₦airaland Forum

meccuno:
[s][/s]America won World war 1 ? and America won the cold war?

How did America lose the cold war??

Mr. Professor

DoggoneDogg:
The Korean War is simple boy.

US wanted to install puppet Seoul as the sole government. It failed.

The day US pulls its useless military base from South Korea, Pyongyang will absorb South Korea in less than a month.

Rubbish!!

The Korean war was never initiated by the US, it was due to invasion of South Korea.


Go and read about the war very well
The US intervened to stop the spread of communism in the Korean peninsula.


Apart from that you are greatly underestimating South Korea military capabilities now

Mangekyo:
Guy what are you talking sef?
See let me educate you in a civilized way.
You may be right about the Russian nuked being as old as to the soviet Era, BUT, so are the ones USA got in their arsenal.
The USA and Russia are no longer creating nuclear warheads, and definitely aren't modifying them. In fact sef they're even reducing them. Russia formally had 40k nuclear warheads but reduced them to 7k approximately. The USA are currently doing the same. So at the end of the day both got old nuclear weapons....

Also BTW, let me tell you. The soviets were the ones who created the biggest nuclear warhead till date. So I wouldn't underestimate the capabilities of the ones remaining in the Russian arsenal

You are wrong, the Russian don't have up to 40k nuclear weapons, even during Soviets era where there was the MAD (mutual assured destruction) doctrine, the nuclear capacity the US and USSR were closed to each, not this gaps that you are mentioning

Mangekyo:
I asked you a simple question before. Why did USA decide not to use a nuke on the nazis (as you said), a people that were threatening the world, then....... Decided to use a nuke against Japan who were obviously a less threat?

Also currently, Russia got more nuked than us and her allies combined. Since you believe nukes win you battles, Russia should have the advantage should both go toe to toe

Most of the Russian nukes are from the Soviets era and have lesser destructive capacity than the US one

DoggoneDogg:
[s][/s]

Dis wan go just go online, read small then come back to spill drivel.

That's because you don't know about the Korean war and you want to be forming DON on nairaland.


The obvious one is that you spew nonsense with confidence.

thebosstrevor1:
Russia invaded Finland on 1939 and won.

Russia single handedly drove the Germans in winter from Moscow up to Berlin and captured the city.

The Russian were able to defeat the Germans, because the German army were also occupied at the western front. Russia were able to reach Berlin first, because it is in East Germany, look at the map.

DoggoneDogg:
Russia singlehandedly defeated Hitler.

Looooolll

Russia that struggled badly against Finland

seunny4lif:
Hitler invaded France to humiliated the French because of the result of WW1
Poland because he and Stalin already divided it and he hate the Poles
HIlter needed the Oil but he believes if he can take Moscow then he will have power to take the oil.
Hitler was determined to capture the oil fields of the Caucasus regions

Correct

DoggoneDogg:
So was the North Korean 'invader' defeated? Because I just looked at the map now & North Korea still exists with Pyongyang as capital


..............................................................................................
Do you know why I put invader in quote up there?
Your IQ was revealed when you called a native of the land an invader while a country located thousands of miles away is the rightful occupant.

Na wa.

Go and read about how General Douglas MacArthur and his forces ruthless deal with the North Korean, they withdrew because Harry Truman didn't want a nuclear war, since Soviets developed nuclear weapons around that time.

From your last paragraph, I can deduce that you don't know about the Korean war, you just went on Google


So can you explain how the US lost the cold war I'm still waiting oo

DoggoneDogg:
Abeg work don start jare
I don tire to dey reply same daft mentions over & over again

arguing with you is just a waste of time. You are definitely a troll.

DoggoneDogg:
The objective of the US in Korea was to make only puppet Seoul the capital of Korea, no?


Well, today we have Pyongyang & Seoul.
I don't know about you but that's a failure.

.

The objective was to help South Korea in defeating their northern Invader. Since it was Northe Korea that invaded South Korea.


Don't run away from the gulf war ooooo

joyandfaith:
US did not loose korean war. It was part of cold war game. It was stalemate with armistice signed by all parties involved except south korea.
Korea war is still on technically

The guy even said that US lost the cold war . It seems that the guy is a troll, because that seems too stupid.

DoggoneDogg:
The US lost.

Thanks.

How??

Don't dodge the question oooooooo... How

And what caused the Korean war

Don't run away oo.


Also, the you really know the meaning of gulf war at all, dude stop embarrassing yourself.

DoggoneDogg:
You get power to dey correct.
I just cancel the entire rubbish once I see it.

please can you tell us what happened during the Korean war.

malel1:
They have not won wars And countries are afraid to fight them ?

The guy is really dishonest in his assertion. He even said that the US lost the cold war , that's why I don't take him seriously.

