Windblown2much:
Upon all the happiness tonight, no giveaway to celebrate the win?

Make the rich and privileged assist the poor and less privileged to get something to eat tonight

Let the victory and happiness tonight be felt across the country! The winning really sweet me

Chai my network no gree me watch am finish. How did Super Eagles win? The goal keeper catch some balls or what?

MightySparrow:

The Jehovah's Witnesses's organization has as one of its prime doctrines of 1914 return of Jesus and thereafter began his invisible presence and rulership over his discreet slaves. In the recent waves of ' New Lights ' certain teachings have been discarded, modified and new ones embraced. The latest of these is the wearing of beard by choice not as a requirement as formerly taught and practiced.
Since the death of the founder,. Charles Taxes Russell, many things have changed and splinter groups arose due to internal wranglings and leadership tussles. Many in recent times have left the organization by disagreeing with some doctrines, or a disfellowshiped. In certain European countries, litigations are ongoing for various reasons with the States,. Notable among whose are Spain, Norway and few others.

In a recent convention in Puerto Rico, the topic addressed here was considered and it seems to be jettisoned in no distant future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naqrrit4a6U?si=MMVoBXmWITKrWwc4

It's unfortunate that those who claim to defend JWs here lack knowledge of their religion.

The talk by the Spanish JW is not saying that the 1914 doctrine has been abandoned. JWs doctrinal system attach specific meaning to phrases or words. The speaker is saying that Jesus coming in his "Glorious Throne'" aspect in Matt 24 has been recently clarified. They have done that prior to this year. I can't recall the year this happened now, but it was like 2013 or thereabout that they made that change.

But on Jesus being a king in 1914 is still intact.

Jesus coming in his glorious throne' is now understood to be his judgment appearance during the Great Tribulation. Previously all these terms referred to 1914, but they recently shifted that aspect to GTrib. But his being king of God's kingdom is still in 1914.

The JW still wrongly think Jesus presence began in 1914. The appointed times of the nations still ends in 1914. That appointed time is what gave rise to the calculation that landed them to 1914. That 1914 is still the start of the Lord's day.

Many did misunderstand that speakers point.

Of course they may change the 1914 in the future. That will be a huge change. It will have huge implications if they change it. That doctrine do make them look unintelligent. It is a nonsense of a doctrine. I have written on that in one of my Ministry series on this board.


https://www.nairaland.com/7882892/ministry-jws-part-2-1914

MightySparrow:



Hello Sir. I am just seeing or reading your post on this series for the first time. I will look for the rest.

Go to my profile, you will see all in this series.

These people are just deluded In their conceit. Soon 'New Light' would overtake this belief. None of their doctrines or interpretations have been consistent I personally believe that the GB are either sensual, ignorant or dishonest in their interpretation of the scriptures. Years back, they argued that 'forever' has time limit. They have this bad idea that outside their organization, no one can understand the Bible. Yet they commit blunders.

The new understanding added to that belief that forever has limit. In fact the new light implies that everlasting destruction may not be everlasting. Making us to ask, will some of those who die at Armageddon also be resurrected?

I was arguing this same topic with MaximumSide some months back. His position was no one outside Jews had the gifts off the spirit. I asked him, what happened in Acts of Apostles? The record of the Bible are records of the exploits of the apostles not their converts. Himself as as soldier, I asked him, if the the instructors that teach a particular course were mentioned, does that mean no soldiers were produced? Does that mean none of the soldiers ever went to war?

Maxim doesn't know much about the teachings of JWs. His position on the only Jew miracle is not taught by the GB. That is Maxim's own understanding. Don't blame the GB for that one.

Their GB has lost it altogether. I was surprised to see some of their doctrines being jettisoned subtly.
When you point their errors to them, they suddenly become dishonest, defending the GB not the truth of the scriptures.

Holy Spirit is real as well as the girls.

What do you expect. It is there religion. Many are not interested in the truth of the bible. They are concerned about what there leader teach.

Jehovah's witnesses subscribe to cessationism. A theology that believes that spiritual gifts ceased in the first century.

Jehovah's witness hierarchy doesn't know for sure when the gift ceased. They deductively assume it ended in the first century. One of there books said:

"The gifts of the holy spirit were generally passed on to other Christians in the presence of the apostles, usually by the apostles placing their hands on fellow believers. (Acts 8:​18; 10:44-​46) It appears that those who received the gifts of the spirit from the apostles did not transfer them to others. (Acts 8:​5-7, 14-​17) To illustrate, a government official may issue a driver’s license to someone, but that person is not given the legal authority to issue a license to anyone else. Apparently, speaking in tongues ended with the death of the apostles and those who had personally received the gift from them."

The JW Governing Body do not believe that 1cor 13:8-11 spoke of the gift ending when "that which is perfect" come. Many JWs often quote that scripture, saying that " that which is perfect" is the bible, so when the bible was completed, the gift ended. I don't know how this tradition developed, but that is not what their publications teach. I agree with that truth that the gift will cease when that which is perfect comes, although many witnesses who use that argument don't know they are teaching something different from their church understanding.

Let's look at the Reasoning book of JWs, page 404. Let's first see why they threw away the fine proof in 1cor 13:8-11, after that, we will see when that which is perfect will come.

Why did they dismiss the clear proof of when the gift will end at 1cor 13:8-11?

The Reasoning book states:

"At 1 Corinthians 13:8 reference is made to several miraculous gifts—prophecy, tongues, and knowledge. Verse 9 again refers to two of these gifts—knowledge and prophecy—saying: “For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.” (KJ) Or, as RS reads: “For our knowledge is imperfect and our prophecy is imperfect.” Then verse 10 states: “But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” (KJ) The word “perfect” is translated from the Greek teʹlei·on, which conveys the thought of being full grown, complete, or perfect. Ro, By, and NW here render it “complete.” Notice that it is not the gift of tongues that is said to be “imperfect,” “in part,” or partial. That is said of “prophecy” and “knowledge.” In other words, even with those miraculous gifts, the early Christians had only an imperfect or partial understanding of God’s purpose. But when the prophecies would come to fulfillment, when God’s purpose would be accomplished, then “that which is perfect,” or complete, would come. So, this is obviously not discussing how long the ‘gift of tongues’ would continue."

We can see how clear scripture at 1cor 13 was sidelined by the Watchtower. They were already getting to the correct understanding before they shifted it cleverly.

It is clear from that scripture that the gift of prophecy, knowledge and speaking in tongues are all part of the spiritual gifts, when that of prophecy ends, so will the other gifts. When will they end? The book correctly said it's when Gods purposes all get fulfilled in God's kingdom. By then, that which is perfect or complete would have come, showing that there is no need for the gifts.

After wrongly saying that this scripture is not talking about when the gift will end, the JW leaders proceeded to contradict itself with another comment on the same scripture. Let's see

WT July 15, 1992

Since a babe acts on the basis of limited knowledge and physical development, it can be swayed to and fro, as though being rocked in a cradle. But a man is much more developed physically, has greater knowledge, and usually is not easily swayed. He has abolished childhood thoughts, attitudes, and methods. Similarly, after God’s earthly organization grew out of its infancy, He judged that it did not need the spirit’s gifts of prophecy, tongues, and knowledge. Though present-day members of the congregation, now in its old age, also feel no need for such gifts, they are glad to serve God under the guidance of his spirit."

This article is commenting on verse 11. Here they now said that the scripture is stating when the gift will end, when the church grows out of infancy. They have thus detached the whole point of Paul out of context. Paul had just shown why the gift will cease in the future, because they have partial knowledge. Paul is still continuing with this point by using himself to give object lesson of what he had already said above, just as a babe have partial knowledge, so are those with these spiritual gifts, they will get the perfect knowledge in God's kingdom.

Let's read verses 11, 12;

When I was a child, I used to speak as a child, to think as a child, to reason as a child; but now that I have become a man, I have done away with the traits of a child.  12 For now we see in hazy outline by means of a metal mirror, but then it will be face-to-face. At present I know partially, but then I will know accurately, just as I am accurately known."

