Skepticus:


How will they see, when the ordinary common sense we share here is still hard for them to understand? One yeye character come here dey yarn emotionally-laden nonsense wey no help situation of men in anyway and also, no dey related to the thread and you see the dummies lapping it up like thirsty dogs. In this regard, I tend to give more props to women. Men are unteachable even when the facts are right before them.

I tire for men sha.

Skepticus:


How will they see, when the ordinary common sense we share here is still hard for them to understand? One yeye character come here dey yarn emotionally-laden nonsense wey no help situation of men in anyway and also, no dey related to the thread and you see the dummies lapping it up like thirsty dogs. In this regard, I tend to give more props to women. Men are unteachable even when the facts are right before them.

I'm all for open debate, if someone comes up with an argument stating if you do x , you'll get y results and that doesn't sit right with you, it's better to provide a superior counter argument with statistical evidence showing how they're wrong.

By doing so, you recruit more converts and the stupidity of the original argument can be buried for good, otherwise it reduces the thread to a group of copy cats without original thought apart from what was plagiarised from books.

I noticed the first few pages on the thread were extremely informative and we all read and agreed on most concepts until some people started introducing concepts that antagonized unanimously agreed upon concepts Which is where I think everything went downhill.

Could you tackle the cr7 with a better argument on what he or she stated about what women want and my question to him about what will men get in return?

Or can anyone take it up?

Remember it's all about broadening the mind, nothing personal.

neyoohhh:


I'm all for open debate, if someone comes up with an argument stating if you do x , you'll get y results and that doesn't sit right with you, it's better to provide a superior counter argument with statistical evidence showing how they're wrong.

By doing so, you recruit more converts and the stupidity of the original argument can be buried for good, otherwise it reduces the thread to a group of copy cats without original thought apart from what was plagiarised from books.

I noticed the first few pages on the thread were extremely informative and we all read and agreed on most concepts until some people started introducing concepts that antagonized unanimously agreed upon concepts Which is where I think everything went downhill.

Could you tackle the cr7 with a better argument on what he or she stated about what women want and my question to him about what will men get in return?

Or can anyone take it up?

Remember it's all about broadening the mind, nothing personal.

You want a debate?
What could you possibly say to make he/she a new convert. Yen yen yen yen yen yen

Chateau Heartise

Alpha- inspires desire in women
Beta- negotiate desire with women

Alpha- are demanding of their women
Beta- are appeasing to their women

Alpha- are decisive in relationships
Beta- are indecisive in relationships

Alpha- sets and maintain frame in relationship
Beta- enters the woman's frame in relationship

Alpha- qualify their woman
Beta- qualify to their woman

Alpha- are insensitive and emotionally unavailable
Beta- are sensitive and available

Alpha- Are Narcissist
Beta - Are Neurotic

Alpha- Do whatever they want
Beta - Do whatever society and women want

Alpha- lead and are In authority in a relationship
Beta - Defer to women's authority in a relationship

SOZINN:


You want a debate?
What could you possibly say to make he/she a new convert. Yen yen yen yen yen yen

The only way to silence she is by providing a superior argument.



I'm sure you guys can bury her, please do

[color=#006600][/color]

Skepticus:


How will they see, when the ordinary common sense we share here is still hard for them to understand? One yeye character come here dey yarn emotionally-laden nonsense wey no help situation of men in anyway and also, no dey related to the thread and you see the dummies lapping it up like thirsty dogs. In this regard, I tend to give more props to women. Men are unteachable even when the facts are right before them.

A lot of Men have been so emotionally manipulated and conditioned right from childhood to see women as an innocent, harmless, misunderstood beautiful victims that needs to be protected and provided for Regardless their manipulative,heartless and entitled mentality. And no matter how hard you try it is virtually impossible to change their minds...

To them the main purpose of their existence is to serve, protect and provide for women anything contrary to that is not acceptable and most be resisted by all means...

