Sand2022's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Sand2022's Profile › Sand2022's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 16 pages)
MaxInDHouse:Oga, you have not answered me. So you do not understand the sentence? if you now understand it, you should be apologizing for your misguided attack on me. And not switching to something else I never brought up. |
MaxInDHouse:John had a fixed date, though he never said it. How then do you know if he never said it? I think you should be researching the publications before you comment. You're making errors that even Watchtower can not make. It is true that Jews, including Jesus disciples thought that Messiahs coming will usher in the kingdom. That was the belief probably as taught by the Rabbis. Actually the Messiah will usher in the kingdom according to the prophecy at Isaiah 9. But when he will do so no one knows. They didn't have any fixed date. It was just expectation just as we do have today about God's kingdom. Secondly, John 21 is not about John the Baptist. It's about apostle John, the writer. Even that is not a fixed date. Who knows when John will die? In summary, there was a high sense of urgency and expectation at the time, but they didn't have any fixed date when the kingdom will come. And all there expectation was not by calculating dates and fixing when the kingdom will come, it was just a normal human curiosity. JWs fixing dates was not a sense of urgency, but misinterpretations of the scriptures. But they never had any fixed date in mind. There was a high sense of urgency during that time because of how they understand the law and prophets. |
MaxInDHouse:Don't tell me you don't understand that sentence. The sentence says opposite of what youre attacking. Check it once more. |
gisevak:A second view suggests that December 25 became the date of Jesus’ birth by a priori reasoning that identified the spring equinox as the date of the creation of the world and the fourth day of creation, when the light was created, as the day of Jesus’ conception (i.e., March 25). December 25, nine months later, then became the date of Jesus’ birth. For a long time the celebration of Jesus’ birth was observed in conjunction with his baptism, celebrated January 6." That is the plausible origin of the date. |
pinkylovely:Don't mind them, if you have the opportunity enroll and get your degree. The people who tell you not to go to university do ask elders if they know any brother or sister who is a doctor, estate manager etc. Was Rolf Furuli not a professor while helping the watchtower write publications and make research for them? Was he not a high ranking member before he left? Was James Penton not a professor who wrote some amazing awake articles before he left? Don't mind those hypocrites. Are their lawyers not graduates? |
pinkylovely:Yes. You have a PIMO here. I can understand how you feel. Cognitive dissonance is real. But don't drop questioning things that doesn't line up with scriptures. If you check my profile, you will see me discuss the unscripturalness of these teachings. |
MaxInDHouse:So you think that fixing a definite date the kingdom will come is the same as having a sense of urgency? |
Courz:Very true. It hard to notice that the whole home bible study with bible students was brainwashing technique. They make it seem as if they are loving you by providing free home study. It is meant to brainwash you from what you previously believe then introduce their error. And this study is done with people who know nothing about theology nor the reason for their church's theological position. None of those are scriptural, it is a brainwashing move. Think about it, did Jesus not Paul ever go to people's home to conduct hime bible studies every week, for years? What they do, is it not to preach publicly, if you accept, you get BAPTIZED immediately, then you then join a nearby home meeting where you worship with others who have believed? Today, it would be like, preach, then invite those who believe to a nearby church. Simple. Nothing like coming to someone's house with a prearranged study book to keep brainwashing you each week for years. This is a Governing body technique. It has nothing to do with the bible. The Return Visit Paul did was to go and revisit the home congregations he established as he preached from each city. It was not to homes to continue studying and studying. They aim to make you disbelieve what you believed before and then chose them. This Governing body guys are smart I tell you. |
Courz:You want to join JWs, pay attention to the bolded parts. It is better you don't baptize, cos if you do baptize and the above is true, you will suffer the most. You may even attempt suicide. Don't ever make that mistake. If you like them, just be there friends and NEVER baptized. But if they have gotten you indoctrinated, sorry, you will feel this advise is from apostates, not until you decide you want to leave. But courz it is hard for a new person to know this. Very very hard. The indoctrination is too strong and well thought out. |
