₦airaland Forum

Incarnations of Lucifa himself. Only demons believe their words.

When it was initially reported, you lots said it was a lie. Now that it's no longer hidden, you've changed your narrative to say it's tge right thing to do. Bunch of hypocrites.

Seun, Mynd44, Lalasticlala, Ishilove

If you guys or NL TRULY say no Secessionists then this type of THREADS should not be found anywhere on Nairaland.

It's GROSSLY IMMORAL to allow some groups or persons to viciously attack other groups or persons and still demand that the attacked groups or persons should remain calm.

Please Seun you have to deal with this stuff squarely. Be a defender of equity and justice.

irunooboo:
Reno is a fool and sympathetic to biafra all because GEJ was booted out of power.

Female display of splendid idiocy.

ADVICE: Quit littering NL with your silly geberish, little girl (or is it tomboy?)

kettykin:
Nigeria has no army, calling the bunch of jokers shooting unarmed protesters And who take refuge when they encounter a well Armed group an an army is an insult to professional armies.

Don't mind them, bunch of hopless lying bitches.

Notice that rather than providing FACTUAL timeline and details of what happened, they bent on DEFENDING and REDEEMING the already lost image of the NA. Pure public manipulation and bias.

When they are ready to give an honeest account, they'd tell us:

- how many unarmed pro-Biafran agitators were shot death on the spot,
- how many died later due to gun shot injuries,
- how many sustained and still nurse critical wounds from gun shots,
- how many were illegally detained and tortured,
- how many were secretly buried
- Why was the attack on the civilians launched when some were still asleep and others got ready for early morning prayers? And many more.

Shameful lots.

EPIC

mekaboy:
My friend take your sentiments and hypocrisy and shove it down your ass. Then address the issue logically. It's people like you that feel it's ok for PMB to tell the world Nigerians are corrupt, then turn around and attack Cameron for saying the same.

How come our security agents could arrest Nigerians defending themselves from Lybians but could not prevent an attack on Nigerians?

[s]

MalcoImX:
The dude's talking the most sense. Any criminal that declares war on Nigeria must be fought with with all that Nigeria is capable. In the end, nobody that fought Nigeria had the last laugh. What has Boko Haram achieved if not desolation and misery? What has the Biafrans achieved? Their fate (the Sca(m)vengers will be like those of the Bokos and the Biafrans. We are solidly behind the FG in this, and if need be we'll enroll as reservists and encourage all our kith and kin to finish these criminal saboteurs.

[/s]

The old rascal studied in Turkey, and you, his mortal puppet, bears the monica MalcomX.

Why then should I expect either of you (a bunch of genocidal-blood-thirsty-jihadists) to reason like a 21st century humam being?

Thing is all those who lust to see another genocide in the SS and SE will be frustrated out of life yet their desires will be cut off.

Long expected.

kernel501:
Brown roof demons, always begging and lying.

Bros edit your post. You did not need to REPEAT the whole crap as quote.

This dude is grossly IRRESPONSIBLE. An aged rascal per excellence. Just go checkout the blog ran by the pained old loser. https://friskylarr.com

Concerned folks should put this thing (more of a little demonized chimp) on their security watch.

Awesome. My....

JEEZ!!!

What sort of country is this?

El-rufai will be more like the cabal's choice dice.Though I dislike the dude.

Very well said. Epic actually.

Good move.

[s]

ddippset:
this your essay is still senseless. Read what the op wrote and face the reality that the president said absolutely nothing wrong.But if you feel happier maintaining your stance that the president said he will marginalize 5percent then you and your cohorts better soothe yourselves. As we have all seen the so called 5 percent cannot vote him out of power,cannot impeach him,cannot kill him, cannot stop him from getting his entitlements.so hold on to your 5 percent theory for ever,it's of no consequence.

[/s]

Dumb, dumb, so darn dumb.

So why are you here? Why are you bothered? Why did the OP open this thread if the 5%ers don't matter? Bunch of hi....

[s]

ddippset:
this your essay is still senseless. Read what the op wrote and face the reality that the president said absolutely nothing wrong.But if you feel happier maintaining your stance that the president said he will marginalize 5percent then you and your cohorts better soothe yourselves. As we have all seen the so called 5 percent cannot vote him out of power,cannot impeach him,cannot kill him, cannot stop him from getting his entitlements.so hold on to your 5 percent theory for ever,it's of no consequence.

[/s]

Dumb, dumb, so darn dumb.

seunt4ut:
That's exactly what this present administration is doing. Agitators are those who financially benefiting from Importation, they claimed to be the back bone of the economy a statement that make a lot of sensible people laugh because I never heard where buy and selling is the economy strength. In the next 2yrs this administration will flush out the inferior goods that flock our country and promote locally produce goods made from local raw materials. The simple arithmetic of economy is that when you bring more than you send out your currency will struggle.

Dude you are talking what you don't know. Even US and China are known to import stuff massively. In fact many US consumer goods (yes, including household electronics and gadgets) are manufactured abroad.