Did you notice how verse 12 started? for now we see in hazy outline. This words are connecting the point about the child with another illustration of looking at a metal mirror. How can we be sure? Notice verse 12b. At present I know partially, but then I will know accurately, just as I am accurately known.". We see here that Paul has again brought himself as the object lesson. It's all about the partial knowledge and it ending in the future, when true christians will see face-to-face as it were.

Surprisingly, the Watchtower, gives this verse 12 a different meaning from verse 11.

In the Insight book, under "face", this is said:

"Comparing the understanding of God’s purpose had by the early Christian congregation with the fuller understanding to be had upon receiving their heavenly reward, and then coming to comprehend the divine purpose in its entirety as prophecy is fulfilled, the apostle Paul said: “For at present we see in hazy outline by means of a metal mirror, but then it will be face to face.”​—1Co 13:12; compare 2Co 3:18; 4:6"

Here they believe that the verse 12 will fulfill in the future kingdom, but verse 11 fulfilled after the first century. It is however clear that all this is about the future. Perhaps they did this inconsistent interpretation so that there supposition that the gift ended with the death of the apostles will have a scriptural footing. This is contextually impossible.

Let's look at the theory of Watchtower that the gift was passed by the apostles laying of hands or during their presence. According to them, after they died, no one had the power to transmit such powers. True, the scriptures shows different places the gift was passed by laying hands of the apostles or during their presence. In fact, in one instance, Simon wanted to pay to have that ability.

But we shouldn't forget that the gift came first at Pentecost. God poured the spirit directly from heaven. Nothing prevents God from doing the same anytime He wishes. Secondly, it was not only the apostles that transmitted the gift. We read:

Acts 9
17 So An·a·niʹas went and entered the house, and he laid his hands on him and said: “Saul, brother, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road along which you were coming, has sent me so that you may recover sight and be filled with holy spirit.”

This is how Paul got his miraculous gifts. There is no other area showing that Paul met the apostles to receive the spirit. So it wasn't only the apostles that transmitted that gift. Our God can use anyone to transmit the gift or He pours the Spirit by Himself.

As to the fact that miraculous work should be happening now, is it not written in Joel, that God will pour His spirit in the last days? If we are in the last days, assuming the gift even ceased, why wouldn't God pour it out again in fulfillment of His word?

Secondly, Rev 11:3-9 spoke of two prophets of God that will come with great miraculous power. JWs says this refers to Rutherford and his cohorts, however, verse 7 says that when they FINISH there witnessing, the beast will make war with them and conquer them. Yet this conquering is said to have happened when Rutherford was still alive, and after the so called conquering, Rutherford was still preaching. When the prophecy clearly says, the conquering happened when they have FINISHED their witnessing. To confirm that the two witnesses did finish their witnessing, after they were resurrected, did they start preaching again? No. The account says they flew to heaven.

Thirdly, we can glean from Matt 7:21,22 that we should have true prophets today.

"Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the Kingdom of the heavens, but only the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will. 22 Many will say to me in that day: ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?"

Speaking about people with miraculous gifts, Jesus says, not everyone. By saying not everyone, Jesus implies that some miraculous workers will genuinely call out to him when he comes back. Some will genuinely say they performed healing in his name and he will not deny them. Is it not logical however, to say that if Jesus is warning about false prophet, it shows that there MUST be true ones? If not, the word " false" makes no meaning.

In summary, there is no scriptural support for cessationism.

Emusan:


They're now coming back to their senses that Watchtower shouldn't judge others as they might not be the only true followers of Christ as they usually claim.

They are gradually coming up. Of course there are more steps they need to get there.

MaxInDHouse:
Of course judgment is in God's hands but we know that whoever willfully oppose God's word will not be resurrected.
So stop deceiving yourself!

You just agreed with what I said which you previously didn't understand. Yet you say I should stop deceiving myself. Only you!

Remember we are discussing what the Annual Meeting point is. As to what the scriptures say about who will be resurrected, I said it in the op.

Emusan:


What happened at the annual meeting?

There GB says they should leave the judging aspect to Jesus.

MaxInDHouse:


So in a nutshell what those scriptures says are not to be practiced shey?

Check the response I gave.

MaxInDHouse:


You only seek approval for what you want instead of listening attentively to gain insight.



If someone has never had the chance one on one discussion with God's organization such a person will be given a fair chance after the destruction of the wicked people but if you've gotten the sense of what God's organization is doing yet you chose to sit on the fence them i'm sorry for you!

You didn't learn anything from the broadcast.

MaxInDHouse:


You're just funny walahi talahi!

So because we said some might not even have had the opportunity to gain insight so as to be saved that means even people opposing God's organization conscientiously can also enter the kingdom of our God shey?

Continue deceiving yourself!

What we're saying is this:

Jesus preached for so many years and the thief have had about him but then he's not sure if Jesus is the promised Christ so while still contemplating on what to do with Jesus' case he was caught and sentenced to death only for him to meet the same Jesus on the torture stake. With his state of mind he has condemned himself already knowing fully well that he misused his opportunity of becoming one of Jesus' disciples but now that all hope is lost he doesn't know how to approach the man of his dream not until his cohort asked Jesus to perform his usual miracles that this heartbroken sinner raised his voice and rebuked his fellow culprit.

From what happened there are both sinners on the same page?

That's what we are saying.

Many doesn't understand what Noah was saying back then not until the rain began and destroyed all of them. God will not continue being wrathful with those ignorant ones so on the day of resurrection they will be given the opportunity to see Noah in Paradise you can imagine how they will humbly kiss his feet and readily do whatever that righteous man tells them afterwards. But what about those making jest of Noah and even insulting him for the work he was doing?

Maybe you didn't understand the broadcast. The point of the broadcast is that your GB don't know. Yes, even about those in Babylon the Great that conscientiously oppose your organization. They don't know even if those ones will be resurrected. Maybe you should go and rewatch it. Geoffrey Jackson's last talk advise that you should preach and leave out the judgment aspect for God and Jesus.

The thought the GB has is that one can only be destroyed or die everlastingly if he has received the FULL opportunity to join your Organization. Now how much teaching, preaching shows that one has gotten that full opportunity? There answer; they don't know. Even if those people die during the GT, they say they don't know if they will be resurrected. No one can establish if they have got the full opportunity from Jehovah's standpoint to change.

The whole point of the Broadcast is that they don't know who will or who will not be resurrected.

MaxInDHouse:


Guy we're both saying the same thing now so from your own point of view JW's teachings doesn't stop sincere ones among them from having salvation but from the fact i have you (not those who never met JWs before) can't see God's kingdom if you fail to become one of JWs now!

I know you won't like this but that's the bitter truth.


Jesus explained that those who reject the message of his disciples are doomed {Matthew 10:14-15} and today over 41,000 different religions are claiming Christians with contracting teachings and conflicting doctrines so one may conclude that due to all these confusion God may not judge based on the things we read in the scriptures but then Jesus commanded his own disciples to have LOVE among themselves just as he had for them {John 15:12} he also commanded them to LOVE their neighbours as themselves {Mark 12:31} and to LOVE and pray for those who are looking for ways to hurt them! Luke 6:27-28
He taught them that if what they're practicing is according to his teachings all of them will treat one another like one family {Mark 10:29-30} which is in harmony with what God's servants prophesied before Jesus {Isaiah 2:2-4 & Micah 4:1-3} the one and only person whose wise counsel will make this possible in midst of imperfect humans of different races is the Prince of Peace {Isaiah 9:6} that's why Jesus could confidently proclaim any group of people or organization that fulfilled this task as living WITNESSES of his earthly mission! Act 1:8

So whoever has SEEN any group of people SUCCESSFULLY doing this thing but chose to always speak against them is no longer speaking against those imperfect humans but against the SPIRIT mobilizing them to do the will of God. Matthew 12:31-32

The only thing that could save you now is if you can present a better performing group with regards to the doing of God's will failure to do so means you're an enemy of the Prince whose subjects are working out peace globally among men of goodwill so extermination is waiting for you! Luke 19:27

I told you I will remind you this your post in January 2024. Remember my point, that salvation should be left to Jesus.

