Sand2022's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Sand2022's Profile › Sand2022's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 16 pages)
paxonel:Christ is the central figure that all prophecies point to. So all true prophets emphasize that. But they tell about the future as well. |
MaxInDHouse:If they ever fixed a year, a month or whatever, there is no way to reach that conclusion from the scriptures. A high expectation is already in the land. The Jews see the Messiah as one who will liberate them from Roman captivity and establish his kingdom, but that Jesus disciples fixed a date cannot be concluded from what they said. John 21 might be a possibility that some expected the kingdom during John's lifetime. But can we call that a fixed date? I doubt. who knows how long John will live? Even John who wrote the epistle sounded as if he himself didn't even reach that conclusion himself. He pointed out what Jesus actually said and what some concluded from what he said. So did all, as God's organization at the time teach that the kingdom will come during johns lifetime? No, obviously John didn't see it so. But did some concluded so, yes. How long did that expectation last? We don't know, but there is nothing in the other books of the new testament that suggests that these lasted a long time, and never did any preach such a doctrine. It was never officially agreed by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem. So I don't see how one will find any first century parallel to the organization's fixing dates for the kingdom coming and even announcing it in public preaching. God's people in Bible times didn't do that. |
haddeylium:Jehovah's witnesses cannot be said to be inspired prophets who hear supernatural knowledge from above. I feel they are and should remain bible students and nothing more. This is where there appears to be contradiction. You claim to be spirit directed because you follow your own understanding of what you read in the bible. If you say you are not inspired, you read the bible and tries to see what it means, why then are you claiming to be exclusively used by God when what you're doing is what thousands of bible scholars are doing? There are also other churches who have the same view, who just interpret what they read in the bible without hearing a voice from above. Why don't you consider those other ones as also spirit directed? Most importantly, why do you consider yourself as God's channel? Why is it that if not your religion, others are false? Does that description match one who claim to be just following what he reads in the bible or does it not make one God's voice on the earth? If you claim to be that God's exclusive voice, then you're God's prophet on earth. If you failed, it means that the God who is directjng you though His spirit, as you claim is false god. He keeps pushing you to error and more errors. When we read the bible, we don't see any such case in the bible, where God's exclusive organization is full of scriptural misunderstanding to these incomparable proportion. No single Christian church has committed the amount of errors and doctrinal switching as done by Jehovah's witnesses. How will anyone ever conclude from reading the Bible that God is using such an organization? Does their experience not match what we have been warned at 2 tim 3:6,7, 13? "From among these arise men who slyly work their way into households and captivate weak women loaded down with sins, led by various desires, 7 always learning and yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge of truth. Every weekly meeting is described as "Study". So, if they were just bible students, we can say they are folks who gather to study the bible. No one will call you out for any wrong misunderstanding, but the claim of the organization is huge. God's ONLY channel, His organization, the Only true religion, the Only Faithful Slave God is using. As such, you represent God, in fact you say that you are the only one on earth representing God. That makes you God's Prophet. You are his channel. The point is, from what you really are, folks studying God's word, you shouldn't be called inspired prophets. You should be called bible students. But your other claim takes you to a different level, it makes you inspired prophets. If you remove religious entity from your designation, no one will call you a prophet. And what does "God's channel" tell us about what God will do in the future? 1874 switch 1914 switch 1925 switch 1975 and many more. Please compare that with what you read in the bible and tell me if this organization resembles God's people in Bible times. So if they don't match God's people in Bible times, then the organization is false. |
MaxInDHouse:I don't think that in English the phrase "fixed date" must be a fixed day. A fixed date can mean a fixed year or month. From your escapee reply, I want to believe that you agree that the apostles never set any date for the kingdom to come. |