Rollo Tommasi


Alpha- Are accommodating to self
Beta- Are accommodating to women

Alpha- women are utility to him ( uses women)
Beta- are utility to women ( used by women)

Alpha- In control
Beta- lack control

Alpha- controls frame
Beta- enters frame

Alpha-Accept burden of performance as reality
Beta- Rejects burden of performance as reality

Alpha-Female want to please him
Beta-He wants to please female

Alpha- Masculine frame
Beta- Adopts female social frame

Alpha- retains Independence
Beta- sacrifice independence for security

Alpha- doesn't self depreciate for women
Beta- self depreciate for women

Alpha- spins plate and find new partners
Beta- scarcity, pines for lost partner

Roosh

Alpha- goes after what he wants
Beta- afraid to go after what he wants

Alpha- cocky/ manly
Beta- supplicant

Alpha- Aggressive
Beta-needy

Alpha- ambitious
Beta- agreeable

Alpha- confident
Beta- Timid

Alpha- Accepts risk
Beta- Rejects risk

Alpha- Hard to get
Beta- Easy to get

Alpha- Asks for permission
Beta-Does not ask for permission

CR777:


No time for that bro but I think u should be open to learning more and adding to the ones u already instead of being stuck with only the one u know. Thats the only way to grow. It's just a friendly advice Sha.
Shalom.

We Dey always rationalize every learning here bro

In the past, women were the ones that are emotionally insecure. Complaining about Men and their emotionally unavailability. But this days, No thanks to SIMPs, the reverse is the case.

90% of the threads in Romance section of Nairaland and other social media is about MEN complaining about women and how emotionally unavailable they have become. While the remaining % of threads are also from men seeking advice on how to SIMPly make their women happy.

Everything about the Modern Man have been Feminized. From the way We speak, to the way we dress and walk, Even the way we Think and Act has also been Feminized.

On the other hand, Everything about The Modern Woman are gradually becoming Musiline at an alarming rate. From their Dressing, their movement, the way they talk, reason,interact and support themselves.

The Bro Code is dying While The sister-hood is on the increase.

A lot of Men don't see this changes because we're still living and blinded by the past glorified years.

With the level of SIMPs we currently have on ground, and the upcoming ones, the next 10-20 years is going to be interesting.

neyoohhh:


I'm all for open debate, if someone comes up with an argument stating if you do x , you'll get y results and that doesn't sit right with you, it's better to provide a superior counter argument with statistical evidence showing how they're wrong
By doing so, you recruit more converts and the stupidity of the original argument can be buried for good, .

Scientifically, people don't change their mind when they encounter a contrary opinion to theirs. The few that accept do so after a long time past. So, no need for arguments or debates. If one really desire truth, one way or the other he will find it.

If you observed very well, I do use scientific research data to back up some of my claims, yet, some still complained it was outdated, this and that blah blah blah. Some idiots say it's Western data but if Ubunja give them data from South Africa, they will still complain that the research was not conducted in Nigeria. Coming down to Nigeria, you will start hearing that the particular fact is peculiar to the East or North or West. Arrant nonsense!

The redpill is not infallible, but its standard at present is too pragmatic, logical to debate and argue it with anybody. It doesn't negotiate with anyone! It doesn't seek the need to be loved and cherished by everyone! If anyone finds it too tumultuous to bear, face or handle, that person should ignore it and channel his/her life to other aspects of life, rather than cry all day about the things he don't like about the redpill.

Redpill doesn't need converts or followers. And anyone that do make mention of this as if redpill is a religion or ideologue to be followed is one that doesn't understand the tenets of the redpill. (It's all about human actions and behaviors). Perhaps, you're in this category. Redpill follows the lower ration of the Pareto principle: 80:20, meaning that it's not met for everybody but a few.

You not accepting a fact based on your dispositions should not be confused with a falsity of the fact. But many people do confuse the ingenuity of fact with their feelings, that is, if the statement suits their feelings then it is right, but if not, then, it is wrong.

Redpill doesn't care! You either take it and follow the rabbit hole or remain in wonderland.

neyoohhh:
otherwise it reduces the thread to a group of copy cats without original thought apart from what was plagiarised from books.

Words of jealousy: "long epistles, epistle upon epistles, long jargons, copy cats, plagiarism" etc.

First of all, no thought is original, every facts, thoughts, ideas are offsprings of a mother tree. We can't trace it to the one seed that births the mother tree. Many scientists built on Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Michael Faraday and today they're doing exploits. Even the former built on already foundational knowledge to make exploits e.g Thomas Edison built on the idea of Nikolai Tesla etc. to come up with many inventions. It is called magnification, beautification, upgrading, innovation etc and other words that fits in.