Now after watching the Annual Meeting, how far?

MaxInDHouse:


Explain what those scriptures are saying and the organization that's practicing it if not what JWs are doing?

I have responded to them in the op

During the 2023 Annual Meeting of Jehovah's witnesses, especially the part 2, two talks by David Splane and Geoffrey Jackson revealed the new understanding JWs now have about the fate of the Sodomites, those in Noah's day, those who live from now until before Armageddon. In all, their conclusion is that they don't know, in other words, they are not dogmatic about their fate. These will mean that they don't even know the fate of those in Babylon the Great, and in fact all who are not JWs, including those they call apostates. All these persons might as well come up to meet them in their paradise earth.

Why has JWs landed themselves into this state of confusion? There are two doctrinal errors that I have noticed caused this. As it is said, one theological error, leads to another.

The confusion comes because of their misunderstanding of the timing of the Judgment Day/White Throne Judgment and what will happen during the thousand year reign of Christ.

Let's take it one at a time.

1. Timing of the Judgment Day:

The JWs teach that the judgment day recorded at Rev 20:13-15; John 5:28,29 will all occur during the thousand year reign of Christ. During that time, according to JW, a resurrection will occur.

In a Watchtower article, of February 1, 1974, it says:

"...The context thus shows that the general resurrection of the dead takes place after the “former heaven and the former earth” pass away. When does this take place? According to 2 Peter 3:10, the former heavens and earth are to pass away in “Jehovah’s day.” That day, according to 2 Pe 3 verses 3 through 6, will catch ridiculers unprepared, as did the flood of Noah’s day, and therefore precedes the thousand-year reign of Christ."

In other words, after the destruction at Armageddon, the next stage is the thousand year reign of Christ. Armageddon, according to them, will destroy the figurative heaven and earth. This will usher in the Millennial reign. This millennial reign is seen by JWs as paradise like the Garden of Eden before Adam and Eve sinned. So it's very important time for any to inherit.

Seeing that these paradise is a place of happiness, that this paradise is God's kingdom, the problem then is, John 5:28,29 and Rev 20:13-15, shows that those that will be available during these period are not only the righteous, but also the unrighteous will be there. (Compare also Acts 24:15). Who then are these unrighteous ones? That is the bone of contention. They try to ascertain whom these are by checking what the bible says about Shoel/Hades, laid to rest with ancestors etc. All those captured by these expressions are seen to merit a resurrection into the Millennial reign. They also posit previously that those who died during the flood, or died in Sodom won't be raised. But now, they use Matt 11:23,24 to show that some in Sodom and in Noah's day might be resurrected to be in paradise.

So, a faithful JWs will be going into paradise, not to enjoy, but to live with wicked persons and then go through the work of preaching to them as they do today. What will help them reconcile this confusion?

The judgment mention at Rev 20:11-15 will not happen during the thousand year reign of Christ. This is made clear at Rev 20;4,5. It says:

And I saw thrones, and those who sat on them were given authority to judge. Yes, I saw the souls of those executed for the witness they gave about Jesus and for speaking about God, and those who had not worshipped the wild beast or its image and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand. And they came to life and ruled as kings with the Christ for 1,000 years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the 1,000 years were ended.) This is the first resurrection."

What do we learn here:

The righteous church will rise to heaven in the first resurrection. This church will reign with Christ for a thousand year. Who will they reign over?

After Satan is cast into abyss, see what Verse 3 says:
"so that he would not mislead the nations anymore until the 1,000 years were ended. After this he must be released for a little while."

There will be people, the nations, that will remain to be ruled by the church, the Saints. During this period of thousand years, the second resurrection won't occur. That is why verse 5 says the rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended. After the thousand years however, what will happen?

Rev 20:7-10 shows exactly what will happen. Satan will be released, he will go out to tempt people. He will gain many, and they will advance towards the beloved city, but finally, fire from heaven will kill then off and Satan will be hurled into the lake of fire. After these, which will take considerable time, verse 11-15 then starts to fulfill. All the dead that weren't raised during the first resurrection will now be resurrected and to be judged according to their deeds.

Why then did the JWs start to think that this event will occur immediately after Armageddon? The article quoted above gave the reason, because Rev 20:11 says before the White Throne Judge, "the heaven and earth fled" .

They understand this to mean when the present world is destroyed. But that doesn't have to be a hinderance, first, as at the time this verse 11 is under fulfillment, the recent world that fled is the one that Satan ruled after he was released from Abyss. This could be the heaven and earth being referred to. Secondly, the account didn't say that it was immediately the judge came that this heaven and earth fled. It could just be saying that it was God that caused the heaven and earth to flee during Armageddon, not meaning that it fled when he showed up. Thirdly, that view of the judgment goes against the sequence of occurrence found from verse 1-10. In fact verses 4 and 5 shows how illogical such reasoning is.

2. How People Will Be Judged:

One of the confusions JWs run into is how the wicked will be judged during the thousand year reign.

Rev 20:11-15 shows that people will be judged from the scrolls opened according to their deeds. JWs believe that these deeds won't be the deeds these persons did in their former life. But the one they will do during the millenium. Why believe that? They feel that Rom 6:7 cancels ones' sin when he dies. So he will be coming into the millennium with clean slate as it were. But is that correct?

Let's see one of the scriptures quoted by David Splane during the Annual Meeting. See how it handles this problem. Matt 11

But I say to you, it will be more endurable for Tyre and Siʹdon on Judgment Day than for you.  23 And you, Ca·perʹna·um, will you perhaps be exalted to heaven? Down to the Grave you will come; because if the powerful works that took place in you had taken place in Sodʹom, it would have remained until this very day.  24 But I say to you, it will be more endurable for the land of Sodʹom on Judgment Day than for you.”

Notice that Capernaum showed lack of faith in Jesus. But Jesus is not saying that the judgment for their unbelief will be faced at that time when they die. No. but that they would face judgement for their unbelief during the judgement. At that time people of Tyre will still be facing there's.

In other words, when those in Capernaum is resurrected, they will be judged according to the actions they displayed while Jesus and his disciples preached during the first century.

Jesus brought out that same point at Matt 12. It says:

"Offspring of vipers, how can you speak good things when you are wicked? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. 35 The good man out of his good treasure sends out good things, whereas the wicked man out of his wicked treasure sends out wicked things. 36 I tell you that men will render an account on Judgment Day for every unprofitable saying that they speak; 37 for by your words you will be declared righteous, and by your words you will be condemned.”

When will these people pay for what they speak against Jesus? Verse 36 says, during the Judgment Day.

People Will be judged individually according to what they do NOW, not future. It is to be noted that Rom 6:7 is not even talking about literal death, but spiritual one. He who dies to his former sin has been forgiven of it. Simple. That is the context. You don't have to create roadblock for yourself over that.

Jesus words at John 5:29 carry the same meaning. .

29And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

So you need to beware of this new teaching. They will make you think that if you misbehave now, God will give you another chance of a thousand years in paradise to change. That is a mirage. It doesn't exist. What you do now will be judged in the Judgement Day after the thousand year reign of Christ. And note that it will be more endurable for Sodom during that judgment than for you. God might understand the rebellion of sodomites considering the period of time they lived in, but one who lived now that the gospel is available in your finger tips, I wonder how you will defend your actions before God that time. Repent, Repent, Repent Now.

MaxInDHouse:

For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Do you not judge those inside, while God judges those outside? “Remove the wicked person from among yourselves" 1 Corinthians 5:12-13
Please who are to do this JUDGING in the absence of a JUDICIAL COMMITTEE?