So stop talking crap.

This govt. killed our economy. Just see them threatening private banks like a bunch of clowns, after destroying the banks' cashflows with silly timing for policy implementations. .

I don't simply know where folks like you get all your silly theories from.

Even UAE that's currently turning Dubai into a world-class commercial hub, how many stuffs are they producing?

Can you mention just three stuffs you know are produced, finished and exported from Saudi Arabia now?

ISpiksDaTroof:
"Burned in their tanks" and "They will surrender" is now equal to WMDs?

Can you please try not to quote me ever again in your miserable uneducated life? People of low IQ disgust me.

In your docile dumbness and arrogance it takes matches to set the US Army and their Amoured Tanks on fire, right?

Just know that it takes the worst types of unreasonable-educated-illiterate-dumb-asses not to know that it takes weapons of mass destruction (either real or implied) to threaten the US ARMY.

Get off the darn thread if you have nothing sensible to contribute.

989900:
That'd be weighty if that actually has anything in form of proof or disproof of his allegation, that a gov't would take it upon itself to claim recovery of non-existent funds.

If going by your logic: "undermined his entire credibility wrongly while projecting your false opinion as the last factual word on the matter", because of name vs alias, we could say far, far, worse for Femi then . . . he should have substantiated his claims.

Femi was only trying to show you that this govt. tells unwholsome lies with impunity just like the failed Iraqi govt. F

emi did not say that the goverment did not recover $9 billion. He only adviced that Nigerians should take the report with a large pinch of salt as doing otherwise would show that we have not learnt anything from the lying tradition of this govt. since the last one year.

Femi even went on to list a number of other cases where the govt. clearly lied to the populace deliberately.

The way I see it, disputing the fact that lies are emaneting too much from this govt. simply puts a question mark on your own credibility.

989900:
1. What is your point exactly? Given what I've written, and what Femi said. I know him as Al sahaf. He knows him as 'comical Ali' which I do not know him as, 'cause there is a Chemical Ali who was of course the known one way back from the 1980s, when he gassed his own people . . . and as you rightly pointed out, 'comical Ali' was a derivative of 'chemical Ali's alias.

2. How does knowing, or not knowing one of Al Sahaf's numerous aliases ultimately substitute for proof of Femi's assertion that there is no $9b?

My point is that you discredited femi's comment and undermined his entire credibility wrongly while projecting your false opinion as the last factual word on the matter. That's wrong. Very wrong.

989900:
'Chemical Ali'; not "comical Ali".

BTW, 'Chemical Ali' was not the propagandist, it was Saed Al Sahaf.

If Femi can't get that right, and can't provide solid proof for his illusion, how am I to believe any sh!t he is selling . . . "opinions are like arm pits, everyone has them, and most of them stink".

It appeard the dude is way more informed than you are.

Here's what Wikipedia says about the matter:

Al-Sahhaf is known for his daily press briefings in Baghdad during the 2003 Iraq War. His colorful appearances caused him to be nicknamed "Baghdad Bob"[4] (in the style of previous propagandists with geographical aliases – some of them alliterative, such as "Hanoi Hannah" and "Seoul City Sue" by commentators in the United States. He was nicknamed "Comical Ali" (a wordplay allusion to Chemical Ali, the nickname of former Iraqi Defence Minister Ali Hassan al-Majid) by commentators in the United Kingdom; commentators in Italy similarly nicknamed him "Alì il Comico".

ISpiksDaTroof:
This doesn't even make sense. The Iraqi Government wasn't the one claiming they had WMDs, the U.S and the "coalition" were.

This Mr.Arbisala man, from everything I can glean of him, doesn't seem to be stable.

Activa:
He got yet another thing wrong - Iraq never claimed to have weapons of mass destruction, it was UK and America's lie against her.

ISpiksDaTroof & Activa

Both of you are the ones getting it wrong, the guy in question was doing exactly what Lai Mohammed is doing in Nigeria: silly attempts to brain wash the Iraqi nationals into believing lies. He actually said that US army and their coalition will surrender or be destroyed by Iraq.

See an excerpt from Wikipedia:

His pronouncements included claims that American soldiers were committing suicide "by the hundreds" outside the city, and denial that there were any American tanks in Baghdad, when in fact they were only several hundred meters away from the press conference where he was speaking and the combat sounds of the nearing American troops could already be heard in the background of the broadcast. On another occasion he spoke of the disastrous outcomes of previous foreign attempts to invade Iraq, citing an unspecified western history book and inviting the journalists present to come to his home to read it. His last public appearance as Information Minister was on April 8, 2003, when he said that the Americans "are going to surrender or be burned in their tanks. They will surrender, it is they who will surrender".

This shows how pathetic some APC folks on NL are, and how they habitually push their unverified opinions as fact.

Now that their rants against Femi have been debunked as fallacies, lets watch and see if they'd be men enough to admit their wrong openly and apologise for those silly rants.

BTW here's your source abi stew: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Saeed_al-Sahhaf

bakila:
Why is this beautiful thread ignored this far?