This is not to encourage plagiarism because it hinders one's thought process and causes a lagging in personal growth and development. "Original" articles must/should be credited to the authors.

Nonetheless, people that do complain of copy cats, plagiarism, long epistles, long jargons are most often jealous because they can't come up with anything intelligent and earn their merits. They think everyone is existing in the same confinement as them.

For the record, Ubunja, Bloodysperm, CaveAdullam, Martinez39s, Skepticus, (TheDarkgamer) has undergone a scrutiny/plagiarism test of their thoughts, words and "long epistles" and they weren't found wanting. It all happened on this thread bro. Calm down!

Search any quote or long epistle that you feel it's plagiarised on Google, Reddit, Quota, Facebook etc and if anyone is found wanting call out the person. Winks!

neyoohhh:
I noticed the first few pages on the thread were extremely informative and we all read and agreed on most concepts until some people started introducing concepts that antagonized unanimously agreed upon concepts Which is where I think everything went downhill.

Not really per say, many thought the road ends there but were shocked when they went deeper.

And to be true, almost all the persons inveighing and nagging didn't follow or read from the beginning, they are simps/bluepillers/ashawo thread people that just latch on to page 500 and started spilling trash because their bluepill cherished state is being laid bear and shattered into nothing.

neyoohhh:
Could you tackle the cr7 with a better argument on what he or she stated about what women want and my question to him about what will men get in return?

Or can anyone take it up?

Remember it's all about broadening the mind, nothing personal.

You can take CR7, but please do it in another thread. I'm not interested in arguing or debating with anyone because it will certainly derail the thread. You can say I'm not open minded, scared... Fine, you're right! However, that will not stop me from engaging a genuine seeker of the truth when I come across one. Most of these people are trolls, peruse through their statements and you'll know.

Thanks.

Just imagine after overcoming the hash economical situation in the country, you now end up with a self righteous, self centered, manipulative and entitled entity as a wife/girlfriend. Simply because you're too rigid to implement the Redpill knowledge in your Relationship.

Women don't value friendship like men and I'm really sorry for those calling girls their friends or bestie (whatever that means).

A friend came over to my place yesterday. One thing led to another and he told something that shocked me about a girl he regarded as friend or should I say family coz both families know each very well. And they've known each other for over 14 years.

Here's the full gist. Something last year, this my guy introduced me to an investment scheme that he did and found to be profitable. Due to the trust between us, I invested and so did the girl because he told her.

Along the line, the whole thing went south but due to some signed agreement with the firm between them and my guy, they agreed to refund everyone their capital.

Now this girl all of sudden started misbehaving, there's no sort of insult my guy hasn't received from this girl. All because the investment didn't click as my guy promised her. She literally torments this guy to the extent that for him to post on Whatsapp status na war.

I won't categories my guy as simp even though there's been occasions in the past where he had to spend his last card just to see this girl happy. I'll say he's a victim of NAWALT.

I know first hand some of the things he did for that girl but all this didn't matter. Suddenly, my guy is a scammer and have connived with the firm to swindle her.

It didn't matter much to me until he told me yesterday that he has been refunding this girl her money since January. He pays her a certain amount monthly and this didn't even stop the insults and threats. And all this while I didn't know.

His excuse was that I might ask him to start paying me as well, TF! I bluntly told him to stop whatever nonsense he thinks he's doing by paying back that money.

You didn't steal her money, there's a signed document stating that everyone will get their money back. Even if the girl decides to take it up with the authorities, she's still be asked to excise patience. Why then do you have start playing nice guy by refunding her? What's the worst thing that can happen if you didn't refund her?

I really teared him apart that yesterday and rebuked him from sending any further money to the girl which he promised to..

If you read to this stage, pick a lesson or two for yourself.

White system so anything women talk now Dem go believe dis ain't rape now
This kind lawsuits funny Sha

Women fear black American men die, suit Dem ur Dead

neyoohhh:


I'm all for open debate, if someone comes up with an argument stating if you do x , you'll get y results and that doesn't sit right with you, it's better to provide a superior counter argument with statistical evidence showing how they're wrong.

