₦airaland Forum

EMIOMOADEOYE:
I actually find this hard to believe

Not just because I am a product of Chrisland but because I find the details of the story irreconcilable.

I also need to understand what is been classified as sexual molestation.

A 2 year old is not exactly easy target for pedophile in a school premises.....Chrisland School for that matter in this day and age of CCTV.

These days sexual molestation stories are to be taken with a pinch of salt.

wait for it...... The feminist angry birds will soon come for you. Hope you have your shield

Liard:
Do you know Children can't lie until the age of 4? So this your story sha!

where did you get this theory... Pls I've got kids tht cry and come reporting they were beaten by siblings just to get attention. Stop this.

TessaJ:
hmmmm......one has to be careful. Something like this happened to my sister too. When she was being accused of molesting a three year old girl in her class. She was also accused of scrapping d girl's hair and to worsen the issue, the girl was always pointing to my sister whenever they ask her. The school management brought out all the staff and the girl still pointed to my sister. If not for God, d story would have been different. D girl later said it wasn't my sister that it was her mum that told her to mention my sister's name. Wat am trying to say is that we can't judge yet,let the court do their work with proper investigation.

this is the most objective thing to do. So innocent people don't land in jail because of a blackmailer. Let's not damage our society like how the west is looking to reverse their mistakes.

Liard:
1. The man is not young?
2. So because she involves kids she's a feminist?
3. I just did a thorough research on the mc Martin preschool case and there are absolutely no similarities here.

You started well with well thought out points and argument but now you just keep falling my hand. Smh

that's why its important to stick to topics. The McMartin's case was similar but after years , the accused was acquitted.... Disregard the conspiracy illuminati video that pops up too. If theyd investigated well enough , the accused wouldn't have been incarcerated wrongly for so long.

Liard:
Maybe your own children are like this. Mine is very sharp and can recall events, he has a very vast vocabulary, he knows who is daddy is matter of fact he calls me by name often times, he knows he mum, he knows his grand ma and grand dad amd i can actually have a sensible conversation with him, in short mine is nothing like you described and he isn't even 2 yet.

but I can't fault your observation which can be due to your environment and/or genes so if you have dull children it's because you are dull and your environment sucks.

Just don't reproduce please.

madam stick to topic, I'm in no mood to quarrel with a feminist. Role model indeed.

Saintmary:
My first concern in this case is the child and all children. It's gross irresponsibility to dismiss any child's words as a result of low cognitive abilities or whatever. At least attend to the child FIRST!!! I still pity all children in your care regardless of what you call me.

madam this is simple comprehension , the story says the matter is in court, so it means the child's accusation hasn't been dismissed. Im against condemning the man for the sake of emotional bias.

Liard:
I agree with your point apart from where you said that the words of a two year old are not cognitive (I actually had to mind to insult you for that statement but I will maintain decorum, lol).

My son is barely two and we have conversations. After school he came back one day and told me amamas beat me, face. The next day the teachers confirmed that amamas is in fact his way of saying Azimah and on that day she actually slapped him while they were tussling over toys.

I don't know what kind of children you've raised o, but children are human being with intelligence and cam communicate and are very cognitive. Plus research has shown children are incapable of lying before the age of 3.

Another thing is he doesn't have to penetrate the child to molest her as little as inappropriate touching or putting a child on your lap can constitute abuse.

Please be advised.

first things first be truthful about your sex and change to f if you arent m......... Its cool you held back on the insults, it was definitely a wise move.

A two year olds statement shouldn't be tendered in a court of law, same way an octogenarians statement should be well investigated before tendering as evidence. This doesn't imply octogenarians are vegetables but there's a strong probability senility is beginning to set in. So my point isn't totally disregard a 2yr old statement but it should be heavily investigated. As its being done by the courts. Shekina.

Saintmary:
Do you know how many parents bury these kind of cases because of stigma?
Do you think it was easy for these parents to come out and show the world that their child has been defiled? In your effort to be objective, you sound callous! My God! I'm concerned for your children!!!

You can tell a feminist by their replies. We discuss a topic and quickly she involves my kids. Anyways I'm not referring to other cases, I'm interested in this particular case. Now what If the man's being blackmailed, or are you inferring that's not possible because he's a man. Pls we need to be objective in such cases cos if he's wrongfully convicted based on emmotional bias, you're not only wrecking an innocent young mans life, but also he future o his wife and kids. Like somebody pointed out here....the MCmartin preschool scandal comes to mind. We need to let the courts handle this case cos already ppl like you have condemned him. That's really wicked of anybody to do .