If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For the one who says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works! 2John 10-11
Apostle John said we must stop talking or greeting disfellowshiped ones.


Now I urge you, brothers, through the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you should all speak in agreement and that there should be no divisions among you, but that you may be completely united in the same mind and in the same line of thought. 1Corinthians 1:10
Paul explained that whoever doesn't agree with the oneness we shared shouldn't be viewed as a brother anymore:
"Now I urge you, brothers, to keep your eye on those who create divisions and causes for stumbling contrary to the teaching that you have learned, and avoid them" Romans 16:17


We based everything on the scriptures just as the first century Christians adhere strictly to the teachings of those taking the lead among them! Act 2:42; Hebrews 13:17

May you have PEACE!

Out of context response. Try again

Jehovah's witnesses practice Disfellowshiping and shunning. In their book, Enjoy Life Forever Lesson 57, point 4, this is said:

"If a person who has committed a serious sin refuses to follow Jehovah’s standards, he can no longer be part of the congregation. He is disfellowshipped, and we do not associate with him or even speak with him. Read 1 Corinthians 5:6, 11 and 2 John 9-11, and then discuss this question:"

They base their reasons on those two scriptures and they really mean it when they say they don't associate nor speak with such persons. To be sure, 1corinthian 5 speaks of Disfellowshiping, and also that one does not associate with such persons. How do we understand this instruction? That we strictly do not associate? When we check verses 9 and 10, one will understand why some will conclude that the counsel is strict shunning. Since the verse contrasts how impossible it will be to shun the world with shunning a brother. One can easily conclude that shunning a brother won't require your getting out of the world. So one should strictly shun. That conclusion would have been the best had that been the only scripture available for this subject.

However, at 2Thess 3:14 some who do not want to work are counselled to work, if not, the brothers should "stop associating" with them. This is a similar Greek word that appeared in the counsel at 1cor 5. JW create a distinction between this instruction and the one at 1cor 5. They say that the instruction at 2Thess 3:14 refer to sins that are not serious, and that such persons are handled using a marking talk delivered from the platform. After the congregation have heard the talk, they will now stop associating with that individual in social setting. This understanding is far from the truth.

First, the method Jehovah's witnesses use to handle serious sin is unscriptural. Even with the 1cor 5. Such sinners are handled during a gathering of the congregation, not by a body of elders. See 1cor 5:4. True, the elders will still be among the members, or even chair the gathering, but it is an open judgment on those sinners, it is not when elders enter into a private room with an individual. That is Watchtower policy, not bible.

So the instruction at 2Thess 3:14 is for the whole congregation. The elders will judge such matters in the view of all the congregation, they will all agree that certain person needs to be marked or disfellowshiped.

Is the sin of not working serious? Yes, it is a serious sin. We see that at 1Tim 5:8 where such persons are viewed as one who have disowned the faith. Even worse than person without Faith. Among JWs, any who doesn't provide for his family, when he is not in anyway incapacitated, can be disfellowshiped. So it's surprising that they say that 2thess 3:14 is a case of menial sin. Is it likely that they just want to have control over the flock and the Disfellowshiping injunction seems to provide them with such powers? Perhaps. But the truth is, that scripture helps us to see that the instruction at 1cor 5 is not meant to be applied to the extent the JW apply it. Those persons disfellowshiped are still brothers and they need to be helped.

It seems that the person with the power to disfellowship and hand over to Satan is the General Overseer. He is the one that issues that order for the congregation to apply. So whoever gets disfellowshiped or get mercy is not necessarily a function of repentance on his part. Now JW should pay attention here. It is believed by them that one gets disfellowshiped if he is unrepentant. That's true, but is it an automatic formula... If unrepentant, then you must go? No. The GO might still give such person time to repent even though he is unrepentant at present. He has the power to remove or retain.

Let's see why I said so.

At 2cor 12:21 Paul says:

" Perhaps when I come again, my God might humiliate me before you, and I may have to mourn over many of those who previously sinned but have not repented of their uncleanness and sexual immorality and brazen conduct that they have practiced."

First, we see they are many, and they sinned and had not repented as at the time he is writing. When did they start this sin? Chapter 13:1-3 helps us:

This is the third time I am coming to you. “On the testimony of two or three witnesses every matter must be established.”  2 Although I am absent now, it is as if I were present for the second time, and I give my warning in advance to those who sinned previously and to all the rest, that if ever I come again I will not spare them,"

By saying third time, Paul is showing that these sinners had been sinning since he founded that congregation, this will be around 5years now. Yet, they are unrepentant and not yet disfellowshiped. Among these are still persons teaching different doctrine and challenging Paul's apostleship. So we see they were really unrepentant to even challenge Paul instead of fighting to win over their sins. What can we learn?

1. At 1 Cor 5 Paul ordered the incestuous man to be disfellowshiped, yet there were still unrepentant wrongdoers in Corinth at that time. So Paul's order may be because the sin of this incestuous man was too serious and unheard of even in the world. It does not mean that it was just a case of unrepentance. Unrepentance is inclusive, but it wasn't the only reason.

2. It was in the hand of the GO, not just the elders to order for a disfellowship. Paul spoke of him not sparing them at 2cor 13:2, and in verse 10 he says he has the power to build up and to tear down, obviously meaning to remove or to retain.

Supporting the view that the GO has that power to order for a disfellowship is the words of Jesus to the Angels in the congregations in Asia Minor. These Angels are individuals caring for different cities. And these cities would be composed of many house congregations. Persons like Timothy, Titus etc are examples of persons who took care of congregations in different cities. So when Paul died, these men, Angels as used in the book of Revelation, took over. Jesus words was to commend them and also counsel them on areas they weren't doing well.

If we venture to what Jesus said, we see in some congregations, the angel allowed the sect of Nicolaus to remain, while in another, sects wasn't allowed. In some Prophetess Jezebel flourished. To further show that repentance wasn't the only factor to retain individuals in the congregation, notice that at Rev 2:21 Jesus had previously given Jezebel time to repent, but she was not willing. Now Jesus is given her the last warning to repent in verse 22, that is, additional time to repent although unrepentant at the time. All these while she was allowed to be in the congregation by the Overseer of the congregation Thyatira. Now the letter Jesus sent was to come to this man, not to the elders in that area. This Angel will be the one to order the elders in those areas to remove her. Of course, she would not be seen as an enemy, but be counselled as a sister.

Another example to show that shunning is not implied by Paul's letter at 1cor 5, is the fact that even Jehovah himself did speak to disfellowshiped persons. So I am not against disfellowship, but I think the scriptures are against strict shunning. One can limit his relationship with one disfellowshiped or even one not disfellowshiped yet but has a bad unchristian habit. You need not make such ones your close friends. Jehovah even initiated a discussion with Satan at Job 1:7; 2:2. Jesus spoke with Satan  (Matt 4:8-10), even with demons. These demons pleaded, and he granted their requests (Matt 8:29-32). While Jesus was on earth, he associate with those considered by his religious leaders as expelled for sin. (Matt 9:11).

The witnesses also point to 2John 9-11 as a proof. This instruction is not talking about grave sinners. It refers to preaching incorrect doctrines. The letter is evidently directed to an individual. Some of course feel that a congregation is in focus here. But the former seems obvious.

John was saying that this lady shouldn't welcome anyone with a different message. She was to avoid listening to such message, not the individual himself. Verse 10 says:

10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him."

That is, if such person comes and does not bring the true teaching. Perhaps the person is engaged in preaching. But what if such person comes and brings a wholesome teaching? Obviously the woman will accept him. Notice another thing, what if such person comes without any preaching, but he came to ask about your welfare, he came to just say a normal greeting and walk away, or he came to seek for secular work? According to JWs, you will still not speak to such person. But that is not what this place is talking about. The point is on wrong message, not on the individual. If a church preacher sees you to tell you the need to repent of your sins, is that the incorrect message John has in mind? Not at all. The funny thing is that the JWs do still carry false message to people's homes, I mean message they one day say its false, yet they expect you to keep putting up with those false teachings until their GB will change it. At times they don't change it, or they change it to another worse teaching. But they want you to keep welcoming them.