By doing so, you recruit more converts and the stupidity of the original argument can be buried for good, otherwise it reduces the thread to a group of copy cats without original thought apart from what was plagiarised from books.

I noticed the first few pages on the thread were extremely informative and we all read and agreed on most concepts until some people started introducing concepts that antagonized unanimously agreed upon concepts Which is where I think everything went downhill.

Could you tackle the cr7 with a better argument on what he or she stated about what women want and my question to him about what will men get in return?

Or can anyone take it up?

Remember it's all about broadening the mind, nothing personal.

Brother, if you have taken note of my comments on this thread, I have always advocated for debate. I knew when you first joined, quoted me, making some references to the identity politics of conservative/ldentity that is unique to the west and how it relates to the red pill. I took note of that. By now, you should know who is worth debating with. Some are here just to waste time on straw men arguments unrelated to the issues of men that the red pill discusses.

I'm no fool. I know who to engage in a debate.

You don't expect me to "debate" with one dragging Martinez39s on issues of his private religious belief which is not related to this thread nor drag "Red Pillers" for not donating cash to someone whose phone screen was damaged. If I do, soon, i (and maybe others) will be dragged for being a fan of Warri Wolves over Chelsea or Manchester United. neyoohh, you may soon be dragged for loving rice against akpu - trivia themes that are unrelated to the serious issues of men and this thread.

There are a lot of stupid, undebatable people around including this platform/thread which is open to everyone. You should learn to spot them and not waste your entire life seeking debates that serve you no use. People can shame us for being narrow-minded or calling timewasters "troll". Those in the "know" here don't care.

How do I arrange or colonize a girl for a FWB?

Must I use money?

After several chats, I have being using indirect approach to invite this babe to my crib but she wouldn't come.

I am thinking of telling her directly that I want a FWB relationship wit her.

2dice01:
BluePill Song of the Decade

Sound Sultan - Natural Something


Favorite line
I spend my money everyday untop woman
I dont care if she walk away to another man
I am ready to be your mugu
Your Personal maga for life

² On behalf of all the men
Oya come make i spoil you

³ I know you have a lover
Help me hail your man dem


Personally love this song cus its catchy
The music video made it more fun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6P6MleornA

GOD bless you for the song bro but na that song victory use chop ma money that year o.R.I.P. sound sultan

CaveAdullam:
Scientifically, people don't change their mind when they encounter a contrary opinion to theirs. The few that accept do so after a long time past. So, no need for arguments or debates. If one really desire truth, one way or the other he will find it.

If you observed very well, I do use scientific research data to back up some of my claims, yet, some still complained it was outdated, this and that blah blah blah. Some idiots say it's Western data but if Ubunja give them data from South Africa, they will still complain that the research was not conducted in Nigeria. Coming down to Nigeria, you will start hearing that the particular fact is peculiar to the East or North or West. Arrant nonsense!

The redpill is not infallible, but its standard at present is too pragmatic, logical to debate and argue it with anybody. It doesn't negotiate with anyone! It doesn't seek the need to be loved and cherished by everyone! If anyone finds it too tumultuous to bear, face or handle, that person should ignore it and channel his/her life to other aspects of life, rather than cry all day about the things he don't like about the redpill.

Redpill doesn't need converts or followers. And anyone that do make mention of this as if redpill is a religion or ideologue to be followed is one that doesn't understand the tenets of the redpill. (It's all about human actions and behaviors). Perhaps, you're in this category. Redpill follows the lower ration of the Pareto principle: 80:20, meaning that it's not met for everybody but a few.

You not accepting a fact based on your dispositions should not be confused with a falsity of the fact. But many people do confuse the ingenuity of fact with their feelings, that is, if the statement suits their feelings then it is right, but if not, then, it is wrong.

Redpill doesn't care! You either take it and follow the rabbit hole or remain in wonderland.

Words of jealousy: "long epistles, epistle upon epistles, long jargons, copy cats, plagiarism" etc.

First of all, no thought is original, every facts, thoughts, ideas are offsprings of a mother tree. We can't trace it to the one seed that births the mother tree. Many scientists built on Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Michael Faraday and today they're doing exploits. Even the former built on already foundational knowledge to make exploits e.g Thomas Edison built on the idea of Nikolai Tesla etc. to come up with many inventions. It is called magnification, beautification, upgrading, innovation etc and other words that fits in.