Hunnybee:
I am perplexed by your thoughts and conclusion especially about the part where you say a 2year old's words should not be seen as valid,and buttressed it with you have raised kids. Except the child is mentally retarded,a 2YO will be able to tell you what happened and even act out how it happened,maybe not in vivid detail like an adult but you'll def know what happened and how.

,2 yr olds are erratic and say yes to everything. They don't even know who mummy or daddy is, in the true sense. That's why some tilt towards nannies.

Saintmary:
so, we should doubt the child because she is 2? A psychologist interviewed her for God's sake! Are you saying you are more qualified to ratify a child's story better than a professional? That sounds really bad.

well even psychologists can have a motive or be wrong. Yes a 2year old no matter how brilliant is atill very in cognitive. Soon babies would be making accusations.

Psalm18:
By and large I agree we should allow the court process conclude. But you can understand why emotions are high.
The points you raised about a two year old are not universally true. Some have higher ability than others. On a side note, there is clearly a prima facie case to work with. Why would the child zero in on Adenekan and not any other teacher. The court proceeding is still on, the day the teacher who is in charge of the kids on whose watch Adenekan would come to take out kids testify, would be a game changer.

we don't really know what the child said. This was an indictment by a private investigator, whose motive can't be asserted.

PrecisionFx:
Stop beating bout the bush.



""So women don't sexually molest children?""

women do. But I'm sure thts not why women dominate the creche industry ie whose more of a predator men or women. Women simply handle children better

PrecisionFx:
""What school puts a man in charge of a creche(since were dealing with 2year olds""
So women don't sexually molest children?

well thus specific case involves a man that being said, its pertinent to note that most children below 4years are better cared for under women, by their very nature of tenderness and motherly instincts (feminists even accept this point selfishly). That's why men and women shouldn't be compared. Were unique in various ways.

temmyo:
i just want to correct your notion that penetartion is all there is to sexual abuse/assault/molestation. while this may have been the case in this and many other scenarios involving 2 year olds, there are several other forms in which such abuse can occur eg, orally, by touch, with words,
encouraging others to do it while the perpertrator watches, etc.

well I'm refering to this particular case. Ofcos sexual abuse spans a wide range but this case is penetration.

Saw this story on one feminazis Facebook wall, and tried to decipher the possibility of this story .
These feminists abused me cos I suggested they shouldnt convict the accused via social media trials.
After the taxify saga, and a false rape accusation a friend of mine encountered, I'm beginning to always ensure I take a second look at any sexual accusation. Here were some points in this case, that required some clarification :

What school puts a man in charge of a creche(since were dealing with 2year olds)?.

What were the nannies doing, that they allowed a man on several occasions, to take two minors to an undisclosed location for unexplained periods of time?

Where exactly, in a school did this take place and how in Gods name did this happen, school deserves closure?

How tiny is this mans weewee that he was able to penetrate a 2 year old without extreme damage?

We've raised kids, and I can guarantee anybody that takes the words of a two year old as cognitive, is either mischievous or trying to destroy somebody.
A school like chrisland should have CCTV in its creche, thus, has the footage been examined?, If they don't have, then that's another minus.

Finally the accused has been charged to court, and we need to hear his defense. If he's found guilty ,I'm quite sure he will be convicted via overwhelming evidence. The amount of damage that could be done to a persons life just by media trial can be irreparable. Some feminists even abused me, that the young man deserves no rights to a defense just cos he's a man, and the child was female.

Let the courts decide, and if found guilty, he should face the law AND the school MUST be sanctioned, with the nannies.

Oga runnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn for ur life. If na Yoruba girl, go n conduct deliverance, cos u no dey go NY where .

Don't fall into that trap. Forget looks, an older womans timing isn't urs. It'll be difficult to catch up to her level of maturity.