If among JWs and you welcome a preacher from another church, you could be disfellowshiped by them. But the same issue happened at 2 Cor 11, yet Paul didn't disfellowship anybody. We read:

4 For as it is, if someone comes and preaches a Jesus other than the one we preached, or you receive a spirit other than what you received, or good news other than what you accepted, you easily put up with him."

This congregation allowed people to preach a different doctrine, what JW will call apostasy, yet no one was disfellowshiped. But they were only counselled against such. But in another occasion, people who opposed Paul preached correct message about Christ, Paul rejoiced instead. We read, Phil 1

"True, some are preaching the Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill.  16 The latter are proclaiming the Christ out of love, for they know that I have been appointed to defend the good news;  17 but the former do it out of contentiousness, not with a pure motive, for they are intending to create trouble for me in my prison bonds.  18 With what result? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is being proclaimed, and I rejoice over this. In fact, I will also keep on rejoicing,"

Paul didn't say " oh no, they are Christendom, they are apostates, God will destroy them in Armageddon." Paul was happy that Christ is being preached. So John's point was against wrong message, not just every message coming from others.

There were times when false teachers were disfellowshiped however, example, Hymenaeus and Philectus. (2tim 2:17). But this must be a serious apostasy that became popular and notorious. Why did I say so? Because the superfine apostles at 2cor 11 to 13 were doing the same thing, yet they remained. We will also notice that the disfellowship of these men affected those who did the wrong, not those who listened or associated with them. 2tim 2:18 shows that they were subverting the faith of some, but those who were being subverted were not disfellowshiped. Paul too didn't threaten those who listened to the superfine apostles with disfellowship at 2cor 11. Lastly, even while the incest man was under disfellowship, some in the congregation didn't follow Paul's advise to discipline the man. We can see this at 2cor 2:6. Those who obeyed are in majority, meaning that there were minority that didn't obey. Paul didn't order that those ones that didn't obey should also be disfellowshiped as JWs do.

We can clearly see from the scriptures that JWs go overboard in applying disfellowship against their members. A single sin will warrant an immediate Judicial Committee. If you discuss with anyone disfellowshiped, you stand to be disfellowshiped yourself if you don't stop talking to them. They obviously do this to maintain control and silence any critic. They even make it righteousness to report any who go against their view. So we can see that the policy is not bible based, it's geared towards maintaining a high control religion. That is the logical conclusion.

MaxInDHouse:


You're surely reading from older publications if this is what you think about God's people today because the new light has revealed many things that's totally different from all of these. I personally don't feel attracted to any female dressed like a mourner so the makeup, short skirts issue is PERSONAL.
Disorderly now means much more than these frivolities we are not to be master over the faith of anyone because each person is standing based on his or her conviction!

I think that the disorderly conduct still refer to issues not warranting a judicial Committee.

In your Organize book, this was said:

10 Occasionally, someone not guilty of practicing a grave sin for which he could be expelled from the congregation shows flagrant disregard for God’s standard that should govern Christians. This could include such things as being extremely lazy, critical, or dirty. He could be “meddling with what does not concern [him].” (2 Thess. 3:11) Or he might be one who schemes to take material advantage of others or indulges in entertainment that is clearly improper. The disorderly conduct is serious enough to reflect badly on the congregation, and it has the potential to spread to other Christians."

I keep advising you to research first before you reply.

Christmas being a popular holiday, thrills many. Expectation runs high as the day gradually approaches. However, JWs, like few other Christians are opposed to the celebration. Their major reason being that the celebration has a pagan religious origin and still retains that religious significance. But does Christmas have a pagan origin?

The short answer is, no one knows for sure, what we do know is that neither Jesus nor his early disciples celebrated Christmas. That celebration had not developed back then like having church buildings, operating a multi billion dollar corporation, attending christian conventions have not developed among christians that time. On the aspect of the pagan origin, the story that is popular is that Emperor Constantine established December 25 to be a new day to commemorate the birth of Christ to christianize the pagan's sacred day, and thus entice pagans. The Encyclopedia Britannica puts it this way:

“One widespread explanation of the origin of this date is that December 25 was the Christianizing of the dies solis invicti nati (“day of the birth of the unconquered sun”), a popular holiday in the Roman Empire that celebrated the winter solstice as a symbol of the resurgence of the sun, the casting away of winter and the heralding of the rebirth of spring and summer.”

This theory, though popular, doesn't have any support from the early christians themselves. None of the Apostolic Fathers says that they did shift the date to coincide with pagan holiday. How then did this idea start to be popular?

An article in the biblical archaeology helps us with the answer:

“... It’s not until the 12th century that we find the first suggestion that Jesus’ birth celebration was deliberately set at the time of pagan feasts. A marginal note on a manuscript of the writings of the Syriac biblical commentator Dionysius bar-Salibi states that in ancient times the Christmas holiday was actually shifted from January 6 to December 25 so that it fell on the same date as the pagan Sol Invictus holiday. In the 18th and 19th centuries, Bible scholars spurred on by the new study of comparative religions latched on to this idea.”

The idea is further encouraged by the Christmas traditions that many link to pagan root. So since it appears that christians borrow Christmas tradition from pagan root, one can understand why the theory sailed for years.

However, there seem to be challenges to this idea as recent studies are beginning to show. One of the challenges is mentioned by encyclopedia Britannica. It says:

“One of the difficulties with this view is that it suggests a nonchalant willingness on the part of the Christian church to appropriate a pagan festival when the early church was so intent on distinguishing itself categorically from pagan beliefs and practices.”

In other words, as at the time this December 25 is recognized to have been a celebration of Christ's birth in Rome, around 336 C.E, the church Fathers are rather distinguishing themselves from pagan practices. This would have been a point pagan would use to show that christians were rather becoming like them had this theory been the case. A second weakness of this view is that this December 25 celebration was not done in Constantinople until 380. That would have been strange had this theory been true. How could Constantine not introduce such a feast to his own city till that time? This would be around 50 years after the establishment of Constantinople.

In fact the work of Steven Hijmans in the iconography of the Sun in Roman Religion is currently the major attack on the whole theory. Although time is needed for more debate on the findings of Steven Hijmans among scholars, but till his findings gets defeated and the above mentioned challenges gets knocked down, this theory of a pagan root for Christmas needs to rest. The theory is as a matter of fact known as History of Religions theory (HRT).

There is a second theory gaining attention, however. A theory heralded by Thomas Talley. It is called the Calculation Theory. The encyclopedia Britannica says of it:

“A second view suggests that December 25 became the date of Jesus’ birth by a priori reasoning that identified the spring equinox as the date of the creation of the world and the fourth day of creation, when the light was created, as the day of Jesus’ conception (i.e., March 25). December 25, nine months later, then became the date of Jesus’ birth. For a long time the celebration of Jesus’ birth was observed in conjunction with his baptism, celebrated January 6.”

So light was created in March 25, according to this calculation. This, as the thought goes, means that Jesus the light was conceived by Mary in March 25. Nine months later, December 25th, Jesus was born. Does that sound unreasonable to you? Yes it is, but that's the method used in ancient times by some christians. Not all however arrived at the same date, as we shall see later.

The earliest mention of December 25 as the date Jesus was born is in 221 CE by Sextus Africanus. In a biblical archaeology article TC Schmidt is said to believe that Hippolytus associated Jesus birth to be around December 25. And Hippolytus incription used to support this is dated around 222 CE.

Commenting further on the different dates available in ancient times, the biblical archaeology article on TC Schmidt continues:

“... The early church fathers’ calendrical calculations of Jesus’s conception resulted in the date.


