Martinez39s:
Unfortunately, many men will never learn. They think having millions of dollars is the cure all to every issue they could have with women from approaching women to having sex with any women they want to winning women's hearts and loyalty. What a grim misapprehension.
— Johnny Depp got burnt with Amber Heard (despite evidence coming out that Amber was the abuser, the media remains silent, Amber is still treated as the victim, and nothing has been done to recoup the damages done to Johnny by Amber's false accusations);
— Brad Pitt's riches didn't spear him;
— 52 year old Pamela Anderson, an advocate of men and four time divorcee with children, recently got married to 72 year old rich man Jon Peters after proposing to the rich simp foolish enough to wife a 50+ post wall thot. After 12 days, she ended the marriage when the simp paid off her $200,000 debt;
— Did Prince Harry's wealth make him alpha?

I could list many cases of brutal divorce rape among celebrities. Having money does not make one alpha. Riches just makes one a target. Riches makes one tantamount to a winning mega lottery ticket in the eyes of these höes. Many rich men's wife are cheating on them with the gate man, driver, his friends, brothers, strangers etc. Many rich men are raising kids that ain't theirs. Many rich simps are marrying used up products and single mothers. Being rich won't spare anyone from female nature and the blue pill mindset. Good luck to those that think riches will make them alpha. Many rich men are disgraceful simps.

Martinez39s, no one can doubt your knowledge of the pros and cons when it comes to the game of manipulation and red-pilling.

You understand the game for what it is.

I've been following the Johnny Depp isshh... for a while now and I'm sad to admit it, that Amber cûnt, had all her manipulative and exploitative game played out from day 1, even when she was the clear aggressor abusing the ignorant but talented actor with recorded evidence.

Rich betas are a pathetic disgrace!

Kennedyiheme02:
lol we aren't suprised betaboy

Kennedyiheme02 , don't let the thesyndrome character distract you

mrpaedo:

Divorce rates in Saudi Arabia skyrocketed with the advent of Facebook in that country.Arab women are some of the biggest cheats on earth but they carry out their operations undercover.Tales of conquests from enlightened guys from that region will blow your mind.Why do you think anal sex is so massive in that region?The men are also massive simps.Even their suicide missions,isn't it just to have access to 72 fresh virgins if they succeed?
AWALT-yesterday,today and tomorrow

You are smart!

I've seen even popular red pillers online make that silly error of tagging Arab women (and other women in predominantly Muslim areas) as the "perfect" women. It's also a slap to the NAWALT crew.

The truth is that, like the western society which has given the chances of wealth and liberation to women, the Arab society (with its recent wealth in oil) is beginning to grant same wealth and cultural liberation to its feminist minority and that, has thrown, its decency to a decline.

As a matter of fact, Arab men (with their wealth), are the most stupid of SIMPS you'll find in the dating market. Rich and getting pûssies with women finding them distasteful but like typical rich idiots, they spend to mask their lack of sexual value!

yeyeosoronga:


There is not a single benefit.
What is however surprising is a true alpha male claiming to be who he is not. Some have even added female gender on their monikers, when we all know they are male.
A true alpha will not do that.
I will keep reiterating it, many do not know the meaning of an alpha personality.
Those on here shouting alfafa have been seriously hurt by a woman in the past, possibly due to their financial status and they are just lashing out and having grandiose ideas on NL. It's allowed to live your fantasy sha.
A trained psychologist will see through the bulls#it of what has been said, and most importantly what has been left unsaid.

Claiming who is not by saying he's from Zimbabwe when he's from Nigeria because Zimbabwe is more richer than Nigeria to the extent that they have one of the worst currencies in the world and also, they have the highest immigrants in South Africa (over 300,000 immigrants) because poverty wants to finish them for their country. He lied to be a Zimbabwean because a Zimbabwean is more respectable on nairaland or command respect in the whole world at large.

Abi is not the same Zimbabwe we are reading wierd news about them on nairaland. It seems like there's one Zimbabwe in Europe that you guys are talking about that I'm not aware of.