LAGATA:
Woow! That's the best of all marriages. My wife is 4years older than me and wev bn married for more than two years now without any hitch. She so humble, patient, matured, caring, loving & the best woman I have met. Thou once in a while I feel so unsecure but she's just so caring and understanding. I must say that since we got married till date she always kneel down on her two knees to greet me in the mornings, welcome me with a deep hug when I return from work, unbutton my shirt then goes to dish my meal while I have a cold shower. I must say am lucky... So guys don't feel discouraged as not all older ladies have that 'big woman' or 'elder sister' attitude. U also have a lot to do interms of not allowing this 'i am your husband' thing to control you. Love and pamper her, help her with cooking, house chores, give her surprises, speak calmly with respect, and I assure you it's love forever���

Bollywood movie.....abegy...afterall Nigerians believe davido get private jet n house for Lekki. And buhari no dey corrupt.

That's normal naaa. No be house helps disvirgin most of us. At four dem don arrange me finish sef. She was 12....

So finally an end to babymamas trying to entrap men with kids. 2018 is a really nice year. First the dolls and now this.........woww

pweetiedee:
which of the goddesses?

I know its your dick typing sha.

If u see goddess, you go stay?

she's a chest goddess. I'll worship her foreva..

She's a goddess......where's my Vaseline.

dingbang:
I thought 92.3fm is Nigeria info. Gullible ones out there please this is pure scam

are u mad.,..which Nigeria info Lagos or .....

That pdp spokesman is a dangerous speaker. He virtually destroyed fsshakins career. Unfortunately our youths dnt watch such. They were watching hush puppy dancing

drips8:
okay African nations should be able to replicate the same level of success as the Asians nations have, we have our issues such as having lots of landlocked nations,unstable economic policies,too much tribalism issues, bad education, having relatively new nations, and a lot of people don't even trust nigerian made products but the most developed Asian nations are east Asian nations and these nations have the least European contact, south Asian nations such as Pakistan and India aren't doing too well compared to the east Asian nations.
I agree Africa could move on but there is simply much work to do which can be done

I'm sure we agree the west has no biz in tht. Thts my point . the blame game must end.

Cold puss can never be sweet.

drips8:
The is because the Asian nations didn't go through the whole contact and colonialism process, western occupation on Vietnam and the middle east has ruined the nations, China is a Communist nation, north Korea is based on dictatorship, India has a booming medical scene but still it has major issues, India could also be considered a shithole it's like a bigger version of nigeria

OK clearly you haven't read Asia's history...China, Korea (north south), India under Britain was worse than Nigeria. Did I forget Taiwan, ie the west ran campaigns deriding their products for decades. The truth is any nation that's hoping to be recognised by hoping on solely trade while failing to produce will NVR succeed. Consumer nations are the easiest to bring down. Haiti has no excuse. If they'd taken their goods to the shores of other nations(friendlies), they'd have still exported. But how can u, wen u can't build ships, n waiting for nations to reach thy shores.

seunlayi:
In case you missed it, the President of the United States called Haiti, El Salvador, and African countries “shitholes,” then pretended like he didn’t say it, but basically said it all over again.

This matters not just because it’s racist (the President is racist, in fact, he is professionally racist), because it’s vulgar (“shithole,” one of the all-time great swear words, is forever sullied by this), and because it’s catastrophically bad for foreign and domestic relations. It matters in part because of the history of Haiti, and the history of racist discourse about Haiti.

Ebony Elizabeth Thomas, a professor of education and scholar who’s closely studied these narratives, writes:

The reason why White nationalists like 45 always name Haiti because the Haitian nation & people are unique. Haiti defeated Napoleon, threw off the chains of slavery, and exposed the lie of White supremacy & European imperialism. So there’s no end to their hatred for Haiti.

Jonathan Katz, a journalist and former AP correspondent in Haiti who wrote The Big Truck That Went By about Haiti’s 2010 earthquake and the cholera epidemic that followed, has a longer thread spelling out how these narratives about Haiti were generated and how they work. Here’s a thick excerpt:

In order to do a victory lap around the GDP difference between, say, Norway and Haiti, you have to know nothing about the history of the world. That includes, especially, knowing nothing real about the history of the United States… You’d have to not know that the French colony that became Haiti provided the wealth that fueled the French Empire — and 2/3 of the sugar and 3/4 of the coffee that Europe consumed…

You’d have to not realize that Haiti was founded in a revolution against that system, and that European countries and the United States punished them for their temerity by refusing to recognize or trade with them for decades. You’d have to not know that Haiti got recognition by agreeing to pay 150 million gold francs to French landowners in compensation for their own freedom. You’d have to not know that Haiti paid it, and that it took them almost all of the 19th century to do so.

