it. Both are purely unscriptural. opalu: |
Good that you had enough sense to google it. But it takes more than a grain of phraisal definition you picked on Investopedia (a foreign company) to explain what's now happening in Nigeria. Understanding the CONCEPT (not the phrase) of hostile takeover is more than 5 seconds of googling. It takes a bit of critical thinking and painstaking research, if you're not an investment banker. Now regarding what AMCON is doing I advise you to read the following feature on a 2011 edition of Vanguard (and understand the possibities it seeks to portray) before you start your noise. By the way, here's an exerpt: ...And, errrm, to be clear, I did not actually say that what's going on now IS a "hostile takeover". I merely gave a rhetoric on that one. Meaning that it may or may not be a hostile takeover. In other words, I'm saying that you should care to be sure of what's going on before you support the silly call (by a bunch of non-staters) to crucify the Murays. kayfra: |
If you had at least read a little bit of Fayose's history or prediction for 2016 you'd sure be a bit careful not to speak rashly about him here. wawaboy1: |
How callous. Imagine how you respond to someone's sweat and blood. Do you realize that Silverbird brand has been in existence for decades whereas the said loan was only taken in 2011? Do you even know the terms of that loan? No. Do you have details as to WHY the company defaulted? No. Have you heard about the the concept of "hostile takeover"?, Heck I guess NO again. Do you know if what we're seeing now is a "hostile takeover"? I guess you don't care. Have you (or anyone in your family) ever STARTED (not managed) a sucessful business in your life? Heck NO. So it's now clear why you would shamelessly and publicly wish that a person's investment of over 30 years should be taken over forcefully and sold quickly. The fact that the bruce family is taking this with stride does not mean that they were guilty of anything (as folks like you want to suggest). If anything their stride just shows that they have a great sense of RESPONSIBILITY (not blame shifting) which this govt. desperately needs. kayfra: |
Don't worry. The war against capital which you cheer on will soon reach your own bedroom, one way or the other. Likewise the "heroic" illegal and forceful wealth redistribution which you blindly endorse and are currently so excited about. By the time the chips are down we'd know who's really disgusting, corrupt, incompetent, and meaningless. arresa: |
If you had any atom of sensibility you would have known that all we've had since Jan 2016 is gross anarchy and lawlessness. Impunity had never been this unclad since the civil war. Abuse of office and executive rascality are now the norm. Corruption and disregard for the rule of law had never been this institutionalized. Yet some half brained herdsmasses are in support of the mess. arresa: |
Definitely the judge of the whole earth is not asleep. The collective consciousness of the critical mass has long been craving and crying out for justice. Be rest assured that it will soon strike. And when it does, it will tingle the ear. A rude awakening. onyepapa: |
Okay it's going too far to see where they beg fayose to forgive their mess. But the bank did not go too far when they issued an indicting PUBLIC statement against fayose, right? SHAMELESS HYPOCRITES. tuale4u: |
Just imagine this. It still baffles me how that with this endless "in your face" kind of hairy lies, some bunch of educated dummies will still come up here to claim integrity for his boss. Integrity my foot. RUBBISH. |
No, on the contrary, you lost my vote because you lack the capacity to hold down a bit, think deeper, reflect on issues, before talking. Your knee jerk response to losing my vote just illustrates what I'm saying. No, we don't have to agree on everything. So you lost my vote not because of disagreement, but because of your insensitivity and inability to REFLECT on issues before talking. You think you love Nigeria, but no, you don't. When you do, you'd let every color and shade of her diversity shine without repression. But I do not expect you to understand that. What I do ecpect you to understand is that a queen ought to be a bridge builder, which your statement shows you're not. Okay, let's say you responded too quickly. Given. But how about now that your insensitivity is pointed out, have you done anything remotely related to reflecting deeper on my points? Have you really taken time to THINK about the reasons I gave? What else have you done in response to my points other than throwing up baseless political innuendos and funny assumptions? refiner: |
refiner:You just lost my vote. Why? - For being so insensitive to sensitive issues. - For talking where you should be thinking. - For playing down a matter that borders on national security. - For sacrificing equity on the altar of political correctness. These are not the attributes I expect from my queen. Sorry. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 50 pages)