paxonel:Lol. They are rare, but some have had such reputation in the past. As I progress in my scriptural studies, I am beginning to see that what is unfailing prophecy might not be what I think. What I think is a failed prophecy might in fact have fulfilled differently. |
MaxInDHouse:Nawa o. Oga if there is a fixed date, which date is that? In the case of JWs, we know the date they fixed. So which date did John and Jesus disciples fix? |
MaxInDHouse:Oga, you have not answered me. So you do not understand the sentence? if you now understand it, you should be apologizing for your misguided attack on me. And not switching to something else I never brought up. |
MaxInDHouse:John had a fixed date, though he never said it. How then do you know if he never said it? I think you should be researching the publications before you comment. You're making errors that even Watchtower can not make. It is true that Jews, including Jesus disciples thought that Messiahs coming will usher in the kingdom. That was the belief probably as taught by the Rabbis. Actually the Messiah will usher in the kingdom according to the prophecy at Isaiah 9. But when he will do so no one knows. They didn't have any fixed date. It was just expectation just as we do have today about God's kingdom. Secondly, John 21 is not about John the Baptist. It's about apostle John, the writer. Even that is not a fixed date. Who knows when John will die? In summary, there was a high sense of urgency and expectation at the time, but they didn't have any fixed date when the kingdom will come. And all there expectation was not by calculating dates and fixing when the kingdom will come, it was just a normal human curiosity. JWs fixing dates was not a sense of urgency, but misinterpretations of the scriptures. But they never had any fixed date in mind. There was a high sense of urgency during that time because of how they understand the law and prophets. |
MaxInDHouse:Don't tell me you don't understand that sentence. The sentence says opposite of what youre attacking. Check it once more. |
gisevak:A second view suggests that December 25 became the date of Jesus’ birth by a priori reasoning that identified the spring equinox as the date of the creation of the world and the fourth day of creation, when the light was created, as the day of Jesus’ conception (i.e., March 25). December 25, nine months later, then became the date of Jesus’ birth. For a long time the celebration of Jesus’ birth was observed in conjunction with his baptism, celebrated January 6." That is the plausible origin of the date. |
pinkylovely:Don't mind them, if you have the opportunity enroll and get your degree. The people who tell you not to go to university do ask elders if they know any brother or sister who is a doctor, estate manager etc. Was Rolf Furuli not a professor while helping the watchtower write publications and make research for them? Was he not a high ranking member before he left? Was James Penton not a professor who wrote some amazing awake articles before he left? Don't mind those hypocrites. Are their lawyers not graduates? |
pinkylovely:Yes. You have a PIMO here. I can understand how you feel. Cognitive dissonance is real. But don't drop questioning things that doesn't line up with scriptures. If you check my profile, you will see me discuss the unscripturalness of these teachings. |
MaxInDHouse:So you think that fixing a definite date the kingdom will come is the same as having a sense of urgency? |
Courz:Very true. It hard to notice that the whole home bible study with bible students was brainwashing technique. They make it seem as if they are loving you by providing free home study. It is meant to brainwash you from what you previously believe then introduce their error. And this study is done with people who know nothing about theology nor the reason for their church's theological position. None of those are scriptural, it is a brainwashing move. Think about it, did Jesus not Paul ever go to people's home to conduct hime bible studies every week, for years? What they do, is it not to preach publicly, if you accept, you get BAPTIZED immediately, then you then join a nearby home meeting where you worship with others who have believed? Today, it would be like, preach, then invite those who believe to a nearby church. Simple. Nothing like coming to someone's house with a prearranged study book to keep brainwashing you each week for years. This is a Governing body technique. It has nothing to do with the bible. The Return Visit Paul did was to go and revisit the home congregations he established as he preached from each city. It was not to homes to continue studying and studying. They aim to make you disbelieve what you believed before and then chose them. This Governing body guys are smart I tell you. |
Courz:You want to join JWs, pay attention to the bolded parts. It is better you don't baptize, cos if you do baptize and the above is true, you will suffer the most. You may even attempt suicide. Don't ever make that mistake. If you like them, just be there friends and NEVER baptized. But if they have gotten you indoctrinated, sorry, you will feel this advise is from apostates, not until you decide you want to leave. But courz it is hard for a new person to know this. Very very hard. The indoctrination is too strong and well thought out. |