Why would he lie to be a Zimbabwean while he can achieve the same fit he's achieving being a Nigeria like hadon and ilengend. To me, him being a Zimbabwean is more susceptible to trolling than being a Nigerian because there are so many things to troll him with, so I see him being a Zimbabwean on nairaland as a setback because nairaland is toxic to external, even among ourselves; we don't accept each other. No be the same nairaland you de see afonja, aboki, nyanmiri, ya riba, etc, so na external we go accept. Go and ask Xhosa and one other girl from south Africa wetin Nigerians on nairaland use their eyes see. That Xhosa girl I no even see her break light again.

Let me tell you what don't know; people don't care about where he comes from. I first read his post in 2018, but I got to know he's from zimbabwe in 2019 likewise other people that might have read or will read his posts before they know where he comes ftom. So, I don't see where being a Zimbabwean add any benefit to his works.

So, why would he lie of being a Zimbabwean on a Nigerian forum? Is their any benefits like salary or stipend being given to a Zimbabwean on nairaland?

Skepticus:


You don't wanna know how stupid some of these rich SIMPs can get with smelly, used pûssies.

I wasn't surprised at the news, when I heard it. Only a hopeless simp would get moved at a pússey with more mileage than that of a porn star's.

guess if men have money they don't care what happens to that money.

ubunja:
guess if men have money they don't care what happens to that money.

and they wont help thier fellow man in need

Blackmiserable:


I'm just curious about you. Were you redpilled on a forum, say Reddit?

I was studying about the Illuminati when I stumbled on the Red Pill community by some strange luck

RisenPhoenix:
The only issue I have with this theory of red pillers is that not every man believes that a lifetime of being a fuckboy; sowing his seed hither and yon; is necessarily a good thing. Sure, we recognize the dynamics of inter gender relationships and the effects that radical feminism has had on women, but we still find the few women that accept traditional roles; the ever increasing so-called "tradwives"; and raise good families without relinquishing our control or our masculinity.

actually being a Traditional Conservative man is simple being a Blue Pill provider. The Red Pill has a negative view of even Tradwives because its still the Plantation.

And the increasing Tradwives movement is women being what they really are: Survivors.
Women are modifying themselves to survive after the increasing evidence that feminism is failing. Guys must not fall for the Tradwives thing. It's another trick.

Kennedyiheme02:
and they wont help thier fellow man in need

that's why no simp must be pitied after being scammed by a woman. I normally laugh. Because that same loser will never in a million years extend a helping hand to you. But when pussy is concerned they open their wallet at lightning speed. No pity for vagina worshippers.

Skepticus:


You are smart!

I've seen even popular red pillers online make that silly error of tagging Arab women (and other women in predominantly Muslim areas) as the "perfect" women. It's also a slap to the NAWALT crew.

The truth is that, like the western society which has given the chances of wealth and liberation to women, the Arab society (with its recent wealth in oil) is beginning to grant same wealth and cultural liberation to its feminist minority and that, has thrown, its decency to a decline.

As a matter of fact, Arab men (with their wealth), are the most stupid of SIMPS you'll find in the dating market. Rich and getting pûssies with women finding them distasteful but like typical rich idiots, they spend to mask their lack of sexual value!

On the Arab women, many Red Pill brothers still make the mistake of thinking there's something special about them. Back in 2017 I made this comment. Jump to the bolded:

ubunja:
women have always been what they are.women have never changed.from Eve down to your young sister,women are still what they always have been:what God made them. u may say women are whores meaning they are after your material possessions but remember Eve was given to Adam when Adam had every other thing in his life:animals,a nice garden kingdom,a whole world.so to this day women only appear to men when a man has everything already set up.thats not being a golddigger.thats the natural order. women have stayed true to that instinct since the dawn of time to this present hour.
what has changed thou in today's society is MEN.men used to have honour.to hold women to a standard and not tolerate rubbish.and that on its own kept women's nature under control. today men have lost all honour.anyone will sleep with another man's wife at the speed of light.so women fight easy coperation from men.men no longer get embarassed or ashamed of marrying a woman with another man's child-so women continue having kids and being single mothers.after all marriage is guarranted.men stop carrying about virginity so gals lose virginity at 15.a man will always marry her anyways.
women will behave as men and society will permit and allow.if men tolerate loose women guess what?women will be loose.if men permit women to walk around half naked guess what?women will walk around half naked. believe me the women in Arabia have the same exact character like the women in Nigeria or America.the only difference is MEN IN ARABIA HAVE MADE IT CLEAR WHAT THEY WILL AND WILL NOT TOLERATE..and women behave accordingly.
the problem is not that women have become wh*res but that men have lowered their standards of what they will accept from women that women see no reason to be their best version.
what does a gal gain by being a Good Gal?a husband? LOOOOLbut the gal that spends her 20s wh*ring also gets married at 35!!! so gals see no benefit whasover for being their best.
Men are the problem.they reward the worst behaved women and so give good gals no motivation and reason to be decent.