You’d then have to not know that Haiti was forced to borrow some money to pay back that ridiculous debt, some of it from banks in the United States. And you’d have to not know that in 1914 those banks got President Wilson to send the US Marines to empty the Haitian gold reserve… [You’d] have to not know about the rest of the 20th century either—the systematic theft and oppression, US support for dictators and coups, the US invasions of Haiti in 1994-95 and 2004…



In short, you’d have to know nothing about WHY Haiti is poor (or El Salvador in kind), and WHY the United States (and Norway) are wealthy. But far worse than that, you’d have to not even be interested in asking the question. And that’s where they really tell on themselves… Because what they are showing is that they ASSUME that Haiti is just naturally poor, that it’s an inherent state borne of the corruption of the people there, in all senses of the word.

And let’s just say out loud why that is: It’s because Haitians are black.

Racists have needed Haiti to be poor since it was founded. They pushed for its poverty. They have celebrated its poverty. They have tried to profit from its poverty. They wanted it to be a shithole. And they still do.

If Haiti is a shithole, then they can say that black freedom and sovereignty are bad. They can hold it up as proof that white countries—and what’s whiter than Norway—are better, because white people are better. They wanted that in 1804, and in 1915, and they want it now.

The history of Haiti is weird because it is absurdly well-documented, yet totally poorly known. It’s hard not to attribute that to ideology. We don’t teach the Haitian Revolution the way we teach the American, or the French, or the Mexican, because it’s a complicated story. Kids are more likely to hear variations of “Haiti formed a pact with the devil to defeat Napoleon” (this is real thing, I swear) than Toussaint Louverture’s or Jean-Jacques Dessalines’s names.

Also, while Haiti’s revolution was an early, signature event in world history-the first time a European power would be overthrown by an indigenous army (but not the last)-the causes of Haiti’s poverty are basically identical with those of almost every poor nation around the world: a history of exploitation, bad debt, bad geopolitics, and bad people profiting off of that poverty (almost all of them living elsewhere). And this is basically true about poverty in American cities as well (with all the same attendant racist myths).

Some recommended reading:

The Slaves Who Defeated Napoleon by Phillipe Girard
The Black Jacobins by CLR James
The Big Truck That Went By by Jonathan Katz
Haiti: The Aftershocks of History by Laurent Dubois

https://kottke.org/18/01/how-haiti-became-poor

this piece would have been engrained In the walls of history if African nations with over 60 yrs of independence today, are el Dorado's. Since we know that's not the case then Haiti isn't different. Have you ever taken out time to read Asia's history?!!! China, nkorea, india should all be shitholes too.

Chevronstaff:
Ms Dorcas Shola Fapson Is a disgrace to woman hood, Simple....!!!!!

Does she even know the meaning of "KIDNAP and RAPE?" She claimed she was being kidnapped yet she SAT DOWN COMFORTABLY recording him as he drove you to an unknown location, opened the car, got down and left her alone to open a gate..

Ms.Dorcas was looking for little fame and decided to set an innocent dude up....!!!!! Feminists and there wahala sha....God dey

why una dey vex....this is new age feminism. In the west if she asks for ur nmba n she calls you then you send her thank you mssg the nxt thing u hear is rape. The fctard actress is trying to bring tht stupid western feminist madness here. Eeryfin is rape.

chidichuddo:
you are married right?

if I hear

diluewunmi:
Lol, so saying no man can wash mouth on me upset you abi. I see. Well, thats the truth. No man can wash mouth on me because i will not give that space. If i respect you as a man and you don't put yourself in that space, then i will make you understand where you should be. I am a woman who respect people alot and i expect same because i hate disrespect with a passion. If now, you don't get my point, i wish u the best in your dominating state.

nobody is looking for who to dominate. I hear feminists always saying this while describing it as patriarchy....man generally doesn't even if ant to commit. He'd rather be alone and keep hunting. It's because of women man in order to satisfy her commits and while doing that he still wants to be in control of his life. Very few men want to control their wives.

diluewunmi:
Secondly, to mention my husband and father is rude of you. Don't try it again alright! Those two men, i don't joke with. They mean what the world is to me. So watch your mouth...

yea ...though I'm still trying to figure out how I insulted those men, but ofcos typical of feminists....always issuing empty threats and forming wonder woman with their pretty little foots .....park well o