Diddyydiva:
I support you op

I believe marriage is a limitation,It makes your chances of success slimmer. Its a distraction too.
Its easier to succeed without marriage


This applies to both genders tho. If financial responsibilities are not left to the husband alone, The family will have a better standard of living.

Vinshu:


YES HE DID.

Let's continue

Rotentina:


Please, what does MVP stand for?

ocholawealth:
I no get time for rubbish however, op u try small but, try check wetin the go on for Naija. All dis stupid ideas no go help any babe o. A practical example is Linda Ikeji, with all her dough she no fit get husband. I think the solution rather is, why not marry, suspend the idea of immediately popping out kids atleast for few years to cope with una new status and plan effectively for the better future.

JoeCutie:
All these for me? Omg! I'm even in a lot of trouble than I thought. Lmao! But I'm cutting off some troubles by not continuing with this 'argument'.

Nevertheless, I'd like to know what you mean "we" being sensitive. Enlighten me again, Esther.

Never mind abeg.

umehmj:
You are right my child but the truth remains we can't end poverty, even Christ affirmed it. We can only continue to try.

an elderly word before i leave; nothing confuses a girl more than being in a relationship with a broke guy that is extremely good in bed. *drops phone and picks up my snuff box*

adeaks:
The fallacy in this thread is the assumption that the man's income and his life generally would remain at the same level before he got married, after he got married, and even when the kids start arriving. For someone to keep earning exactly the same income over a couple of years shows there is something wrong somewhere.

The second fallacy is that the wife wont add anything to the man or the upkeep of the house. While I am not saying the wife should be the bread winner, but why should all the expenses be on the man's $500 income alone? It means the wife is a liability and even if you are earning $10,000 such a wife will fritter it away.

How about the wife supporting and collaborating with the husband to grow his $500 income to $2000. No one wants to marry a wife who is only prepared to spend without thinking of how to earn more.

yemsai:

is dat one disrespect? Nd did I even say u were'nt tinking well? Well m nt supporting d liabilty part cos I dnt want to be a liability..is gud to support each oda bt most of d responsibility falls on d husband...dats jst wat m trying to explain

Monalisa185:
abeg, who's equally waiting for the MANCHESTER DERBY match?

adeaks:
Only guys with houses and cars should even date.


Simple question: when your dad was dating your mom, did he have a house and a car?

Let's start from there.

adeaks:



And the majority of girls who will support this are lazy, gold diggers who are only looking for already-made men that they can just pop out babies for without any thought of adding something tangible to the guy's life.

adeaks:



And the majority of girls who will support this are lazy, gold diggers who are only looking for already-made men that they can just pop out babies for without any thought of adding something tangible to the guy's life.

Vinshu:
In order to reduce the level of poverty amongst homes, in my opinion I think a man who has not enough money to buy a house of his own not rent at least a 3 bed room flat and a car to move him and his family around should not get married.

When he gets married in his low credit, the family tends to suffer. The probability that he will get rich is actually 0.5 not up to 1 because Sundry expenses will now become expenses when married. Things he could ignore when single will now be important.

When children arrive, the probability of getting rich falls to an all time low of 0.2. Have you observed that most men have a higher credit score when single? If you have $500 at the end of every week when single if your job/income doesn't change or upgrade when you get married your $500 falls to $200 because you no longer feed yourself but feed a woman and probably a child.

When the child grows older school fees will set in. And other bad debts will be incured .

Don't get me wrong, I ain't saying he will never make it but in the mean time, why bring a child to the world to suffer? Even if it's for 6 years before you make it? Why take a woman from her father's comfy house to hardship in the name of marriage?

I advice ladies never to get married no matter how cool a guy is unless he is proven to be able to cater for your needs and that of your children financially in all ramifications both expenses and sundry expenses.

It doesn't make any sense, what you enjoy when single as a lady why stop enjoying it because your husband has no money or your money now goes to supporting him?

They say women ain't equal to men. Ok let the men be rich and rich enough to take care of their wives 101% before getting married. In fact, studies show most men marry for sex.

Specialbaby:
Majority of those who will dispute this well articulated thread are broke guys who don't want to get their hands dirty!



Why date or marry when you are not financially stable only to belive in better days ahead??it just crazy!!

adeaks:
Only guys with houses and cars should even date.


Simple question: when your dad was dating your mom, did he have a house and a car?

Let's start from there.

adeaks:


But that's the point. The guy is working to better himself but you don't want to give him a chance. You only want someone who has already 'bettered' himself. So if I am already made and I can see that that's the main reason you are going out with me, it means I can replace you at anytime with other girls because you are not adding anything to me. You are only taking away.

Specialbaby:
Majority of those who will dispute this well articulated thread are broke guys who don't want to get their hands dirty!



Why date or marry when you are not financially stable only to belive in better days ahead??it just crazy!!

adeaks:



And the majority of girls who will support this are lazy, gold diggers who are only looking for already-made men that they can just pop out babies for without any thought of adding something tangible to the guy's life.

tunergy:



Great write up. Weldone.

However you didn't take into consideration the essence of marriage which is for couples to complement each other. Hence his $500 savings could drop to $350 assuming he did not marry a liability.

I support #GenderEquality and responsibility lies on both partners and one sided.

Just another angle to your thought.

So Women who cannot Own houses and Buy their own cars should stay in their Father's house until they can afford such. :-)

Specialbaby:
it better to remain single than marry a liability as a husband!

adeaks:
Only guys with houses and cars should even date.


Simple question: when your dad was dating your mom, did he have a house and a car?

Let's start from there.

Vinshu:
In order to reduce the level of poverty amongst homes, in my opinion I think a man who has not enough money to buy a house of his own not rent at least a 3 bed room flat and a car to move him and his family around should not get married.

When he gets married in his low credit, the family tends to suffer. The probability that he will get rich is actually 0.5 not up to 1 because Sundry expenses will now become expenses when married. Things he could ignore when single will now be important.

When children arrive, the probability of getting rich falls to an all time low of 0.2. Have you observed that most men have a higher credit score when single? If you have $500 at the end of every week when single if your job/income doesn't change or upgrade when you get married your $500 falls to $200 because you no longer feed yourself but feed a woman and probably a child.

When the child grows older school fees will set in. And other bad debts will be incured .

Don't get me wrong, I ain't saying he will never make it but in the mean time, why bring a child to the world to suffer? Even if it's for 6 years before you make it? Why take a woman from her father's comfy house to hardship in the name of marriage?

I advice ladies never to get married no matter how cool a guy is unless he is proven to be able to cater for your needs and that of your children financially in all ramifications both expenses and sundry expenses.

It doesn't make any sense, what you enjoy when single as a lady why stop enjoying it because your husband has no money or your money now goes to supporting him?

They say women ain't equal to men. Ok let the men be rich and rich enough to take care of their wives 101% before getting married. In fact, studies show most men marry for sex.