Omar09:


After all I read from you, seen on this platform and witnessed first hand, I'd never make that mistake of marrying someone I love. She has to be the one to love me and then I reciprocate.

God bless you

Martinez39s:
Here are other memes for the nice guys. I have many of them. I will open a thread for them tomorrow.

Abeg Tag me bro... When you open the thread

ubunja:
actually being a Traditional Conservative man is simple being a Blue Pill provider. The Red Pill has a negative view of even Tradwives because its still the Plantation.

And the increasing Tradwives movement is women being what they really are: Survivors.
Women are modifying themselves to survive after the increasing evidence that feminism is failing. Guys must not fall for the Tradwives thing. It's another trick.

Yes. I understand that red pill pundits consider it a blue pill situation. Red pillers assume that all alphas want to be fuckboys throughout their lifetimes and if they are not, then they are beta and lack game, but that is not always inherently true. They do not consider that some alphas choose the married lifestyle for various reasons despite having game, and with full awareness and control. To some, it's not a gender win-lose situation. It is all about getting tired of a new face next to you on the pillow every day, itchy warts and crabs on your groin, and the eternal drama that comes with smitten women who use you sexually as much as you use them. Sure it's glamorous but it's shallow and unfulfilling once you do it for any extended period of time.

Our great grandfathers were often the alpha of alphas; I do not think anyone can truthfully deny that; yet they did not shirk the responsibility of providing for their households. In fact, the measure of their ability to fulfill that responsibility WAS their masculinity. To me, it's a fair compromise. Sure, the tradwives situation is about their survival, but what the heck, it suits me as much as it does them. And if one or more women (I don't rule out polygyny) can suppress their roaming instincts sufficiently to stay in my house, remain sexually faithful, provide me with regular sex and take care of my other needs and my children's adequately, I do not see paying her/them a living wage to be an unfair trade.

So do I think that men need to free themselves from the 'love' traps aka the control and exploitation of material women in return for vague promises of sex? Absolutely. Do I want men to be aware of hypergamy and its effect on women's behaviour? Of course, I am pained to see beta men exploited in marriages controlled by their jaded wives. But do I think that the solution is to scam to scammer so to speak? No. I think a satisfactory win-win situation is still attainable by marrying untouched young women, retaining control and remaining aware.

Korllami007:


So, why would he lie of being a Zimbabwean on a Nigerian forum? Is their any benefits like salary or stipend being given to a Zimbabwean on nairaland?

Probably the same reason he has female on his moniker when you know he is male.
He alone can answer why

ubunja:
if a man won't hear then let him suffer the consequences.

. Well said.

RisenPhoenix:


Yes. I understand that red pill pundits consider it a blue pill situation. Red pillers assume that all alphas want to be fuckboys throughout their lifetimes and if they are not, then they are beta and lack game, but that is not always inherently true. They do not consider that some alphas choose the married lifestyle for various reasons despite having game, and with full awareness and control. To some, it's not a gender win-lose situation. It is all about getting tired of a new face next to you on the pillow every day, itchy warts and crabs on your groin, and the eternal drama that comes with smitten women who use you sexually as much as you use them. Sure it's glamorous but it's shallow and unfulfilling once you do it for any extended period of time.