This is not to encourage plagiarism because it hinders one's thought process and causes a lagging in personal growth and development. "Original" articles must/should be credited to the authors.

Nonetheless, people that do complain of copy cats, plagiarism, long epistles, long jargons are most often jealous because they can't come up with anything intelligent and earn their merits. They think everyone is existing in the same confinement as them.

For the record, Ubunja, Bloodysperm, CaveAdullam, Martinez39s, Skepticus, (TheDarkgamer) has undergone a scrutiny/plagiarism test of their thoughts, words and "long epistles" and they weren't found wanting. It all happened on this thread bro. Calm down!

Search any quote or long epistle that you feel it's plagiarised on Google, Reddit, Quota, Facebook etc and if anyone is found wanting call out the person. Winks!

Not really per say, many thought the road ends there but were shocked when they went deeper.

And to be true, almost all the persons inveighing and nagging didn't follow or read from the beginning, they are simps/bluepillers/ashawo thread people that just latch on to page 500 and started spilling trash because their bluepill cherished state is being laid bear and shattered into nothing.


You can take CR7, but please do it in another thread. I'm not interested in arguing or debating with anyone because it will certainly derail the thread. You can say I'm not open minded, scared... Fine, you're right! However, that will not stop me from engaging a genuine seeker of the truth when I come across one. Most of these people are trolls, peruse through their statements and you'll know.

Thanks.

The bolded sealed it all. I can't say more.

BLOODYSPERM:
Rollo Tommasi




Alpha- self depreciates for women
Beta- doesn't self depreciate for women

What does this mean?

CaveAdullam:

You can take CR7, but please do it in another thread. I'm not interested in arguing or debating with anyone because it will certainly derail the thread. You can say I'm not open minded, scared... Fine, you're right! However, that will not stop me from engaging a genuine seeker of the truth when I come across one. Most of these people are trolls, peruse through their statements and you'll know.

Thanks.

The word troll has really suffered for una hands.
Guy, leave matter, u no get better point.

It's a nice evening though, I'm chilling with my guys while awaiting una next copy and paste work.
Real men are out there, experiencing the real world, you all are online, copying and pasting teachings of biased minds, When real men wanna share facts with you all based on real life experiences, you call him a troll.

This same pattern of copy and pasting is the reason Nigeria is where it is today, producing half-baked graduates, no real knowledge, just made to cram some bunch of written works by other people, including dead people sef.
No practicality, just theories upon theories.

U guys are still far from reality, I pray it won't be too late when you all finally wake up.

Junnior:

What does this mean?

It means that when a man demean yourself ,lower his standards, go against his core values/ principles/ what you stand for to please a woman and try to win her affection, typical of men when the meet their unicorn or men supplicating just to get sex

manuelberry:
GOD bless you for the song bro but na that song victory use chop ma money that year o.R.I.P. sound sultan

Victory no get Joy

oyolohi:
I got interested in the matter of mods shutting down this page or not:

While I don't think that would happen soon, I've chosen to act while having fun.

I've coded a script and scraped this thread: all 147 pages of it (as at this afternoon).

The whole data has been stored on my SSD in JSON format. I'll be releasing the code after cleaning it up.

Here's the format for now:

{
    page_number: {
        post_number: {
            author: str,
            text: str,
            likes: int,
            shares: int,
            date: str,
        },
    },
}

With the JSON data (accessible by all), one could do interesting things like sorting posts made by particular users, most liked, shared, etc.

The version 2 of the script will store images and memes so nothing will be lost; might drop it on github when I'm done.

It's lots of interesting things to do with data from this page, -- with little AI and Language Processing, I will separate the posts into:
1. Questions (and answers to those questions)
2. Experiences (and users opinions)
3. Philosophies
...

Lots of interesting things to do with this page right now... you guys should stay tuned. 21cents and co, don't worry, we've got your back.

P.S. : Martinez39s, you didn't think of this? I want to believe you already have some pages of NL "programmatically" stored OFFLINE

I want to learn from you sir.

Kindly be my tutor, please.