The early church fathers believed that Jesus was conceived on Passover and born nine months later. However, they differed in their dates for Passover, which is calculated on the lunar calendar. This resulted in a variety of dates for Christ of dates for Christmas, one of which was December 25.”

So the Calculation Theory posits that the December 25 didn't first issue from pagans. This view seem to gain support since the pagan celebration of December 25 began in 274 CE, when Emperor Aurelian established that feast for the birth of Sol Invictus. However, we see the date already being arrived at prior to that date using a method they knew back then.

It should also be noted that the History of Religion's Theory agrees that the celebration of Christ's birth had already been part of the feast of Epiphany before it was separated from that feast to a different date, December 25. That shows that there had been a celebration of the birth of Christ even before the claimed shift to December 25. That alone helps us see the weakness of pagan origin for the celebration of Jesus birth. The only point the HRT can argue is the December 25 date, not the celebration. Even the December 25 too has a major opposing argument against it. Not to forget that while churches in the west is seen to have moved the date to December 25, the churches in the East kept their Christmas celebration on January 6, while some on 19th. So if the HRT is true, how come we have those who celebrate Christmas on January 6 and 19th as far back as fourth century?

Another important destructive point to consider is the one made by Talley himself. His findings showed that Constantine was not based in Rome during the period following the council of Nicea. And this period was essential to the syncretism argued by the HRT.

Professor Susan K. Roll, who is a major proponent of HRT puts it this way:

“The major contribution made by Talley to the question of Constantine's influence on the institution of the Christmas feast in Rome is simply the recognition that Constantine was not based in Rome in the years following the council of Nicea, the decisive period for the establishment of Christmas according to the “solar syncretism” theory.”
Towards The Origins of Christmas (footnote)

So we can see that although many Christmas customs issue from pagans, they are hardly the originators of this feast.

There is no reason therefore to judge others who may chose to celebrate this occasion. You might chose not to celebrate it, that's your decision. In as much as the focus is on Christ and not engaging in worldly behaviors, one with strong faith can celebrate. Finally, let's heed the bible advise at ROM 14:

1Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters. 2One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. 3The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them. 4Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand."

achorladey:


I added that part where they use the term reasonableness and discernment to show how they can very much disfellowship the person who is disorderly under the guise of discernment and reasonableness of the person causing division in the congregation.

Hahaha. I see. It happens.

achorladey:


I am very much familiar with the point you made. The execution of these procedures are done by men not angels from heaven. When a person is disorderly an one of the elders brings the angle of causing division in the congregation into it, that person will get disfellowshipped. When the disorderliness is a serious sin classed under causing division. That person will get disfellowshipped

I understand you. Not all elders understand the policy of their GB. You can see Maxim na. If Maxim is an elder, you can imagine the kind of that will happen. Hahaha

The truth is, scripturally, disorderly ones is the same as serious sin, but we are just discussing how their GB sees it.

Disorderly matters refer to matters not considered to be serious sins eg. Too lazy, short skirts, excessive make ups etc. The GB find it hard to fix what is disorderly behavior because, the proper understanding of that book of thesalonians is serious sin that warrant judicial Committee. But the GB doesn't want to see it so. Why? Because that place states that such disorderly ones should also be seen as brothers, and no one should view them as an enemy. Since the GB feel that they must shun according to their understanding, they now gave that scripture a different meaning. The problem now is to state the sins involved. That scripture is a major hit against their shunning policy. I will one day make a write up against this shunning policy. By then I will explain more.

achorladey:



You don start your lies and manipulations packed into your madness and insanities peddling brains abi?

MARKING DISORDERLY ONES 76

At times it may be necessary to mark those who display a flagrant disregard for Jehovah’s standards though not practicing a grave sin that merits judicial action. (2 Thess. 3:6, 14, 15; w99 7/15 pp. 29-31) This could include such things as being grossly lazy or critical or being a profitless talker who is a constant ‘meddler with what does not concern him.’ (2 Thess. 3:11) It may involve one who schemes to take material advantage of others, indulges in entertainment that is clearly improper, dates an unbeliever, or dates when not legally or Scripturally free.—od chap. 14 pars. 9-12. 77. If the disorderly conduct is generally unknown to others and poses no threat to their spiritual well-being, usually it is best to handle things through admonition and counsel. The body of elders should not be hasty in deciding to give a warning talk. However, if the individual does not see the error of his way but continues to be an unwholesome influence, a warning talk may be given to the congregation. Elders must use reasonableness and discernment in determining whether a particular situation is sufficiently serious and disturbing to require a warning talk.

It is that last part I want Sand2022 to concentrate upon. The foot soldiers have the leeway to use what they call reasonableness and discernment to send the disorderly packing out of that religious organization

No. That's not what the last part is saying. It is rather saying that the foot soldiers should should discernment to know when to give a warning talk. Warning talk is given on top of their platform. But they may chose to just give the person private counsel rather than make a warning talk. However, since they are close to the situation, they would know when the issue is particularly disturbing to the congregation to warrant a warning talk. That's the point.

MaxInDHouse:


The highlighted is WRONG!

We MUST disfellowship anyone who is walking disorderly before you become one of us you would have learned all the things that leads to disfellowship but when you MISTAKENLY does it we MUST make sure it's not intentional so that you will be WARNED but then if you're not willing to accept the discipline we will show you the door: DISFELLOWSHIP!

You really need to go back and research like I always tell you. You claim to be an elder and you are saying this.

achorladey:


In the final analysis when the disorderly is under 4 that person will be disfellowshipped

Those places you posted is talking about serious sins that warrant judicial Committee. A group of three men or above who reviews if someone is repentant to warrant a reproof or disfellowship. That is different from handling disorderly ones.

Disorderly ones are marked. This marking involve warning talk speaking about the deviation by that individual, but the name of the individual is not mentioned during such talk. These disorderly behavior is not serious sins. This one's marked are still brothers or sisters. While disfellowshiped ones are not called brothers.

achorladey:



Whenever they classify anyone as disorderly, that's one ground for disfellowshipping such person. The reason there are many cases of those that got hammered regarding that policy and procedure regarding wearing beards

No. They generally don't disfellowship disorderly persons. They only give warning talk about them.

oteneaaron:


Do you know that the Madrid High Court in a ruling recently called your organization a "sect or cult"?

This is from a press release about the judgment:

That report by Avoidjw website seem to be false. I stand corrected. Bitterwinter.org shows that the Association of Victims of JW lost that suit with a fine imposed on them. I don't believe that report.

Jehovah's witnesses should be seen a control group, not a destructive cult. They have a form of control, but it's wrong to see them as destructive cult. They just have a different view of things. No matter how odd, it is still their own worldview.

MaobiCarl:

Well there are cases of disfellowship of brothers wearing beards. Assuming you're approached by elders and you act irresponsibly to the extent of questioning the governing body's policy on beards.. Your case will turn to a disfellowship case... How you react to the judiciary panel will determines the verdict

Seriously? Well, generally it is not a Disfellowshiping offence. But there are cases where it may turn to that. It's possible. But it will be very rare.

MaxInDHouse:

Birthday celebration is not purely secular!

I'm from a religiously divided family, some are real Traditionalists, some claim Christians and others are Muslims. The Traditionalists in my family are deeply rooted in it so i learned a lot from them. Traditionalists use their birthdays to celebrate themselves so most of them often do something to be commemorated annually when they're no more.
The Israelites don't do anything as such when it comes to birthday celebrations they just don't think of it as most servants of God among them were INSPIRED to write bad things about birthdays! Job 3:3; Ecclesiastes 7:1; Jeremiah 20:14

Jesus Christ commanded his friends to remember the date he died not his birthday.

That's the HERITAGE of God's people: JEHOVAH'S PEOPLE! Isaiah 54:17b

I dont know your area very well. Here, birthdays are largely a secular occasion.

But if I may ask, what do you understand by the phrase, religious occasion?