Our great grandfathers were often the alpha of alphas; I do not think anyone can truthfully deny that; yet they did not shirk the responsibility of providing for their households. In fact, the measure of their ability to fulfill that responsibility WAS their masculinity. To me, it's a fair compromise. Sure, the tradwives situation is about their survival, but what the heck, it suits me as much as it does them. And if one or more women (I don't rule out polygyny) can suppress their roaming instincts sufficiently to stay in my house, remain sexually faithful, provide me with regular sex and take care of my other needs and my children's adequately, I do not see paying her/them a living wage to be an unfair trade.

So do I think that men need to free themselves from the 'love' traps aka the control and exploitation of material women in return for vague promises of sex? Absolutely. Do I want men to be aware of hypergamy and its effect on women's behaviour? Of course, I am pained to see beta men exploited in marriages controlled by their jaded wives. But do I think that the solution is to scam to scammer so to speak? No. I think a satisfactory win-win situation is still attainable by marrying untouched young women, retaining control and remaining aware.

to be honest I never liked the word "Alpha". I once even spoke against it but I eventually adopted it, but grudgingly. I hate that word. I prefer "Bad Boy" and "Player" and even "Thug". That's what I have used even from the start when I wrote. Alpha just muddies the waters.

I'm for Bad Boys and Players and Thugs. Not responsible men who build families. My brand of Red Pill has always been on Pump and Dump. Maybe I need to return to my roots.

yeyeosoronga:


Probably the same reason he has female on his moniker when you know he is male.
He alone can answer why

There are females on nairaland using male moniker, so can you tell me what's their motive?
And people that are neither using M or F like me, can you tell us the motive of doing that?

ubunja:
I was studying about the Illuminati when I stumbled on the Red Pill community by some strange luck

Thanks for letting us know.

ubunja:

A lady has to bring money to make it work. I hate working and I wanna retire soonest. I'm a gold digging man. I don't have time for that provider role.

Nothing is fair in life. And I'm not here to be fair. Money or no love. My heart is for sale.

Wow...Ubunja you're a god...I salute you sir

RisenPhoenix:


Yes. I understand that red pill pundits consider it a blue pill situation. Red pillers assume that all alphas want to be fuckboys throughout their lifetimes and if they are not, then they are beta and lack game, but that is not always inherently true. They do not consider that some alphas choose the married lifestyle for various reasons despite having game, and with full awareness and control. To some, it's not a gender win-lose situation. It is all about getting tired of a new face next to you on the pillow every day, itchy warts and crabs on your groin, and the eternal drama that comes with smitten women who use you sexually as much as you use them. Sure it's glamorous but it's shallow and unfulfilling once you do it for any extended period of time.

Our great grandfathers were often the alpha of alphas; I do not think anyone can truthfully deny that; yet they did not shirk the responsibility of providing for their households. In fact, the measure of their ability to fulfill that responsibility WAS their masculinity. To me, it's a fair compromise. Sure, the tradwives situation is about their survival, but what the heck, it suits me as much as it does them. And if one or more women (I don't rule out polygyny) can suppress their roaming instincts sufficiently to stay in my house, remain sexually faithful, provide me with regular sex and take care of my other needs and my children's adequately, I do not see paying her/them a living wage to be an unfair trade.

So do I think that men need to free themselves from the 'love' traps aka the control and exploitation of material women in return for vague promises of sex? Absolutely. Do I want men to be aware of hypergamy and its effect on women's behaviour? Of course, I am pained to see beta men exploited in marriages controlled by their jaded wives. But do I think that the solution is to scam to scammer so to speak? No. I think a satisfactory win-win situation is still attainable by marrying untouched young women, retaining control and remaining aware.

You're game. This is fvcking " awareness "

ubunja:

A lady has to bring money to make it work. I hate working and I wanna retire soonest. I'm a gold digging man. I don't have time for that provider role.