gohf:Don't forget that the given authority is during Jesus incarnation. People do miss the fact that Jesus performed two functions, one as human for the salvation of man, and one in his Divinity. During Jesus Christophany, as we see in the Old Testament, Jesus doesn't come at that time as if he was given authority by God. He came as God intoto. Consider his appearance to Adam and his wife. Did you see Jesus then saying, God told me to tell you? He came as God. Even Jehovah's witnesses acknowledged that Jesus may have been the one appearing then. I think Jesus Redemptive role is what people mistake and I see why many see it that way, I saw it so before. If we read the praise given to Jehovah at Isaiah 6:1-3, we will think the person on the throne is God the father right? But John 12:41 tells us that Jesus was the one there. So don't confuse Jesus Redemptive role with his Divinity. |
gohf:Jesus is evidently the one who made that statement. But that is another topic. I agree we are not to have another besides God, however, there are many places where Jesus is worshipped, even in his christophanic appearances in the OT. What Trinity teaching is doing is to bring a summary of whom God is so as not to ignore other scriptures that presents someone else who is worshipped. Let me give one example of what I mean. Now, the scripture you quoted above shows we shouldn't worship another God, but notice what happened at Josh 5:14-15. Pls read it. First, do you agree that the Prince of Jehovah's Army is Jesus? If yes, do you agree he was worshipped there? Additionally, check rev 5:8-14. Do you agree Jesus is worshipped there as Jehovah is? So which way can you have another Deity besides Jehovah? Don't you think that seeing them as having one essence help dispel any contradictions? John 1:3 like I said, it still didn't call him the creator but the means by which the creator made what was made. For example I can't send you this message without a phone, network, data, technology etc. I used this to reach out, do you understandPerhaps you didn't mean to make Jesus inanimate, but the analogy seem to suggest that. What I think you mean is that Jesus was just an Agent through which God made things, as such, God is the creator and not Jesus. I used to see it that way before, but I saw one scripture that challenged that. Let's see Heb 1:10-12 And: “At the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands. 11 They will perish, but you will remain; and just like a garment, they will all wear out, 12 and you will wrap them up just as a cloak, as a garment, and they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will never come to an end.” Here we see Jesus clearly praised as the creator. All creation are the work of Jesus hands. This verse is taken from Psalm 102:25-27. A place used to praise God for his creations. Here Paul is saying that Jesus was in fact the person being praised there for creation. Will you not agree that if Jesus was just an agent and nothing more like me and you are as we preach the goodness, he will not need to be praised for what he did as an Agent? Notice the final words; "and you will wrap them up just as a cloak, as a garment, and they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will never come to an end." This verse can only refer to God. God is the only one who is immutable. Also confirm from Heb 13:8. Only God can have that description. What Trinity is saying is that this unique nature possess by God the Father is shared by both the Son and the Spirit. For me, this reconciles many scriptures attributing the Father's unique characteristics to others. so you do understand and by the way the subject here isn't the divinity of Jesus but if he is God. Of course there is only one God and then only one mediator and son, Jesus ChristAt times the bible uses the word God in reference to God the Father, in some cases to the Son or the Holy Spirit. These three have God being used for them in a unique way as to the Supreme Deity. So if there were no place what is unique to God is assigned to others, I don't think we will be having this conversation now. But there are, and you have to reconcile it. What exactly did I write or quote, anyway I am certain I wrote and you read that Jesus is at the right hand of God and not that Jesus is God.Jesus was not appointed to be the exact FACSIMILE of His very BEING. Maybe you might need to see the force of that Greek word. This means that all the unique attribute of God is the exact same Jesus has. This is not the same as creatures have. We still see a similar phrasing at Phil 2. God's FORM. check that in Greek as well. There is no way to escape Jesus nature as being same with God the Father. This is what the scripture says, not trinitarians. God the Father occupies a headship role in the divine council. So