NowYouKnow:


Jehovah's Witnesses abstain from celebrating birthdays due to our interpretation of certain biblical principles. While the Bible does mention birthday celebrations, it is in a context that Jehovah's Witnesses believe associates them with practices that go against our religious beliefs.

For example, in the Bible, both instances of birthday celebrations involve negative outcomes: Pharaoh's birthday celebration (Genesis 40:20-22) and King Herod's birthday party, where John the Baptist was beheaded (Matthew 14:6-10). Jehovah's Witnesses take these instances as indications that birthday celebrations are not aligned with our understanding of biblical principles.

Additionally, we strive to avoid any customs or traditions that have pagan or non-Christian origins. Since the historical roots of birthday celebrations can be traced back to various pagan practices, we Jehovah's Witnesses choose not to partake in them as a matter of religious conviction.

That is basically the case, but not entirely so. They avoid any celebration or any item with pagan religious origin, and still retains that pagan religious significance in the area the witness lives. The main point is the religious significance. Once the religious significance is off, a witness in such area can engage in it.

Birthdays in most cases don't even have religious meaning in most areas of the world. In most cases, the celebration is purely secular. I agree that most witnesses don't seem to understand this fact.

MaobiCarl:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-T5ix4smik?si=qIQeaoqFi3Nib844

So after many decades of demonising, ostracising and sometimes disfellowshiping male members who opt to wear or keep their God given natural beards. The leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses sect has approved responsible male brothers to wear and keep beards if they choose in a recent update aired on jw broadcast dated December 15,2023.

On this update nos 8 they've agreed that is non scriptural to instruct Christians on how to look outwardly uniformly. They now accept that spirituality is the basis of Christianity not outward appearances or trying to appear or sound different from other competing religious organisations .

There's high and mixed emotions amongst the members now. Many are disappointed while few who has been scorned by elders and congregation leaders for trying to leave there beards to grow may be the only ones excited.

But personally they( Governing Body) needs to apologise to there members for trying to make them look like a cult. Cus is only a cult that that enforce a dress pattern or grooming for members from varying cultures and backgrounds all around the world

Source :https://www.jw.org/en/news/region/global/2023-Governing-Body-Update-8/

That's commendable. The religion is too controlling. In the name of unity, they want to regulate even how you make love with your wife. The issue of beard generated controversy for years in the west, but all the opposers of this now changed doctrine were discriminated, viewed as disorderly, and were never given church work. Just beard. Religious leaders are really going too far. In some cases, they approved beard in one location, and disallowed it in another.

All these while the GB was wrong.

They seem to have poor bible scholars over there or that the bible scholars are doing great work, but the leadership doesn't often listen to their advise. Because this issue is no-brainer if you ask me.

However, I don't think they disfellowship for this. But they just don't see you as a JW in most areas eg , Nigeria. You can't occupy any office in most JW congregation. In some areas, if you claim you're a witness, they will first check if you have a beard. If you do, they just conclude you're not. Cos you have mark of the beast.lol

But we need to commend them for such change. Atleast they changed.

Aemmyjah:
Does God Exist?
The Bible’s answer
Yes, the Bible provides compelling evidence that God exists. It encourages us to build faith in God, not by blindly believing religious assertions, but by using our “power of reason” and “mental perception.” (Romans 12:1; 1 John 5:​20, footnote) Consider the following lines of reasoning based on the Bible:

1. The existence of an orderly universe containing life points to a Creator. The Bible says: “Of course, every house is constructed by someone, but the one who constructed all things is God.” (Hebrews 3:4) Although this logic is simple, many well-educated people find it to be powerful. For example, the late astronomer Allan Sandage once said regarding the universe: “I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery, but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.”

2. As humans, we have an innate desire to understand the meaning and purpose of life, a type of hunger that can remain after our physical needs have been met. This is part of what the Bible calls our “spiritual need,” which includes the desire to know and worship God. (Matthew 5:3; Revelation 4:​11) This spiritual need not only gives evidence that God exists but also indicates that he is a loving Creator who wants us to satisfy that need.​—Matthew 4:4.

3. Detailed prophecies in the Bible were written centuries ahead of time and came true exactly as predicted. The accuracy and detail of those predictions strongly suggest that they came from a superhuman source.​—2 Peter 1:​21.

4. Bible writers had scientific knowledge that was beyond the understanding of their contemporaries. For example, in ancient times many peoples believed that the earth was supported by an animal, such as an elephant, a boar, or an ox. In contrast, the Bible says that God is “suspending the earth upon nothing.” (Job 26:7) Similarly, the Bible correctly describes the shape of the earth as a “sphere,” or “globe.” (Isaiah 40:22, footnote; Douay Version) Many people feel that the most reasonable explanation for such advanced understanding is that Bible writers received their information from God.

5. The Bible answers many difficult questions, the type of questions that when not satisfactorily answered can lead a person to atheism. For example: If God is loving and all-powerful, why is there suffering and evil in the world? Why is religion so often an influence for bad rather than for good?​—Titus 1:​16.

***For example, the late astronomer Allan Sandage once said regarding the universe: “I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery, but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.”

©https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/does-god-exist/

Fine one.

In addition miracles both past and present supports the existence of God.

MaxInDHouse:


Christians are SOLDIERS under the command of Christ Jesus and as soldiers we must obey the last order. People who don't know what we have but lived by conscience as men of integrity will be resurrected based on conscience that's why God gave such ones a merit for keeping their integrity even though they don't know the righteousness of God {Romans 2:14-15} but once you have met those practicing what is beneficial and you stubbornly stick to your conscience that's the time your personal opinion becomes a problem for you why? That means you just want to do what pleases you not what you know is best {Isaiah 64:6} you're to give God your best {Matthew 22:37} meaning what you know is up to date not presenting what you're not fully convinced as the best.

I was a Muslim from birth but after seeing that my religion is not up to date on righteousness of God i began seeking for what is best that's how i met the JWs so i joined them in order to give God my best as one who love him. If you stick to your religion and say members from a religion (that your own people despises so much) are OK then you're deceiving yourself, what exactly makes the enmity between these religions and JWs so intense? Do you really care to know? Genesis 3:15 compare to Luke 16:26
it's the best you're to give God as one who love him.

Jesus puts it this way:

And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.Mark 12:30

So my friend if you're 100% certain of your beliefs work with all your heart {Revelations 22:11-12} whatever you can do for your God now do it with all your strength! Ecclesiastes 9:10

As for me i'm 100% certain that no human can cross into God's Kingdom now if you're not one of Jehovah's Witnesses or seriously studying with them to become one of them the only way angels are writing names according to God's word is those studying the Bible together one on the just as JWs are doing with their neighbours! Malachi 3:16

May you have PEACE!

Good. I like that. It's best to say that's what you believe. I respect that even though I have a different opinion as to your stand, but it's certainly your belief and you're entitled to it.

Shalom!

Janosky:


*Oga, your argument is built on quick sand. .

Do you have Acts 9:3-9 in your Bible?
Oga Sand2022, who converted Saul?
You know it's Jesus Christ.

Acts 9:1-6
New English Translation
The Conversion of Saul

*After his conversion,who did Jesus send to lead Saul?
Ananias of course!
Acts 9:10-17
Now there was a disciple in Damascus named Ananias. The[v] Lord[w] said to him in a vision, “Ananias,” and he replied, “Here I am,[x] Lord.” 11 Then the Lord told him, “Get up and go to the street called ‘Straight,’[y] and at Judas’ house look for a man from Tarsus named Saul. For he is praying, 12 and he has seen in a vision[z] a man named Ananias come in and place his hands on him so that he may see again.” 13 But Ananias replied,[aa] “Lord, I have heard from many people[ab] about this man, how much harm he has done to your saints in Jerusalem, 14 and here he has authority from the chief priests to imprison[ac] all who call on your name!”[ad] 15 But the Lord said to him, “Go, because this man is my chosen instrument[ae] to carry my name before Gentiles and kings and the people of Israel.[af] 16 For I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name.”[ag] 17 So Ananias departed and entered the house, placed[ah] his hands on Saul[ai] and said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came here,[aj] has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.”[ak]

** Oga,Did Paul (Saul) set up shop as sole proprietor Churchpreneur (the common trend in Christendom)?

[b]Acts 9:19-20 is the answer
For several days[ao] he was with the disciples in Damascus, 20 and immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues,[ap] saying, “This man is the Son of God.”[aq]

* Acts 9:19-20, was Paul playing football and chess with the disciples "for several days?"
The disciples trained, guided Paul "for several days" to grasp the basics before Paul set out to preach in verse 20.