gohf:Don't forget that the given authority is during Jesus incarnation. People do miss the fact that Jesus performed two functions, one as human for the salvation of man, and one in his Divinity. During Jesus Christophany, as we see in the Old Testament, Jesus doesn't come at that time as if he was given authority by God. He came as God intoto. Consider his appearance to Adam and his wife. Did you see Jesus then saying, God told me to tell you? He came as God. Even Jehovah's witnesses acknowledged that Jesus may have been the one appearing then. I think Jesus Redemptive role is what people mistake and I see why many see it that way, I saw it so before. If we read the praise given to Jehovah at Isaiah 6:1-3, we will think the person on the throne is God the father right? But John 12:41 tells us that Jesus was the one there. So don't confuse Jesus Redemptive role with his Divinity. |
gohf:Jesus is evidently the one who made that statement. But that is another topic. I agree we are not to have another besides God, however, there are many places where Jesus is worshipped, even in his christophanic appearances in the OT. What Trinity teaching is doing is to bring a summary of whom God is so as not to ignore other scriptures that presents someone else who is worshipped. Let me give one example of what I mean. Now, the scripture you quoted above shows we shouldn't worship another God, but notice what happened at Josh 5:14-15. Pls read it. First, do you agree that the Prince of Jehovah's Army is Jesus? If yes, do you agree he was worshipped there? Additionally, check rev 5:8-14. Do you agree Jesus is worshipped there as Jehovah is? So which way can you have another Deity besides Jehovah? Don't you think that seeing them as having one essence help dispel any contradictions? John 1:3 like I said, it still didn't call him the creator but the means by which the creator made what was made. For example I can't send you this message without a phone, network, data, technology etc. I used this to reach out, do you understandPerhaps you didn't mean to make Jesus inanimate, but the analogy seem to suggest that. What I think you mean is that Jesus was just an Agent through which God made things, as such, God is the creator and not Jesus. I used to see it that way before, but I saw one scripture that challenged that. Let's see Heb 1:10-12 And: “At the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands. 11 They will perish, but you will remain; and just like a garment, they will all wear out, 12 and you will wrap them up just as a cloak, as a garment, and they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will never come to an end.” Here we see Jesus clearly praised as the creator. All creation are the work of Jesus hands. This verse is taken from Psalm 102:25-27. A place used to praise God for his creations. Here Paul is saying that Jesus was in fact the person being praised there for creation. Will you not agree that if Jesus was just an agent and nothing more like me and you are as we preach the goodness, he will not need to be praised for what he did as an Agent? Notice the final words; "and you will wrap them up just as a cloak, as a garment, and they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will never come to an end." This verse can only refer to God. God is the only one who is immutable. Also confirm from Heb 13:8. Only God can have that description. What Trinity is saying is that this unique nature possess by God the Father is shared by both the Son and the Spirit. For me, this reconciles many scriptures attributing the Father's unique characteristics to others. so you do understand and by the way the subject here isn't the divinity of Jesus but if he is God. Of course there is only one God and then only one mediator and son, Jesus ChristAt times the bible uses the word God in reference to God the Father, in some cases to the Son or the Holy Spirit. These three have God being used for them in a unique way as to the Supreme Deity. So if there were no place what is unique to God is assigned to others, I don't think we will be having this conversation now. But there are, and you have to reconcile it. What exactly did I write or quote, anyway I am certain I wrote and you read that Jesus is at the right hand of God and not that Jesus is God.Jesus was not appointed to be the exact FACSIMILE of His very BEING. Maybe you might need to see the force of that Greek word. This means that all the unique attribute of God is the exact same Jesus has. This is not the same as creatures have. We still see a similar phrasing at Phil 2. God's FORM. check that in Greek as well. There is no way to escape Jesus nature as being same with God the Father. This is what the scripture says, not trinitarians. God the Father occupies a headship role in the divine council. So almost all things are credited to Him, I think this made us think that He is the only one involved. The incarnation brought more revelation to us that in fact Jesus was sharing in all the glory given to God the Father when in heaven. (John 17:5) Gen 1:26 gave us a hint that only one person is not involved, but it wasnt clearly revealed then. Being at God's right hand or receiving authority from Him doesn't change his nature. It only shows that God the Father as the head is credited with assigning roles and authority. It also shows that humility rules even within the divine council. It doesn't diminish the nature. Jesus subjects to the father as well. Scholars call this functions or roles within the divine council. Consider this, people have grieved God before and was forgiven, but if you grieve the Holy Spirit, you won't be forgiven. That doesn't mean the Spirit is greater than God the Father, but it is the role the Spirit occupies that make him have that authority. |