Nothing is fair in life. And I'm not here to be fair. Money or no love. My heart is for sale.

i agree now it been revealed men are more valuable in society... to get my attention you need to show me something more than pussy before i give you my attention.. we aee wise now.. pusyy is nothing

Martinez39s:
Unfortunately, many men will never learn. They think having millions of dollars is the cure all to every issue they could have with women from approaching women to having sex with any women they want to winning women's hearts and loyalty. What a grim misapprehension.
— Johnny Depp got burnt with Amber Heard (despite evidence coming out that Amber was the abuser, the media remains silent, Amber is still treated as the victim, and nothing has been done to recoup the damages done to Johnny by Amber's false accusations);
— Brad Pitt's riches didn't spear him;
— 52 year old Pamela Anderson, an advocate of men and four time divorcee with children, recently got married to 72 year old rich man Jon Peters after proposing to the rich simp foolish enough to wife a 50+ post wall thot. After 12 days, she ended the marriage when the simp paid off her $200,000 debt;
— Did Prince Harry's wealth make him alpha?

I could list many cases of brutal divorce rape among celebrities. Having money does not make one alpha. Riches just makes one a target. Riches makes one tantamount to a winning mega lottery ticket in the eyes of these höes. Many rich men's wife are cheating on them with the gate man, driver, his friends, brothers, strangers etc. Many rich men are raising kids that ain't theirs. Many rich simps are marrying used up products and single mothers. Being rich won't spare anyone from female nature and the blue pill mindset. Good luck to those that think riches will make them alpha. Many rich men are disgraceful simps.

I hope men would listen to avoid sob tales in future. Thanks to arming myself since I had Spears launched at my heart multiple times. Thanks to being red pulled I'll never give room to any abuser for more than one single fvkcen moment. Mess up, get thrown out principle works for me on ordinary friendship/acquaintance levels not to mention marriage/dating concerns


The rule like RisenPhoenix clearly stated alongside The Op and you and I is for men to always think on their feet. For men seeking marriage in future, do not try it without a preNup

emmaodet:


Hmmmmmmmm
I think Life is Unfair especially to Good, Nice and Quiet Guys.

But from my observation, all the bad things our parent, family and community warn us about which they claim are Sin are what makes you Virtually an Alfa.
Does it mean all the warnings and threats of going to Hell fire are false? Because the right thing and normal thing to do in a relationship is to respect a lady and treat are like a queen but it seems you need to go the opposite direction for you to be appreciated.
It is a Crazy world out there, things are not the way we think it should be.
Fuvk Nature and the Creator for turning everything upside down while still threatening you with Hell fire if you go the wrong way which is the right way anyway.
Fuvk All the Gods, Fuvk them all for playing with our intelligence because what is normal is not normal at all.

you're wise.

ubunja:
Nice one bro.
Alpha Fvcks, Beta Bucks.

Alpha is the original term for the alphabetical letter "A". Beta is the original term for the alphabetical letter "B".

Alphas get for free what Betas pay top dollar for. (and still not get)

Or to put it another way: Players, Bad Boys and Thugs fvck pussy they are not paying for. While Nice Guys, Simps and Husband Material men, pay for pussy they are not fvcking.

When younger, women date Players and Bad Boys (the As) for fun, then when they get older, sometimes as single mothers after maybe 30 when they wanna settle down cause they're tired they then give Nice Guys (the Bs) their chance. The Bs (betas) then marry and spend on these women.

But even before marriage, in day to day, when girls are younger, the thugs/players/bad boys always get the pussy free while the good guy/church guy/nice guy has to spend and even then not get the pussy because the girl will tell him "No sex before marriage," "I'm celibate" or some other shiit like that. Generally if you're a good guy who's Husband Material you'll not get the sex before marriage because the girl is "saving" you for marriage. When you'll have that honor of eating bad boys' left overs.

--------------------------------

Another term for "Alpha Fvcks, Beta Bucks" is "Female Dual Mating Strategy".

What Female Dual Mating Strategy means is that Women generally group all men under Two groups: The Fvckers and The Providers.

A Woman has two needs: Money and Sex.
In a perfect world she would be getting both these things from one man.

But the problem is the Man who has the money usually is not the best Fvcker, while Man who is the best Fvcker usually is not the man with the money. So a woman is forced to date 2 men at the same time: The man with money but who can't dick her nicely (dating him publicly) and at the same time date the man who can dick her proper but who is broke (dating him secretly).