almost all things are credited to Him, I think this made us think that He is the only one involved. The incarnation brought more revelation to us that in fact Jesus was sharing in all the glory given to God the Father when in heaven. (John 17:5) Gen 1:26 gave us a hint that only one person is not involved, but it wasnt clearly revealed then. Being at God's right hand or receiving authority from Him doesn't change his nature. It only shows that God the Father as the head is credited with assigning roles and authority. It also shows that humility rules even within the divine council. It doesn't diminish the nature. Jesus subjects to the father as well. Scholars call this functions or roles within the divine council. Consider this, people have grieved God before and was forgiven, but if you grieve the Holy Spirit, you won't be forgiven. That doesn't mean the Spirit is greater than God the Father, but it is the role the Spirit occupies that make him have that authority. |
MightySparrow:Yes. Abel Damina is doing a great work. Perhaps God wants to use him to shake His church. Not that all he says is true, but many have lost interest in the bible and are more interested in money. |
olola4:The dismissal is temporary until investigation is concluded. |
Rev 22:6 says 6 He said to me: “These words are faithful and true; yes, Jehovah, the God who inspired the prophets, has sent his angel to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. 7 Look! [b]I am coming quickly. Happy is anyone observing the words of the prophecy of this scroll."(NWT) Note: the word "Jehovah" was inserted by New World Translation committee. Check the interlinear to confirm. Two line of evidence pointing to Jesus are: 1. The person that sent his Angel to declare the message to his slaves is Jesus, not Jehovah. Read Rev 1:1. 2. The phrase "I am coming QUICKLY" is consistently attributed to Jesus in the book of Revelation, not Jehovah. (Read rev 2:16; 3:11; 22:20) Let's start with the first point. Rev 1:1 says in part: A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he (Jesus) sent his angel..." Rev 22:16 add more proof. 16 “‘I, JESUS, sent my angel to bear witness to you... So we see that even from the context of Revelation 22, Jesus is the one that sent his Angel. What about the second point, "I am coming QUICKLY"? From Revelation chapter 22 also, and even the whole revelation book, that phrase is used for Jesus. However, chapter 22 identified who is coming quickly. Who? Verse 29 answers: 20 “The one who bears witness of these things says, ‘Yes, I am coming quickly.’” “Amen! Come, Lord Jesus.” Therefore, Revelation chapter 22 contextually identifies Jesus as God, and also Alpha and Omega. (Verse 12, 13) Next time, I will discuss Alpha and Omega in the book of revelation. Tags: achorladey, Jozzy4, MaxInDHouse, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Boomark, Emusan, Dtruthspeaker |
gohf:Firstborn doesn't mean first creature, try reading verse 16. It helps show why he is called the firstborn. It gives the reason when it says "because by him are all things made". Secondly, seeing Jesus as a creature goes against John 1:3 which unambiguously says that "apart from him not EVEN ONE thing was made". That is totally unambiguous. Heb.1.2 But now in these final days, he has spoken to us through his Son. God promised everything to the Son as an inheritance, and through the Son he made the universe and everything in it. (NLT)Jesus being used by God to create things doesn't affect his divinity. That is if you understand the subject. From what you quoted on Heb 1:3, you see clearly that Jesus is the exact representation of His very BEING. the point of Trinity is exactly that, Jesus is of the same essence as God the Father. Sustaining the all things by the word of His power can only be work done by the Almighty for that would mean sustaining even all creatures, angels, humans, universe etc. A creature cannot do this. Is Jesus undermined by being called son of God and not God? Do you think he is that proud like the devil who wants to be who he is not?I don't understand how this fit. The power of a creature? The question is who gave the power.That scripture didn't say the power was given. He is already the exact representation of God's being. So He possess that power essentially. |
cutecommend:It is good reply will start from asking us, what is worldly song? By worldly, do you mean songs without any gospel theme? A song sang by one who doesn't attend church? Or a song that promote what God hates, in other words, if Flavour sing about wedding, that isn't worldly because it is not what God hates? It is difficult to know what people mean by worldly song, even me get confused as to what that statement really means. It appears that what comes to our mind is a song sang by celebrity secular musicians. But such secular songs do sometimes take on gospel titles. My question before I reply is, what is a worldly song? |
Janosky:You remember why I don't respond to your comments? |