DubaiLandLord:
Without the USA, the Germans would have destroyed the USSR.

Don't mind the wannabe historian.

I will keep saying it.

Sahara reporters is a dangerous media outlet.

Techguy96:
I actually do

okay oo

lexy2014:
U still weren't able to negate what he said

Techguy other account

lexy2014:
This was ur response to him:

So you know better than the military abi?

Do you know think real life scenario, is the same as your project in school.

How does this negate what he said?

that was not the only reply, that I said that because he said this

"This is also invalid.

Someone can get all this details and make the call elsewhere.

It's not necessary that a terrorist will make such call right in front of the army at their checkpoint.
Infact such terrorist will be foolish."

He was quoting another person, not me but his reply shows that he is just boasting, since he is a civilian and knows little about warfare.

When experts are talking or giving some directives, it is better that does who don't know about the subject keep quiet.


Military: Don't use phone in checkpoints.
Techguy: You can use phone joor.
Me: Why did you say that, are you an expert?
Techguy: Yes, I know better than the military
Me:
Me: So you know better than military intelligence officers, IT experts, engineers and others professionals in the military
Techguy: okay bye

lexy2014:
Good and have u negated these points he raised especially when u consider d comment he was responding to ab initio?

Yes

lexy2014:
I have checked that's why I got into d discussion and so far u haven't been able to negate a single thing he said

His main point is that terrorists using phone cells as remote detonators do not have to be there. He also said that terrorists doing so are foolish.



I refuted his claim in one main sentence? Terrorists are not rational people.

lexy2014:
Even if he mentioned that he is an engineer, how does it negate d points he made?

Can u show d "rationality of terrorists" that u are referring to?

Can u negate any of d points he raised?

check his previous posts don't waste my time

lexy2014:
Pls what has his school project got to do with d discussion?

Can u show d "rationality of terrorists" that u are referring to?

Didn't you read his previous post that he said that terrorist using cell phone in military checkpoint is a foolish person? Did you think that terrorist think that way? Do you think that they are afraid to die? They have a dangerous ideology that a rational mind will find it difficult to comprehend.

Concerning project? He said that he is an engineer that he has done some practical about remote detonation through phone. I told him that real life scenario is different from the school

lexy2014:
Techguy96 made some valid points. I was expecting u to negate d points he made. Instead u are attacking his person without really making any point

which points did he made??

He's talking about rationality of terrorist, as if terrorists are rational people, do you think that they are afraid to die.

Real life is different from school project.

Techguy96:
Ok bye

Bye

Since you know better than intelligence office, Military communication experts, IT experts, Engineers and co.

Techguy96:
Are u talking about the phone detonating bomb or that a terrorist doesn't necessarily need to make call right in the checkpoint?

Because I don't see where my school project comes in play.

And yes I know better that alot of Nigeria military.

Are you not in Nigeria, don't know that boko haram terrorists will use cellphone to detonate bombs in checkpoints.

As for you saying that you know better than the Military? What's your qualifications? Do you think there are no experts, engineers, intelligence officers in the military?

You will just stay behind your keyboard and be typing rubbish.

Techguy96:
This is also invalid.

Someone can get all this details and make the call elsewhere.

It's not necessary that a terrorist will make such call right in front of the army at their checkpoint.
Infact such terrorist will be foolish.

So you know better than the military abi?

Do you know think real life scenario, is the same as your project in school.

Techguy96:
That's not true, I studied electrical electronics engineering, I know one or two things about electromagnetic waves and automation.

These are project we use to do in school, triggering actuators using phone.

And I can boldly tell u that u don't need to be close to the bomb.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2003/06/fbi-cell-phones-triggered-bombs/amp

Read this article, there is a range that you can use cell phone to detonate bombs not from anywhere in the world.

Techguy96:
If a bomb was planted at the checkpoint, U can use phone to detonate the bomb from anywhere in the world.

Beside why would u want to detonate the bomb at the checkpoint when u are at the checkpoint, unless u are a suicide bomber.

But a suicide bomber will not go through that stress of using a phone when they can strap the bomb to the body.

Stop talking about something you don't know, they have to be close to the bomb, because of radio wave.

Don't talk about something you don't know

Kaduna1stson:
.

Such a dumb reply?

Countless other devices like watches, remote controls and switches can also be used to detonate bomb. Why stopping people from using phones while allowing people to wear watches.

The real reason is to stop people from taking picture and video of exchange of money collected at checkpoints.

believe me, that's not the reason at all.

Phones are commonly used than the other devices you mentioned.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna535846


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/boston-marathon-bomb-attack/


since you claim to be an expert, how many times are wristwatches being used as bomb detonator.

It is not good to be using phones at checkpoints.

Phones are sometimes used to detonate bombs.