People are fed up with poo.

SR, plus its cheap and rotten journalism, has become like maggot infested latrine to most dudes.

Thus folks need to stay off SR to remain rational and politically healthy.

A bunch of socialist anti-capital leeches. Any enterprising Nigerian that fails to vote for PDP in 2019 will have himself/herself to blame.

Sweetlemon:
When will you guys learn to stop picking just one sentence from a whole speech and exaggerating everything this man says.
I watched that video it's nothing like the way the media reported it. It was just a phrase from a full sentence. Haba!

You're lying and you know it.

There's nothing on earth that makes that statement justifiable.

The man was clearly asked about how he plans to ensure an ALL INCLUSIVE governance in ND, but he responded with an emphatic assertion that "in all honesty", a consitituency that gave him 97% of their votes cannot be treated equally with those that gave him just 5% of theirs.

And to drive the point home, he went on to say that the govetnment should act in ways that'd show appreciation to those who voted him into power.

And in case you're still in doubt, check all his appointments and allocations till date - he's still proving that he was never misquoted.

So I do not understand why you are lying here.

Not even a single APC gun or his numerous spokesmen who are known for blantant statement reversals and denials has yet come out to deny or debunk that statement.

So what's your problem exactly?

jpphilips:
author=paschu

Dude get off my mention. First, you are not the OP. Second, in spite of all your wasted efforts all you could come up with were silly assumptions and stupid inuendos. You're not worth my time please. Get the heck off my mention.

[s]

sonnie10:
This is just my opinion about the whole of this story. Because I understand the environment in Nigeria, and the extent people would go to achieve their goals, so I will give my perspective. The story does not add up and it is surrounded by suspicious undertones. First, let me be clear on this, for those who know how asylum works, they won't be surprised with my position. No be say I wan knock the guy's job but to inform to people on the other side of this story.

The premise is that if one comes up with a good story, especially if there is a claim that the individual's life is at risk, then he may gain asylum from one of the Western countries. This in essence is the background of this particular story.

Who goes to Borno to process visa? Borno of all places at this point in time! Why Borno? The answer is simple, to establish the story. Without linking the story to Borno which is a hot zone, known for the activities of BH and by extension terrorism the evidence won't be complete. Any story teller wants a captivating story to win attention and build more evidence, whether there are true or not.

Time and space will not permit to continue, but in my view, none of these ever happened. No one went to Borno, no one was abducted, no one was asked to denounce his faith. Someone is seeking attention form cheap publicity on Nairaland, someone wants to seek asylum. In fact, someone needs to be invited over by the police.

I do not know this person neither do I have anything with him, but I know the environment he lives in. Shalom!

[/s]

[size=24pt]Only a fool talks with ABSOLUTE certainty about a strange matter before hearing all the facts.[/size]

jpphilips:
Read the title of the thread!!




Has it been Bombed?





[/color]

Oga stop that noise. NONE of the oil blocks posted by OP has been bombed either. Or did you not read what he wrote? It's just a cheap propaganda. Nothing else. Just pure deception.

AJINATU:
Accepted. We all want True Federalism nay resource control, but why is that the Northern Oil Block owners like Atiku, TY Danjuma, Daribe etc havent been affected by the Militants attacks? Why are the Militants blowing up pipeline connected to oil blocks that are majorly owned by Southerners? Both questions are what the OP's article posits

[b]If I got your drift right the oil blocks you listed were not attacked, rather they were shut down because the export pipelines they feed crude oil to has been bombed. If this assertion is correct, then it goes to show that your conclusion is faulty on two grounds:

1. The forcados export pipeline is NOT the only pipelines the NDA has bombed. But your analysis did not tell us the oil blocks that feed those first set of pipelines - those blocks could be owned by notherners.

2. The claim that 60% output is cut off by vandals without touching any of the said 85% oil blocks owned by notherners is also flawed, and that's still based on the number 1 point above.

Your list simply does not contain all the affected oil blocks. And I think this was done deliberately to change the popular narrative.

Reality is:

(1) the volume of crude output is not strictly determined by the number of oil blocks but by the unit production capacity of each block, and I think this number varies from block to block.

(2) you did not mention the financiers of most of the oil blocks in your already partial list. You only mention the financiers with igbo affinity. This stinks of bias and deliberate manipulation.

(3) It's NOT the bombing of the forcados terminal alone that cut off 60% of crude output as you claimed- I think that number was as a result of all the attacks since the inception of the current wave of mliitancy.

Therefore, to justify this kind of erratic conclusion you are pushing here, you need to show the complete list of all the affected oil blocks since the begining of the resurgence of militancy in ND. And you should not just show the true owners of all the omitted oil blocks, you must also go into details to show who the financiers of each oil bloc are.

Waiting...[/b]

***update***

There's a conflict in your figure. Nigeria's official output I think is 2.2 million barrels/day, so how does your 800,000 barrels reduction equate to 60%? Please explain your figures AJINATU.