MightySparrow:Yes. Abel Damina is doing a great work. Perhaps God wants to use him to shake His church. Not that all he says is true, but many have lost interest in the bible and are more interested in money. |
olola4:The dismissal is temporary until investigation is concluded. |
Rev 22:6 says 6 He said to me: “These words are faithful and true; yes, Jehovah, the God who inspired the prophets, has sent his angel to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. 7 Look! [b]I am coming quickly. Happy is anyone observing the words of the prophecy of this scroll."(NWT) Note: the word "Jehovah" was inserted by New World Translation committee. Check the interlinear to confirm. Two line of evidence pointing to Jesus are: 1. The person that sent his Angel to declare the message to his slaves is Jesus, not Jehovah. Read Rev 1:1. 2. The phrase "I am coming QUICKLY" is consistently attributed to Jesus in the book of Revelation, not Jehovah. (Read rev 2:16; 3:11; 22:20) Let's start with the first point. Rev 1:1 says in part: A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he (Jesus) sent his angel..." Rev 22:16 add more proof. 16 “‘I, JESUS, sent my angel to bear witness to you... So we see that even from the context of Revelation 22, Jesus is the one that sent his Angel. What about the second point, "I am coming QUICKLY"? From Revelation chapter 22 also, and even the whole revelation book, that phrase is used for Jesus. However, chapter 22 identified who is coming quickly. Who? Verse 29 answers: 20 “The one who bears witness of these things says, ‘Yes, I am coming quickly.’” “Amen! Come, Lord Jesus.” Therefore, Revelation chapter 22 contextually identifies Jesus as God, and also Alpha and Omega. (Verse 12, 13) Next time, I will discuss Alpha and Omega in the book of revelation. Tags: achorladey, Jozzy4, MaxInDHouse, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Boomark, Emusan, Dtruthspeaker |
gohf:Firstborn doesn't mean first creature, try reading verse 16. It helps show why he is called the firstborn. It gives the reason when it says "because by him are all things made". Secondly, seeing Jesus as a creature goes against John 1:3 which unambiguously says that "apart from him not EVEN ONE thing was made". That is totally unambiguous. Heb.1.2 But now in these final days, he has spoken to us through his Son. God promised everything to the Son as an inheritance, and through the Son he made the universe and everything in it. (NLT)Jesus being used by God to create things doesn't affect his divinity. That is if you understand the subject. From what you quoted on Heb 1:3, you see clearly that Jesus is the exact representation of His very BEING. the point of Trinity is exactly that, Jesus is of the same essence as God the Father. Sustaining the all things by the word of His power can only be work done by the Almighty for that would mean sustaining even all creatures, angels, humans, universe etc. A creature cannot do this. Is Jesus undermined by being called son of God and not God? Do you think he is that proud like the devil who wants to be who he is not?I don't understand how this fit. The power of a creature? The question is who gave the power.That scripture didn't say the power was given. He is already the exact representation of God's being. So He possess that power essentially. |
cutecommend:It is good reply will start from asking us, what is worldly song? By worldly, do you mean songs without any gospel theme? A song sang by one who doesn't attend church? Or a song that promote what God hates, in other words, if Flavour sing about wedding, that isn't worldly because it is not what God hates? It is difficult to know what people mean by worldly song, even me get confused as to what that statement really means. It appears that what comes to our mind is a song sang by celebrity secular musicians. But such secular songs do sometimes take on gospel titles. My question before I reply is, what is a worldly song? |
Janosky:You remember why I don't respond to your comments? |
CAPTIVATOR:You seem to miss out on the fact that when the Watchtower says God chose not to know the Sodomites, that was not what the Bible says. The bible says that God will go to find out if what he has heard about them is the way it is, I am paraphrasing here. And if it is true, the verse says "I will get to KNOW IT". So from the scriptural phrasing, one can also say that God do not know it until He came to investigate. That place didn't say "well, I decided not to know it or I chose not to know it." So that Jesus says he doesn't know shouldn't make you to conclude that He cannot know. He didn't say I CANNOT know. He is the one who will destroy the world, mind you. How is it that he CANNOT know? This is a dumb take though, God , angels , and Jesus all have the same essence. Essence means Nature or what someone is made of. God, Jesus and the angels in heaven are all Spirit beings, that's their essence. In fact the bible speak of Christina's has having the hope of Divine ( God's ) Nature at ressurection. Does that mean they have same authority as God to know time and seasons ?While God and the angels are spirits, this doesn't mean they are the exact FACSIMILE of God's VERY BEING. heb 1:3. God is not a creature. So no creature can be described as having the EXACT Facsimile of his not very person, but very BEING. The Bible tells us more as well. The bible says that ALL the FULLNESS of DIVINE Godhead (theotes) dwells in him. As a JW, do you remember the often quoted ROM 1:20? I guess you do. Now in that verse, "Godship" is mentioned there in reference to God. Remember? Good. Now the word that appeared in that ROM 1:20 for "Godship", is the exact same Greek word that appeared for Jesus at Colosians were it is said that ALL the FULLNESS of the divine Godship dwell in him. Now how can you run away from that strong scriptural evidence of Jesus being much like facsimile of Jehovah? |