*** Nutshell
Paul had leaders before he became one of leaders with other Apostles/Elders in Jerusalem.

Oga, Hebrew 13:7,17 & Acts chapters 2,9 &15 are in your Bible.
Let the gospel of the Apostles sink in to your heart.

Or write your own bible

It is easier to help a dumb person who is humble. But if he has pride, it's best to let him alone, so that he will keep thinking he knows when he knows nothing. Enjoy your life.

MaxInDHouse:


Guy we're both saying the same thing now so from your own point of view JW's teachings doesn't stop sincere ones among them from having salvation but from the fact i have you (not those who never met JWs before) can't see God's kingdom if you fail to become one of JWs now!

I know you won't like this but that's the bitter truth.


Jesus explained that those who reject the message of his disciples are doomed {Matthew 10:14-15} and today over 41,000 different religions are claiming Christians with contracting teachings and conflicting doctrines so one may conclude that due to all these confusion God may not judge based on the things we read in the scriptures but then Jesus commanded his own disciples to have LOVE among themselves just as he had for them {John 15:12} he also commanded them to LOVE their neighbours as themselves {Mark 12:31} and to LOVE and pray for those who are looking for ways to hurt them! Luke 6:27-28
He taught them that if what they're practicing is according to his teachings all of them will treat one another like one family {Mark 10:29-30} which is in harmony with what God's servants prophesied before Jesus {Isaiah 2:2-4 & Micah 4:1-3} the one and only person whose wise counsel will make this possible in midst of imperfect humans of different races is the Prince of Peace {Isaiah 9:6} that's why Jesus could confidently proclaim any group of people or organization that fulfilled this task as living WITNESSES of his earthly mission! Act 1:8

So whoever has SEEN any group of people SUCCESSFULLY doing this thing but chose to always speak against them is no longer speaking against those imperfect humans but against the SPIRIT mobilizing them to do the will of God. Matthew 12:31-32

The only thing that could save you now is if you can present a better performing group with regards to the doing of God's will failure to do so means you're an enemy of the Prince whose subjects are working out peace globally among men of goodwill so extermination is waiting for you! Luke 19:27

I will remind you all these things you said by January 2024.

He that humble himself will be exalted, but he that exalt himself will be humiliated. The pride you guys put on even with low bible understanding is much. Maybe God has kept you people in a constant back and forth scriptural merry go round because of this pride. Such that you ll keep learning but never coming to the accurate knowledge of the truth. Jesus has been assigned by God to be the judge, no one else. Why not stop being presumptuous and let Jesus do that? Why say one must come to you to be saved? Are you Jesus?

Let me ask you Mr savior:

- On what basis will those righteous ones who lived from 2nd century to the 18th century be saved to even live in heaven as your doctrine posit? And none of them ever preached against hell fire till death.

- on what basis will Russel enter heaven even as he served the false god of Giza, celebrated what you called pagan Christmas, and had the title Pastor, and he held that till death?

- On what basis will Rutherford enter heaven when he called belief in superior authority to refer to government as false teachings, stopped the elder arrangement, called himself faithful slave and he kept that belief until death?

God is not searching for a better performing group. Faith in His son makes you part of God's house. Divergent opinions is human, God knows that truth in all these divergent opinions. What God is watching is not your divergent opinion, but your heart condition. He knows one who has a different opinion, and knows if that one can change if God corrects him or her. If God sees that you can change that view deep within if He confronts you with your error, He will save you. JWs keep making that mistake. You can't get all the truth unless God tells you. God knows that. See the example of Job.

Both Job and his companions were all theologically wrong in one way or another. We could even say that Elihu was the only one without error, we can surmise that since God didn't rebuke him. But who was God's number one righteous man among all? Job. Why? Because he knows all the truth? No. The famous "God gives and God takes" came from Job. In fact God rebuked Job with many questions since he challenged God. But what was the difference? When God corrected Job, He accepted and repented in dust and ashes. That is what God is looking out for not doctrinal correctness Mr savior. If God sees that your doctrinal position was not out of hatred for Him, and that if He just rebuke you you will repent, to God you're still His child.

In the religion Jesus worshiped, Judaism, there were divergent opinions. There were saducees, pharisees, John and his disciples, Jesus and his disciples. All of them didn't have one teaching. John's disciples fasted, Jesus disciples didn't fast. John disciples had a prayer taught them by John. Jesus disciples had theirs. Among Pharisees and Sadducees are different Rabbi with their individual students or disciples. There were herodians, Free People, Zillots etc all in one true religion, Judaism. Even with the divergent opinion, they all worshipped Jehovah together. But outside, they have different opinion on some matters.

During the time of apostles, divergent opinion didn't fly away. Remember when Paul returned to Jerusalem and complain came that he was teaching apostasy from Moses? That was the issue of circumcision. The elders advised him to go and fulfill a vow in the temple. What those that teach us?

First, that while Paul was teaching against observing the law of Moses and saying that the law was out of the way, the elders in Jerusalem were following the mosaic law and it's practices. That perhaps is one of the reasons Paul wrote the letter to the hebrews. He used that book to teach them, both the elders and members of the congregation in Jerusalem why the law is out of the way.

Even among the elders in Jerusalem are those called "supporters of circumcision".

But inspite of these, both Paul and the brothers in Jerusalem were still christians. God knows within these divergent opinions, ones who are sincere for Him.

If you search for God's people by looking for group that perfectly love themselves, no quarrel, no disunity whatsoever, you are deceiving yourself. The so called division can happen in a group being used by God. In fact aweful thjngs can happen in God's house, yet God is still using them. It's time JW stop using this tactics. They use these to poison the mind of their members to hate the body of Christ in Christendom.

Don't you read your bible? Apart from the example I gave above, didn't you see that Israelites, although convenanted to do God's will, love themselves and their neighbours. What did we see? Didn't they often worship false gods, committed immorality, even fought among themselves? At one time, the whole Israel fought Benjamin. At another, Jephthah and his Gibeah people fought Ephraimites, at another David fought Israel who had gone with Absalom, Israel did fight also with Judah when the two tribes divided. What now? God is no longer using them? Nonsense.

If you focus your attention on the errors in in the body of Christ or supposed division, you will reach the wrong conclusion. God doesn't want division. Yes, but He deals with imperfect humans whom He knows will manifest imperfect tendencies. God is not a man to easily and quickly abandon His body because he sees these. No. Don't let JWs leadership poison your mind with this lie. This was exactly what the Essenes in quonram did. They separated from Jerusalem worship because they saw that the priest and pharisees were corrupt. Truly, these persons were corrupt, there were divergent opinion back then, but God have not left Judaism. He was there for those who worshiped him wholesouled even in erronic teachings. Eg, Simeon, Anna, John the Baptist, Mary, Joseph. All these were still following the divergent teachings of these Pharisees and Sadducees. Even John the Baptist inquired if there anither Messiah coming. That could be because of what he was taught. Yet he pleased God.

If you keep looking for that perfect group with no differences of opinion within it, you will be misled. When God shifted his attention to Christianity, he poured out his spirit as evidence. The same is true today. That outpouring of spirit with miracles is the divine sign of approval, not merely correct understanding. Not that correct understanding is wrong, but God knows you can't get it all unless he supernaturally tells you.

Don't think that God will keep shifting group He uses because of divergent opinion. No.