These Two men each brings what the other can't
bring. One brings the dollars, another brings the dick.

Which leads to the man with the money ending up raising the broke man's child unawares. While the broke man himself has all manner of pussy knocking at his door (because he doesn't work so he has the energy and time for extended sex and becomes extremely skilled at sex) yet he will have no woman to call his own or to walk publicly with
because he is essentially a "secret" women are keeping amongst themselves. (Yes, women secretly rotate a jobless broke man who can fvck, amongst themselves like a sort of a sex slave. Sometimes women can pool money together and rent a place for the guy so as to access his dick at their
own convenience)


Its very rare for a man to be a total package to a woman.


If you're a jobless broke man who can only provide sex, the greatest threat to your relationship is a working guy who can provide money.
If you're a working guy who can provide money, the greatest threat to your relationship is a jobless broke man who can provide sex.


Which means a poor man's GF will cheat with a rich man. While a rich man's GF will cheat with a jobless bum.


Its the Female Dual Mating Strategy. The Alpha Fvcks, Beta Bucks.


And "Alpha" does not mean successful in terms of world and career but successful in dating and reproduction. The men who are a success in the world and careers are the Betas. Which makes them the Providers in the first place.

So are you implying that one cannot be financially successful and still be able to Bleep women's brains out??

If that's what this your epistle means, then you are sitting on a long thing.

Your theory is half baked sir.

NAMS

OkpaNsukkaisBae:




you're wise.

Thanks

ubunja:
actually being a Traditional Conservative man is simple being a Blue Pill provider. The Red Pill has a negative view of even Tradwives because its still the Plantation.

And the increasing Tradwives movement is women being what they really are: Survivors.
Women are modifying themselves to survive after the increasing evidence that feminism is failing. Guys must not fall for the Tradwives thing. It's another trick.

What is this Plantation all about? I read it alot on mgtow sites.
Also, you talked about Men with the point we have changed while the women are still operating the way they were programmed but i think women have changed too.
Over the years, their taste and appetites keep going up and up and it as gotten to a stage where it is not sustainable again while the men are still keep the role of a provider

ubunja:

On the Arab women, many Red Pill brothers still make the mistake of thinking there's something special about them. Back in 2017 I made this comment. Jump to the bolded:

You captured it all in the last line. Men have lowered their standards often rewarding bad behaviours in women.

emmaodet:


What is this Plantation all about? I read it alot on mgtow sites.
Also, you talked about Men with the point we have changed while the women are still operating the way they were programmed but i think women have changed too.
Over the years, their taste and appetites keep going up and up and it as gotten to a stage where it is not sustainable again while the men are still keep the role of a provider

lol the Plantation is men slaving away for women and society. Where a man lives his whole life waking up in the morning going to work in a never-ending circle his whole life as society's and women's work horse.

namss:


So are you implying that one cannot be financially successful and still be able to Bleep women's brains out??

If that's what this your epistle means, then you are sitting on a long thing.

Your theory is half baked sir.

NAMS

half baked or not follow it and see the results. Things of sex and relationships are not logical. Yet there are patterns you can spot and take advantage of.
I don't even know how you arrived at " one cannot be financially successful and still be able to Bleep women's brains out??"

My message does not even drive that direction.

If I had time to go deeper with that message it was gonna be even longer. But for you I'll go deeper:

Men with money generally don't have THE TIME to spend the day on top of a woman. They're busy. Most are workaholics. Some go up and down on trips for business and leisure. To rich men sex is almost always at the bottom of the list. That's why it's poor people who have plenty of kids cause they live boring lives where sex is about the only fun thing they can afford/have. Unlike men with money. They have better things to do with their time.

Hope it's clear.

ubunja:
I'm a Zimbabwean in SA who discovered this site by pure chance.

SA women are fast overtaking men in life. And most SA men are clueless about Game because most were raised by single mothers (80 %+/-). So they don't have a clue about being alpha etc.

While the women lack father figures so any strong male characterwise gets their attention.

Can I get your WhatsApp digits?

SOFTDRINK:
Can I get your WhatsApp digits?

on my profile bossman