CAPTIVATOR:If by produce, you mean created, you are contradicting a scripture there. All that was created, all, I mean, all came from Jesus. That is what John 1:3 says. So it is scripturally wrong to use the word create for Jesus. |
Brenbentondiaz:Ok. Where did I miss out. |
encyclopediax:While he is God, he is not the same person as God the Father. This has always been the misunderstanding among JWs. The Trinity holds that they are of the same nature. That is the major point. If Jesus isssssss God why doesssssss He ssssay " Only the Father Knows when the World will End ? " Good Master.... " Why call me though good ? Non is Good but God ," Jesus is asking why ssssssomeone is calling Him good and Wants only God the Father to be called goodI have addressed this issue of not knowing when the end will come above. Jesus plays two roles. He restrained himself of many things while in the flesh. He emptied himself as recorded at Phil 2:5-6 With regards to Jesus saying God good. Well, I don't think you mean that Jesus is not good. Is that your point? Take note also that Jesus is the called the ONLY Potentate at 1tim 6. Is Jesus the only Sovereign? for God so loved the World that He gave His only begotten Son ". We can see there are two different entities the Father who gave his Son . Jesus is The Messiah and Savior of The World. He is not God and does not need to be God to save the world. Adam was not God. Jesus is The New Adam to Restore mankind back to God.I don't see how all that changes anything. By saying "different entities", it appears you hold to Modalism, that is what JWs preach against. They teach less about the core traditional teaching of Trinity. To the church teaching that the father and Jesus are the same entity is heresy. So I agree with you that such teaching is false |
TemmyT002:It is true that the word God can stand for title. Even humans and angels can bear that title. However, some scriptures shows that Jesus Godship goes beyond title. I have a thread where I delt broadly on that. Would you want to check it? Before then, how would you explain the worship given him at Rev 5:13-14? |
MaxInDHouse:I am not into church name stuff, I am for Jesus. If you want to know the one I currently attend in person, you already know it - Jehovah's Witness. |
Brenbentondiaz:He still speaking in terms of his human nature. Christ was raised in human body, though now glorified, notice that he still answers the root and offspring of David and the lamb of God in the book of Revelation. David was never his Father prior to his humanity. But he now operates on that cos of his humanity. But at the same time, the divine nature he also possess. Jesus operates from two natures from the time he came on earth and upwards. Scholars call this a hypostatic Union. |
MaxInDHouse:My church is Church of Christ aka the body of Christ which I am part of. |
tareboy:Yes, as a human he had some limitations. Notice that at Luke 2:52, he is said to be increasing in wisdom and physical stature. Jesus while in heaven had complete knowledge, but as a man, he had some limitations. However, what's your thoughts about his sustaining ALL things. Does that sound like what a creature can do? |
jiggaz:Is it your point that Judas fail out of grace or what? |
Omooba77:I think people still pay tithe in his church. Right? |
We will look at col 1:17 Colossians 1:17 He existed before everything else began, and he holds all creation together. A creature cannot possibly do that. Heb 1:3 tells us more. Hebrews 1:3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, Notice that Jesus is here said to uphold ALL things by the word of His power. This is not just elevating all things, but the point is that Christ sustains ALL things, universe, humans, animals etc, by the word of His power. So after creating all things, He also sustains ALL things. Also take note of the Power aspect. Such power must be the Highest form of power there is. For the power of a creature cannot possibly sustain all things. This doesn't sound like what an ordinary creature can do. Does it? Tags: Aemmyjah, achorladey, Jozzy4, MaxInDHouse, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Boomark, Emusan, Dtruthspeaker. |