CAPTIVATOR:You seem to miss out on the fact that when the Watchtower says God chose not to know the Sodomites, that was not what the Bible says. The bible says that God will go to find out if what he has heard about them is the way it is, I am paraphrasing here. And if it is true, the verse says "I will get to KNOW IT". So from the scriptural phrasing, one can also say that God do not know it until He came to investigate. That place didn't say "well, I decided not to know it or I chose not to know it." So that Jesus says he doesn't know shouldn't make you to conclude that He cannot know. He didn't say I CANNOT know. He is the one who will destroy the world, mind you. How is it that he CANNOT know? This is a dumb take though, God , angels , and Jesus all have the same essence. Essence means Nature or what someone is made of. God, Jesus and the angels in heaven are all Spirit beings, that's their essence. In fact the bible speak of Christina's has having the hope of Divine ( God's ) Nature at ressurection. Does that mean they have same authority as God to know time and seasons ?While God and the angels are spirits, this doesn't mean they are the exact FACSIMILE of God's VERY BEING. heb 1:3. God is not a creature. So no creature can be described as having the EXACT Facsimile of his not very person, but very BEING. The Bible tells us more as well. The bible says that ALL the FULLNESS of DIVINE Godhead (theotes) dwells in him. As a JW, do you remember the often quoted ROM 1:20? I guess you do. Now in that verse, "Godship" is mentioned there in reference to God. Remember? Good. Now the word that appeared in that ROM 1:20 for "Godship", is the exact same Greek word that appeared for Jesus at Colosians were it is said that ALL the FULLNESS of the divine Godship dwell in him. Now how can you run away from that strong scriptural evidence of Jesus being much like facsimile of Jehovah? |
CAPTIVATOR:If by produce, you mean created, you are contradicting a scripture there. All that was created, all, I mean, all came from Jesus. That is what John 1:3 says. So it is scripturally wrong to use the word create for Jesus. |
Brenbentondiaz:Ok. Where did I miss out. |
encyclopediax:While he is God, he is not the same person as God the Father. This has always been the misunderstanding among JWs. The Trinity holds that they are of the same nature. That is the major point. If Jesus isssssss God why doesssssss He ssssay " Only the Father Knows when the World will End ? " Good Master.... " Why call me though good ? Non is Good but God ," Jesus is asking why ssssssomeone is calling Him good and Wants only God the Father to be called goodI have addressed this issue of not knowing when the end will come above. Jesus plays two roles. He restrained himself of many things while in the flesh. He emptied himself as recorded at Phil 2:5-6 With regards to Jesus saying God good. Well, I don't think you mean that Jesus is not good. Is that your point? Take note also that Jesus is the called the ONLY Potentate at 1tim 6. Is Jesus the only Sovereign? for God so loved the World that He gave His only begotten Son ". We can see there are two different entities the Father who gave his Son . Jesus is The Messiah and Savior of The World. He is not God and does not need to be God to save the world. Adam was not God. Jesus is The New Adam to Restore mankind back to God.I don't see how all that changes anything. By saying "different entities", it appears you hold to Modalism, that is what JWs preach against. They teach less about the core traditional teaching of Trinity. To the church teaching that the father and Jesus are the same entity is heresy. So I agree with you that such teaching is false |
TemmyT002:It is true that the word God can stand for title. Even humans and angels can bear that title. However, some scriptures shows that Jesus Godship goes beyond title. I have a thread where I delt broadly on that. Would you want to check it? Before then, how would you explain the worship given him at Rev 5:13-14? |
MaxInDHouse:I am not into church name stuff, I am for Jesus. If you want to know the one I currently attend in person, you already know it - Jehovah's Witness. |
Brenbentondiaz:He still speaking in terms of his human nature. Christ was raised in human body, though now glorified, notice that he still answers the root and offspring of David and the lamb of God in the book of Revelation. David was never his Father prior to his humanity. But he now operates on that cos of his humanity. But at the same time, the divine nature he also possess. Jesus operates from two natures from the time he came on earth and upwards. Scholars call this a hypostatic Union. |
MaxInDHouse:My church is Church of Christ aka the body of Christ which I am part of. |
tareboy:Yes, as a human he had some limitations. Notice that at Luke 2:52, he is said to be increasing in wisdom and physical stature. Jesus while in heaven had complete knowledge, but as a man, he had some limitations. However, what's your thoughts about his sustaining ALL things. Does that sound like what a creature can do? |