CAPTIVATOR:That is consistent with what the Bible says. He does not know just as Jehovah's witnesses teach with regards to the Sodomites. You teach that Jehovah only knew when he came down to observe. So from JW view, you can no longer use this issue of knowledge against Jesus. If God doesn't know certain things at least for sometime, how then would you expect Jesus to know certain things all the time? You said his humanity limited him, but you are very blind to the Fact that he mentioned angels, did humanity also limit the angels ? That nullify your point.Not if you understand the Trinity doctrine which it appears you do not even understand. Jesus has the same essence as God, the angels do not possess this essence. Now For your information , Jesus cannot " Choose" not to know , the same way the angel's, humans mentioned in that text didn't choose. Do we choose ? No. That bible verse is a pure testament to the Fact that only the Father has the Authority to set time and seasons.No. You don't equate Jesus with humans and angels in his full divinity. I made this point above: "Back to the point. Jesus never said he cannot know. After his resurrection notice that Jesus told his apostles that it does not belong to THEM(you) to know the date that the father has kept in his own JURISDICTION. So that is the role of His father to set the date. That is a role. Trinitarian agree that there can be distinction within the Godhead and that there are distinct roles. First by Jesus saying it does not belong to "THEM" to know neither did he say it does not belong to US including himself, this could mean that at this time Jesus now knows, but he doesn't want to share that knowledge to THEM. He didn't now say "no one knows except the Father". Jesus didn't say CANNOT. I mean how will he come to judge the world and destroy the wicked if he cannot know when the end will come? Is he not the one that will be bringing it to end? |
CAPTIVATOR:The JW do not believe in total omniscient like the church do. If God doesn't know anything at any time and even if no one else knows, that nullifies His omniscience. Omniscient doesn't mean ability to know, but overall knowledge of everything both in the past, present and future. So if the JW view is that God doesn't know that Adam will sin, then God is not omniscient. Jesus said he doesn't know, BUT ONLY the Father know. That is not a choice!!!! Just as every other person mentioned in that Matt 24:36 including angels didn't have such choice. They actually do not know!Point of correction. Jesus didn't say he cannot know, mind you. Cannot would refer to ability to know. That is not what Jesus says. He said no one knows, including him, so as at that time, that is true. You can't say that even now, Jesus doesn't know. Of course Jesus was in his humanity. Trinitarians view his humanity as a bit of limitation to his divine essence. So this point isn't actually kicking against Trinity doctrine. You would need to make a criticism that takes note of what someone actually teaches. Not what he doesn't. Back to the point. Jesus never said he cannot know. After his resurrection notice that Jesus told his apostles that it does not belong to THEM to know the date that the father has kept in his own JURISDICTION. So that is the role of His father to set the date. That is a role. Trinitarian agree that there can be distinction within the Godhead and that there are distinct roles. First by Jesus saying it does not belong to "THEM" to know neither did he say it does not belong to US including himself, this could mean that at this time Jesus now knows, but he doesn't want to share that knowledge to THEM. He didn't now say "no one knows except the Father". Please do not look down on roles within the Godhead or jurisdictions. For eg, one can speak against God and Jesus and be forgiven, but you don't dare speak against the holy spirit. You won't be forgiven that sin, either now nor even in the new system of things. Does that mean that the Holy Spirit is now greater than Jesus and God the father? It is simply roles and jurisdictions. And don't make it also sound as if the role occupied by the Holy Spirit is superior to that of the father and Son. Jesus said who will sit in his left and right is his father to give. It doesn't mean that Jesus can't chose who will be there, but that is His father's jurisdiction. You ask me to show you how others know what God chose not to know. Didn't you see my reference to Sodom? People like Lot started lamenting about the badness of the area. Meaning that Lot and his family were the ones complainng about the errors of the Sodomites, then God said He would go down to investigate whether the complaint He had heard is true. I am just paraphrasing here. So those who are making the complain already knows they were bad. When God investigated, did He not agree that their sin was indeed too bad as people complained? I am telling you JW position on this subject. Bear that in mind. Show me a single place the Father choose not to know something but claims someone somewhere know?See above What makes him God Almighty is that authority , when he choose to not know, NOBODY ElSE can know. .Omniscient means one who knows all in the past, present and future. From JW view, God is not at least completely omniscient. So if Jesus is not completely omniscient, it doesn't affect his Godship from JW perspective. |
CAPTIVATOR:Having that authority is not the issue, but that He doesn't know it at some point according to JWs, so God is not omniscient. That being the case, Jesus can also chose not to know. Another implication of this is that he doesn't know doesn't mean he is not God, just as God didn't know whether Adam will sin doesn't mean he isn't God. |




